Upregulated N6-Methyladenosine RNA in Peripheral Blood: Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer

Han Xiao; Xiaobo Fan; Rui Zhang; Guoqiu Wu

doi:10.4143/crt.2020.870

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 53(2); 2021 > Article

Original Article Breast cancer Upregulated N6-Methyladenosine RNA in Peripheral Blood: Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer: Han Xiao¹, Xiaobo Fan¹, Rui Zhang¹, Guoqiu Wu²; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2021;53(2):399-408.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.870
Published online: October 27, 2020

¹Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

²Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Correspondence: Guoqiu Wu, Center of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, 87 Ding Jiaqiao, Nanjing 210009, China,
Tel: 86-25-83272503, Fax: 86-25-83272503, E-mail: nationball@163.com

• Received: August 31, 2020 • Accepted: October 25, 2020

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

6,889 Views
222 Download
24 Web of Science
20 Crossref
28 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
An effective biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) and benign breast diseases (BBD) is crucial for improving the prognosis. We investigated whether N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) can be a diagnostic biomarker of BC.
Materials and Methods
We detected the contents of peripheral blood m⁶A in 62 patients with BC, 41 patients with BBD, and 41 normal controls (NCs) using the colorimetric method. The relative expression of the m⁶A regulated genes methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) and fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) was analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Results
m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA was significantly higher in patients with BC than that in patients with BBD (p < 0.001) or the NCs (p < 0.001). m⁶A was closely associated with the disease stage (from stage 0 to stage I-IV, p=0.003). The receiver operating characteristic curve of m⁶A contained an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.887 in BC, which was greater than that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153). The combination of m⁶A, CEA, and CA153 improved the AUC to 0.914. The upregulated and downregulated mRNA expression of METTL14 and FTO, respectively, might contribute to the increase of m⁶A in patients with BC. m⁶A combined with METTL14 and FTO improved the AUC to 0.929 with a specificity of 97.4% in the peripheral blood of patients with BC.
Conclusion
The peripheral blood RNA of m⁶A might be a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis of BC.
Key words: Breast neoplasms, Benign breast diseases, N6-methyladenosine, Biomarker, Peripheral blood RNA

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths in women [1]. Approximately 2.1 million new cases were diagnosed in 2018, from those of 630,000 women were died of BC, inaccessible and unaffordable treatment often coincides with the tragic consequences of delayed diagnosis [2]. In general, early BC has a 5-year survival rate of > 80% with a good prognosis during the early stages and with basic treatment [3]. In the past few decades, several methods have been used to clinically diagnose BC. These include breast ultrasonography, mammography, exfoliative cytology, and tumor markers that include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) [4,5]. However, the sensitivity or specificity is not sufficient to screen for BC, or especially, for the early diagnosis of BC. Therefore, a simple, sensitive, and effective diagnostic method is needed to detect BC at an early stage and obtain a better prognosis.

Post-transcriptional modification has become an important regulator in the disease progression of a variety of diseases. Among these, N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant mRNA modification. This modification can be installed using methyltransferase and removed using demethylase [6]. Functions of m⁶A change the expression of target genes and affect the corresponding physiological functions [7]. Additionally, modification of m⁶A due to methylation in various cancers has been reported recently. The findings have implicated m⁶A modification as a prognostic target of digestive tract tumors and suggest that m⁶A modification promotes the brain metastasis of lung cancer [8,9]. More importantly, several articles have suggested that the development of BC may be related to the disharmony of m⁶A methylation [10,11].

The modification of m⁶A is a dynamic and reversible process which catalyzed by the methyltransferase complex consisting of the methyltransferase-like 3 and 14 proteins (METTL3 and METTL14) with their cofactors Wilms tumor 1 associated protein (WTAP), RNA binding motif protein 15, and Vir like m⁶A methyltransferase associated, among others [12]. The reversible process relies on demethylases including fat mass along with obesity-associated protein (FTO) and its homologue AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) to ensure the balance of m⁶A modification in transcription [7]. In recent years, peripheral blood molecular markers as “liquid biopsies” have gained recognition because of their convenience, good reproducibility, and early detection of cancer. Many blood-based biomarkers have been used in the diagnosis of cancer [13]. m⁶A had been reported as a novel potential biomarker of type 2 diabetes mellitus in peripheral blood [14]. However, whether the m⁶A modification in peripheral blood RNA can be a novel diagnostic biomarker for BC has not been investigated.

In this work, we examined m⁶A that was upregulated in peripheral blood RNA in patients with BC compared to that in patients with benign breast disease (BBD) and normal controls (NCs). The comparison assessed the independent and combined diagnostic values of m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA, with the aim of exploring whether m⁶A might be a diagnostic biomarker for BC. We also investigated the upregulation of the METTL14 gene and the downregulation of the FTO gene that accompanied the increase of m⁶A to explore whether these gene expression patterns contribute to m⁶A as a biomarker for the early screening and diagnosis of patients with BC.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients and blood samples

Peripheral blood samples from 62 female patients with BC (including 53 tumor resection and 9 without surgery), 41 female patients with BBD (benign fibroadenoma of breast or mastopathy), and 41 female NCs who sought a routine health check-up during the same period and who did not have any breast diseases or other cancerous diseases. All patients were recruited at the Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University from August 2018 to May 2019. All samples were initially diagnosed and untreated (including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy). There was no history of basic or chronic diseases. Data including age, histologic grade, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage were recorded. The BC stage was evaluated using the TNM system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer [15]. The background demographic characteristics of the participating patients and NCs are described in S1 Table. Of the 62 patients with BC, 53 underwent surgery, and nine received only chemotherapy or radiotherapy. One milliliter of peripheral blood sample was individually collected in a tube coated with ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid to prevent coagulation. The blood was immediately mixed with 3 mL RNALock Reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China) to stabilize RNA. The mixed samples were stored at −80°C for no longer than 3 months.

2. Extraction of total RNA in peripheral blood

Total RNA was isolated from 1 mL peripheral whole blood using a commercially available RNAprep Pure Blood Kit (Tiangen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality and yield were measured using spectrophotometry with a NanoDrop 2000 device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at optical densities of 260 and 280 nm. Reverse-transcription from RNA to cDNA was accomplished using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

3. Colorimetric quantification of RNA m⁶A

m⁶A in total RNA was measured using a colorimetric method with EpiQuik m⁶A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 200 ng isolated RNA was added to detect wells covered by the binding mixed solution with incubation at 37°C for 90 minutes. After washing three times, the capture antibody solution, detection antibody solution, and enhancer solution were added to detect wells containing various sample dilutions at room temperature according the manufacturer’s instructions. Color developing solution and stop solution were added and the absorbance of each well was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. A standard curve ranging from 0.02 to 1 ng of m⁶A was constructed. The m⁶A levels were calculated based on this standard curve.

4. Analysis of METTL14 and FTO mRNA expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantify the expression levels of METTL14 and FTO using Green Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa Bio) and CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The cycle parameters were 95°C for 5 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 65°C for 5 seconds. METTL14 quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction primers used were as follows: forward, 5′-AGTGCCGACAGCATTGGTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGAG- CAGAGGTATCATAGGAAGC-3′. FTO quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction primers used were: forward, 5′-TTGGACGGTACAGATATGGAACATTTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTTTTAGTTTCT-TTGCCTTTGGGGAT-3′. mRNA levels were normalized to reference gene sequences of β-actin forward, 5′-CTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGGGACTTCCTGTAACAATGCA-3′. The absolute expression levels of METTL14 and FTO were calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCt method.

5. Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics ver. 25.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and MedCalc ver. 17.0 (MedCalc, Mariakerke, Belgium). Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests were used to analyse data unless otherwise indicated. One-Way ANOVA were analyzed for data of three or more groups by Bonferroni test. We report the nominal p-value for each comparison without adjusting for multiple testing. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

1. Upregulation of peripheral blood m⁶A in patients with BC

A total of 144 RNA samples (62 patients with BC, 41 patients with BBD, and 41 NCs) were measured using the colorimetric method to determine whether m⁶A was higher in patients with BC. As shown in Fig. 1A, the mean contents of m⁶A in RNA from patients with BC, patients with BBD, and NCs were 0.141±0.076%, 0.066±0.039%, and 0.056±0.035%, respectively. m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA of patients with BBD and the NCs was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The m⁶A in the peripheral blood RNA of patients with BC was significantly higher than that in the NCs (p < 0.001) and patients with BBD (p < 0.001). In addition, m⁶A in patients with BC was significantly distinguished from that in the noncancerous groups (NGs; 41 BBD, and 41 NCs), with its expression being significantly upregulated in patients with BC compared to that in the NGs (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1B). These results indicated that the upregulation of peripheral blood m⁶A in patients with BC can differentiate patients with BC from the patients with BBD or NCs.

2. Association between peripheral blood m⁶A and clinicopathological characteristics in BC

Associations between peripheral blood m⁶A levels and clinicopathological parameters in patients with BC are presented in Table 1. The m⁶A level of peripheral blood was closely associated with stage (from stage 0 to stage I–IV, p=0.003). m⁶A in patients with BC with carcinoma in situ (0 stage, n=6, 0.085±0.020) was significantly different from that in stage I (n=10, 0.166±0.096), II (n=31, 0.152±0.084), and III+IV (n=8, 0.155±0.032) in peripheral blood RNA (Fig. 2A). The m⁶A level in stage I–IV patients with BC was significantly higher than the level at stage 0 (p=0.005). However, there were no associations in the m⁶A level with age, T classification, M classification, regional lymph node metastasis, presence/absence of triple-negative breast cancer, and other clinical tumor markers that included α-fetoprotein, CEA, CA125, and CA153 (Table 1, Fig. 2B).

3. Diagnostic value of peripheral blood m⁶A in patients with BC

To assess whether the m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA had diagnostic value for patients with BC, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to identify a cutoff value that would differentiate patients with BC from NCs. As shown in Fig. 3A and B and Table 2, the area under the curve (AUC) for m⁶A was 0.887 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.826 to 0.948; p < 0.001) and the optimal cutoff value was 0.070 (sensitivity 91.94%, specificity 65.85%), as determined using the highest Youden index. ROC curve analysis of other clinical tumor indicators revealed an AUC of 0.599 (95% CI, 0.489 to 0.709) and 0.572 (95% CI, 0.461 to 0.683) for CEA and CA153, respectively (Table 2, Fig. 3C). These results indicated that the diagnostic value of m⁶A alone was better than that of CEA or CA153. Additionally, the AUC for the combination of m⁶A, CEA, and CA153 improved to 0.914 (95% CI, 0.861 to 0.966; p < 0.001) with a specificity of 89.2% specificity with compromised sensitivity 80.3% as the optimal cutoff value for 0.0992 (Fig. 3D). The findings validated the use of m⁶A alone in peripheral blood RNA as a biomarker to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity for detection of patients with BC and indicated that combining CEA and CA153 with it yielded better specificity for BC.

