| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Cancer Research and Treatment > Volume 50(3); 2018 > Article
Lee, Choi, Lee, Lee, Lee, Yoo, Kim, Han, and Park: Utility of the National Lung Screening Trial Criteria for Estimation of Lung Cancer in the Korean Population



Screening forlung cancerin high-risk patients using the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) criteria resulted in a decreased lung cancer-related mortality rate. However, whether these criteria are applicable to the Korean has not been investigated thus far. Therefore, we estimated the utility of the NLST criteria as a screening tool for lung cancer in the Korean population.

Materials and Methods

The total number of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases in 2013 was obtained from the Korea National Statistical Office. The proportion of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases that met the NLST criteria was calculated via a retrospective cohort of a tertiary referral hospital. We estimated the nationwide proportion of patients who met the NLST criteria using the 5th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted during 2010-2012 (KNHANES V).


Using KNHANES V data, we found that approximately 6.92% of the general population of Korea would meet the NLST criteria. In the tertiary referral hospital, 29.6% of the 2,689 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients met the NLST criteria. In 2013, the total number of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases in Korea was 23,177. The estimated nationwide proportions of lung cancer patients who met and did not meet the NLST criteria were 0.37% and 0.06%, respectively, yielding a ratio of 5.78.


The NLST criteria demonstrated sound clinical utility for lung cancer screening of high-risk patients in Korea.


According to the Global Burden of Cancer Study 2012, lung cancer is a common cancer (1.8 million cases) and the number one cause of cancer-related deaths, and accounts for 1.6 million cases worldwide owing to a high case fatality rate (0.87; overall ratio of mortality to incidence) [1,2]. Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate for lung cancer does not vary drastically across stages and has remained consistently low over the past several decades, because the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage [3]. Therefore, early detection of lung cancer is important to improve survival rates. For the purpose of early detection of lung cancer, large-scale clinical trials of lung cancer screening methods, such as chest radiography (CXR) and sputum cytology, have been conducted. However, these trials did not demonstrate the reduction of lung cancer mortality rate [4]. Before the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), lung cancer screening was not recommended [5]. In 2011, the NLST showed a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality rates and a 6.7% decrease in all-cause mortality rates [6]. This positive result of NLST could be explained by the following two reasons. First, they used low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) which is higher sensitivity than CXR as screening tools. Performing additional diagnostic procedures resulted in a higher detection rate of early-stage lung cancers in the LDCT group than in the CXR group; thus, a lower mortality rate was observed in the LDCT group [7]. Second, the NLST selected participants with high risk based on age and cumulative tobacco smoke exposure. Thus far, the NLST has influenced many guidelines for lung cancer screening, including those drafted by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Colleges of Chest Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [8-11]. Most current screening guidelines have been adopted from the NLST criteria itself.
In Korea, the National Cancer Information Center has been recommending lung cancer screening for people who meet the NLST criteria since 2015 [12] and based on this recommendation the Ministry of Health and Welfare established a nationwide lung cancer screening pilot study in 2017 [13]. However, the validity of the NLST criteria has not been evaluated in the Korean population thus far. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the utility of the NLST criteria for lung cancer screening in the Korean population.

Materials and Methods

1. Study design and participants

To estimate the proportion of individuals among the Korean population who met the NLST criteria, we used two data sets from the 5th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES V) database. The KNHANES V was conducted over 2010-2012 by the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is considered to be representative of the health status in Korea. These data consist of responses from the Nutrition Survey, Health Examination Survey, and Health Interview Survey, and contain smoking history including current smoking status and the pack-year history of smoking. However, the KNHANES V does not provide valid information regarding when an ex-smoker quit smoking. Consequently, if an ex-smoker satisfied the age and smoking pack-year criteria, they were considered to have met the NLST criteria.
We also analyzed the medical records of enrolled patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer in the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) from 1 June 2012 to 31 December 2015. These patients were divided into two groups: an NLST-positive group, defined as patients who satisfied all the NLST eligibility criteria (age 55-74 years, a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years, and currently smoking or quit smoking within the past 15 years) [6], and an NLST-negative group, defined as patients who did not meet any of the criteria. Lung cancer stage was evaluated according to the 7th edition of the TNM classification [14].
Weighted analysis was used to analyze the KNHANES V data. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA ver. 13 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX). The level of statistical significance was set at p=0.05.

2. Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of SNUH (IRB No. 1612-026-812) and performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent was waived.


