Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Hyung-Kook Yang"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Negative Public Attitudes towards Cancer Survivors Returning to Work: A Nationwide Survey in Korea
Hye-Young Shim, Ji-Yeon Shin, Jong Heun Kim, So-Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Jong-Hyock Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):815-824.   Published online June 5, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.094
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Early diagnosis and an improved survival rate have emerged as important issues for cancer survivors returning to work during the prime of their working life. This study investigated the attitudes of the general public towards cancer survivors returning to work in Korea and attempted to identify the factors influencing this negative attitude. Materials and Methods A general public perception survey regarding cancer survivors returning to work, targeting 2,000 individuals between 40-70 years of age, was conducted as face-to-face home visit.
Results
The public expressed a negative attitude towards cancer survivors returning to work, in terms of both perception and acceptance. Negative perception was higher among those in metropolitan areas compared with urban/rural areas (odds ratio [OR], 1.71), with monthly incomes < $2,000 compared with > $4,000 (OR, 1.54), and with patient care experience compared with those without (OR, 1.41). Negative acceptance was higher among those with monthly incomes < $2,000 compared with > $4,000 (OR, 1.71) and those with patient care experience compared with those without (OR, 1.54). The common factors between acceptance and perception that influenced negative attitude included area of residence, patient care experience, and monthly income. Conclusion This study identified negative attitudes towards cancer survivors returning to work in South Korea and the factors influencing the reintegration of cancer survivors into society. It is necessary to promote community awareness and intervention activities to enable access to community, social, and individual units for the social reintegration of cancer survivors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role performance and factors affecting quality of life in bladder cancer survivors with ileal orthotopic neobladder
    So Hee Kim, Eunjung Ryu, Byong Chang Jeong
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 11(6): 100490.     CrossRef
  • Perception of Korean healthy adolescents on cancer and adolescent cancer survivors: a cross-sectional survey
    Min Kyung Hyun, Yeonseung Lee, Hyun Jeong Lee, Young Ae Kim
    BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Employees’ attitudes toward cancer, cancer survivors, and cancer survivors’ return to work
    Si Eun Lee, Eun Young Park
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 10(3): 100197.     CrossRef
  • In What Ways Does Health Related Stigma Affect Sustainable Employment and Well-Being at Work? A Systematic Review
    I. E. van Beukering, S. J. C. Smits, K. M. E. Janssens, R. I. Bogaers, M. C. W. Joosen, M. Bakker, J. van Weeghel, E. P. M. Brouwers
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.2022; 32(3): 365.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Stigma on the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Sexual Satisfaction Among Breast Cancer Survivors
    Yuxin Zhang, Jie Zhao, Nan Jiang, Ting Wang, He Cao, Quqing Wang, Xiaomin Wei, Jiwei Wang, Jinming Yu
    The Journal of Sexual Medicine.2022; 19(6): 1002.     CrossRef
  • The transcultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Toward Recognizing Early and Noticeable Deterioration scale
    Wenbo Li, Hongyu Yu, Bing Li, Yanli Zhang, Mingshu Fu
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cross-cultural validation of the Cancer Stigma Scale in the general Japanese population
    Emi Takeuchi, Daisuke Fujisawa, Rina Miyawaki, Hiroko Yako-Suketomo, Koichiro Oka, Masaru Mimura, Miyako Takahashi
    Palliative and Supportive Care.2021; 19(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • Association between cancer stigma and job loss among cancer survivors
    Sungkeun Shim, Danbee Kang, Ka Ryeong Bae, Woo Yong Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Tae Sung Sohn, Byong Chang Jeong, Dong Hyun Sinn, Sun Seog Kweon, Young Mog Shim, Juhee Cho
    Psycho-Oncology.2021; 30(8): 1347.     CrossRef