4. Upregulated mRNA expression of the METTL14 gene and downregulated expression of the FTO gene in patients with BC

To explain why m⁶A increased in patients with BC, we detected the mRNA expression levels of the core regulatory genes (including m⁶A methyltransferases METTL3, METTL14, and WTAP, and m⁶A demethylases ALKBH5 and FTO) that might be involved in dynamic m⁶A modification of RNA in random 15 pair training cohorts using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Only the expression of METTL14 and FTO was significantly different in patients with BC compared with that in the NCs in peripheral blood RNA (p < 0.001) (S2 Fig.). These results demonstrated that along with the dynamic m⁶A modification of RNA, variants of METTL14 are contributed as did the FTO demethylase in peripheral blood RNA of patients with BC.

Next, the expression of METTL14 and FTO was checked in the remaining available samples as the validation cohorts. The mRNA expression of METTL14 as the methyltransferases for m⁶A was prominently upregulated in the peripheral blood RNA of patients with BC compared with that in the NCs (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A). The average mRNA expression level of METTL14 in BC group was 1.75-fold higher than that in the NCs. Furthermore, the mRNA expression of FTO m⁶A demethylase in peripheral blood was significantly downregulated in patients with BC (p=0.002) (Fig. 4B). The average mRNA expression level of FTO in BC group was 0.74-fold compared with NCs. This finding was consistent with the lower expression level of FTO in 1,104 tumor tissues than that in 113 normal tissues (Fig. 4C). Moreover, the expression level of FTO in tumor tissues was significantly negatively correlated with the overall survival rate in patients with BC (Fig. 4D). However, both METTL14 and FTO were not significantly different based on other clinicopathological characteristics in patients with BC (S3 Table). The results suggest that the mRNA expression of the METTL14 and FTO genes may be a potential marker for patients with BC.

5. Combined diagnostic value of m⁶A, the METTL14 mRNA level, and FTO mRNA level in patients with BC

The performance of m⁶A and its regulatory gene indicators in detecting BC was assessed in 60 patients with BC. In a ROC curve, the individual AUC of METTL14 and FTO reached 0.631 and 0.737, respectively (Fig. 5A). When m⁶A was combined with the METTL14 and FTO regulatory genes, the AUC increased to 0.929 (95% CI, 0.880 to 0.977) (Table 2, Fig. 5A). In addition, the specificity reached 97.4% without compromising too much sensitivity (78.9%), and the optimal cutoff value was 0.119 for this combined diagnosis (Fig. 5B). There was no significant correlation between m⁶A and the relative mRNA levels of METTL14/FTO in peripheral blood of patients with BC (S4 Fig.). m⁶A combined with METTL14 and FTO in peripheral blood showed the best diagnostic capability for patients with BC (Table 2).

Discussion

BC is characterized by heterogeneity in the initiation and development of genetic or epigenetic factors, and its sensitivity and specificity in early diagnosis remain the greatest challenge [16]. The low comprehensive predictive value of the main biomarkers for BC tumors in serum, such as CEA, CA153, CA199, and CA125, and their methods of detection lead to the difficulty in the early diagnosis of BC [17]. The m⁶A modification is one RNA epigenetic modification. Its maladjustment was correlated with tumors, while blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers imply the uncertainty associated with BC detection and risk assessment [18,19]. A schematic diagram of the present study design and the dynamic change of m⁶A modification in peripheral blood RNA are depicted in the Fig. 6. We found that the upregulation of the m⁶A level in peripheral blood may potentially be a novel diagnostic biomarker for BC. Simultaneously, m⁶A combined with its regulated genes METTL14 and FTO as a diagnostic biomarker displayed better diagnostic value in BC compared with current clinically available tumor biomarkers.

m⁶A was first discovered in the 1970s, and many emerging evidences supported that m⁶A modification can regulate the stability, translation, and splicing process of mRNA [20]. This modification can significantly regulate the occurrence of human cancer, which may be exploited to develop new biomarkers for detection and novel therapeutic targets for clinical studies of malignant tumors. A recent study suggest ed that the m⁶A level in BC tissues was increased compared with noncancerous tissues [21]. We measured the contents of m⁶A in the peripheral blood of 62 patients with BC and found that they were significantly higher than the levels in patients with BBD or the NCs. In particular, upregulated stage I–IV BC were significantly different from carcinoma in situ, which may be helpful for the early diagnosis of BC (Figs. 1A and 2A). ROC curve analysis showed m⁶A could differentiate patients with BC from NCs, with an AUC of 0.887 and high sensitivity of 91.94%, which was markedly greater than the values for CEA or CA153. This means that in patients with early BC, m⁶A has higher sensitivity and can effectively distinguish patients with BBD or healthy women. Thus, m⁶A could qualify as an indicator of BC preliminary screening. The combination of CEA and CA153 with m⁶A enhanced the AUC to 0.914 and improved specificity to 89.20%. We suggest that based on its convenience and diagnostic value, peripheral blood m⁶A could be a promising biomarker.

