Purpose Early diagnosis and an improved survival rate have emerged as important issues for cancer survivors returning to work during the prime of their working life. This study investigated the attitudes of the general public towards cancer survivors returning to work in Korea and attempted to identify the factors influencing this negative attitude. Materials and Methods A general public perception survey regarding cancer survivors returning to work, targeting 2,000 individuals between 40-70 years of age, was conducted as face-to-face home visit.
Results The public expressed a negative attitude towards cancer survivors returning to work, in terms of both perception and acceptance. Negative perception was higher among those in metropolitan areas compared with urban/rural areas (odds ratio [OR], 1.71), with monthly incomes < $2,000 compared with > $4,000 (OR, 1.54), and with patient care experience compared with those without (OR, 1.41). Negative acceptance was higher among those with monthly incomes < $2,000 compared with > $4,000 (OR, 1.71) and those with patient care experience compared with those without (OR, 1.54). The common factors between acceptance and perception that influenced negative attitude included area of residence, patient care experience, and monthly income. Conclusion This study identified negative attitudes towards cancer survivors returning to work in South Korea and the factors influencing the reintegration of cancer survivors into society. It is necessary to promote community awareness and intervention activities to enable access to community, social, and individual units for the social reintegration of cancer survivors.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Role performance and factors affecting quality of life in bladder cancer survivors with ileal orthotopic neobladder So Hee Kim, Eunjung Ryu, Byong Chang Jeong Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 11(6): 100490. CrossRef
Perception of Korean healthy adolescents on cancer and adolescent cancer survivors: a cross-sectional survey Min Kyung Hyun, Yeonseung Lee, Hyun Jeong Lee, Young Ae Kim BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Employees’ attitudes toward cancer, cancer survivors, and cancer survivors’ return to work Si Eun Lee, Eun Young Park Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 10(3): 100197. CrossRef
In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review I. E. van Beukering, S. J. C. Smits, K. M. E. Janssens, R. I. Bogaers, M. C. W. Joosen, M. Bakker, J. van Weeghel, E. P. M. Brouwers Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.2022; 32(3): 365. CrossRef
Effects of Stigma on the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Sexual Satisfaction Among Breast Cancer Survivors Yuxin Zhang, Jie Zhao, Nan Jiang, Ting Wang, He Cao, Quqing Wang, Xiaomin Wei, Jiwei Wang, Jinming Yu The Journal of Sexual Medicine.2022; 19(6): 1002. CrossRef
The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Toward Recognizing Early and Noticeable Deterioration scale Wenbo Li, Hongyu Yu, Bing Li, Yanli Zhang, Mingshu Fu Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Cross-cultural validation of the Cancer Stigma Scale in the general Japanese population Emi Takeuchi, Daisuke Fujisawa, Rina Miyawaki, Hiroko Yako-Suketomo, Koichiro Oka, Masaru Mimura, Miyako Takahashi Palliative and Supportive Care.2021; 19(1): 75. CrossRef
Association between cancer stigma and job loss among cancer survivors Sungkeun Shim, Danbee Kang, Ka Ryeong Bae, Woo Yong Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Tae Sung Sohn, Byong Chang Jeong, Dong Hyun Sinn, Sun Seog Kweon, Young Mog Shim, Juhee Cho Psycho-Oncology.2021; 30(8): 1347. CrossRef
Empathic approach to reducing the negative attitudes of nursing undergraduate students towards cancer Hamdiye Arda Sürücü, Esra Anuş Topdemir, Altun Baksi, Dilek Büyükkaya Besen Nurse Education Today.2021; 105: 105039. CrossRef
Identification of Korean cancer survivors’ unmet needs and desired psychosocial assistance: A focus group study Joo Young Kim, Mison Chun, Sang-Won Kim, Joonsup Song, Rosemary Frey PLOS ONE.2020; 15(1): e0228054. CrossRef
Self-reported depression in cancer survivors versus the general population: a population-based propensity score-matching analysis Su Jung Lee, Kathleen B. Cartmell Quality of Life Research.2020; 29(2): 483. CrossRef
Public Attitudes towards Cancer Survivors among Korean Adults Su Yeon Kye, Hyun Jeong Lee, Yeonseung Lee, Young Ae Kim Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 722. CrossRef
A return-to-work intervention protocol directed at cancer patients (self-assessment, tailored information & lifestyle management for returning to work among cancer patients, START): A multi-center, randomized controlled trial Ka Ryeong Bae, Danbee Kang, Jae Yoon Yi, Yeojin Ahn, Im-Ryung Kim, Sun-Seog Kweon, Jin Seok Ahn, Seok Jin Nam, Young Mog Shim, Mison Chun, Jaesung Heo, Juhee Cho Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications.2020; 19: 100633. CrossRef
Relationship between cancer stigma, social support, coping strategies and psychosocial adjustment among breast cancer survivors No Eul Kang, Hye Young Kim, Ji Young Kim, Sung Reul Kim Journal of Clinical Nursing.2020; 29(21-22): 4368. CrossRef