Of the people included in the KNHANES V database, the data for 12,475 persons were included in the final analysis after excluding persons whose smoking histories were not investigated and those aged below 40 years (Fig. 1A). The mean age of the population was 55.8 years, and 6.9% satisfied the NLST criteria. Furthermore, the proportion of ever smokers and the mean smoking pack-year index was 43.9% and 23.8, respectively (Table 1).
At SNUH, we collected data for 2,725 patients and excluded 36 patients aged under 40 years (Fig. 1B). The mean age of this population was 66.8 years, and 29.6% of patients with lung cancer met the NLST criteria. The proportion of ever smokers (65.5%) was higher in the SNUH cohort than in the KNHANES V cohort (Table 1). The median follow-up period of the SNUH lung cancer patients was 1.49 years.
According to the Korea National Statistical Office, 23,177 people were diagnosed with lung cancer in 2013 [15,16]. Using SNUH lung cancer cohort data, we estimated that 6,860 (29.6%) and 16,317 (70.4%) lung cancer patients met and did not meet the NLST criteria, respectively. Using the KNHANES data we found that, of the Korean patients aged over 40 years, 1,893,065 (6.9%) satisfied the NLST criteria and 25,463,377 (93.1%) did not satisfy the NLST criteria. Therefore, among the patients who met the NLST criteria, about 0.37% (6,860/1,893,065) were estimated to have lung cancer, and conversely, about 0.064% (16,317/25,463,377) of people who did not satisfy the NLST criteria were expected to develop lung cancer. Importantly, the incidence of lung cancer was 5.58 times higher in the NLST-positive group (Fig. 2).


The findings of our study showed that the incidence of lung cancer in Korea is 5.58 times higher among those who satisfy the NLST criteria than among those who do not. Thus far, no previous study has evaluated the utility of NLST criteria in the Korean population as a screening tool for high-risk patients.
Nonetheless, the application of the NLST criteria to the Korean population involves a few obstacles. Korea is a country with an intermediate tuberculosis incidence rate (80 cases per 1000,000 persons) [17]. In other words, the false-positive rate achieved via LDCT may be higher than that in countries enrolled in the NLST study. A high false positive rate was determined to be associated with cost effectiveness, health-related quality of life, or anxiety and other adverse events associated with invasive interventions such as biopsy. Therefore, a variety of approaches to reduce false-positive rate have been developed by increasing the threshold for pulmonary nodules, such as lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System [18].
Recently, ten Haaf et al. [19] demonstrated that both the sensitivities and specificities of the 6-year lung cancer incidence determined using the NLST criteria were lower than that reported using other screening criteria (e.g., Liverpool Lung Project or Bach model) in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial CXR arm. Therefore, lung cancer screening in high-risk patients identified using NLST criteria will be helpful to develop a prediction model suitable for the Korean population.
Using KNHANES V data, we estimated that approximately 6.9% of the population in Korea would meet the NLST criteria. Previous studies have reported similar results: 6.2% of United States are covered among over 40 years population according to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result in the United States [20]. In addition, in this study, 29.6% of patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer met the NLST criteria. This result is also consistent with those of previous studies conducted in the United States and Asian population. Pinsky and Berg [20] reported that 26.7% of lung cancer patients in the United States met the strict NLST eligibility criteria using statistical models based on data derived from SEER. A total of 27.8% of lung cancer patients was covered in Asian population-based study [12].
There are several limitations in this study. First, the smoking history data in the KNHANES V was self-reported; therefore, it could have been underreported. Second, accurate estimation of lung cancer using the NLST criteria involves inevitable errors because the KNHANES V did not evaluate the participant’s history when they quit smoking. However, since the NLST-positive group identified using KNHANES V data contains not only the original NLST eligible population but also a larger proportion of people classified as NLST positive, the cancer incidence ratio would probably be higher than that estimated. Third, our results cannot be generalized to all Korean lung cancer patients because it used data obtained from a single tertiary hospital; moreover, the study was retrospective in nature. Nevertheless, the SNUH data cannot be regarded as unreliable because the NLST eligible population was similar to that described in previous studies conducted in other countries.
The benefits of lung cancer screening using LDCT might be more pronounced in Korean patients identified as being at high risk per the NLST criteria.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.


