Purpose
We aimed to identify, verify, and validate a multiplex urinary biomarker-based prediction model for diagnosis and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma of bladder, using high-throughput proteomics methods.
Materials and Methods
Label-free quantification of data-dependent and data-independent acquisition of 12 and 24 individuals was performed in each of the discovery and verification phases using mass spectrometry, simultaneously using urinary exosome and proteins. Based on five scoring system based on proteomics data and statistical methods, we selected eight proteins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on urine from 120 patients with bladder mass lesions used for validation. Using multivariable logistic regression, we selected final candidate models for predicting bladder cancer.
Results
Comparing the discovery and verification cohorts, 38% (50/132 exosomal differentially expressed proteins [DEPs]) and 44% (109/248 urinary DEPs) are consistent at statistically significance, respectively. The 20 out of 50 exosome proteins and 27 out of 109 urinary proteins were upregulated in cancer patients. From eight selected proteins, we developed two diagnostic models for bladder cancer. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of two models were 0.845 and 0.842, which outperformed AUROC of urine cytology.
Conclusion
The results showed that the two diagnostic models developed here were more accurate than urine cytology. We successfully developed and validated a multiplex urinary protein-based prediction, which will have wide applications for the rapid diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. External validation for this biomarker panel in large population is required.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A novel machine learning algorithm selects proteome signature to specifically identify cancer exosomes Bingrui Li, Fernanda G Kugeratski, Raghu Kalluri eLife.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A novel machine learning algorithm selects proteome signature to specifically identify cancer exosomes Bingrui Li, Fernanda G Kugeratski, Raghu Kalluri eLife.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comprehensive Urinary Proteome Profiling Analysis Identifies Diagnosis and Relapse Surveillance Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Qi Chang, Yongqiang Chen, Jianjian Yin, Tao Wang, Yuanheng Dai, Zixin Wu, Yufeng Guo, Lingang Wang, Yufen Zhao, Hang Yuan, Dongkui Song, Lirong Zhang Journal of Proteome Research.2024; 23(6): 2241. CrossRef
Construction of noninvasive prognostic model of bladder cancer patients based on urine proteomics and screening of natural compounds Shun Wan, Jinlong Cao, Siyu Chen, Jianwei Yang, Huabin Wang, Chenyang Wang, Kunpeng Li, Li Yang Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(1): 281. CrossRef
Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Take It or Leave It? Ana Teixeira-Marques, Catarina Lourenço, Miguel Carlos Oliveira, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(7): 6757. CrossRef
Advances in the application of label‐free quantitative proteomics techniques in malignancy research Xiao Meng, Dong Liu, Yan Guan Biomedical Chromatography.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Off the fog to find the optimal choice: Research advances in biomarkers for early diagnosis and recurrence monitoring of bladder cancer Jiaxin Zhao, Jinming Li, Rui Zhang Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2023; 1878(4): 188926. CrossRef
An overview of metabolomic and proteomic profiling in bipolar disorder and its clinical value Henrique Caracho Ribeiro, Flávia da Silva Zandonadi, Alessandra Sussulini Expert Review of Proteomics.2023; 20(11): 267. CrossRef
Proteome and immune responses of extracellular vesicles derived from macrophages infected with the periodontal pathogen Tannerella forsythia Younggap Lim, Hyun Young Kim, Dohyun Han, Bong‐Kyu Choi Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A Liquid Biopsy in Bladder Cancer—The Current Landscape in Urinary Biomarkers Milena Matuszczak, Adam Kiljańczyk, Maciej Salagierski International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(15): 8597. CrossRef
Next-generation proteomics of serum extracellular vesicles combined with single-cell RNA sequencing identifies MACROH2A1 associated with refractory COVID-19 Takahiro Kawasaki, Yoshito Takeda, Ryuya Edahiro, Yuya Shirai, Mari Nogami-Itoh, Takanori Matsuki, Hiroshi Kida, Takatoshi Enomoto, Reina Hara, Yoshimi Noda, Yuichi Adachi, Takayuki Niitsu, Saori Amiya, Yuta Yamaguchi, Teruaki Murakami, Yasuhiro Kato, Tak Inflammation and Regeneration.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to develop a model for predicting pathologic extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) while integrating magnetic resonance imaging-based T-staging (cTMRI, cT1c-cT3b).