The Effects of a Culturally Tailored, Patient-Centered Psychosocial Intervention in South Korean Cancer Survivors Dohun Kim, Sun Ju Chang, Hyun Ok Lee, Seung Hee Lee Clinical Nursing Research.2019; 28(8): 931. CrossRef
Evaluation of the First Polish Web-Based Intervention Aimed at Improving Cancer Prevention (the PORINA Study) Maksymilian Gajda, Małgorzata Kowalska, Jan E. Zejda International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(6): 1167. CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to examine the following questions: to what extent do patients and caregivers perceive their family members to be avoidant of communication regarding patient’s cancer, and to what extent do these perceptions interrelate; and how do such perceptions influence their own and each other’s communication behaviors, communication outcome, mental health, and quality of life. Materials and Methods A national survey was performed with 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate, 76.2%). To examine the dyadic interaction, we developed linked patient and family member questionnaires, including the Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer (FACC) scale. Results The mean scores (standard deviations) of patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were low at 10.9 (15.5) and 15.5 (17.5), respectively (p < 0.001), and concordance was low, a well (Spearman’s rho, 0.23). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with lower levels of disclosure and behaviors of holding back communication, as well as lower levels of mental health outcome and quality of life. The same was true for caregivers (all p < 0.05). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with caregiver holding back, caregiver’s depression level, and caregiver quality of life (all p < 0.05). Both patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were independently associated with communication difficulty within the family. Conclusion Future research would benefit from the measurement of FACC from both patients and caregivers, and promote family intervention to enhance openness to communication, which would be helpful for improving mental health and quality of life for both patients and caregivers.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Dyadic association between mindfulness, family avoidance of communication about cancer and fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer couples: A cross-sectional study Xiangyu Zhao, Yunxue Zhang, Rui Qin, Guopeng Li, Xudong He, Xiaona Shen, Ping Li European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 68: 102491. CrossRef
Caring for a Parent With a Blood Cancer: Sibling Communication Challenges and Psychosocial Outcomes Kevin B. Wright, Carma L. Bylund, Diliara Bagautdinova, Chelsea N. Hampton, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Elisa S. Weiss, Maria Sae-Hau, Carla L. Fisher Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study Ye Zhou, Chong Chin Che, Mei Chan Chong, Yuzhu Hou, Xiangqun Xiao, Yun Liu, Haiyan Zhao Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Cancer Caregivers’ Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact Anny T.H.R. Fenton, Kalen M. Fletcher, Deniz Kizildag, Nancy A. Borstelmann, Daniela Kessler, Christine Cronin, Anna C. Revette, Alexi A. Wright, Elizabeth Frank, Andrea C. Enzinger Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2023; 65(1): 16. CrossRef
Relationships Among Perceived Social Support, Family Resilience, and Caregiver Burden in Lung Cancer Families: A Mediating Model Yalin Zhang, Yuxin Ding, Chunhua Liu, Juejin Li, Qi Wang, Yunhuan Li, Xiaolin Hu Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2023; 39(3): 151356. CrossRef
Exploring Dyad-Based Communication During Cancer Martha E. Francis, Pranshu Mohindra, Kim Mooney-Doyle Cancer Nursing.2023; 46(6): E384. CrossRef
Contributors to well‐being of Chinese left‐behind families: A dyadic perspective from family resilience and grandparent–grandchild relationship Qiong Hu, Yanlin Zhou, Peiqi Dong, Cihua Xu, Qiong Zhang Child & Family Social Work.2023; 28(3): 646. CrossRef
The perception of life and death in patients with end-of-life stage cancer: A systematic review of qualitative research Ayumi Kyota, Kiyoko Kanda, Maiko Senuma, Noriko Tsukagoshi, Tamae Futawatari, Yuka Kondo European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 66: 102354. CrossRef
Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran Azam Naghavi, Samaneh Salimi, Winfried Rief, Pia von Blanckenburg Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context: A mixed‐method study Yalin Zhang, Shu Zhang, Chunhua Liu, Xiaoli Chen, Yuxin Ding, Chang Guan, Xiaolin Hu Journal of Clinical Nursing.2023; 32(21-22): 7751. CrossRef
Distinct dyadic quality of life profiles among patient-caregiver dyads with advanced lung cancer: a latent profile analysis Hui Wang, Tiantian Deng, Cong Cao, Danjun Feng Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Family communication and coping among racial‐ethnic minority cancer patients: A systematic review Yu‐Ju Huang, Chiara Acquati, Monit Cheung Health & Social Care in the Community.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Barriers to seeking psychosocial support among adult patients with hematologic neoplasms: a qualitative study Mengting Xie, Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Xiaoxia Wu, Yong Wu, Rong Hu Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(3): 2613. CrossRef
Openness and topic avoidance in interpersonal communication about ovarian cancer: An uncertainty management perspective Dinah A. Tetteh, Najma Akhther Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer—refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample Natasha Michael, Alex Gorelik, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Merlina Sulistio, Patrick Tee, Katherine Hauser, David Kissane Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(9): 7387. CrossRef
The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Virginia Sanchini, Gabriella Pravettoni Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of a dyadic intervention to improve communication between patients with cancer and their caregivers: A randomized pilot trial Julien Tiete, Nicole Delvaux, Aurore Liénard, Darius Razavi Patient Education and Counseling.2021; 104(3): 563. CrossRef
Hostility in cancer patients as an underexplored facet of distress Luigi Grassi, Martino Belvederi Murri, Michelle Riba, Silvia de Padova, Tatiana Bertelli, Silvana Sabato, Maria Giulia Nanni, Rosangela Caruso, Heifa Ounalli, Luigi Zerbinati Psycho-Oncology.2021; 30(4): 493. CrossRef
Effects of family participatory dignity therapy on the psychological well-being and family function of patients with haematologic malignancies and their family caregivers: A randomised controlled trial Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Wenkui Xu, Mengting Xie, Yong Wu, Rong Hu International Journal of Nursing Studies.2021; 118: 103922. CrossRef
The effect of death anxiety in nurses on their approach to dying patients: A cross‐sectional study Adalet Üstükuş, Zehra Eskimez Perspectives in Psychiatric Care.2021; 57(4): 1929. CrossRef
Dyadic effects of family-functioning and resilience on quality of life in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model Hui Wang, Haorun Yue, Minmin Ren, Danjun Feng European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 52: 101963. CrossRef
Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy Claire C Conley, Amy K Otto, Glynnis A McDonnell, Kenneth P Tercyak Translational Behavioral Medicine.2021; 11(11): 2018. CrossRef
The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers Tess Thompson, Dana Ketcher, Tamryn F. Gray, Erin E. Kent Social Science & Medicine.2021; 287: 114357. CrossRef
The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) scale: psychometric assessment in women treated for cancer Elizabeth K. Arthur, Celia E. Wills, Kristine Browning, Janine Overcash, Usha Menon Supportive Care in Cancer.2020; 28(3): 1449. CrossRef
The Critical Need to Recognize That Families Matter for Adult Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature Sarah B. Woods, Kate Bridges, Erica N. Carpenter Family Process.2020; 59(4): 1608. CrossRef
Family Communication Patterns and Challenges of Huntington’s Disease Risk, the Decision to Pursue Presymptomatic Testing, and Test Results Kelsey Stuttgen, Juli Bollinger, Allison McCague, Rachel Dvoskin, Debra Mathews Journal of Huntington's Disease.2020; 9(3): 265. CrossRef
Open communication between caregivers’ and terminally ill cancer patients about illness and death: The role of gender - A correlational study Sara Carmel, Yoram Singer, Nili Yosef-Sela, Yaacov G. Bachner European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2020; 49: 101828. CrossRef
Patient-family communication mediates the relation between family hardiness and caregiver positivity: Exploring the moderating role of caregiver depression and anxiety Joo Yeon Shin, Michael F. Steger, Dong Wook Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Juhee Cho, Ansuk Jeong, Keeho Park, Sun Seog Kweon, Jong-Hyock Park Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2019; 37(5): 557. CrossRef
Reports of Sharing and Withholding Cancer-Related Information by Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Supporters Maria Checton, Maria Venetis, Danielle Catona, Allyson Bontempo, Kathryn Greene, Alexandre de Meritens, Katie Devine Oncology Nursing Forum.2019; 46(6): 676. CrossRef
Family Members’ Experiences With Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Nicole DePasquale, Ashley Cabacungan, Patti L. Ephraim, LaPricia Lewis-Boyér, Neil R. Powe, L. Ebony Boulware Kidney Medicine.2019; 1(4): 171. CrossRef
The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy Caroline S. Dorfman, Eneka Lamb, Alyssa Van Denburg, Anava A. Wren, Mary Scott Soo, Kaylee Faircloth, Vicky Gandhi, Rebecca A. Shelby Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2018; 36(2): 222. CrossRef
Underestimated caregiver burden by cancer patients and its association with quality of life, depression and anxiety among caregivers J.Y. Shin, J.-W. Lim, D.W. Shin, S.Y. Kim, H.-K. Yang, J. Cho, A. Jeong, D. Jo, C.-Y. Yim, K. Park, J.-H. Park European Journal of Cancer Care.2018; 27(2): e12814. CrossRef
The Dyadic Effects of Family Cohesion and Communication on Health-Related Quality of Life: The Moderating Role of Sex Jung-won Lim, En-jung Shon Cancer Nursing.2018; 41(2): 156. CrossRef