EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma-Associated Malignant Pleural Effusion and Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Jiyoul Yang; Ok-Jun Lee; Seung-Myoung Son; Chang Gok Woo; Yusook Jeong; Yaewon Yang; Jihyun Kwon; Ki Hyeong Lee; Hye Sook Han

doi:10.4143/crt.2017.378

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 50(3); 2018 > Article

Original Article EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma-Associated Malignant Pleural Effusion and Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Jiyoul Yang, MD¹, Ok-Jun Lee, MD, PhD^2,3, Seung-Myoung Son, MD², Chang Gok Woo, MD², Yusook Jeong, MD¹, Yaewon Yang, MD¹, Jihyun Kwon, MD¹, Ki Hyeong Lee, MD, PhD^1,4, Hye Sook Han, MD, PhD^1,4,; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2018;50(3):908-916.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.378
Published online: September 19, 2017

¹Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea

²Department of Pathology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea

³Department of Pathology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea

⁴Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence: Hye Sook Han, MD, PhD Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea
Tel: 82-43-269-6306 Fax: 82-43-273-3252 E-mail: sook3529@hanmail.net

• Received: August 13, 2017 • Accepted: September 14, 2017

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

10,151 Views
280 Download
34 Web of Science
26 Crossref
39 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are often observed in lung cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPEs (LA-MPEs) and its correlation with efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.
Materials and Methods
Samples comprised 40 cell blocks of pathologically-confirmed LA-MPEs collected before the start of EGFR TKI therapy. EGFR mutation status was re-evaluated by peptide nucleic acid clamping and the clinical outcomes of EGFR TKI‒treated patients were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
EGFR mutations were detected in 72.5% of LA-MPE cell blocks (29/40). The median progression-free survival for patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs was better than that for patients with wild-type EGFR (7.33 months vs. 2.07 months; hazard ratio, 0.486; 95% confidence interval, 0.206 to 1.144; p=0.032). The objective response rate (ORR) of 26 patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs among the 36 patients with measurable lesions was 80.8%, while the ORR of the 10 patients with wild-type EGFR in LA-MPEs was 10% (p < 0.001). Among the 26 patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs, the ORR of target lesions and LA-MPEs were 88.5% and 61.5%, respectively (p=0.026).
Conclusion
EGFR mutation status in cell blocks of LA-MPEs confirmed by pathologic diagnosis is highly predictive of EGFR TKI efficacy. For patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs, the response to EGFR TKIs seems to be worse for pleural effusions than for solid tumors.
Key words: Epidermal growth factor receptor, Lung adenocarcinoma, Pleural effusion, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Introduction

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for around 80%-85% of lung cancers [1]. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and less than 30% of patients undergo surgical resection [2]. The initial therapy for advanced NSCLC is systemic chemotherapy with platinum-based doublets, but the response is poor (median overall survival, approximately 1 year) [3]. By contrast, treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) leads to a significant improvement in the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC, particularly those harboring EGFR gene mutations [4]. These mutations comprise small in-frame deletions and substitutions clustered around the ATP-binding site in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of EGFR; these mutations increase the affinity of ATPase and EGFR TKIs [5,6]. EGFRmutations occur in the majority of female, non-smoking Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma [5,6]. Successful treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR TKIs means that EGFR mutation status can be used to select patients who will benefit from treatment with these drugs. Currently, tumor tissue obtained at surgery or biopsy are used for EGFR mutation tests [7]; unfortunately, it is difficult to obtain an adequate amount of tumor tissue from patients with advanced NSCLC. Moreover, the often poor performance status of patients with advanced NSCLC means that they may not tolerate diagnostic procedures or the location of the tumor may make it impossible to obtain tissue. Thus, new types of sample are needed to replace or supplement current samples to detect EGFR mutations.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is present in approximately 50% of advanced NSCLC patients, most frequently in those with lung adenocarcinoma [8,9]. This adenocarcinoma grows in the peripheral lung tissue and invades the pleural cavity easily. Sampling pleural effusion is a relatively simple, non-invasive, and repeatable procedure, and MPE is a feasible source of tumor DNA for molecular analysis [9]. Therefore, MPE samples are useful when no tumor tissues are available for mutation analysis. Although many studies show that MPEs from NSCLC patients are a good material in which to detect EGFR mutations [10-19], there are insufficient data to evaluate the utility of MPEs for determining overall EGFR mutation rates and the efficacy of EGFR TKIs.

Here, we selected patients using pathologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE (LA-MPE) samples and re-evaluated EGFR mutation status using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping, which has a sensitivity of 1%. The clinical outcome of patients receiving EGFR TKIs was then analyzed retrospectively. Tumor response to EGFR TKI therapy was analyzed by examining the response of target lesions and pleural effusions separately.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients and sample collection

From March 2010 to August 2016, cases from Chungbuk National University Hospital were reviewed using a pathologic database of lung adenocarcinoma patients that contained cell blocks of MPEs. All MPEs excluded tuberculosis pleurisy through acid-fast bacilli staining and tuberculosispolymerase chain reaction (PCR). All cell blocks of MPE samples contained adenocarcinoma cells. Ethanol-fixed, paraffinembedded cell blocks of MPEs obtained from histologicallyor cytologically-confirmed lung adenocarcinoma patients who showed no evidence of another malignant tumor were included. Lung adenocarcinoma was confirmed by pathology reports of primary tumor biopsies or of cell blocks of MPEs that stained positive for thyroid transcription factor-1. Matched formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgically resected or biopsy specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma were also retrieved for comparison. All cell blocks of LA-MPEs or primary lung adenocarcinoma tissues were collected before the start of EGFR TKI therapy. Clinical characteristics, including age, sex, smoking history, and EGFR TKI therapy, were obtained from medical records. EGFR TKIs were divided into three groups according to the initial EGFR TKI agent used: (1) gefitinib or erlotinib were classified as first generation EGFR TKIs; (2) afatinib or dacomitinib were classified as second generation EGFR TKIs; and (3) osimertinib, rociletinib, and HM61713 were classified as third generation EGFR TKIs.

2. DNA extraction and PNA clamping

DNA was extracted from five representative paraffin sections (10 μm) cut from cell blocks and tumor tissue. Prior to DNA isolation, the tissue was deparaffinized in xylene and then washed in 70% ethanol. DNA was isolated using a High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA was eluted in 50 μL elution buffer, and the concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The extracted DNA was stored at –20°C until required.

A PNAClamp EGFR Mutation Detection Kit (PANAGENE, Inc., Daejeon, Korea) was used to detect EGFR mutations by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), as previously described [17,18]. The assay, based on PNA clamping technology, quickly and accurately detects specific mutations or deletions at known positions within the EGFR gene. Detection of 47 mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of EGFR is possible. Briefly, all reactions were carried out in a volume of 20 μL containing template DNA, a primer, a PNA probe set, and SYBR Green PCR master mix. RT-PCR was performed using a CFX 96 apparatus (Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 5 minutes at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 70°C for 20 seconds, 63°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. PCR efficiency was determined by evaluating threshold cycle (Ct) values, which were calculated automatically from PCR amplification plots of SYBR Green fluorescence versus number of cycles. Delta Ct (ΔCt) was calculated as the Ct value of the standard Ct minus the Ct value of the sample. Higher ΔCt values indicate more efficient amplification of the mutant. A cutoff value of 2.0 was used to indicate the presence of mutant DNA.

3. Efficacy of EGFR TKI therapy

All patients were treated with EGFR TKI therapy and the response was evaluated, although some were defined as mutation-negative. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of EGFR TKI therapy until confirmed disease progression or death. Based on serial imaging studies, treatment response was classified as follows: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria [20]. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a CR or PR. The size of the pleural effusion was defined as follows: Massive, effusion volume > 75% of the hemithorax; large, effusion volume 50%-75% of the hemithorax; moderate, effusion volume 25%-50% of the hemithorax; and small, effusion volume < 25% of the hemithorax. Pleural effusion responses were evaluated by computed tomography before and after EGFR TKI therapy. Modified pleural effusion response criteria from the Japan Lung Cancer Society were adopted [21-23]: CR was defined as complete disappearance of pleural fluid lasting for at least 4 weeks; PR was defined as a distinguishable decrease (at least a 30% decrease in the volume of pleural effusion) for more than 4 weeks; PD was defined as appreciable progression of effusion (at least a 20% increase in the volume of pleural effusion) or need of drainage within 4 weeks; and SD was defined as failure to meet the above criteria or no change in the amount of pleural effusion, which required no thoracentesis for more than 4 weeks. Effusion response rate was defined as the percentage of patients with a CR or PR.

4. Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chisquare test (except where a small size required the use of Fisher exact test). PFS after EGFR TKI therapy was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided and p-values < 0.05 were defined as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software, ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

5. Ethical statement

The study, including the retrospective use of archival cell blocks of LA-MPEs or tissue for EGFRmutation analysis, was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungbuk National University Hospital.

Written informed consents were obtained; however, the informed consents were waived in patients who died at the time of the study.

Results

1. Patient characteristics

Of the 204 cell blocks of LA-MPEs confirmed by pathologic diagnosis that were screened between March 2010 and August 2016, 40 that were collected before the start of EGFR TKI therapy were analyzed (Fig. 1). Among them, 23 patients had paired surgically resected or biopsy specimens of primary lung adenocarcinoma. The clinical characteristics of the 40 patients are listed in Table 1. The median age was 71 years (range, 42 to 94 years). Twenty-five patients (62.5%) were female and 25 (62.5%) were never-smokers. The patients were grouped according to the size of the pleural effusion: 13 patients (32.5%) had a small effusion, 11 (27.5%) had a moderate effusion, and eight patients (20.0%) each had large and massive effusions. The initial EGFR TKI was administered as a first-line treatment during the course of the disease in 27 (67.5%), as a second-line treatment in 11 (27.5%), and as a third-line or further treatment in two (5.0%). Thirty-four patients (85%) were treated with first generation EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib or erlotinib.

2. EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs and the efficacy of EGFR TKI therapy

The median PFS for patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs was significantly longer than that for patients with wild-type EGFR (7.33 vs. 2.07 months; hazard ratio, 0.486; 95% confidence interval, 0.206 to 1.144; p=0.032) (Fig. 2).

The tumor response to EGFR TKIs among the 36 patients with measurable lesions according to EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs is shown in Table 2. Of the 26 patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPE, 21 (80.8%) showed a PR, one (3.8%) showed SD, and four (15.4%) showed PD. Of the 10 patients with wild-type EGFR in LA-MPEs, one (10.0%) showed a PR, four (40.0%) showed SD, and five (50.0%) showed PD. EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs correlated with the overall tumor response to EGFR TKI therapy (p < 0.001).

The tumor response of target lesions and pleural effusions to EGFR TKIs among the 26 patients with measurable lesions and EGFRmutations in LA-MPEs is shown in Table 3. Tumor response of target lesions showed PR of 88.5%, SD of 3.8%, and PD of 7.7%. Tumor response of pleural effusions showed CR of 15.4%, PR of 46.1%, SD of 11.5%, and PD of 26.5%. Among the 26 patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs, the ORR of the target lesions and LA-MPEs were 88.5% and 61.5%, respectively (p=0.026).

1) EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs and corresponding primary lung adenocarcinomas

EGFRmutations were found in 29/40 LA-MPEs and 19/23 primary lung adenocarcinomas (72.5% vs. 82.6%). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.060) (Table 4). The most frequent mutations observed in LA-MPEs and primary lung adenocarcinomas were a deletion mutation in exon 19 and a point mutation (L858R) in exon 21. EGFR mutations in primary lung adenocarcinomas and LA-MPEs from the same patients are presented on a patient-by-patient basis in Table 5. EGFRmutation status between primary lung adenocarcinomas and corresponding LA-MPEs showed a discordance rate of 26.1% (6 of 23 patients, case Nos. 15-20). Among the six patients, one harbored an EGFR mutation in the LA-MPE but not in the primary lung adenocarcinoma and five with EGFR mutations in the primary lung adenocarcinoma had no mutations in LA-MPEs. Among the 14 patients with EGFR mutations in both primary lung adenocarcinoma and LA-MPEs (case Nos. 1-14), the pleural effusion in six (case Nos. 9-14) showed PD in response to EGFR TKIs. The target lesions including the primary lung tumor showed a PR, whereas the response of the pleural effusion was classified as PD in the four patients with EGFR mutations in both the primary lung adenocarcinoma and LA-MPEs (case Nos. 9-12).

Discussion

Here, we found that EGFR mutation status in cell blocks of LA-MPEs confirmed by pathologic diagnosis is highly predictive of EGFR TKI efficacy. Furthermore, patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and pleural effusions that harbor EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs respond less well to EGFR TKIs than those with solid tumors.

Advances in technologies that have very high sensitivity for detecting mutations in a few tumor cells show that EGFR mutations are detectable in pleural effusion samples [9-19], and that the EGFR mutation status of a pleural effusion is a useful predictor of the clinical outcome for NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs [10,11,14-16,18]. The present study examined only lung adenocarcinoma and cytologically-confirmed MPEs, and analyzed patients that had previously received EGFR TKIs. The results show that the EGFR mutation rate in patients with pleural effusion (78.5%) was higher than reported previously. Although previous studies demonstrate the benefits of using body fluids to detect EGFRmutations, the association between EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs and the efficacy of EGFR TKIs has remained relatively unexplored. However, most previous studies included fewer patients showing a response to EGFR TKIs, or used EGFR mutation tests with high false-negative rates or systemic body fluid samples such as plasma samples [10,11,14-16,18]. Liu et al. [14] analyzed the correlation between the response to EGFR TKIs and EGFR mutation status in 32 cellfree pleural fluid samples using the Amplification Refractory Mutation System method; however, the ORR for patients with wild-type EGFR in pleural fluid was 60%, and false-negative results were still detected. Jian et al. [15] used PCR and Taqman-Minor Groove Binding probes to analyze EGFR mutations in 56 plasma and 32 cell-free pleural effusion samples from NSCLC patients and examined the correlation with responses to gefitinib. Response rates in those with mutant EGFR were significantly higher than in those with wild-type EGFR (90.9% vs. 9.1%, respectively). Here, we selected only cell block samples of LA-MPEs containing cytologically-confirmed adenocarcinoma cells. The EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs was then analyzed using PNA clamping, a method with a sensitivity of 1%. Overall, the tumor response was significantly higher (80.8% vs. 10.0%) and PFS (7.33 months vs. 2.07 months) significantly longer in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR in LA-MPEs, respectively. Although previous studies show that when sensitive genotyping assays are used, cell-free pleural fluid provides the same mutational information as pleural effusion cells [13,19], it is impossible to evaluate precisely whether the tumor-derived DNA was adequately contained since extracted free DNA arises not only from tumor cells but also from necrotic or apoptotic non-tumor cells. Furthermore, the fraction of tumor cells in MPE may be very small, which means that any signal generated by somatic mutations may be easily obscured by the background signal generated by wild-type alleles. Therefore, the sensitivity of mutation detection assay is very critical, and false-negative results would become a major problem if an insensitive assay was used. Therefore, if EGFRmutation testing is to be performed in pleural effusion, we recommend that for MPE containing cytologically-confirmed adenocarcinoma cells, cell pellets rather than cell-free fluid is used, and that sensitive methods such as PNA clamping, rather than insensitive methods, are used.

Previous studies discussed the efficacy of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with pleural effusion [24]; the results reveal that the response rate was only slightly lower than that observed in previous prospective randomized trials, in which treatment duration with gefitinib was considerably shorter. This is consistent with our findings of similar TKI response rates in patients with EGFR-mutated pleural effusion, although they show a shorter PFS than other patients with EGFR mutation examined in previous studies. Our study also examined responses to EGFR TKI therapy according to the EGFRmutation status of LA-MPEs; this was done by examining the response of target lesions and pleural effusions separately. Among patients with EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs, the response rate of the target lesions and pleural effusions was 88.5% and 65.4%, respectively. For patients harboring EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs, responses to EGFR TKIs seem to be worse in pleural effusions than in target lesions. This suggests that lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE may exhibit unique pathophysiology, and that this interferes with EGFR TKI treatment outcome. One hypothesis is that the tissue surrounding the pleural space or physiological third space created by the pleural effusion may be a barrier to effective transport of EGFR TKIs. However, Masago et al. [25] report good penetration of erlotinib into the pleural space, resulting in marked accumulation of erlotinib in MPE upon repeated dosing. MPE is traditionally attributed to occlusion of parietal pleural stromata or obstruction of lymph vessels which is underscored by inflammation, increased angiogenesis and vascular leakage [9]. If obstruction of the pleural fluid flow occurs by destroying the structure of the lymph node in NSCLC patients with MPE, the total volume of pleural fluid may not decrease, even if EGFR TKI therapy is used to kill cancer cells in the pleural fluid. Another hypothesis is that cancer stem cells in the pleural effusion contribute to the high therapeutic failure rates observed in patients with MPE. A recent study proposed that cancer stem cells in the pleural effusion contribute to the metastatic cascade via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), anoikis, and adaptation to the microenvironment, which may explain the high therapeutic failure rates in patients with MPE [26]. By reducing cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions, cancer cells enter the serous cavities where they become detached from the parent tumor and are rendered “homeless.” The floating malignant cells, which are in a state of anoikis in effusions, should succumb to apoptosis and disappear [27]. However, in reality, the opposite occurs because these cells are uniquely capable of proliferating progressively despite the presumably unfavorable microenvironment. The effusions may serve as a reservoir for tumor cells in the pleural cavity, where they can progress through EMT, become invasive again, and establish further metastases, which then function as a dynamic reservoir that can supply the cancer tissue through autocrine and/or paracrine interactions with growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and transforming growth factor β) and other stimuli such as chemokines and cytokines produced mainly by cellular components, including mesothelial cells, some stromal cells, and inflammatory cells [28-30]. MPEs are filled with tumor cells that have the properties of cancer stem cells after interacting with the microenvironment [26]. A growing body of evidence suggests a relationship between EMT, the emergence of cancer stem cells, and drug resistance [30].