This study was supported by a grant (No. 1612-026-812) from the SNUH Research Fund. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Fig. 1.
(A) Flow diagram of study population (fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [KNHANES V]). (B) Flow diagram of study population (Seoul National University Hospital [SNUH]). NLST, National Lung Screening Trial.
Fig. 2.
Estimation of lung cancer incidence in Koreans ≥ 40 years using National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) criteria. SNUH, Seoul National University Hospital; KNHANES V, fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the KNHANES V and SNUH cohort
Characteristic Value
KNHANES V (n=12,475)
 Age (yr) 55.8±0.18a)
 Male sex (%) 47.9
 BMI (kg/m2) 24.1±0.04
  Ever (%) 43.9
  PY 23.8±0.67
 NLST positive (%) 6.9
SNUH cohort (n=2,689)
 Age 66.8±9.71
 Male sex 1,805 (67.1)
 BMI 23.4±3.16
  Ever 1,760 (65.5)
  PY 39.7±22.7
  Screening 1,256 (47.0)
  Symptoms 1,424 (53.0)
 ECOG score
  0 1,111 (41.3)
  1 1,223 (45.5)
  2 267 (9.93)
  3 78 (2.90)
  4 10 (0.37)
  ADC 1,524 (56.7)
  SqCC 642 (23.9)
  SCLC 271 (10.1)
  Others 252 (9.37)
 Stage (NSCLC)
  1 729/2,415 (27.1)
  2 271/2,415 (10.1)
  3 551/2,415 (20.5)
  4 864/2,415 (32.1)
 Lung function (n=2,365)
  FEV1 (%) 96.8±22.7
  FVC (%) 95.9±17.5
  DLCO (%) 91.0±21.5
EGFR mutations 654/1,684 (38.8)
ALK translocations 82/1,688 (4.86)
 NLST positive 797 (29.6)

Values are presented as mean±standard error or number (%) unless otherwise indicated. KNHANES V, fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SNUH, Seoul National University Hospital; BMI, body mass index; PY, pack years; NLST, National Lung Screening Trial; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ADC, adenocarcinoma; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung carcinoma; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; DLCO, diffusing capacity; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase.


1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–86.
crossref pmid
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2017 [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2017. [cited 2017 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/index 2017.

3. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Ward E, Ries LA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1407–27.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Woolner LB, Taylor WF, Miller WE, Muhm JR, et al. Screening for lung cancer: a critique of the Mayo Lung Project. Cancer. 1991;67(4 Suppl):1155–64.
crossref pmid
5. Frame PS. Routine screening for lung cancer?: Maybe someday, but not yet. JAMA. 2000;284:1980–3.
crossref pmid
6. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409.
crossref pmid pmc
7. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Clingan KL, et al. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1980–91.
crossref pmid pmc
8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Lung cancer screening [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2014. [cited 2014 Dec 26]. Available from: http://www.nccn.org.

9. Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:330–8.
crossref pmid
10. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307:2418–29.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, Jett JR, Keshavjee S, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:33–8.
crossref pmid
12. Jang SH, Sheen S, Kim HY, Yim HW, Park BY, Kim JW, et al. The Korean guideline for lung cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015;58:291–301.
13. The Ministry of Health and Welfare. Lung cancer screening for high-risk smokers between 55 and 74 years old [Internet]. Goyang: National Cancer Center; c2016. [cited 2017 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.ncc.re.kr/prBoardView1.ncc?nwsId=2298&searchKey=total&searchValue=&pageNum=7.

14. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14.
crossref pmid
15. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Cancer incidence, cancer survival rate and prevalence in 2013 [Internet]. Goyang: National Cancer Center; c2015. [cited 2017 Oct 1]. Available from: http://ncc.re.kr/prBoardView1.ncc?nwsId=2188.

16. Oh CM, Won YJ, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Cho H, Lee JK, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2013. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:436–50.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

18. McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB, Flacke S, Wald C. Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a Clinical CT Lung Screening Program. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(2 Suppl):R25–9.
crossref pmid
19. Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemagi MC, Han SS, Kong CY, Plevritis SK, et al. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: a retrospective validation study. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002277.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Pinsky PF, Berg CD. Applying the National Lung Screening Trial eligibility criteria to the US population: what percent of the population and of incident lung cancers would be covered? J Med Screen. 2012;19:154–6.
crossref pmid
Editorial Office
Korean Cancer Association
Room 1824, Gwanghwamun Officia
92 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03186, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3276-2410   FAX: +82-2-792-1410   E-mail: journal@cancer.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Cancer Association. All rights reserved.                 Developed in M2Community