We examined the mRNA expression of m⁶A methylases and demethylases. The METTL14 methylase was significantly increased and the FTO demethylase was decreased in BC peripheral blood relative to NCs (Fig. 4A and B). In BC, promoter DNA hypermethylation has been reported as a common feature and genome-wide hypomethylation can frequently occur in regions of segmental duplications [16]. METTL14 methylase and FTO demethylase contribute to m⁶A modification in many cancers. Recently, it was reported that METTL14 plays an essential role in normal hematopoiesis. Thus, METTL14 has oncogenic roles in hepatocellular carcinoma and malignant hematopoiesis [8,22]. In addition, FTO was identified as the first RNA demethylase with an eraser function in m⁶A modification. FTO is critical in the progression of many cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia, glioblastoma, endometrial cancer, gastric cancer, and BC [23,24]. The downregulated expression level of FTO was also detected in 1104 tumor tissues from the StarBase database. Their negative correlation with the overall survival rate in patients with BC from Kaplan-Meier plots suggested that the low expression of FTO is associated with poor prognosis (Fig. 4C and D). Presently, the combination of METTL14 and FTO with m⁶A in BC peripheral blood improved the specificity to 97.4% and the sensitivity to 78.9%, with a ROC AUC of 0.929. Thus, the regulatory profile of these two genes verified the specific changes of m⁶A in peripheral blood of patients with BC, laterally. These results indicate that the combination of METTL14, FTO, and m⁶A has greater diagnostic efficacy for screening BC using peripheral blood.

The upregulation of METTL14 and downregulation of FTO may be related to the increased dynamic m⁶A modification in peripheral blood RNA of patients with BC. The specific mechanisms for their regulation are unclear. Maladjustment of METTL14 and FTO in BC tumor tissues has been described [25,26]. The RNA extraction protocol from peripheral whole blood mainly extracted RNA from nuclear cells (mainly white blood cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes, as well as reticulocytes). The increased m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA may have occurred for several reasons. First, the extracellular vesicles secreted by tumor cells may carry some transcriptional information of m⁶A modification that is pass on to the nuclear cells in peripheral blood RNA [27]. Second, intercellular cross-talk delivers the m⁶A modified signal to nucleate cells of peripheral blood and modifies their RNA [28]. Third, is the similarity to circulating tumor cells in BC, which act as precursors to metastasis and affect DNA methylation as well as RNA methylation [29]. The specific causes of this phenomenon and whether other cancers also have this characteristic will require further study. Our results were obtained only from peripheral blood. Examination of the relative tumor tissues may verify the results.

In conclusion, m⁶A in peripheral blood can be a potential novel diagnostic biomarker for BC. Increased mRNA expression of METTL14 and reduced mRNA expression of FTO may laterally underlie the upregulation of m⁶A, which could be exploited for use as a combination diagnostic biomarker.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (https://www.e-crt.org).

crt-2020-870_S1Table.pdf

crt-2020-870_S2Fig.pdf

crt-2020-870_S3Table.pdf

crt-2020-870_S4Fig.pdf

NOTES

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (https://www.e-crt.org).

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University according to the Chinese Ethical Regulations. All blood samples were obtained with informed consent, and ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Xiao H, Wu G.

Collected the data: Xiao H.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Xiao H, Fan X, Zhang R.

Wrote the paper: Xiao H, Wu G.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81603016, 81773624), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20160706, BE2017746), the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX09301026-005, 2020ZX09201015).

Fig. 1

Quantification and statistical analysis of N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) from peripheral blood RNA in patients with breast cancer (BC), patients with benign breast diseases (BBD), normal controls (NCs), and noncancerous groups (NGs). m⁶A in peripheral blood RNA from 62 patients with BC, 41 patients with BBD and 41 NCs (A), or 82 patients from the NGs (B). Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results from replicate measurements.

Fig. 2

Statistical analysis of N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) in peripheral blood RNA with different clinical characteristics in patients with breast cancer. m⁶A in total peripheral blood RNA of patients with breast cancer at different clinical stages (6 stage 0, 10 stage I, 31 stage II, 6 stage III, and 2 stage IV) (A) and those with no metastasis or regional lymph node metastasis (B). Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results from replicate measurements.

Fig. 3

Diagnostic value for peripheral blood RNA of N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) alone or combination with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) to diagnose patients with breast cancer (BC). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for m⁶A in the diagnosis of BC (A) and cutoff value of m⁶A for normal controls (NCs) and patients with BC (B). ROC curve analysis of m⁶A compared and combined diagnosis with CEA and CA153 (C) and cutoff value analysis for the combination of m⁶A, CEA, and CA153 in NCs and patients with BC (D). AUC, area under the curve.

Fig. 4

Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) and fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) mRNA expression in peripheral blood RNA in patients with breast cancer (BC), and the expression of FTO and their association with overall survival in tumor tissue. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of METTL14 (A) and FTO (B) mRNA expression levels in the peripheral blood of normal controls (NCs) and patients with BC. (C) Analysis of the expression level of FTO from the StarBase database in NCs and patients with BC. (D) Correlation of the expressions with the overall survival analysis from a Kaplan-Meier plot. Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results.

