Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Survival Outcome of Combined GnRH Agonist and Tamoxifen Is Comparable to That of Sequential Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy Plus Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients with Lymph-Node–Negative, Hormone-Responsive, HER2-Negative, T1-T2 Breast Cancer: Guiyun Sohn, Sei Hyun Ahn, Hee Jeong Kim, Byung-Ho Son, Jong Won Lee, Beom Seok Ko, Yura Lee, Sae Byul Lee, Seunghee Baek; Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1351-1362. Published online April 6, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.444

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes between combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen (GnRHa+T) and sequential adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and tamoxifen (AC->T) in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, lymph-node–negative breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
In total, 994 premenopausal women with T1-T2, lymph-node–negative, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer between January 2003 and December 2008 were included in this retrospective cohort study. GnRHa+T and AC->T were administered to 608 patients (61.2%) and 386 patients (38.8%), respectively. Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting were applied to the original cohort, and 260 patients for each treatment arm were included in the final analysis. Recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival was compared between the two treatment groups.
Results
A total of 994 patients were followed up for a median of 7.4 years (range, 0.5 to 11.4 years). The 5-year follow-up rate was 98.7%, and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. In propensity=matched cohorts (n=520), there was no difference in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates between the two treatment groups (p=0.306, p=0.212, and p=0.102, respectively), and this was maintained after applying inverse probability weighting.
Conclusion
GnRHa+T is a reasonable alternative to AC-> T in patients with premenopausal, hormoneresponsive, HER2-negative, lymph-node–negative, T1-T2 breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Effectiveness of post-mastectomy adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with prognostic stage IB breast cancer: A SEER-based study
HongMei Wang, Yi Peng, Jianbin Wu, ZhuangWei Chen, HuaLe Zhang
Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(9): 3634. CrossRef
Risk of recurrence among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Elizabeth M. Salvo, Abril Oliva Ramirez, Jenilee Cueto, Ernest H. Law, Aaron Situ, Chris Cameron, Imtiaz A. Samjoo
The Breast.2021; 57: 5. CrossRef
Effectiveness of a 6-Month 22.5-mg Leuprolide Acetate Depot Formulation With Tamoxifen for Postoperative Premenopausal Estrogen Suppression in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Zhen-Yu Wu, Young-jin Lee, Heejeong Kim, Jongwon Lee, Il Yong Chung, Jisun Kim, Saebyeol Lee, Byung-Ho Son, Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Gyungyub Gong, Sei-Hyun Ahn, BeomSeok Ko
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Changes in bone mineral density during 5 years of adjuvant treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients
Minsung Kim, Hanna Kim, Sei Hyun Ahn, Vafa Tabatabaie, Sung Wook Choi, Guiyun Sohn, Sae Byul Lee, Beom Seok Ko, Il Yong Chung, Jisun Kim, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hee Jeong Kim
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 180(3): 657. CrossRef
Change in Estradiol Levels among Premenopausal Patients with Breast Cancer Treated Using Leuprolide Acetate 11.25 Milligrams 3-Month Depot and Tamoxifen
Young-jin Lee, Zhen-Yu Wu, Hee jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Il Yong Chung, Jisun Kim, Sae Byul Lee, Byung Ho Son, Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Ho Jung, Gyungyub Gong, Sei-Hyun Ahn, BeomSeok Ko
Journal of Breast Cancer.2020; 23(5): 553. CrossRef
Survival outcome of combined GnRH agonist and tamoxifen is comparable to that of sequential adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer
Doonyapat Sa‑Nguanraksa, Thitikon Krisorakun, Wanee Pongthong, Pornchai O‑Charoenrat
Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef

17,646 View
210 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine Plus Vinorelbine Followed by Docetaxel Versus Adriamycin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Changhoon Yoo, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Jeong Eun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Gyung-Yub Gong, Byung-Ho Son, Sei-Hyun Ahn, Seung Do Ahn, Hak-Hee Kim, Hee Jung Shin, Woo Kun Kim; Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(3):406-415. Published online November 27, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.073

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
Given the promising activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer, this randomized phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Materials and Methods Patients with operable breast cancer (n=75) were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of adriamycin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (AC-D) or four cycles of capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 (day 1-14) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (CV-D). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary breast (ypT0/is). Results Most patients (84%) had locally advanced (n=41) or inflammatory breast cancer (n=22). pCR rates in the primary breast were 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 30%) and 11% (95% CI, 4% to 26%) in the AC-D and CV-D groups, respectively. The overall response rates and 5-year progression-free survival rates in the AC-D and CV-D groups were 62% and 64%, and 51.3% (95% CI, 34.6% to 68.0%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 13.3% to 47.1%), respectively. Although both regimens were well tolerated, CV-D showed less frequent grade 3-4 neutropenia and vomiting than AC-D, whereas manageable diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome were more common in the CV-D group. Conclusion CV-D is a feasible and active non-anthracycline–based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer
Siao-Nge Hoon, Peter K H Lau, Alison M White, Max K Bulsara, Patricia D Banks, Andrew D Redfern
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
rApoptin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells via phosphorylation of Nur77 and Akt
Zhenhuan Hou, Jun Mao, Ying Lu, Lianhong Li
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.2018; 498(1): 221. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Challenges and uncertainties
Mick Van de Wiel, Yanina Dockx, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Sigrid Stroobants, Wiebren A.A. Tjalma, Manon T. Huizing
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2017; 210: 144. CrossRef
Human serum albumin-mediated apoptin delivery suppresses breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo
Fang Wu, Yizhi Liu, Jian Li, Lei Hou, Fuxi Lei, Shangke Huang, Lu Feng, Xinhan Zhao
Oncology Letters.2017; 13(2): 579. CrossRef
Capecitabine in Combination with Standard (Neo)Adjuvant Regimens in Early Breast Cancer: Survival Outcome from a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Ze-Chun Zhang, Qi-Ni Xu, Sui-Ling Lin, Xu-Yuan Li, Hemant Kumar Bid
PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0164663. CrossRef

14,884 View
103 Download
6 Web of Science
5 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search