The present study has some limitations. First, this study retrospectively analyzed only patients previously exposed to EGFR TKIs to confirm the association between EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs and efficacy of EGFR TKI therapy; therefore, it is not possible to present the overall EGFR mutation rate in pleural effusion in patients with LA-MPE. Second, we did not analyze the follow-up cytology of LA-MPEs to evaluate negative cytologic findings after EGFR TKI therapy. There are no standard criteria for evaluating the effusion response to treatment in patients with MPEs. Similar to our study, most investigations have attempted to evaluate patients by correlating the treatment response with traditional solid tumor responses without looking at cytologic findings [22,23]. However, according to the response criteria of the Japan Lung Cancer Society, changes in the volume of pleural effusion alone should not be used to assess responses since they do not truly reflect alterations in tumor burden; also, negative cytologic findings are also important for defining the response [21]. Third, therapeutic thoracentesis, chest tube drainage, and intrapleural administration of sclerosing agents or anticancer agents may influence the prediction of response to pleural effusion. In this study, 30 patients (75%) underwent more than 2 times (more than 1 L/time) of therapeutic thoracentesis or chest tube drainage before tumor response evaluation. The pleural effusion response was lower than the solid tumor response, despite the possibility of being measured accurately by these additional procedures. Finally, we could not analyze the mechanism underlying poor responses of MPE to EGFR TKIs because serial sampling of pleural effusion or analysis of molecular biomarkers unique to the pathophysiology of LA-MPE were not performed.

EGFR mutation status in LA-MPEs is highly predictive of the efficacy of EGFR TKI therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Pleural effusions in patients harboring EGFR mutations in LA-MPEs do not respond to EGFR TKIs as well as solid tumors. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the poor response of pleural effusion to EGFR TKIs and to develop new strategies that extend the benefits of EGFR TKIs and subsequent treatments in patients with LA-MPEs.

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the research grant of the Chungbuk National University Hospital in 2016.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram. MPE, malignant pleural effusion; EGFR TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Fig. 2.

Progression-free survival according to EGFR mutation status in cell blocks of malignant pleural effusion. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; WT, wildtype; MT, mutant-type; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic	No. of patients (n=40)
Age at diagnosis (yr)
Median	71 (42-94)
Sex
Male	15 (37.5)
Female	25 (62.5)
ECOG performance status
0	3 (7.5)
1	36 (90.0)
2	1 (2.5)
Smoking history
Never smoker	25 (62.5)
Former and current smoker	11 (27.5)
Unknown	4 (10.0)
Size of the pleural effusion
Small	13 (32.5)
Moderate	11 (27.5)
Large	8 (20.0)
Massive	8 (20.0)
EGFR TKI therapy
1st line	27 (67.5)
2nd line	11 (27.5)
≥ 3rd line	2 (5.0)
Generation EGFR TKI
1st	34 (85.0)
2nd	4 (10.0)
3rd	2 (5.0)

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Table 2.

Tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Response	Total (n=36)	EGFR mutation status of LA-MPEs
Response	Total (n=36)	EGFR MT (n=26)	EGFR WT (n=10)	p-value
Best overall response
PR	22 (61.1)	21 (80.8)	1 (10.0)	< 0.001
SD	5 (13.9)	1 (3.8)	4 (40.0)
PD	9 (25.0)	4 (15.4)	5 (50.0)

Values are presented as number (%). EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; MT, mutant type; WT, wild type; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.

Table 3.

Comparison of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors between target lesions and pleural effusions in patients with EGFR MT-MPE

	EGFR MT in LA-MPE (n=26)		p-value
	Target lesions	Pleural effusion	p-value
Best overall response
CR	0	4 (15.4)	0.007
PR	23 (88.5)	12 (46.2)
SD	1 (3.8)	3 (11.5)
PD	2 (7.7)	7 (26.9)
Objective response	23 (88.5)	16 (61.5)	0.026

Values are presented as number (%). EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MPE, malignant pleural effusion; MT, mutant type; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.

Table 4.

EGFR mutation status in malignant pleural effusion and primary lung adenocarcinoma

	EGFR mutation status of LA-MPEs (n=40)	EGFR mutation status of primary lung adenocarcinoma (n=23)	p-value
EGFR mutation status
EGFR WT	11 (27.5)	4 (17.4)	0.060
EGFR MT	29 (72.5)	19 (82.6)
Exon 19 deletion	17 (58.6)	12 (63.2)
Exon 21 L858R	9 (31.0)	5 (26.3)
Exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R	2 (6.9)	2 (10.5)
Exon 21 L861R	1 (3.4)	0

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; WT, wild type; MT, mutant type.

Table 5.

Comparison of EGFR mutation status among patients with malignant pleural effusions and primary lung adenocarcinomas

Case	Patient characteristic			EGFR mutation status		Response
Case	Sex	Age (yr)	Smoking	Primary lung adenocarcinoma	LA-MPEs	Target lesions	Pleural effusion
1	F	71	Never	L858R	L858R	PR	CR
2	M	42	Current	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
3	M	81	Former	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
4	F	59	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
5	F	77	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
6	M	81	Current	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	No	PR
7	F	52	Never	L858R	Exon 19 del/L858R	PR	SD
8	F	46	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	No	SD
9	F	66	Never	L858R	L858R	PR	PD
10	M	87	Former	Exon 19 del/L858R	L858R	PR	PD
11	M	82	Former	Exon 19 del/L858R	Exon 19 del	PR	PD
12	M	58	Former	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PD
13	F	68	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	SD	PD
14	F	68	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PD	PD
15	M	62	Former	WT	Exon 19 del/L858R	PR	PD
16	F	62	Current	L858R	WT	SD	PR
17	F	72	Never	Exon 19 del	WT	PD	PD
18	M	71	Former	Exon 19 del	WT	SD	SD
19	F	94	Never	L858R	WT	SD	PD
20	M	62	Never	L858R	WT	SD	PD
21	M	71	Former	WT	WT	SD	PD
22	F	81	Never	WT	WT	No	PR
23	M	71	Current	WT	WT	PD	PD

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; PR, partial response; CR, complete response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; WT, wild type.

