EunKyo Kang, Jae Myung Cha, Seo Young Kang, Kiheon Lee, Su Young Kim, Younghoon Kim, An Na Seo, Hyo-Jin Kang, Jong Keon Jang, Kwang-Pil Ko, Aesun Shin, Dae Kyung Sohn, Youngki Hong, Eun-Jung Cho, Minje Han, Soo Young Kim, Hyeon Ji Lee, Chang Kyun Choi, Mina Suh
Cancer Res Treat. 2026;58(3):872-883. Published online March 13, 2026
Purpose This study aimed to develop the 2025 update to the Korean colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines by systematically assessing recent evidence, integrating domestic data, and addressing changes since the 2015 guideline revision, and accordingly, provide an evidence-based standard for clinicians and policymakers.
Materials and Methods A multidisciplinary committee developed the guidelines using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The process involved establishing three key questions focused on efficacy, accuracy, and optimal age and interval for screening. A systematic review of international guidelines and primary literature (327 studies included) was conducted. A utility-based analysis using the Markov model was also performed to determine optimal screening ages and intervals.
Results The review identified high-certainty evidence for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in reducing CRC mortality and moderatecertainty evidence for colonoscopy. Evidence for computed tomography colonography (CTC) and stool DNA testing showed very low certainty. Based on this synthesis and cost-utility analysis, the committee conditionally recommends screening for asymptomatic, average-risk adults aged 45-74 years using either colonoscopy every 10 years or FIT every 1-2 years. CTC and stool DNA testing were not recommended owing to insufficient evidence.
Conclusion The 2025 Korean Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening provide the latest evidence-based recommendations tailored to the domestic context. By conditionally adopting both colonoscopy and FIT for individuals aged 45-74 years, these guidelines aim to optimize public health outcomes and reduce the colorectal cancer burden in South Korea.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Age-dependent effects of gastric cancer screening endoscopy on mortality: a nationwide cohort study Seokho Myeong, Jaehun Jung, Ki-Hwan Bae, Ilsoo Kim, Donghoon Kang, Yu Kyung Cho, Hyeon Woo Yim, Jae Myung Park Endoscopy.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose
Molecular treatments targeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are important strategies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, clinicopathologic implications of EGFRs and EGFR ligand signaling have not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the expression of EGFR ligands and correlation with their receptors, clinicopathologic factors, and patients’ survival with CRC.
Materials and Methods
The expression of EGFR ligands, including heparin binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HBEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), betacellulin, and epidermal growth factor (EGF), were evaluated in 331 consecutive CRC samples using mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH). We also evaluated the expression status of EGFR, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), HER3, and HER4 using immunohistochemistry and/or silver ISH.
Results
Unlike low incidences of TGF (38.1%), betacellulin (7.9%), and EGF (2.1%), HBEGF expression was noted in 62.2% of CRC samples. However, the expression of each EGFR ligand did not reveal significant correlations with survival. The combined analyses of EGFR ligands and EGFR expression indicated that the ligands‒/EGFR+ group showed a significant association with the worst disease-free survival (DFS; p=0.018) and overall survival (OS; p=0.005). It was also an independent, unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.026) and OS (p=0.007). Additionally, HER4 nuclear expression, regardless of ligand expression, was an independent, favorable prognostic factor for DFS (p=0.034) and OS (p=0.049), by multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Ligand-independent EGFR overexpression was suggested to have a significant prognostic impact; thus, the expression status of EGFR ligands, in addition to EGFR, might be necessary for predicting patients' outcome in CRC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Orthogonal Tri‐Modular Coiled‐Coil Assembly for Programmable Multi‐Cargo Display on Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 Yong Joon Cho, Gyu‐Jin Lee, Jong‐Ha Park, Sung In Lim Small.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Immune–tumor cell ligand–receptor axes driving metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance in cancer Hailin Zhu, Wang Yi, Yujie Wu, Rong Li, Boxuan Zhou Frontiers in Immunology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Advancements in Targeted Therapies for Colorectal Cancer: Overcoming Challenges and Exploring Future Directions Said A. Khelwatty, Soozana Puvanenthiran, Alan M. Seddon, Izhar Bagwan, Sharadah Essapen, Helmout Modjtahedi Cancers.2025; 17(17): 2810. CrossRef
Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors Stimulate MAPK-Mediated Growth of Lung Cancer Cells by Transactivating HER4 in a Neuregulin-1, MAP Kinase-Dependent Manner Requiring Activation of the ROS-System Terry W. Moody, Irene Ramos-Alvarez, Tatiana Iordanskaia, Samuel A. Mantey, Robert T. Jensen Biology.2025; 14(9): 1225. CrossRef
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of HER2 amplification, overexpression, and positivity in colorectal cancer Harshabad Singh, Ashley Kang, Lisa Bloudek, Ling-I Hsu, Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels, Michael Stecher, Muriel Siadak, Kimmie Ng JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Molecular characterization of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, identified by multiomic data analysis Kailun Xu, Shu Zheng, Baosheng Li, Yingkuan Shao, Xiaoyang Yin Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Mechanism of 5-fluorouracil nanoparticles on releasing skin squamous cell carcinoma through regulation of Wnt/β-catenin expression Lixin Peng, Xinping Zhang, Bin Du, Liangliang Sun, Yuguang Zhao Materials Express.2022; 12(2): 220. CrossRef
Research on Anti-Tumor Nano-Particle with New Type 5-Fluorouracil on the Peritoneal Metastasis of Breast Cancer Yujie Xiao, Guilin Huang, Yibo Xiang Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering.2021; 11(7): 1277. CrossRef
Growth Factors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK Signaling Pathways in Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis: Where Are We Now? Constantin Stefani, Daniela Miricescu, Iulia-Ioana Stanescu-Spinu, Remus Iulian Nica, Maria Greabu, Alexandra Ripszky Totan, Mariana Jinga International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(19): 10260. CrossRef
SOX2 Promotes Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Upregulating the Expression of FSCN1 and HBEGF Weikai Xiao, Shaoquan Zheng, Xinhua Xie, Xing Li, Lijuan Zhang, Anli Yang, Jian Wang, Hailin Tang, Xiaoming Xie Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics.2020; 17: 118. CrossRef
Combined Therapeutic Effects of 131I-Labeled and 5Fu-Loaded Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Colorectal Cancer
Pingping Wu, Huayun Zhu, Yan Zhuang, Xiaofeng Sun, Ning Gu International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 2777. CrossRef
Enhanced antitumor efficacy in colon cancer using EGF functionalized PLGA nanoparticles loaded with 5-Fluorouracil and perfluorocarbon Pingping Wu, Qing Zhou, Huayun Zhu, Yan Zhuang, Jun Bao BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
HER4 promotes the progression of colorectal cancer by promoting epithelial‑mesenchymal transition Xiaojing Jia, Huien Wang, Zhongxin Li, Jing Yan, Yan Guo, Wujie Zhao, Lixia Gao, Bin Wang, Yitao Jia Molecular Medicine Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Key to Selective Intracellular Delivery A. A. Rosenkranz, T. A. Slastnikova Biochemistry (Moscow).2020; 85(9): 967. CrossRef
Co-expression and prognostic significance of putative CSC markers CD44, CD133, wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII in metastatic colorectal cancer Said Abdullah Khelwatty, Sharadah Essapen, Izhar Bagwan, Margaret Green, Alan M. Seddon, Helmout Modjtahedi Oncotarget.2019; 10(18): 1704. CrossRef