Materials and Methods A total of 1,915 who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2006-2016 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis as well as Bayesian network (BN) modeling based on possible confounding factors. The BN model was internally validated using 5-fold validation.
Results According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) (β=0.050, p < 0.001), percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPC) (β=0.033, p < 0.001), both lobe involvement on biopsy (β=0.359, p=0.009), Gleason score (β=0.358, p < 0.001), and cTMRI (β=0.259, p < 0.001) were significant factors for ECE. For SVI, iPSA (β=0.037, p < 0.001), PPC (β=0.024, p < 0.001), Gleason score (β=0.753, p < 0.001), and cTMRI (β=0.507, p < 0.001) showed statistical significance. BN models to predict ECE and SVI were also successfully established. The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)/accuracy of the BN models were 0.76/73.0% and 0.88/89.6% for ECE and SVI, respectively. According to internal comparison between the BN model and Roach formula, BN model had improved AUC values for predicting ECE (0.76 vs. 0.74, p=0.060) and SVI (0.88 vs. 0.84, p < 0.001).
Conclusion Two models to predict pathologic ECE and SVI integrating cTMRI were established and installed on a separate website for public access to guide radiation oncologists.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Measurements of target volumes and organs at risk using DW‑MRI in patients with central lung cancer accompanied with atelectasis Xinli Zhang, Tong Liu, Hong Zhang, Mingbin Zhang Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Ji Sung Shim, Ho Kyung Seo, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Seok Ho Kang, UCART (Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment Group in Korea) Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1064-1072. Published online October 30, 2018
Purpose
The lower incidence of bladder cancer among women has led to a lack of information on female radical cystectomy (RC). This study aimed to analyze the characteristics related with female RC in a cohort from multiple academic institutions.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective review of 384 female patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer. Epidemiologic, perioperative variables including urologic referral periodwith consequent pathologic stage distributions were assessed. The changes in surgical techniques over time were illustrated. Also, we evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 2 and 5 years and overall survival (OS) at 5 years with stage-specific analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
The mean follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile rage [IQR], 9 to 55). The average time to urologic referral with initial symptoms was 5.5 (IQR, 1 to 6) months and over 20% of patients visited clinics after 6 months. In subsequent stage distributions according to referral period, T2 or higher stage distributions were abruptly increased after 1 year. Overall 2-year/5-year RFS rates were 0.72/0.57 and 5-year OS was 0.61. Notable surgical descriptions were as follows: 91% of patients underwent open RC; 80% of patients underwent an ileal conduit; and 83% of patients received anterior exenteration. However, the proportions of robotic surgery, orthotopic neobladder and organ sparing cystectomy have increased recen-tly.
Conclusion
We identified the general characteristics and changes in pattern of female RC. Our results also suggest that women are susceptible to delays in referral to an urologist and are at greater risk for worse prognosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Perioperative, oncological, and survival outcomes of robotic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion in females Varun V. Agarwal, B. Yuvaraja Thyavihally, Santosh Subhash Waigankar, Preetham Dev, Abhinav P. Pednekar, Diptiman Roy, Nevitha Athikari, Meenal Hastak, Naresh Badlani, D. Harshwardhan Pokharkar, Nagaraja Sekhar Ayyalasomayajula, Archan Khandekar, Ashish A Indian Journal of Urology.2023; 39(1): 27. CrossRef
Safety and Efficacy of Reproductive Organ-Sparing Radical Cystectomy in Women With Variant Histology and Advanced Stage Sunil H. Patel, Shirley Wang, Meredith R. Metcalf, Natasha Gupta, Andrew Gabrielson, Esther Lee, Mary Rostom, Phil Pierorazio, Armine Smith, Noah Hahn, Mark Schoenberg, Max Kates, Jean Hoffman-Censits, Trinity J. Bivalacqua Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2022; 20(1): 60. CrossRef
The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion based on radical cystectomy pentafecta Tae Il Noh, Ji Sung Shim, Sung Gu Kang, Jun Cheon, Jong Hyun Pyun, Seok Ho Kang Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Jung Kwon Kim, Bumsik Hong, Seok Ho Kang, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, Ho Kyung Seo, On behalf of Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment (UCART) Study Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):963-972. Published online October 12, 2018
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes between open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
The medical records of consecutive ONU and LNU cases from five tertiary institutions were retrospectively analyzed between 2000 and 2012. The propensity-score matching methodology was used to compare the two surgical approaches in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, grade, pathologic T and N categories, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and follow-up duration. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests and clustered Cox regression were used to compare the estimated rates of survival for each surgical approach and to investigate the effect of the surgical approach on each prognostic outcome.
Results
Six hundred thirty-eight propensity-score matching pairs (n=1,276) were compared; LNU was significantly better than ONU in all types of survival, including intravesical recurrencefree survival (IVRFS), disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.05). The 3-year OS and CSS rates were significantly higher with LNU than with ONU (p < 0.05). Compared with ONU, LNU had significantly better 3-year OS and CSS rates (82.9% and 86.2% vs. 78.3% and 81.8%); there were no differences at 5 years. In subgroup analysis of the early-staged group, advanced-stage group, lymph node–positive group, and lymph node–negative group, the two approaches did not significantly affect prognostic outcomes, except LNU improved the IVRFS in the lymph node–negative or no history of previous bladder cancer group.
Conclusion
LNU had a significantly better prognostic outcome than ONU after propensity-score matching.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies Shidong Deng, Lingzhi Liu, Yurou Wang, Chuan Zhou, Huihui Zhang Surgical Innovation.2024; 31(5): 520. CrossRef
Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Ichiro Tsuboi, Akihiro Matsukawa, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Jakob Klemm, Robert J Schulz, Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Sever Chiujdea, Tamás Fazekas, Marcin Miszczyk, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Tatsushi Kawada, Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Kensuke Bekku, Koi World Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic versus Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Nico C. Grossmann, Francesco Soria, Tristan Juvet, Aaron M. Potretzke, Hooman Djaladat, Alireza Ghoreifi, Eiji Kikuchi, Andrea Mari, Zine-Eddine Khene, Kazutoshi Fujita, Jay D. Raman, Alberto Breda, Matteo Fontana, John P. Sfakianos, John L. Pfail, Ekater Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1409. CrossRef
Factors Predicting Oncological Outcomes of Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Taiwan I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Chao-Hsiang Chang, Chi-Ping Huang, Wen-Jeng Wu, Ching-Chia Li, Chung-Hsin Chen, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chi-Wen Lo, Chih-Chin Yu, Chung-You Tsai, Wei-Che Wu, Jen-Shu Tseng, Wun-Rong Lin, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu-Khun Lee, Yeong-Chin Jou, Ian-Seng C Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study Hoyoung Bae, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung Cancers.2022; 14(10): 2497. CrossRef
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis Radosław Piszczek, Łukasz Nowak, Wojciech Krajewski, Joanna Chorbińska, Sławomir Poletajew, Marco Moschini, Krzysztof Kaliszewski, Romuald Zdrojowy World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta‐analysis Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
RETRACTED: Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Ja Hyeon Ku, Seok Ho Kang, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Isaac Yi Kim PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0255965. CrossRef
Risk factor analysis of intravesical recurrence after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma Masato Yanagi, Tsutomu Hamasaki, Jun Akatsuka, Yuki Endo, Hayato Takeda, Yukihiro Kondo BMC Urology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an interdisciplinary collaboration between urology and radiology Jacob L. Roberts, Fady Ghali, Lejla Aganovic, Seth Bechis, Kelly Healy, Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz, Riccardo Autorino, Ithaar Derweesh Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(12): 3893. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wen Liu, Lijiang Sun, Fengju Guan, Fangming Wang, Guiming Zhang Disease Markers.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Tae Heon Kim, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Seok Ho Kang, Ja Hyeon Ku, Byong Chang Jeong, on behalf of Urothelial Cancer-Advanced Research and Treatment (UCART) Study Group
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):240-251. Published online April 24, 2018
Purpose
We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU).
Materials and Methods
Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model.