REFERENCES

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. Article PubMed
2. Spiro SG, Silvestri GA. One hundred years of lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:523–9. Article PubMed
3. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–6. Article PubMed
4. Tan DS, Yom SS, Tsao MS, Pass HI, Kelly K, Peled N, et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer consensus statement on optimizing management of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: status in 2016. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:946–63. Article PubMed
5. Lee DH, Srimuninnimit V, Cheng R, Wang X, Orlando M. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in the treatment of non-small sell lung cancer: lessons learned. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:549–54. Article PubMed PMC PDF
6. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of nonsmall-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–39. Article PubMed
7. Do H, Krypuy M, Mitchell PL, Fox SB, Dobrovic A. High resolution melting analysis for rapid and sensitive EGFR and KRAS mutation detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:142.Article PubMed PMC PDF
8. Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii32–40. Article PubMed
9. Froudarakis ME. Pleural effusion in lung cancer: more questions than answers. Respiration. 2012;83:367–76. Article PubMed
10. Soh J, Toyooka S, Aoe K, Asano H, Ichihara S, Katayama H, et al. Usefulness of EGFR mutation screening in pleural fluid to predict the clinical outcome of gefitinib treated patients with lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2353–8. Article PubMed
11. Kimura H, Fujiwara Y, Sone T, Kunitoh H, Tamura T, Kasahara K, et al. EGFR mutation status in tumour-derived DNA from pleural effusion fluid is a practical basis for predicting
13. Zhang X, Zhao Y, Wang M, Yap WS, Chang AY. Detection and comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in cells and fluid of malignant pleural effusion in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;60:175–82. Article PubMed
14. Liu Y, Liu B, Li XY, Li JJ, Qin HF, Tang CH, et al. A comparison of ARMS and direct sequencing for EGFR mutation analysis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment prediction in body fluid samples of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:111.Article PubMed PMC
15. Jian G, Songwen Z, Ling Z, Qinfang D, Jie Z, Liang T, et al. Prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the plasma/pleural effusion to efficacy of gefitinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:1341–7. Article PubMed
16. Han HS, Eom DW, Kim JH, Kim KH, Shin HM, An JY, et al. EGFR mutation status in primary lung adenocarcinomas and corresponding metastatic lesions: discordance in pleural metastases. Clin Lung Cancer. 2011;12:380–6. Article PubMed
17. Han HS, Lim SN, An JY, Lee KM, Choe KH, Lee KH, et al. Detection of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma specimens with different proportions of tumor cells using two methods of differential sensitivity. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:355–64. Article PubMed
18. Yeo CD, Kim JW, Kim KH, Ha JH, Rhee CK, Kim SJ, et al. Detection and comparison of EGFR mutations in matched tumor tissues, cell blocks, pleural effusions, and sera from patients with NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion, by PNA clamping and direct sequencing. Lung Cancer. 2013;81:207–12. Article PubMed
19. Liu D, Lu Y, Hu Z, Wu N, Nie X, Xia Y, et al. Malignant pleural effusion supernatants are substitutes for metastatic pleural tumor tissues in EGFR mutation test in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89946Article PubMed PMC
20. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. Article PubMed
21. Japan Lung Cancer Society. Classification of lung cancer. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 2000. p. 49–52.
22. Masago K, Fujimoto D, Fujita S, Hata A, Kaji R, Ohtsuka K, et al. Response to bevacizumab combination chemotherapy of malignant pleural effusions associated with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3:415–9. Article PubMed PMC
23. Fujita A, Takabatake H, Tagaki S, Sekine K. Combination chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural effusions from non-small cell lung cancer : cisplatin, ifosfamide, and irinotecan with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Chest. 2001;119:340–3. Article PubMed
24. Wang TF, Chu SC, Lee JJ, Yang GG, Huang WH, Chang ET, et al. Presence of pleural effusion is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with epidermal growth factor receptormutated lung cancer receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13:304–13. Article PubMed
25. Masago K, Togashi Y, Fukudo M, Terada T, Irisa K, Sakamori Y, et al. Plasma and pleural fluid pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI-420 in patients with non-smallcell lung cancer with pleural effusion. Clin Lung Cancer. 2011;12:307–12. Article PubMed
26. Chen SF, Lin YS, Jao SW, Chang YC, Liu CL, Lin YJ, et al. Pulmonary adenocarcinoma in malignant pleural effusion enriches cancer stem cell properties during metastatic cascade. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54659Article PubMed PMC
27. Liotta LA, Kohn E. Anoikis: cancer and the homeless cell. Nature. 2004;430:973–4. Article PubMed
28. Cheng D, Lee YC, Rogers JT, Perkett EA, Moyers JP, Rodriguez RM, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor level correlates with transforming growth factor-beta isoform levels in pleural effusions. Chest. 2000;118:1747–53. Article PubMed
29. Sikora JJ, Dworacki GT, Kaczmarek MT, Jenek RE, Zeromski JO. Immunosuppressive mechanisms in the microenvironment of malignant pleural effusions. Cancer Detect Prev. 2004;28:325–30. Article PubMed
30. Singh A, Settleman J. EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:4741–51. Article PubMed PMC PDF