Fig. 5

Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14), fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO), and their combination diagnostic value along with N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for METTL14 and FTO alone or combined diagnosis with m⁶A (A) and cutoff value analysis for the combination of m⁶A, METTL14, and FTO in normal controls (NCs) and patients with breast cancer (BC) (B). AUC, area under the curve.

Fig. 6

Study design and the dynamic N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification of peripheral blood RNA in breast cancer (BC). (A) Flowchart depicting the study design for m⁶A of peripheral blood RNA biomarker in BC; (B) the schematic illustration for dynamic m⁶A modification of peripheral blood RNA in BC. BBD, benign breast diseases; FTO, fat mass and obesity-associated; METTL14, methyltransferase-like 14; NC, normal control; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Table 1

Association between the m⁶A contents and the clinicopathological characteristics in BC patients

Variable	No. of patients	Peripheral blood m⁶A contents mean±SD (%)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 50	22	0.141±0.070	0.795
≥ 50	40	0.141±0.080
TNM
0	6	0.085±0.020	0.968
I	10	0.166±0.096
II	31	0.152±0.084
III	6	0.143±0.021
IV	2	0.190±0.042
Stage
0	6	0.085±0.020	0.003
I–IV	49	0.155±0.080
T category
Tis	6	0.085±0.020	0.129
T1–T2	41	0.155±0.086
T3–T4	6	0.142±0.029
N category
N0	35	0.135±0.078	0.078
N1	15	0.171±0.085
N2–N3	3	0.143±0.031
M category
M0	53	0.146±0.079	0.174
M1	2	0.190±0.042
TNBC
Yes	8	0.150±0.068	0.72
No	47	0.147±0.081
AFP (ng/mL)
< 6	59	0.142±0.077	0.735
≥ 6	3	0.127±0.076
CEA (ng/mL)
< 5	54	0.146±0.079	0.213
≥ 5	8	0.108±0.039
CA125 (IU/mL)
< 35	55	0.141±0.079	0.649
≥ 35	7	0.140±0.049
CA153 (IU/mL)
< 25	58	0.141±0.077	0.985
≥ 25	4	0.143±0.078

AFP, α-fetoprotein; BC, breast cancer; CA125, cancer antigen 125; CA153, carbohydrate antigen 153; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; m⁶A, N6-methyladenosine; SD, standard deviation; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

Table 2

The sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic value about various marker alone and their combination test

Marker	NCs vs. BC
Marker	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	AUC	p-value	95% CI
m⁶A	91.94	65.85	0.887	< 0.001	0.826–0.948
CEA	34.43	95.00	0.599	0.077	0.489–0.709
CA153	29.51	100.00	0.572	0.205	0.461–0.683
METTL14	70.00	65.00	0.643	0.016	0.527–0.760
FTO	52.54	85.00	0.719	< 0.001	0.615–0.823
m⁶A+CEA	83.61	82.50	0.909	< 0.001	0.855–0.964
m⁶A+CA153	88.52	77.50	0.890	< 0.001	0.828–0.951
m⁶A+CEA+CA153	80.33	89.20	0.914	< 0.001	0.861–0.966
m⁶A+METTL14+FTO	78.95	97.44	0.929	< 0.001	0.880–0.977

AUC, area under the curve; BC, breast cancer; CA153, carbohydrate antigen 153; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; FTO, fat mass and obesity-associated; m⁶A, N6-methyladenosine; METTL14, methyltransferase-like 14; NC, normal control.

REFERENCES

1. Zhang L, Qiang J, Yang X, Wang D, Rehman AU, He X, et al. IL1R2 blockade suppresses breast tumorigenesis and progression by impairing USP15-dependent BMI1 stability. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7:1901728.Article PubMed
2. Tang J, Ren J, Cui Q, Zhang D, Kong D, Liao X, et al. A prognostic 10-lncRNA expression signature for predicting the risk of tumour recurrence in breast cancer patients. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:6775–84. Article PubMed PMC
3. Chavez-MacGregor M, Mittendorf EA, Clarke CA, Lichtensztajn DY, Hunt KK, Giordano SH. Incorporating tumor characteristics to the American Joint Committee on Cancer breast cancer staging system. Oncologist. 2017;22:1292–300. Article PubMed PMC
4. Gao Y, Liu M, Shi S, Sun Y, Li M, Zhang M, et al. Diagnostic value of seven biomarkers for breast cancer: an overview with evidence mapping and indirect comparisons of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Exp Med. 2020;20:97–108. Article PubMed
5. Nam SE, Lim W, Jeong J, Lee S, Choi J, Park H, et al. The prognostic significance of preoperative tumor marker (CEA, CA15-3) elevation in breast cancer patients: data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;177:669–78. Article PubMed
6. Koh CW, Goh YT, Goh WS. Atlas of quantitative single-base-resolution N(6)-methyl-adenine methylomes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5636.Article PubMed PMC PDF
7. He L, Li H, Wu A, Peng Y, Shu G, Yin G. Functions of N6-methyladenosine and its role in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:176.Article PubMed PMC
8. Hu BB, Wang XY, Gu XY, Zou C, Gao ZJ, Zhang H, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) RNA modification in gastrointestinal tract cancers: roles, mechanisms, and applications. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:178.Article PubMed PMC
9. Wang H, Deng Q, Lv Z, Ling Y, Hou X, Chen Z, et al. N6-methyladenosine induced miR-143-3p promotes the brain metastasis of lung cancer via regulation of VASH1. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:181.Article PubMed PMC
10. Deng X, Su R, Feng X, Wei M, Chen J. Role of N(6)-methyladenosine modification in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;48:1–7. Article PubMed
11. Zhang C, Samanta D, Lu H, Bullen JW, Zhang H, Chen I, et al. Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m(6)A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E2047–56. Article PubMed PMC
12. Lan Q, Liu PY, Haase J, Bell JL, Huttelmaier S, Liu T. The critical role of RNA m(6)A methylation in cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1285–92. Article PubMed
13. Cheng J, Tang Q, Cao X, Burwinkel B. Cell-free circulating DNA integrity based on peripheral blood as a biomarker for diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:1595–602. Article PubMed
14. Shen F, Huang W, Huang JT, Xiong J, Yang Y, Wu K, et al. Decreased N(6)-methyladenosine in peripheral blood RNA from diabetic patients is associated with FTO expression rather than ALKBH5. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E148–54. Article PubMed
15. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4. Article PubMed
16. Pasculli B, Barbano R, Parrella P. Epigenetics of breast cancer: Biology and clinical implication in the era of precision medicine. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;51:22–35. Article PubMed
17. Di Gioia D, Blankenburg I, Nagel D, Heinemann V, Stieber P. Tumor markers in the early detection of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients: CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, HER2 shed antigen, LDH and CRP in combination with CEA and CA 15-3. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;461:1–7. Article PubMed
18. Bodelon C, Ambatipudi S, Dugue PA, Johansson A, Sampson JN, Hicks B, et al. Blood DNA methylation and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of four prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21:62.Article PubMed PMC
19. Tang Q, Cheng J, Cao X, Surowy H, Burwinkel B. Blood-based DNA methylation as biomarker for breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:115.Article PubMed PMC
20. Choe J, Lin S, Zhang W, Liu Q, Wang L, Ramirez-Moya J, et al. mRNA circularization by METTL3-eIF3h enhances translation and promotes oncogenesis. Nature. 2018;561:556–60. Article PubMed PMC
21. Wang H, Xu B, Shi J. N6-methyladenosine METTL3 promotes the breast cancer progression via targeting Bcl-2. Gene. 2020;722:144076.Article PubMed
22. Deng X, Su R, Weng H, Huang H, Li Z, Chen J. RNA N(6)-methyladenosine modification in cancers: current status and perspectives. Cell Res. 2018;28:507–17. Article PubMed PMC
23. Chen J, Du B. Novel positioning from obesity to cancer: FTO, an m(6)A RNA demethylase, regulates tumour progression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145:19–29. Article PubMed
24. Li Z, Weng H, Su R, Weng X, Zuo Z, Li C, et al. FTO plays an oncogenic role in acute myeloid leukemia as a N(6)-methyladenosine RNA demethylase. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:127–41. Article PubMed
25. Liu L, Liu X, Dong Z, Li J, Yu Y, Chen X, et al. N6-methyladenosine-related genomic targets are altered in breast cancer tissue and associated with poor survival. J Cancer. 2019;10:5447–59. Article PubMed PMC
26. Wu L, Wu D, Ning J, Liu W, Zhang D. Changes of N6-methyladenosine modulators promote breast cancer progression. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:326.Article PubMed PMC
27. Becker A, Thakur BK, Weiss JM, Kim HS, Peinado H, Lyden D. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: cell-to-cell mediators of metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:836–48. Article PubMed PMC
28. Halvorsen AR, Helland A, Gromov P, Wielenga VT, Talman MM, Brunner N, et al. Profiling of microRNAs in tumor interstitial fluid of breast tumors: a novel resource to identify biomarkers for prognostic classification and detection of cancer. Mol Oncol. 2017;11:220–34. Article PubMed
29. Gkountela S, Castro-Giner F, Szczerba BM, Vetter M, Landin J, Scherrer R, et al. Circulating tumor cell clustering shapes DNA methylation to enable metastasis Seeding. Cell. 2019;176:98–112. Article PubMed PMC