  • Empathic approach to reducing the negative attitudes of nursing undergraduate students towards cancer
    Hamdiye Arda Sürücü, Esra Anuş Topdemir, Altun Baksi, Dilek Büyükkaya Besen
    Nurse Education Today.2021; 105: 105039.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Korean cancer survivors’ unmet needs and desired psychosocial assistance: A focus group study
    Joo Young Kim, Mison Chun, Sang-Won Kim, Joonsup Song, Rosemary Frey
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(1): e0228054.     CrossRef
  • Self-reported depression in cancer survivors versus the general population: a population-based propensity score-matching analysis
    Su Jung Lee, Kathleen B. Cartmell
    Quality of Life Research.2020; 29(2): 483.     CrossRef
  • Public Attitudes towards Cancer Survivors among Korean Adults
    Su Yeon Kye, Hyun Jeong Lee, Yeonseung Lee, Young Ae Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 722.     CrossRef
  • A return-to-work intervention protocol directed at cancer patients (self-assessment, tailored information & lifestyle management for returning to work among cancer patients, START): A multi-center, randomized controlled trial
    Ka Ryeong Bae, Danbee Kang, Jae Yoon Yi, Yeojin Ahn, Im-Ryung Kim, Sun-Seog Kweon, Jin Seok Ahn, Seok Jin Nam, Young Mog Shim, Mison Chun, Jaesung Heo, Juhee Cho
    Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications.2020; 19: 100633.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between cancer stigma, social support, coping strategies and psychosocial adjustment among breast cancer survivors
    No Eul Kang, Hye Young Kim, Ji Young Kim, Sung Reul Kim
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2020; 29(21-22): 4368.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of a Culturally Tailored, Patient-Centered Psychosocial Intervention in South Korean Cancer Survivors
    Dohun Kim, Sun Ju Chang, Hyun Ok Lee, Seung Hee Lee
    Clinical Nursing Research.2019; 28(8): 931.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the First Polish Web-Based Intervention Aimed at Improving Cancer Prevention (the PORINA Study)
    Maksymilian Gajda, Małgorzata Kowalska, Jan E. Zejda
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(6): 1167.     CrossRef
  • 15,875 View
  • 145 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer: A Dyadic Examination
Dong Wook Shin, Jooyeon Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Juhee Cho, Jung Ho Youm, Gyu Seog Choi, Nam Soo Hong, BeLong Cho, Jong-Hyock Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):384-392.   Published online March 13, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.280
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the following questions: to what extent do patients and caregivers perceive their family members to be avoidant of communication regarding patient’s cancer, and to what extent do these perceptions interrelate; and how do such perceptions influence their own and each other’s communication behaviors, communication outcome, mental health, and quality of life. Materials and Methods A national survey was performed with 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate, 76.2%). To examine the dyadic interaction, we developed linked patient and family member questionnaires, including the Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer (FACC) scale. Results The mean scores (standard deviations) of patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were low at 10.9 (15.5) and 15.5 (17.5), respectively (p < 0.001), and concordance was low, a well (Spearman’s rho, 0.23). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with lower levels of disclosure and behaviors of holding back communication, as well as lower levels of mental health outcome and quality of life. The same was true for caregivers (all p < 0.05). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with caregiver holding back, caregiver’s depression level, and caregiver quality of life (all p < 0.05). Both patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were independently associated with communication difficulty within the family. Conclusion Future research would benefit from the measurement of FACC from both patients and caregivers, and promote family intervention to enhance openness to communication, which would be helpful for improving mental health and quality of life for both patients and caregivers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dyadic association between mindfulness, family avoidance of communication about cancer and fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer couples: A cross-sectional study
    Xiangyu Zhao, Yunxue Zhang, Rui Qin, Guopeng Li, Xudong He, Xiaona Shen, Ping Li
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2024; 68: 102491.     CrossRef
  • Caring for a Parent With a Blood Cancer: Sibling Communication Challenges and Psychosocial Outcomes
    Kevin B. Wright, Carma L. Bylund, Diliara Bagautdinova, Chelsea N. Hampton, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Elisa S. Weiss, Maria Sae-Hau, Carla L. Fisher
    Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study
    Ye Zhou, Chong Chin Che, Mei Chan Chong, Yuzhu Hou, Xiangqun Xiao, Yun Liu, Haiyan Zhao
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Caregivers’ Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact
    Anny T.H.R. Fenton, Kalen M. Fletcher, Deniz Kizildag, Nancy A. Borstelmann, Daniela Kessler, Christine Cronin, Anna C. Revette, Alexi A. Wright, Elizabeth Frank, Andrea C. Enzinger
    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.2023; 65(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Relationships Among Perceived Social Support, Family Resilience, and Caregiver Burden in Lung Cancer Families: A Mediating Model
    Yalin Zhang, Yuxin Ding, Chunhua Liu, Juejin Li, Qi Wang, Yunhuan Li, Xiaolin Hu
    Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2023; 39(3): 151356.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Dyad-Based Communication During Cancer
    Martha E. Francis, Pranshu Mohindra, Kim Mooney-Doyle
    Cancer Nursing.2023; 46(6): E384.     CrossRef
  • Contributors to well‐being of Chinese left‐behind families: A dyadic perspective from family resilience and grandparent–grandchild relationship
    Qiong Hu, Yanlin Zhou, Peiqi Dong, Cihua Xu, Qiong Zhang
    Child & Family Social Work.2023; 28(3): 646.     CrossRef
  • The perception of life and death in patients with end-of-life stage cancer: A systematic review of qualitative research
    Ayumi Kyota, Kiyoko Kanda, Maiko Senuma, Noriko Tsukagoshi, Tamae Futawatari, Yuka Kondo
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 66: 102354.     CrossRef
  • Communication with cancer patients: the perspective of caregivers versus non-caregivers in Iran
    Azam Naghavi, Samaneh Salimi, Winfried Rief, Pia von Blanckenburg
    Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context: A mixed‐method study
    Yalin Zhang, Shu Zhang, Chunhua Liu, Xiaoli Chen, Yuxin Ding, Chang Guan, Xiaolin Hu
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2023; 32(21-22): 7751.     CrossRef
  • Distinct dyadic quality of life profiles among patient-caregiver dyads with advanced lung cancer: a latent profile analysis
    Hui Wang, Tiantian Deng, Cong Cao, Danjun Feng
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Family communication and coping among racial‐ethnic minority cancer patients: A systematic review
    Yu‐Ju Huang, Chiara Acquati, Monit Cheung
    Health & Social Care in the Community.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Barriers to seeking psychosocial support among adult patients with hematologic neoplasms: a qualitative study
    Mengting Xie, Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Xiaoxia Wu, Yong Wu, Rong Hu
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(3): 2613.     CrossRef
  • Openness and topic avoidance in interpersonal communication about ovarian cancer: An uncertainty management perspective
    Dinah A. Tetteh, Najma Akhther
    Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer—refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample
    Natasha Michael, Alex Gorelik, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Merlina Sulistio, Patrick Tee, Katherine Hauser, David Kissane
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(9): 7387.     CrossRef
  • The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol
    Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Virginia Sanchini, Gabriella Pravettoni
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of a dyadic intervention to improve communication between patients with cancer and their caregivers: A randomized pilot trial
    Julien Tiete, Nicole Delvaux, Aurore Liénard, Darius Razavi
    Patient Education and Counseling.2021; 104(3): 563.     CrossRef
  • Hostility in cancer patients as an underexplored facet of distress
    Luigi Grassi, Martino Belvederi Murri, Michelle Riba, Silvia de Padova, Tatiana Bertelli, Silvana Sabato, Maria Giulia Nanni, Rosangela Caruso, Heifa Ounalli, Luigi Zerbinati
    Psycho-Oncology.2021; 30(4): 493.     CrossRef
  • Effects of family participatory dignity therapy on the psychological well-being and family function of patients with haematologic malignancies and their family caregivers: A randomised controlled trial
    Chunfeng Wang, Jingyi Chen, Ying Wang, Wenkui Xu, Mengting Xie, Yong Wu, Rong Hu
    International Journal of Nursing Studies.2021; 118: 103922.     CrossRef
  • The effect of death anxiety in nurses on their approach to dying patients: A cross‐sectional study
    Adalet Üstükuş, Zehra Eskimez
    Perspectives in Psychiatric Care.2021; 57(4): 1929.     CrossRef
  • Dyadic effects of family-functioning and resilience on quality of life in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model
    Hui Wang, Haorun Yue, Minmin Ren, Danjun Feng
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 52: 101963.     CrossRef
  • Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy
    Claire C Conley, Amy K Otto, Glynnis A McDonnell, Kenneth P Tercyak
    Translational Behavioral Medicine.2021; 11(11): 2018.     CrossRef
  • The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers
    Tess Thompson, Dana Ketcher, Tamryn F. Gray, Erin E. Kent
    Social Science & Medicine.2021; 287: 114357.     CrossRef
  • The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) scale: psychometric assessment in women treated for cancer
    Elizabeth K. Arthur, Celia E. Wills, Kristine Browning, Janine Overcash, Usha Menon
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2020; 28(3): 1449.     CrossRef
  • The Critical Need to Recognize That Families Matter for Adult Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Sarah B. Woods, Kate Bridges, Erica N. Carpenter
    Family Process.2020; 59(4): 1608.     CrossRef
  • Family Communication Patterns and Challenges of Huntington’s Disease Risk, the Decision to Pursue Presymptomatic Testing, and Test Results
    Kelsey Stuttgen, Juli Bollinger, Allison McCague, Rachel Dvoskin, Debra Mathews
    Journal of Huntington's Disease.2020; 9(3): 265.     CrossRef
  • Open communication between caregivers’ and terminally ill cancer patients about illness and death: The role of gender - A correlational study
    Sara Carmel, Yoram Singer, Nili Yosef-Sela, Yaacov G. Bachner
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2020; 49: 101828.     CrossRef
  • Patient-family communication mediates the relation between family hardiness and caregiver positivity: Exploring the moderating role of caregiver depression and anxiety
    Joo Yeon Shin, Michael F. Steger, Dong Wook Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung-Kook Yang, Juhee Cho, Ansuk Jeong, Keeho Park, Sun Seog Kweon, Jong-Hyock Park
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2019; 37(5): 557.     CrossRef
  • Reports of Sharing and Withholding Cancer-Related Information by Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Supporters
    Maria Checton, Maria Venetis, Danielle Catona, Allyson Bontempo, Kathryn Greene, Alexandre de Meritens, Katie Devine
    Oncology Nursing Forum.2019; 46(6): 676.     CrossRef
  • Family Members’ Experiences With Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation
    Nicole DePasquale, Ashley Cabacungan, Patti L. Ephraim, LaPricia Lewis-Boyér, Neil R. Powe, L. Ebony Boulware
    Kidney Medicine.2019; 1(4): 171.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy
    Caroline S. Dorfman, Eneka Lamb, Alyssa Van Denburg, Anava A. Wren, Mary Scott Soo, Kaylee Faircloth, Vicky Gandhi, Rebecca A. Shelby
    Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.2018; 36(2): 222.     CrossRef
  • Underestimated caregiver burden by cancer patients and its association with quality of life, depression and anxiety among caregivers
    J.Y. Shin, J.-W. Lim, D.W. Shin, S.Y. Kim, H.-K. Yang, J. Cho, A. Jeong, D. Jo, C.-Y. Yim, K. Park, J.-H. Park
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2018; 27(2): e12814.     CrossRef
  • The Dyadic Effects of Family Cohesion and Communication on Health-Related Quality of Life: The Moderating Role of Sex
    Jung-won Lim, En-jung Shon
    Cancer Nursing.2018; 41(2): 156.     CrossRef
  • 12,520 View
  • 134 Download
  • 34 Web of Science
  • 33 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP