Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04): Jeanny Kwon, Keun-Young Eom, Young Seok Kim, Won Park, Mison Chun, Jihae Lee, Yong Bae Kim, Won Sup Yoon, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Sei Kyung Chang, Bae Kwon Jeong, Seok Ho Lee, Jihye Cha; Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):964-974. Published online October 24, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.346

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
We aimed to assess prognostic value of metastatic pelvic lymph node (mPLN) in early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Also, we sought to define a high-risk group using prognosticators for recurrence.
Materials and Methods
A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the data from 13 Korean institutions from 2000 to 2010. A total of 249 IB-IIA patients with high-risk factors were included. We evaluated distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in relation to clinicopathologic factors including pNstage, number of mPLN, lymph node (LN)ratio (number of positive LN/number of harvested LN), and log odds of mPLNs (log(number of positive LN+0.5/number of negative LN+0.5)).
Results
In univariate analysis, histology (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC] vs. others), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of mPLNs (≤ 3 vs. > 3), LN ratio (≤ 17% vs. > 17%), and log odds of mPLNs (≤ ‒0.58 vs. > ‒0.58) were significant prognosticators for DMFS and DFS. Resection margin involvement only affected DFS. No significant survival difference was observed between pN0 patients and patients with 1-3 mPLNs. Multivariate analysis revealed that mPLN > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC were unfavorable index for both DMFS (p < 0.001, p=0.020, and p=0.031, respectively) and DFS (p < 0.001, p=0.017, and p=0.001, respectively). A scoring system using these three factors predicts risk of recurrence with relatively high concordance index (DMFS, 0.69; DFS, 0.71).
Conclusion
mPLN > 3 in early-stage cervical cancer affects DMFS and DFS. A scoring system using mPLNs > 3, LVI, and non-SqCC could stratify risk groups of recurrence in surgically resected early-stage cervix cancer with high-risk factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Should all cervical cancer patients with positive lymph node receive definitive radiotherapy: a population-based comparative study
Yang Wang, Xingyu Liu, Jing Liu, Liying Liu, Yue Ma
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2025; 311(1): 123. CrossRef
Current Paradigm and Future Directions in the Management of Nodal Disease in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
Elki Sze-Nga Cheung, Philip Yuguang Wu
Cancers.2025; 17(2): 202. CrossRef
Spectral computed tomography in the assessment of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy: a single-center, prospective study
Zheng Zeng, Yining Chen, Yuliang Sun, Bing Zhou, Haoran Xu, Lei He, Ke Hu, Jie Qiu, Fuquan Zhang, Junfang Yan
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Hybrid Model-Based Clinicopathological Features and Radiomics Based on Conventional MRI for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis and DFS in Cervical Cancer
Mingke Tian, Fengying Qin, Xinyan Sun, Huiting Pang, Tao Yu, Yue Dong
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk stratification of node-positive early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective single-center study
Shuang-Zheng Jia, Duan Yang, Xue-Jiao Yang, Rui Wang, Xi Yang, Man-Ni Huang, Ju-Sheng An
Radiation Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Significance of tumor size and number of positive nodes in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1 cervical cancer
Michihide Maeda, Seiji Mabuchi, Mina Sakata, Satoki Deguchi, Reisa Kakubari, Shinya Matsuzaki, Tsuyoshi Hisa, Shoji Kamiura
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 54(2): 146. CrossRef
Internal Validation of Predictive Models for Recurrence-Free Survival and Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Figo Stages I–IV Cervical Cancer
Jorge Cea García, Francisco Márquez Maraver, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez, Laura Ríos-Pena, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction of recurrence-related factors for patients with early-stage cervical cancer following radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy
Gui-Fen Ma, Gen-Lai Lin, Si-Tong Wang, Ya-Yu Huang, Chun-Li Xiao, Jing Sun, Ting-Yan Shi, Li-Bing Xiang
BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively
Shuang Dong, Yan-Qing Peng, Ya-Nan Feng, Xiao-Ying Li, Li-Ping Gong, Shuang Zhang, Xiao-Shan Du, Li-Tao Sun
BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive value of number of metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio for prognosis of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer: a multi-center retrospective study
Yanna Ye, Rui Lian, Zhiqiang Li, Xiaolin Chen, Yahong Huang, Jilong Yao, Anwei Lu, Jinghe Lang, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen
BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Cervical Cancer in Asian Populations: A Scoping Review of Research From 2013 to 2023
Syed S Abrar, Seoparjoo Azmel Mohd Isa, Suhaily Mohd Hairon, Najib M Yaacob, Mohd Pazudin Ismail
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
New Classification of Tumor Microvessels and the Risk of Regional Metastasis in Squamous Cell and Glandular Cancers
Marina Senchukova
American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2024; 12(5): 61. CrossRef
Analysis of prognostic factors for cervical mucinous adenocarcinoma and establishment and validation a nomogram: a SEER-based study
Yiping Hao, Qingqing Liu, Ruowen Li, Zhonghao Mao, Nan Jiang, Bingyu Wang, Wenjing Zhang, Baoxia Cui
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
Xingtao Long, Misi He, Lingling Yang, Dongling Zou, Dong Wang, Yuemei Chen, Qi Zhou
Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Development of novel tracers for sentinel node identification in cervical cancer
Keisuke Kodama, Chuya Tateishi, Tsuyoshi Oda, Lin Cui, Kazutaka Kuramoto, Hideaki Yahata, Kaoru Okugawa, Shoji Maenohara, Hiroshi Yagi, Masafumi Yasunaga, Ichiro Onoyama, Kazuo Asanoma, Takeshi Mori, Yoshiki Katayama, Kiyoko Kato
Cancer Science.2023; 114(11): 4216. CrossRef
Preoperative prediction of cervical cancer survival using a high-resolution MRI-based radiomics nomogram
Jia Li, Hao Zhou, Xiaofei Lu, Yiren Wang, Haowen Pang, Daniel Cesar, Aiai Liu, Ping Zhou
BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy as an Alternative Treatment Option for Patients with Cervical Cancer without Access to Radiotherapy Facilities
Yanna Ye, Zhiqiang Li, Biliang Chen, Shan Kang, Bin Ling, Li Wang, Jilong Yao, Jinghe Lan, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Canine anal sac gland carcinoma with regional lymph node metastases treated with sacculectomy and lymphadenectomy: Outcome and possible prognostic factors
Jean‐Benoit Tanis, Angharad B. Simlett‐Moss, Malgorzata Ossowksa, Thomas W. Maddox, James Guillem, Cristobal Lopez‐Jimenez, Gerry Polton, Rachel Burrow, Riccardo Finotello
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology.2022; 20(1): 276. CrossRef
The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early‐stage cervical cancer
Ester P. Olthof, Constantijne H. Mom, Malou L. H. Snijders, Hans H. B. Wenzel, Jacobus van der Velden, Maaike A. van der Aa
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.2022; 101(5): 550. CrossRef
Development and Validation of Novel Nomograms to Predict the Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients With Lymph Node Metastasis
Jianying Yi, Zhili Liu, Lu Wang, Xingxin Zhang, Lili Pi, Chunlei Zhou, Hong Mu
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
Fengying Qin, Huiting Pang, Tao Yu, Yahong Luo, Yue Dong
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Tumoral Morphologic Features From Cervical Biopsies That Are Predictive of a Negligible Risk for Nodal Metastasis and Tumor Recurrence in Usual-type Cervical Adenocarcinomas
Yue Wang, Ruby Jean Chang, Rong-Zhen Luo, Jing Yu, Xiaofei Zhang, Xianghong Yang, M.R. Quddus, Li Li, Wentao Yang, Aijun Liu, Qingping Jiang, Ruijiao Zhao, Huiting Zhu, Feng Zhou, Yiying Wang, Xiujie Sheng, Li-Li Liu, Yan-Lin Wen, Natalie Banet, C.J. Sung
American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2022; 46(5): 713. CrossRef
Significance of the Number and the Location of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Locally Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Salvage Hysterectomy plus Lymphadenectomy
Seiji Mabuchi, Naoko Komura, Michiko Kodama, Michihide Maeda, Yuri Matsumoto, Shoji Kamiura
Current Oncology.2022; 29(7): 4856. CrossRef
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer
Mengting Wang, Min Ma, Liju Yang, Chengtong Liang
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
High expression of PYK2 is associated with poor prognosis and cancer progression in early-stage cervical carcinoma
Can Zhang, Xinghua Zhu, Yong Li, Jia Shao, Haibo Xu, Lei Chen, Youli Dan, Hua Jin, Aiqin He
Medicine.2022; 101(41): e31178. CrossRef
Whether individualized dose escalation should be recommended for lymph nodes with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer?
Xiaojuan Lv, Huiting Rao, Tao Feng, Chufan Wu, Hanmei Lou
Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
Haixia Cui, Yuan Huang, Weibo Wen, Xiangdan Li, Dongyuan Xu, Lan Liu
Medicine.2022; 101(42): e30745. CrossRef
The Impact of Revised FIGO 2018 Staging System on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Carcinoma Cervix
Sharanya Sathish, Geeta Acharaya, Kiran Kulkarni, Gayatri Ravikumar
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
Se Ik Kim, Tae Hun Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Taek Sang Lee, Hye Won Jeon, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song
Yonsei Medical Journal.2021; 62(3): 231. CrossRef
Recurrence pattern and prognostic factors for survival in cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis
Cigdem Kilic, Gunsu Kimyon Comert, Caner Cakir, Dilek Yuksel, Bahadır Codal, Fatih Kilic, Osman Turkmen, Alper Karalok, Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin, Nurettin Boran, Taner Turan
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2021; 47(6): 2175. CrossRef
Risk factors for nodal failure after radiochemotherapy and image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: An EMBRACE analysis
Max Peters, Astrid A.C. de Leeuw, Christel N. Nomden, Kari Tanderup, Kathrin Kirchheiner, Jacob C. Lindegaard, Christian Kirisits, Christine Haie-Meder, Alina Sturdza, Lars Fokdal, Umesh Mahantshetty, Peter Hoskin, Barbara Segedin, Kjersti Bruheim, Bhavan
Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 163: 150. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Radical Hysterectomy
Yoon Hee Lee, Gun Oh Chong, Su Jeong Kim, Ja Hyun Hwang, Jong Mi Kim, Nora Jee-Young Park, Dae Gy Hong
Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 8137. CrossRef
The Combination of T Stage and the Number of Pathologic Lymph Nodes Provides Better Prognostic Discrimination in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer With Lymph Node Involvement
Yongrui Bai, Ling Rong, Bin Hu, Xiumei Ma, Jiahui Wang, Haiyan Chen
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy
Koray Aslan, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli, Murat Oz, Yusuf Aytac Tohma, Ali Haberal, Ali Ayhan
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive value of preoperative serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC–Ag) level on tumor recurrence in cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radical surgery: A single-institution study
Qinhao Guo, Jun Zhu, Yong Wu, Hao Wen, Lingfang Xia, Xiaohua Wu, Xingzhu Ju
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 46(1): 131. CrossRef
Effects of preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on postoperative pathological outcome of cervical cancer——from the large database of 46,313 cases of cervical cancer in China
Weili Li, Ping Liu, Weidong Zhao, Zhaohong Yin, Zhong Lin, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang, Chunlin Chen
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 46(1): 148. CrossRef
DSG2 expression is correlated with poor prognosis and promotes early-stage cervical cancer
Shuhang Qin, Yuandong Liao, Qiqiao Du, Wei Wang, Jiaming Huang, Pan Liu, Chunliang Shang, Tianyu Liu, Meng Xia, Shuzhong Yao
Cancer Cell International.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
Luigi Pedone Anchora, Vittoria Carbone, Valerio Gallotta, Francesco Fanfani, Francesco Cosentino, Luigi Carlo Turco, Camilla Fedele, Nicolò Bizzarri, Giovanni Scambia, Gabriella Ferrandina
Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1552. CrossRef
UGT1A1 polymorphism has a prognostic effect in patients with stage IB or II uterine cervical cancer and one or no metastatic pelvic nodes receiving irinotecan chemotherapy: a retrospective study
Hideki Matsuoka, Ryusuke Murakami, Kaoru Abiko, Ken Yamaguchi, Akihito Horie, Junzo Hamanishi, Tsukasa Baba, Masaki Mandai
BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage
Vincent Balaya, Benedetta Guani, Laurent Magaud, Hélène Bonsang-Kitzis, Charlotte Ngô, Patrice Mathevet, Fabrice Lécuru