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Advances in the study of epithelial mesenchymal transition in cancer progression: Role of miRNAs
Jia Zhang, Runting Yin, Yongwang Xue, Rong Qin, Xuequan Wang, Shuming Wu, Jun Zhu, Yan-Shuang Li, Cai Zhang, Yuan Wei
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology.2025; 196: 69. CrossRef
RNA methylation: A new promising biomaker in cancer liquid biopsy
Chenxin Xu, Xin Xu, Yiwen Huang, Shuang Shang, Lifang Ma
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2025; 1880(3): 189337. CrossRef
Demethylase FTO inhibits the occurrence and development of triple-negative breast cancer by blocking m<sup>6</sup>A-dependent miR-17-5p maturation-induced ZBTB4 depletion
Jingyi Ni, Xiaoyun Lu, Xiangxiang Gao, Conghui Jin, Junfeng Mao
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica.2024; 56(1): 114. CrossRef
Unraveling the cross‐talk between N6‐methyladenosine modification and non‐coding RNAs in breast cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications
Xuan Liu, Xuelong Xie, Chentao Sui, Xuexue Liu, Miao Song, Qing Luo, Ping Zhan, Jia Feng, Jinbo Liu
International Journal of Cancer.2024; 154(11): 1877. CrossRef
N6-methyladenosine levels in peripheral blood RNA: a potential diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer
Chunying Zhang, Jiadi Chen, Jingyi Ren, Xiaoyu Li, Yaqin Zhang, Bihan Huang, Yihan Xu, Luyan Dong, Yingping Cao
Cancer Cell International.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Demethylases in tumors and the tumor microenvironment: Key modifiers of N6-methyladenosine methylation
Junchen Guo, Liang Zhao, Meiqi Duan, Zhi Yang, He Zhao, Baiming Liu, Yihan Wang, Liping Deng, Chen Wang, Xiaodi Jiang, Xiaofeng Jiang
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2024; 174: 116479. CrossRef
The interaction between m6A modification and noncoding RNA in tumor microenvironment on cancer progression
Liushan Wei, Shun Liu, Zhizhong Xie, Guotao Tang, Xiaoyong Lei, Xiaoyan Yang
International Immunopharmacology.2024; 140: 112824. CrossRef
Simultaneous detection of membrane protein and mRNA at single extracellular vesicle level by droplet microfluidics for cancer diagnosis
Huixian Lin, Bo Li, Jingyun Guo, Xueying Mai, Haiyang Yu, Weilun Pan, Bodeng Wu, Wei Liu, Mingzhen Zhong, Tong Liao, Ye Zhang, Bo Situ, Xiaohui Yan, Yifan Liu, Chunchen Liu, Lei Zheng
Journal of Advanced Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
METTL protein family: focusing on the occurrence, progression and treatment of cancer
Huhu Zhang, Fulin Sun, Shuyao Jiang, Fanghao Yang, Xiaolei Dong, Guoxiang Liu, Mengjun Wang, Ya Li, Mohan Su, Ziyuan Wen, Chunjuan Yu, Chenkai Fan, Xiaoxia Li, Zhe Zhang, Lina Yang, Bing Li
Biomarker Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Multiomics analyses and machine learning of nuclear receptor coactivator 6 reveal its essential role in hepatocellular carcinoma
Yinghao Fang, Yuyan Xu, Wei Liao, Tao Ji, Linyuan Yu, Longhai Li, Mingxin Pan, Dinghua Yang
Cancer Science.2023; 114(1): 75. CrossRef
Effect of Polyphenols and Zinc Co-Supplementation on the Development of Neoplasms in Rats with Breast Cancer
Martyna Jastrzębska, Joanna Giebułtowicz, Andrzej K. Ciechanowicz, Robert Wrzesień, Wojciech Bielecki, Barbara Bobrowska-Korczak
Foods.2023; 12(2): 356. CrossRef
Understanding the Epitranscriptome for Avant-Garde Brain Tumour Diagnostics
Ágota Tűzesi, Susannah Hallal, Laveniya Satgunaseelan, Michael E. Buckland, Kimberley L. Alexander
Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1232. CrossRef
Development of a N6-methyladenosine-directed single quantum dot-based biosensor for sensitive detection of METTL3/14 complex activity in breast cancer tissues
Ming-hao Liu, Wan-tong Yu, Ning-ning Zhao, Jian-Ge Qiu, Bing-Hua Jiang, Yan Zhang, Chun-yang Zhang
Analytica Chimica Acta.2023; 1279: 341796. CrossRef
Functions, mechanisms, and therapeutic implications of METTL14 in human cancer
Qian Guan, Huiran Lin, Lei Miao, Huiqin Guo, Yongping Chen, Zhenjian Zhuo, Jing He
Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Methyladenosine Modification in RNAs: From Regulatory Roles to Therapeutic Implications in Cancer
Xiaolin Qu, Yongqiu Zhang, Xianzheng Sang, Ding Ren, Hong Zhao, Stephen T. C. Wong
Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3195. CrossRef
METTL14 promotes migration and invasion of choroidal melanoma by targeting RUNX2 mRNA via m6A modification
Xi Zhang, Xiaonan Zhang, Tengyue Liu, Zhe Zhang, Chiyuan Piao, Hong Ning
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine.2022; 26(22): 5602. CrossRef
Regulatory Role of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) Modification in Osteosarcoma
Yujie Zhang, Yanyan Wang, Liwei Ying, Sifeng Tao, Mingmin Shi, Peng Lin, Yangxin Wang, Bin Han
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Epitranscriptomics of Ischemic Heart Disease—The IHD-EPITRAN Study Design and Objectives
Vilbert Sikorski, Pasi Karjalainen, Daria Blokhina, Kati Oksaharju, Jahangir Khan, Shintaro Katayama, Helena Rajala, Satu Suihko, Suvi Tuohinen, Kari Teittinen, Annu Nummi, Antti Nykänen, Arda Eskin, Christoffer Stark, Fausto Biancari, Jan Kiss, Jarmo Sim
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(12): 6630. CrossRef
Regulatory roles of RNA modifications in breast cancer
Kanchan Kumari, Paula Groza, Francesca Aguilo
NAR Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
m6A target microRNAs in serum for cancer detection
Bo Zhang, Zhenmei Chen, Baorui Tao, Chenhe Yi, Zhifei Lin, Yitong Li, Weiqing Shao, Jing Lin, Jinhong Chen
Molecular Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Upregulated N6-Methyladenosine RNA in Peripheral Blood: Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer

Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(2):399-408. Published online October 27, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.870

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Electronic Supplementary Material
NOTES
REFERENCES

Upregulated N6-Methyladenosine RNA in Peripheral Blood: Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer

Fig. 1 Quantification and statistical analysis of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) from peripheral blood RNA in patients with breast cancer (BC), patients with benign breast diseases (BBD), normal controls (NCs), and noncancerous groups (NGs). m6A in peripheral blood RNA from 62 patients with BC, 41 patients with BBD and 41 NCs (A), or 82 patients from the NGs (B). Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results from replicate measurements.