Results
A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Nicholas Corsi, Ivan Rakic, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Marco Finati, Matthew Davis, Shane Tinsley, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Cr BJU International.2024; 133(5): 555. CrossRef
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study Hoyoung Bae, Jae Hoon Chung, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Hyun Hwan Sung Cancers.2022; 14(10): 2497. CrossRef
Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Gopal Sharma, Anuj Kumar Yadav, Tarun Pareek, Pawan Kaundal, Shantanu Tyagi, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Shrawan Kumar Singh International braz j urol.2022; 48(3): 406. CrossRef
Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta‐analysis Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang International Journal of Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
RETRACTED: Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Guihong Liu, Zeqin Yao, Guoqiang Chen, Yalang Li, Bing Liang Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Ja Hyeon Ku, Seok Ho Kang, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Isaac Yi Kim PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0255965. CrossRef
Unusual presentation of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan: Direct comparison from Taiwan‐Japan UTUC Collaboration Cohort Hao Lun Luo, Chikara Ohyama, Shingo Hatakeyama, Hung Jen Wang, Tohru Yoneyama, Wen Chou Yang, Yao Chi Chuang, Yen Ta Chen, Wei Chin Lee, Yuan Tso Cheng, Chih Hsiung Kang, Po Hui Chiang International Journal of Urology.2020; 27(4): 327. CrossRef
Concomitant carcinoma in situ as a prognostic factor in the upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xiaoshuai Gao, Yucheng Ma, Guo Chen, Jixiang Chen, Hao Li, Hong Li, Xin Wei, Kunjie Wang Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2020; 38(6): 574. CrossRef
Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma Tae Heon Kim, Yoon Seok Suh, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han Yong Choi, Hyun Hwan Sung Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an interdisciplinary collaboration between urology and radiology Jacob L. Roberts, Fady Ghali, Lejla Aganovic, Seth Bechis, Kelly Healy, Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz, Riccardo Autorino, Ithaar Derweesh Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(12): 3893. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wen Liu, Lijiang Sun, Fengju Guan, Fangming Wang, Guiming Zhang Disease Markers.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), statin, and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor on the development of kidney, prostate, and urothelial cancers by analyzing the Korean National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database.
Materials and Methods
Among a representative sample cohort of 1,025,340 participants in NHIS-NSC database in 2002, we extracted data of 799,850 individuals who visited the hospital more than once, and finally included 321,122 individuals aged 40 and older. Following a 1-year washout period between 2002 and 2003, we analyzed 143,870 (male), 320,861 and 320,613 individuals for evaluating the risk of prostate cancer, kidney cancer and urothelial cancer developments, respectively, during 10-year follow-up periods between 2004 and 2013. The medication group consisted of patients prescribed these drugs more than 60% of the time in 2003. To adjustfor various parameters of the patients, a multivariate Cox regression model was adopted.
Results
During 10-year follow-up periods between 2004 and 2013, 9,627 (6.7%), 1,107 (0.4%), and 2,121 (0.7%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, kidney cancer, and urothelial cancer, respectively. Notably, multivariate analyses revealed that NSAIDs significantly increased the risk of prostate cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35). Also, it was found that aspirin (HR, 1.28) and statin (HR, 1.55) elevated the risk of kidney cancer. No drugs were associated with the risk of urothelial cancer.
Conclusion
In sum, our study provides the valuable information for the impact of aspirin, NSAID, statin, and COX-2 inhibitor on the risk of prostate, kidney, and urothelial cancer development and its survival outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association between Statin Use and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis Tzu Shuang Chen, Hui Ying Liu, Yin Lun Chang, Yao Chi Chuang, Yen Ta Chen, Yu Li Su, Chun Chieh Huang, Yen Ting Wu, Hung Jen Wang, Hao Lun Luo The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(3): 630. CrossRef
Establishment of Prospective Registry of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The Korean Urological Oncology Society Database Gyoohwan Jung, Jung Kwon Kim, Seong Soo Jeon, Jae Hoon Chung, Cheol Kwak, Chang Wook Jeong, Hanjong Ahn, Jae Young Joung, Tae Gyun Kwon, Sung Woo Park, Seok-Soo Byun The World Journal of Men's Health.2023; 41(1): 110. CrossRef
Evaluation of statin use and renal cell carcinoma risk identifies sex-specific associations with RCC subtypes Irmina Maria Michalek, Rebecca E. Graff, Alejandro Sanchez, Toni K. Choueiri, Eunyoung Cho, Mark A. Preston, Kathryn M. Wilson Acta Oncologica.2023; 62(9): 988. CrossRef
Effect of aspirin on incidence, recurrence, and mortality in prostate cancer patients: integrating evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies Shaodi Ma, Weihang Xia, Birong Wu, Chenyu Sun, Yuemeng Jiang, Haixia Liu, Scott Lowe, Zhen Zhou, Peng Xie, Juan Gao, Linya Feng, Xianwei Guo, Guangbo Qu, Yehuan Sun European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2023; 79(11): 1475. CrossRef
Evidence on Statins, Omega-3, and Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review Hwanik Kim, Jung Kwon Kim The World Journal of Men's Health.2022; 40(3): 412. CrossRef
The Association of Prediagnostic Statin Use with Aggressive Prostate Cancer from the Multiethnic Cohort Study Fei Chen, Peggy Wan, Lynne R. Wilkens, Loïc Le Marchand, Christopher A. Haiman Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2022; 31(5): 999. CrossRef
Aspirin and the risk of nondigestive tract cancers: An updated meta‐analysis to 2019 Claudia Santucci, Silvano Gallus, Marco Martinetti, Carlo La Vecchia, Cristina Bosetti International Journal of Cancer.2021; 148(6): 1372. CrossRef
Association between depression and risk of Parkinson's disease in South Korean adults Wonjeong Jeong, Hyunkyu Kim, Jae Hong Joo, Sung-In Jang, Eun-Cheol Park Journal of Affective Disorders.2021; 292: 75. CrossRef
Can Aspirin Use Be Associated With the Risk or Prognosis of Bladder Cancer? A Case-Control Study and Meta-analytic Assessment Bo Fan, Alradhi Mohammed, Yuanbin Huang, Hong Luo, Hongxian Zhang, Shenghua Tao, Weijiao Xu, Qian Liu, Tao He, Huidan Jin, Mengfan Sun, Man Sun, Zhifei Yun, Rui Zhao, Guoyu Wu, Xiancheng Li Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Association Between Genetically Proxied Lipid-Lowering Drug Targets and Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Mendelian Randomization Study Luyang Liu, Chao Sheng, Zhangyan Lyu, Hongji Dai, Kexin Chen Frontiers in Nutrition.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Associations of low-dose aspirin or other NSAID use with prostate cancer risk in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Study Charlotte Skriver, Christian Dehlendorff, Michael Borre, Klaus Brasso, Signe Benzon Larsen, Anne Tjønneland, Anton Pottegård, Jesper Hallas, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Søren Friis Cancer Causes & Control.2020; 31(2): 139. CrossRef
Impact of Concomitant Medication Use and Immune-Related Adverse Events on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Shipra Gandhi, Manu Pandey, Nischala Ammannagari, Chong Wang, Mark J Bucsek, Lamya Hamad, Elizabeth Repasky, Marc S Ernstoff Immunotherapy.2020; 12(2): 141. CrossRef
Risks of solid cancers in elderly persons with osteoarthritis or ankylosing spondylitis Michael M Ward, Sara Alehashemi Rheumatology.2020; 59(12): 3817. CrossRef
Complex roles of the old drug aspirin in cancer chemoprevention and therapy Hui Hua, Hongying Zhang, Qingbin Kong, Jiao Wang, Yangfu Jiang Medicinal Research Reviews.2019; 39(1): 114. CrossRef
Establishment of the Seoul National University Prospectively Enrolled Registry for Genitourinary Cancer (SUPER-GUC): A prospective, multidisciplinary, bio-bank linked cohort and research platform Chang Wook Jeong, Jungyo Suh, Hyeong Dong Yuk, Bum Sik Tae, Miso Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Jin Ho Kim, Sang Youn Kim, Jeong Yeon Cho, Seung Hyup Kim, Kyung Chul Moon, Gi Jeong Cheon, Ja Hyeon Ku, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Cheol Kwak Investigative and Clinical Urology.2019; 60(4): 235. CrossRef
The impact of acute inflammation on progression and metastasis in pancreatic cancer animal model Keun Soo Ahn, Ji Yeon Hwang, Ho-Seong Han, Sang Tae Kim, Ilseon Hwang, Young-Ok Chun Surgical Oncology.2018; 27(1): 61. CrossRef
Prostate cancer multifocality, the index lesion, and the microenvironment Rafael R. Tourinho-Barbosa, Jean de la Rosette, Rafael Sanchez-Salas Current Opinion in Urology.2018; 28(6): 499. CrossRef
Intake of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Zhenhua Shang, Xue Wang, Hao Yan, Bo Cui, Qi Wang, Jiangtao Wu, Xin Cui, Jin Li, Tongwen Ou, Kun Yang Frontiers in Oncology.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the changes of conditional survival (CS) probabilities and to identify the prognostic parameters that significantly affect CS over time post-surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Materials and Methods A total of 330 patients were examined in the final analysis. Primary end point was conditional cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for calculation of CS. Cox regression hazard ratio model was used to determine the predictors of CS.