Cancers.2020; 12(12): 3554. CrossRef
Burden of lymphatic disease predicts efficacy of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer
Giorgio Bogani, Daniele Vinti, Ferdinando Murgia, Valentina Chiappa, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Fabio Martinelli, Antonino Ditto, Francesco Raspagliesi
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(9): 1355. CrossRef
Prognostic factors for and pattern of lymph-node involvement in patients with operable cervical cancer
P. Widschwendter, W. Janni, C. Scholz, A. De Gregorio, N. De Gregorio, T W P Friedl
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2019; 300(6): 1709. CrossRef
Postoperative chemotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: Results of a multicenter phase II trial (JGOG1067)
Maki Matoda, Nobuhiro Takeshima, Hirofumi Michimae, Takashi Iwata, Harushige Yokota, Yutaka Torii, Yorito Yamamoto, Kazuhiro Takehara, Shin Nishio, Hirokuni Takano, Mika Mizuno, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Yuji Takei, Tetsuya Hasegawa, Mikio Mikami, Takayuki Eno
Gynecologic Oncology.2018; 149(3): 513. CrossRef

10,869 View
340 Download
51 Web of Science
43 Crossref

Adjuvant Treatment after Surgery in Stage IIIA Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: Mee Sun Yoon, Seung Jae Huh, Hak Jae Kim, Young Seok Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Joo-Young Kim, Jong-Hoon Lee, Hun Jung Kim, Jihye Cha, Jin Hee Kim, Juree Kim, Won Sup Yoon, Jin Hwa Choi, Mison Chun, Youngmin Choi, Kang Kyoo Lee, Myungsoo Kim, Jae-Uk Jeong, Sei Kyung Chang, Won Park; Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):1074-1083. Published online October 29, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.356

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
We evaluated the role of adjuvant therapy in stage IIIA endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) alone or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) according to risk group. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective study was conducted including patients with surgical stage IIIA endometrial cancertreated by radical surgery and adjuvant RT or CTRT. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
Results
Ninety-three patients with stage IIIA disease were identified. Nineteen patients (20.4%) experienced recurrence, mostly distant metastasis (17.2%). Combined CTRT did not affect DFS (74.1% vs. 82.4%, p=0.130) or OS (96.3% vs. 91.9%, p=0.262) in stage IIIA disease compared with RT alone. Patients with age ≥ 60 years, grade G2/3, and lymphovascular space involvement had a significantly worse DFS and those variables were defined as risk factors. The high-risk group showed a significant reduction in 5-year DFS (≥ 2 risk factors) (49.0% vs. 88.0%, p < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group (< 2). Multivariate analysis confirmed that more than one risk factor was the only predictor of worse DFS (hazard ratio, 5.45; 95% confidence interval, 2.12 to 13.98; p < 0.001). Of patients with no risk factors, a subset treated with RT alone showed an excellent 5-year DFS and OS (93.8% and 100%, respectively). Conclusion We identified a low-risk subset of stage IIIA endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients who might be reasonable candidates for adjuvant RT alone. Further randomized studies are needed to determine which subset might benefit from combined CTRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Practice patterns and survival in FIGO 2009 stage 3B endometrial cancer
Jessica Jou, Lindsey Charo, Marianne Hom-Tedla, Katherine Coakley, Pratibha Binder, Cheryl Saenz, Ramez N. Eskander, Michael McHale, Steven Plaxe
Gynecologic Oncology.2021; 163(2): 299. CrossRef
Treatment strategies for endometrial cancer: current practice and perspective
Yeh C. Lee, Stephanie Lheureux, Amit M. Oza
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.2017; 29(1): 47. CrossRef

14,441 View
126 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search