Fig. 2 Statistical analysis of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in peripheral blood RNA with different clinical characteristics in patients with breast cancer. m6A in total peripheral blood RNA of patients with breast cancer at different clinical stages (6 stage 0, 10 stage I, 31 stage II, 6 stage III, and 2 stage IV) (A) and those with no metastasis or regional lymph node metastasis (B). Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results from replicate measurements.

Fig. 3 Diagnostic value for peripheral blood RNA of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) alone or combination with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) to diagnose patients with breast cancer (BC). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for m6A in the diagnosis of BC (A) and cutoff value of m6A for normal controls (NCs) and patients with BC (B). ROC curve analysis of m6A compared and combined diagnosis with CEA and CA153 (C) and cutoff value analysis for the combination of m6A, CEA, and CA153 in NCs and patients with BC (D). AUC, area under the curve.

Fig. 4 Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) and fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) mRNA expression in peripheral blood RNA in patients with breast cancer (BC), and the expression of FTO and their association with overall survival in tumor tissue. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of METTL14 (A) and FTO (B) mRNA expression levels in the peripheral blood of normal controls (NCs) and patients with BC. (C) Analysis of the expression level of FTO from the StarBase database in NCs and patients with BC. (D) Correlation of the expressions with the overall survival analysis from a Kaplan-Meier plot. Bars represent the mean±standard deviation of the results.

Fig. 5 Methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14), fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO), and their combination diagnostic value along with N6-methyladenosine (m6A). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for METTL14 and FTO alone or combined diagnosis with m6A (A) and cutoff value analysis for the combination of m6A, METTL14, and FTO in normal controls (NCs) and patients with breast cancer (BC) (B). AUC, area under the curve.

Fig. 6 Study design and the dynamic N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of peripheral blood RNA in breast cancer (BC). (A) Flowchart depicting the study design for m6A of peripheral blood RNA biomarker in BC; (B) the schematic illustration for dynamic m6A modification of peripheral blood RNA in BC. BBD, benign breast diseases; FTO, fat mass and obesity-associated; METTL14, methyltransferase-like 14; NC, normal control; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Upregulated N6-Methyladenosine RNA in Peripheral Blood: Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer

Table 1

Association between the m⁶A contents and the clinicopathological characteristics in BC patients

Variable	No. of patients	Peripheral blood m⁶A contents mean±SD (%)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 50	22	0.141±0.070	0.795
≥ 50	40	0.141±0.080
TNM
0	6	0.085±0.020	0.968
I	10	0.166±0.096
II	31	0.152±0.084
III	6	0.143±0.021
IV	2	0.190±0.042
Stage
0	6	0.085±0.020	0.003
I–IV	49	0.155±0.080
T category
Tis	6	0.085±0.020	0.129
T1–T2	41	0.155±0.086
T3–T4	6	0.142±0.029
N category
N0	35	0.135±0.078	0.078
N1	15	0.171±0.085
N2–N3	3	0.143±0.031
M category
M0	53	0.146±0.079	0.174
M1	2	0.190±0.042
TNBC
Yes	8	0.150±0.068	0.72
No	47	0.147±0.081
AFP (ng/mL)
< 6	59	0.142±0.077	0.735
≥ 6	3	0.127±0.076
CEA (ng/mL)
< 5	54	0.146±0.079	0.213
≥ 5	8	0.108±0.039
CA125 (IU/mL)
< 35	55	0.141±0.079	0.649
≥ 35	7	0.140±0.049
CA153 (IU/mL)
< 25	58	0.141±0.077	0.985
≥ 25	4	0.143±0.078

Table 2

The sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic value about various marker alone and their combination test

Marker	NCs vs. BC
Marker	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	AUC	p-value	95% CI
m⁶A	91.94	65.85	0.887	< 0.001	0.826–0.948
CEA	34.43	95.00	0.599	0.077	0.489–0.709
CA153	29.51	100.00	0.572	0.205	0.461–0.683
METTL14	70.00	65.00	0.643	0.016	0.527–0.760
FTO	52.54	85.00	0.719	< 0.001	0.615–0.823
m⁶A+CEA	83.61	82.50	0.909	< 0.001	0.855–0.964
m⁶A+CA153	88.52	77.50	0.890	< 0.001	0.828–0.951
m⁶A+CEA+CA153	80.33	89.20	0.914	< 0.001	0.861–0.966
m⁶A+METTL14+FTO	78.95	97.44	0.929	< 0.001	0.880–0.977

Table 1 Association between the m6A contents and the clinicopathological characteristics in BC patients

Table 2 The sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic value about various marker alone and their combination test