Results UTUC patients who had already survived 5 years after radical nephroureterectomy had a more favorable CS probability in all given survivorships compared to those with shorter survival times. Patients with unfavorable pathologic features showed a higher increment of 5-year conditional CSS and OS compared to their counterparts. For 5-year conditional CSS, several factors, including high-grade tumor, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor location showed significant association with risk elevation over time. Only age remained as a predictor of 5-year conditional OS with increased risk in all given survivorships. For 5-year IVRFS, no variables remained as significant predictive factors over time after surgery. Conclusion Our study provides valuable information for practical survival estimation and relevant prognostic factors for patients with UTUC after surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with Variant Histology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Jinhyung Jeon, Jae Heon Kim, Jee Soo Ha, Won Jae Yang, Kang Su Cho, Do Kyung Kim Urologia Internationalis.2024; 108(4): 339. CrossRef
Dynamic estimates of survival in oncocytic cell carcinoma of the thyroid Yang Shi, Yuenan Zheng, Hao Zhang, Wenwu Dong, Ping Zhang Discover Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Predicting Oncological Outcomes of Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Taiwan I-Hsuan Alan Chen, Chao-Hsiang Chang, Chi-Ping Huang, Wen-Jeng Wu, Ching-Chia Li, Chung-Hsin Chen, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chi-Wen Lo, Chih-Chin Yu, Chung-You Tsai, Wei-Che Wu, Jen-Shu Tseng, Wun-Rong Lin, Yuan-Hong Jiang, Yu-Khun Lee, Yeong-Chin Jou, Ian-Seng C Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma Sung Han Kim, Mi Kyung Song, Ja Hyeon Ku, Seok Ho Kang, Byong Chang Jeong, Bumsik Hong, Ho Kyung Seo, Isaac Yi Kim PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0255965. CrossRef
Contemporary conditional cancer‐specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract Giuseppe Rosiello, Carlotta Palumbo, Sophie Knipper, Angela Pecoraro, Stefano Luzzago, Marina Deuker, Francesco A. Mistretta, Zhe Tian, Nicola Fossati, Andrea Gallina, Francesco Montorsi, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Fred Saad, Alberto Briganti, Pierre I. Karakie Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 121(7): 1154. CrossRef
Dynamic evaluation of conditional survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma after surgical resection: A large-scale prospective study Lingjun Yan, Fa Chen, Lin Chen, Jing Lin, Qing Chen, Xiaodan Bao, Yu Qiu, Lisong Lin, Xiaoyan Zheng, Lizhen Pan, Jing Wang, Zhijian Hu, Fengqiong Liu, Baochang He, Bin Shi Oral Oncology.2020; 104: 104639. CrossRef
Gender Is a Significant Prognostic Factor for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Large Hospital-Based Cancer Registry Study in an Endemic Area Chun-Chieh Huang, Yu-Li Su, Hao-Lun Luo, Yen-Ta Chen, Terence T. Sio, Hsuan-Chih Hsu, Chia-Hsuan Lai Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors of Overall Survival in Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Fausto Petrelli, Mohamed Ismail Yasser Hussein, Ivano Vavassori, Sandro Barni Urology.2017; 100: 9. CrossRef
The Conditional Survival with Time of Intravesical Recurrence of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Keisuke Shigeta, Eiji Kikuchi, Masayuki Hagiwara, Toshiyuki Ando, Ryuichi Mizuno, Takayuki Abe, Shuji Mikami, Akira Miyajima, Ken Nakagawa, Mototsugu Oya Journal of Urology.2017; 198(6): 1278. CrossRef
Conditional survival in patients with gallbladder cancer Yi-Jun Kim, Kyubo Kim Chinese Journal of Cancer.2017;[Epub] CrossRef