Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Jong Tae Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Risk Factors for a False-Negative Result of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Seung Ah Lee, Hak Min Lee, Hak Woo Lee, Ban Seok Yang, Jong Tae Park, Sung Gwe Ahn, Joon Jeong, Seung Il Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):625-633.   Published online July 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.089
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can accurately represent the axillary lymph node (ALN) status, the false-negative rate (FNR) of SLNB is the main concern in the patients who receive SLNB alone instead of ALN dissection (ALND).
Materials and Methods
We analyzed 1,886 patientswho underwent ALNDafter negative results of SLNB,retrospectively. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with a falsenegative (FN) result. Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS).
Results
Tumor located in the upper outer portion of the breast, lymphovascular invasion, suspicious node in imaging assessment and less than three sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were significant independent risk factors for FN in SLNB conferring an adjusted odds ratio of 2.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 3.39), 2.69 (95% CI, 1.47 to 4.91), 2.59 (95% CI, 1.62 to 4.14), and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.45 to 3.95), respectively. The prognostic factors affecting DFS were tumor size larger than 2 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.96) and FN of SLNB (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.42 to 4.42) in SLN-negative group (FN and true-negative), but in ALN-positive group (FN and true-positive), FN of SLNB (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.25) did not affect DFS.
Conclusion
In patients with risk factors for a FN such as suspicious node in imaging assessment, upper outer breast cancer, less than three harvested nodes, we need attention to find another metastatic focus in non-SLNs during the operation. It may contribute to provide an exact prognosis and optimizing adjuvant treatments.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Axillary staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in early breast cancer: impact of tumor subtypes
    Abdullah Gunes, Nuray Colapkulu-Akgul, Caner Akgul, Ibrahim Unlu, Saffet Cinar
    Annals of Saudi Medicine.2025; 45(3): 145.     CrossRef
  • Detection of presence or absence of metastasis in WSI patches of breast cancer using the dual-enhanced convolutional ensemble neural network
    Ruigang Ge, Guoyue Chen, Kazuki Saruta, Yuki Terata
    Machine Learning with Applications.2024; 17: 100579.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound radiomics based on axillary lymph nodes images for predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer
    Yu-Long Tang, Bin Wang, Tao Ou-Yang, Wen-Zhi Lv, Shi-Chu Tang, An Wei, Xin-Wu Cui, Jiang-Sheng Huang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Future Directions in the Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Filippo Pesapane, Luciano Mariano, Francesca Magnoni, Anna Rotili, Davide Pupo, Luca Nicosia, Anna Carla Bozzini, Silvia Penco, Antuono Latronico, Maria Pizzamiglio, Giovanni Corso, Enrico Cassano
    Medicina.2023; 59(9): 1544.     CrossRef
  • Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Can Be Omitted in Breast Cancer Patients With Mastectomy and False-Negative Frozen Section in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
    Jing Si, Rong Guo, Huan Pan, Xiang Lu, Zhiqin Guo, Chao Han, Li Xue, Dan Xing, Wanxin Wu, Caiping Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • False-negative frozen section of sentinel nodes in early breast cancer (cT1-2N0) patients
    Zhu-Jun Loh, Kuo-Ting Lee, Ya-Ping Chen, Yao-Lung Kuo, Wei-Pang Chung, Ya-Ting Hsu, Chien-Chang Huang, Hui-Ping Hsu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What Is High-risk Breast Cancer With Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes for Regional Recurrence?
    Sang-Won Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Haeyoung Kim, Oyeon Cho, Won Park, Mison Chun
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 111(4): 992.     CrossRef
  • Validating the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Result: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER Database
    Jiwoong Jung, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Jongjin Kim, Sohee Oh, Su-jin Kim, Chang-Sup Lim, In Sil Choi, Ki-Tae Hwang
    Cancers.2020; 12(4): 950.     CrossRef
  • Retrospectively validating the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial in a large Asian Z0011-eligible cohort
    Jiwoong Jung, Wonshik Han, Eun Sook Lee, So-Youn Jung, Jai Hong Han, Dong-Young Noh, Yumi Kim, Hee Jun Choi, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Jong Won Lee, Hee Jeong Kim, Eunhae Um, Joo Heung Kim, Seho Park, Young Up Cho
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 175(1): 203.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in combination with blue dye vs. indocyanine green fluorescence, in combination with blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Yidong Zhou, Yan Li, Feng Mao, Jing Zhang, Qingli Zhu, Songjie Shen, Yan Lin, Xiaohui Zhang, He Liu, Mengsu Xiao, Yuxin Jiang, Qiang Sun
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,161 View
  • 352 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Genetic Polymorphism of Epoxide Hydrolase and GSTM1 in Lung Cancer Susceptibility of Korean Population
Jun Hwa Hwang, Kyu Sik Kim, Yu Il Kim, Eun Joung Kim, Kyung Hwa Park, Gye Jung Cho, Jin Young Ju, Sung Chul Lim, Young Chul Kim, Kyung Ok Park, Jong Tae Park, Sung Ja Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(6):483-488.   Published online December 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2003.35.6.483
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Although 80~90% of patients with lung cancer are smokers, only 11% of smokers develop lung cancer. Genetic susceptibility according to the polymorphism of the epoxide hydrolase (mEPHX) gene and homozygous deletion of GSTM1 (M1 subunit of Glutathione S transferase) was studied in this case control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Genomic DNA from 76 subjects with lung cancer (40 squamous cell carcinoma, 13 adenocarcinoma, 10 subtype undetermined non-small cell lung cancer, and 13 small cell lung carcinoma) and 62 age- matched controls were extracted from peripheral white blood cells. PCR and RFLP (restriction fragments length polymorphism) with restriction enzyme (RsaI) and automatic sequencing were used for mEPHX genotyping (T-->C, Tyr113His) in exon 3 and (A-->G, His139Arg) in exon 4. Looking for homozygous deletions of GSTM1, multiplex PCR with primers for the GSTM1 gene and coagulation factor V gene (as positive control) were performed. RESULTS: The age distribution between the cancer and control groups were similar (63.6 7.2 vs. 61.1 7.9 years). The lung cancer group, however, had more smokers (73.3%, 44/60) than the control group (21/54, 38.9%, p<0.001). The rate of homozygous deletion of the GSTM1 gene was significantly higher in the lung cancer group (65.8%, 50/76) than in the control group (46.8%, 29/62, p<0.05), causing the relative risk of GSTM1 deletion for lung cancer as 2.19 (95% CI: 1.10~4.35, p=0.02). Among 118 subjects whose mEPHX gene polymorphisms were studied, 62 (52.5%) subjects showed genotypes with slow enzyme activity while 45 (38.1%) showed normal enzyme activity and 11 (9.3%) showed fast enzyme activity. There was no significant difference in the distribution of mEPHX gene polymorphisms between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The homozygous deletion of the GSTM1 gene was associated with high lung cancer susceptibility, whereas the mEPHX genotype showed no significant connection with risk of lung cancer in a sample Korean population.
  • 4,409 View
  • 19 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP