Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Lung and Thoracic cancer

Lazertinib versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC: LASER301 Korean Subset: Ki Hyeong Lee, Byoung Chul Cho, Myung-Ju Ahn, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Youngjoo Lee, Jong-Seok Lee, Joo-Hang Kim, Young Joo Min, Gyeong-Won Lee, Sung Sook Lee, Kyung-Hee Lee, Yoon Ho Ko, Byoung Yong Shim, Sang-We Kim, Sang Won Shin, Jin-Hyuk Choi, Dong-Wan Kim, Eun Kyung Cho, Keon Uk Park, Jin-Soo Kim, Sang Hoon Chun, Jangyoung Wang, SeokYoung Choi, Jin Hyoung Kang; Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):48-60. Published online June 27, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.453

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This subgroup analysis of the Korean subset of patients in the phase 3 LASER301 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to lazertinib (240 mg/day) or gefitinib (250 mg/day). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
In total, 172 Korean patients were enrolled (lazertinib, n=87; gefitinib, n=85). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. One-third of patients had brain metastases (BM) at baseline. Median PFS was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7 to 26.1) for lazertinib and 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.3) for gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.60). This was supported by PFS analysis based on blinded independent central review. Significant PFS benefit with lazertinib was consistently observed across predefined subgroups, including patients with BM (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.53) and those with L858R mutations (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.63). Lazertinib safety data were consistent with its previously reported safety profile. Common adverse events (AEs) in both groups included rash, pruritus, and diarrhoea. Numerically fewer severe AEs and severe treatment–related AEs occurred with lazertinib than gefitinib.
Conclusion
Consistent with results for the overall LASER301 population, this analysis showed significant PFS benefit with lazertinib versus gefitinib with comparable safety in Korean patients with untreated EGFRm NSCLC, supporting lazertinib as a new potential treatment option for this patient population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jietao Ma, Xiaoxue Pang, Shuling Zhang, Letian Huang, Li Sun, Chengbo Han
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

6,040 View
576 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Head and Neck cancer

Induction Chemotherapy as a Prognostication Index and Guidance for Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Concept of Chemo-Selection (KCSG HN13-01): Yun-Gyoo Lee, Eun Joo Kang, Bhumsuk Keam, Jin-Hyuk Choi, Jin-Soo Kim, Keon Uk Park, Kyoung Eun Lee, Hyo Jung Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Min Kyoung Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Seong Hoon Shin, Hye Ryun Kim, Sung-Bae Kim, Hwan Jung Yun; Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):109-117. Published online April 27, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1329

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
Certain patient subgroups who do not respond to induction chemotherapy (IC) show inherent chemoresistance in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of IC, and role of IC in guiding the selection of a definitive locoregional therapy.
Materials and Methods
Out of the 445 patients in multi-institutional LA-HNSCC cohort, 158 (36%) receiving IC were enrolled. The study outcome was to assess overall survival (OS) through IC responsiveness and its role to select subsequent treatments.
Results
Among 135 patients who completed subsequent treatment following IC, 74% responded to IC (complete response in 17% and partial response in 58%). IC-non-responders showed 4.5 times higher risk of mortality than IC-responders (hazard ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 2.32 to 8.81; p < 0.001). Among IC-responders, 84% subsequently received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and OS was not differed by surgery or CCRT (p=0.960). Regarding IC-non-responders, 54% received CCRT and 46% underwent surgery, and OS was poor in CCRT (24-month survival rate of 38%) or surgery (24-month survival rate of 63%).
Conclusion
Response to IC is a favorable prognostic factor. For IC-responders, either surgery or CCRT achieved similar survival probabilities. For IC-non-responder, multidisciplinary approach was warranted reflecting patients’ preference, morbidity, and prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical decision pathway and management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary consensus in Asia-Pacific
Ye Guo, Torahiko Nakashima, Byoung Chul Cho, Darren W.-T. Lim, Muh-Hwa Yang, Pei-Jen Lou, June Corry, Jin Ching Lin, Guo Pei Zhu, Kyung Hwan Kim, Bin Zhang, Zhiming Li, Ruey-Long Hong, Junice Yi Siu Ng, Ee Min Tan, Yan Ping Liu, Con Stylianou, Carmel Spit
Oral Oncology.2024; 148: 106657. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 blockade combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Ping Han, Faya Liang, Pan Song, Taowei Wu, Yangyang Li, Ming Gao, Peiliang Lin, Jianming Fan, Xiaoming Huang
Holistic Integrative Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical prognostic factors to guide treatment strategy for HPV‑positive oropharyngeal cancer using treatment outcomes of induction chemotherapy: A real‑world experience
Hyun Bang, Hyeon-Jong Kim, Seung Lee, Hyun Shim, Jun Hwang, Woo Bae, Ik-Joo Chung, Sang-Hee Cho
Oncology Letters.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of induction chemotherapy in advanced‐stage olfactory neuroblastoma
Sung‐Woo Cho, Bhumsuk Keam, Keun‐Wook Lee, Ji‐Won Kim, Doo Hee Han, Hyun Jik Kim, Jeong‐Whun Kim, Dong‐Young Kim, Chae‐Seo Rhee, Yun Jung Bae, Ji‐Hoon Kim, Keun‐Yong Eom, Hong‐Gyun Wu, Yong Hwy Kim, Chae‐Yong Kim, Sun Ha Paek, Hyojin Kim, Tae‐Bin Won
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology.2024; 14(12): 1882. CrossRef
Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer
B. B. Vyzhigina, M. A. Kropotov, B. I. Dolgushin, D. A. Safarov, I. V. Pogrebnyakov, S. B. Alieva
Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy.2024; 7(3): 62. CrossRef
Response to induction chemotherapy as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Francesca Huwyler, Roland Giger, Ruben Bill, Daniel Rauch, Simon Haefliger
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Response to induction chemotherapy in sinonasal malignancies: A single‐institutional experience
Sarah C. Nyirjesy, Rachel Fenberg, Margaret A. Heller, Ryan T. Judd, Michael M. Li, Brandon Koch, Marcelo Bonomi, Ricardo L. Carrau, Kyle K. VanKoevering
Head & Neck.2023; 45(6): 1445. CrossRef
Human Papillomavirus-Related Non-Metastatic Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: Current Local Treatment Options and Future Perspectives
Michaela Svajdova, Pavol Dubinsky, Tomas Kazda, Branislav Jeremic
Cancers.2022; 14(21): 5385. CrossRef

7,158 View
229 Download
6 Web of Science
8 Crossref

Randomized Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-Naïve Korean Patients with Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dong-Wan Kim, Hoon-Gu Kim, Joo-Hang Kim, Keunchil Park, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Joung Soon Jang, Bong-Seog Kim, Jin-Hyoung Kang, Kyung Hee Lee, Sang-We Kim, Hun Mo Ryoo, Jin-Soo Kim, Ki Hyeong Lee, Jung Hye Kwon, Jin-Hyuk Choi, Sang Won Shin, Seokyung Hahn, Dae Seog Heo; Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):119-127. Published online March 12, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.019

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This randomized phase III study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinote-can plus cisplatin (IP) over etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in Korean patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned to receive IP, composed of irinotecan 65 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8+cisplatin 70 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks, or EP, composed of etoposide 100 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 2, 3+cisplatin 70 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles, until disease progression, or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was overall survival.
Results
A total of 362 patients were randomized to IP (n=173) and EP (n=189) arms. There were no significant differences between IP and EP arms for the median overall survival (10.9 months vs. 10.3 months, p=0.120) and the median progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p=0.115). However, there was a significant difference in response rate (62.4% vs. 48.2%, p=0.006). The pre-planned subgroup analyses showed that IP was associated with longer overall survival in male (11.3 months vs. 10.1 months, p=0.036), < 65 years old (12.7 months vs. 11.3 months, p=0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 (12.4 months vs. 10.9 months, p=0.040) patient groups. The severity of treatment-related adverse events such as grade 3/4 anemia, nausea and diarrhea was more frequent in patients treated with IP.
Conclusion
The IP chemotherapy did not significantly improve the survival compared with EP chemotherapy in Korean patients with extensive-disease SCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Factors associated with posttraumatic stress and anxiety among the parents of babies admitted to neonatal care: a systematic review
Reem Malouf, Sian Harrison, Victoria Pilkington, Charles Opondo, Chris Gale, Alan Stein, Linda S. Franck, Fiona Alderdice
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Real world results of locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer patients treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy in first line: Moroccan cohort
Hassan Abdelilah Tafenzi, Farah Choulli, Edwin Kelly Haag, Anass Baladi, Ismail Essaadi, Rhizlane Belbaraka
Translational Oncology.2024; 47: 102015. CrossRef
Clinical Benefits of new Systemic Therapy for Small‐Cell Lung Cancer Over Two Decades: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Yuejing Chen, Honghong Liu, Shaohua Bai, Xuejiao Han, Fei Jin, Bo Cui
The Clinical Respiratory Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Camptothecin and Its Derivatives from Traditional Chinese Medicine in Combination with Anticancer Therapy Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Paul O. Odeniran, Paradise Madlala, Nompumelelo P. Mkhwanazi, Mahmoud E. S. Soliman
Cancers.2024; 16(22): 3802. CrossRef
Effect of trilaciclib administered before chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of four randomized studies
Ying Liu, Lin Wu, Dingzhi Huang, Qiming Wang, Chen Yang, Li Zhou, Shuguang Sun, Xiaomei Jiang, Ying Cheng
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2024; 42: 100869. CrossRef
Efficacy and toxicity profile of first‐line treatment for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta‐analysis
Guo Lin, Zhuoran Yao, Kai Kang, Hui Wang, Ren Luo, You Lu
Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(9): 10230. CrossRef
Therapeutic strategy analysis of patients with advanced stage high‐grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: A real‐world multicenter study
Yuanyuan Zhang, Yi Huang, Suiyu Luo, Lin Li, Hongying Yang, Ziyi Wang, Yongmei Peng, Manni Huang, Jusheng An, Xi Yang, Jing Wang, Chunmei Li, Lingying Wu
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2022; 158(3): 722. CrossRef
Systematic evaluation of the efficacy‐effectiveness gap of systemic treatments in extensive disease small cell lung cancer
Christine M. Cramer‐van der Welle, Franz M. N. H. Schramel, Bas J. M. Peters, John W. G. van Putten, Olaf H. Klungel, Harry J. M. Groen, Ewoudt M. W. van de Garde
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.2021; 30(4): 445. CrossRef
Treatment Outcomes of 9,994 Patients With Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer From a Retrospective Nationwide Population-Based Cohort in the Korean HIRA Database
Jung Soo Lee, Seoree Kim, Soo-Yoon Sung, Yeo Hyung Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Ji Hyung Hong, Yoon Ho Ko
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapeutic Regimens with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Previously Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Koichi Ando, Ryo Manabe, Yasunari Kishino, Sojiro Kusumoto, Toshimitsu Yamaoka, Akihiko Tanaka, Tohru Ohmori, Tsukasa Ohnishi, Hironori Sagara
Current Oncology.2021; 28(2): 1094. CrossRef
Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Seo Ree Kim, Ji Hyung Hong, Soo-Yoon Sung, Yeo Hyung Kim, Sang Hoon Chun, Hyun Woo Lee, Jung Soo Lee, Yoon Ho Ko
BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical significance of the cachexia index in patients with small cell lung cancer
Se-Il Go, Mi Jung Park, Gyeong-Won Lee
BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Sevens Cases of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses
Ichiro Sekine, Kan Kishibe, Miki Takahara, Hiroaki Katada, Tatsuya Hayashi, Yasuaki Harabuchi
Nihon Bika Gakkai Kaishi (Japanese Journal of Rhinology).2021; 60(2): 169. CrossRef
Advances in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes from an Expert Roundtable Discussion
Millie Das, Sukhmani K. Padda, Jared Weiss, Taofeek K. Owonikoko
Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(11): 5431. CrossRef
Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies
Ellen Cusano, Chelsea Wong, Eddy Taguedong, Marcus Vaska, Tasnima Abedin, Nancy Nixon, Safiya Karim, Patricia Tang, Daniel Y. C. Heng, Doreen Ezeife
Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 4894. CrossRef
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic marker in patients with extensive‐stage disease small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial
Gyeong‐Won Lee, Se‐Il Go, Dong‐Wan Kim, Hoon‐Gu Kim, Joo‐Hang Kim, Ho Jung An, Joung Soon Jang, Bong‐Seog Kim, Seokyung Hahn, Dae Seog Heo
Thoracic Cancer.2020; 11(1): 62. CrossRef
IRS2 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker in Response to Ceritinib in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Mi-Sook Lee, Kyungsoo Jung, Ji-Young Song, Min-Jung Sung, Sung-Bin Ahn, Boram Lee, Doo-Yi Oh, Yoon-La Choi
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics.2020; 16: 188. CrossRef
Etoposide and cisplatin versus irinotecan and cisplatin as the first‐line therapy for patients with advanced, poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A randomized phase 2 study
Panpan Zhang, Jie Li, Jian Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jun Zhou, Xicheng Wang, Zhi Peng, Lin Shen, Ming Lu
Cancer.2020; 126(S9): 2086. CrossRef
Systematic review of first-line chemotherapy for chemo-naïve extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: network meta-analysis
Hao Chen, Nobuyuki Horita, Kentaro Ito, Hideyuki Nagakura, Yu Hara, Nobuaki Kobayash, Masaki Yamamoto, Makoto Kudo, Takeshi Kaneko
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
A Retrospective Cohort Study on Pretreated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Prognosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evidence of Effect Modification by Chemotherapy Regimen

Feiwen Liu, Shaozhang Zhou, Liping Tan, Huiqin Jiang, Yucong Huang
Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 10341. CrossRef
Comparison of First-Line Treatments for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ting Zhou, Zhonghan Zhang, Fan Luo, Yuanyuan Zhao, Xue Hou, Tingting Liu, Kai Wang, Hongyun Zhao, Yan Huang, Li Zhang
JAMA Network Open.2020; 3(10): e2015748. CrossRef
Thérapie ciblée et immunothérapie du cancer bronchique à petites cellules
J.-L. Pujol, C. Goze, C. Pujol, B. Roch
Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités.2019; 11(3): 315. CrossRef
Irinotecan-platinum combination therapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Fei Xu, Xiaoli Ren, Yuan Chen, Qianxia Li, Ruichao Li, Yu Chen, Shu Xia
BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Traitement médical du cancer bronchique à petites cellules : peut-on sortir de l’aire du cisplatine–étoposide ?
Jean-Louis Pujol, Benoît Roch, Camille N. Pujol, Catherine Goze
Bulletin du Cancer.2018;[Epub] CrossRef

12,725 View
517 Download
29 Web of Science
24 Crossref

Multidimensional Constructs of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Korean Cancer Patients with Heterogeneous Diagnoses: Eun-Hyun Lee, Mison Chun, Hee-Jung Wang, Ho Yeong Lim, Jin-Hyuk Choi; Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(3):148-156. Published online June 30, 2005; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.3.148

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the multidimensional constructs of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with cancer, employing not only the commonly used multitrait scaling analysis and interscale correlations, but also the factorial and multidimensional scaling (MDS) analyses.

Materials and Methods

A total of 334 Korean cancer patients participated in this cross-sectional study. All patients completed the QLQ-C30.

Results

With the multitrait scaling analysis, the cognitive functioning scale did not meet item convergent and divergent validities. With the interscale correlations, the physical and role functioning scales were found to be highly correlated; this was also evident in the factorial analysis. The MDS showed that each item within the social, emotional, global health status/quality of life, and nausea/vomiting scales were clustered close together, but far from those of the other scales.

Conclusion

The authors conclude that the four way evaluation of the QLQ-C30 produced results that supported the original hypothesized constructs. However, the physical and role functioning scales were not distinctive, and that of the cognitive functioning was somewhat problematic in the Korean population with cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Validation of Gujarati Version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Modules in Head and Neck Cancer Patients of Western India
Sujal Parkar, Abhishek Sharma, Mihir Shah
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.2022; 74(S2): 2291. CrossRef
Psychometric property of an instrument 1: content validity
Eun-Hyun Lee
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing.2021; 27(1): 10. CrossRef
Development of an Instrument to Assess the Nursing Professional Pride
JaeHee Jeon, EunHee Lee, EunJoo Kim
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2020; 50(2): 228. CrossRef
Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 Questionnaires

Ghufran Jassim, Ahmed AlAnsari
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.2020; Volume 16: 3045. CrossRef
Predictive Factors of Overall Well-Being Using the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL Extracted from the EORTC QLQ-C30
Kinsey Lam, Liang Zeng, Liying Zhang, Ling-Ming Tseng, Ming-Feng Hou, Alysa Fairchild, Vassilios Vassiliou, Reynaldo Jesus-Garcia, Mohamed A. Alm El-Din, Aswin Kumar, Fabien Forges PharmD, Wei-Chu Chie, Arjun Sahgal, Michael Poon, Edward Chow
Journal of Palliative Medicine.2013; 16(4): 402. CrossRef
Development and Validation of the Hospice Palliative Care Performance Scale
So-Hi Kwon
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2011; 41(3): 374. CrossRef
Translation and Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 into Indonesian Version for Cancer Patients in Indonesia
D. A. Perwitasari, J. Atthobari, I. Dwiprahasto, M. Hakimi, H. Gelderblom, H. Putter, J. W. R. Nortier, H.-J. Guchelaar, A. A. Kaptein
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2011; 41(4): 519. CrossRef
Psychometric Evaluation of a Need Scale for Cancer Patients Undergoing Follow-up Care
Eun-Hyun Lee, Seongmi Moon, Soo-Yeon Cho, Young Taek Oh, Mison Chun, Sung Hwan Kim, Jae-Sung Kim, Hye Kyung Kim
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2010; 40(4): 551. CrossRef

17,799 View
101 Download
8 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search