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cancer‐associated fibroblast‐derived colony‐stimulating factor 2 confers acquired osimertinib resistance in lung adenocarcinoma via promoting ribosome biosynthesis
Yutang Huang, Xiaoqing Wang, Chunjie Wen, Jingchan Wang, Honghao Zhou, Lanxiang Wu
MedComm.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies on removal of indwelling pleural catheters in non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions
Melissa Wang, Kaitlin Sparrow, Chrystal Chan, Ashley Gillson, Daniel Stollery, Pen Li
Respiratory Medicine.2023; 206: 107093. CrossRef
Malignant pleural effusion diagnosis and therapy
Liangliang Yang, Yue Wang
Open Life Sciences.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Failure pattern and radiotherapy exploration in malignant pleural effusion non-small cell lung cancer treated with targeted therapy
Qingsong Li, Cheng Hu, Shengfa Su, Zhu Ma, Yichao Geng, Yinxiang Hu, Huiqin Li, Bing Lu
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in non‐small‐cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion treated with targeted therapy: Propensity score matching study
Qingsong Li, Cheng Hu, Shengfa Su, Zhu Ma, Yichao Geng, Yinxiang Hu, Haijie Jin, Huiqin Li, Bing Lu
Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(14): 14949. CrossRef
EGFR Mutation is a Prognostic Factor in Lung Cancer Patients with Pleural Dissemination Detected During or After Surgery
Toshiya Fujiwara, Kazuhiko Shien, Motoki Matsuura, Junichi Soh, Hiromasa Yamamoto, Soshi Takao, Yuho Maki, Tsuyoshi Ueno, Ryujiro Sugimoto, Ken Suzawa, Mikio Okazaki, Hiroyuki Tao, Makio Hayama, Masafumi Kataoka, Yoshifumi Sano, Hidetoshi Inokawa, Motohir
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(11): 6697. CrossRef
Efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for initially diagnosed lung cancer with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion
Zihui Li, Jie Deng, Fei Yan, Li Liu, Yanling Ma, Jianhai Sun
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Establishment of prognostic nomograms for predicting the progression free survival of EGFR‐sensitizing mutation, advanced lung cancer patients treated with EGFR‐TKIs
Xinyang Du, Hua Bai, Zhijie Wang, Jianchun Daun, Zheng Liu, Jiachen Xu, Geyun Chang, Yixiang Zhu, Jie Wang
Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(9): 1289. CrossRef
Clinical features and prognosis according to genomic mutations in primary and metastatic lesions of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
Wei Zhang, Wenjuan Han, Bo Yu, Xin Zhao, Gaojun Lu, Wendy Wu, Yi Zhang
Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(11): 1642. CrossRef
Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: Where Are We Now?
Julien Guinde, Hervé Dutau, Philippe Astoul
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.2022; 43(04): 559. CrossRef
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Malignant Pleural Effusion May Require Primary Tumor Radiotherapy in Addition to Drug Treatment
Qingsong Li, Cheng Hu, Shengfa Su, Zhu Ma, Yichao Geng, Yinxiang Hu, Huiqin Li, Bing Lu
Cancer Management and Research.2022; Volume 14: 3347. CrossRef
The impact of smoking status on the progression‐free survival of non‐small cell lung cancer patients receiving molecularly target therapy or immunotherapy versus chemotherapy: A meta‐analysis
Xinyi Li, Cong Huang, Xiaohui Xie, Ziyang Wu, Xia Tian, Yibo Wu, Xin Du, Luwen Shi
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2021; 46(2): 256. CrossRef
Risk Factors for and Time to Recurrence of Symptomatic Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR or ALK Mutations
Audra J. Schwalk, David E. Ost, Sahara N. Saltijeral, Henriette De La Garza, Roberto F. Casal, Carlos A. Jimenez, Georgie A. Eapen, Jeff Lewis, Waree Rinsurongkawong, Vadeerat Rinsurongkawong, Jack Lee, Yasir Elamin, Jianjun Zhang, Jack A. Roth, Stephen S
Chest.2021; 159(3): 1256. CrossRef
Advances in pleural infection and malignancy
Eihab O. Bedawi, Julien Guinde, Najiib M. Rahman, Philippe Astoul
European Respiratory Review.2021; 30(159): 200002. CrossRef
Diving into the Pleural Fluid: Liquid Biopsy for Metastatic Malignant Pleural Effusions
Maria Alba Sorolla, Anabel Sorolla, Eva Parisi, Antonieta Salud, José M. Porcel
Cancers.2021; 13(11): 2798. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Outcomes of Metastatic Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Tetsuo Tani, Ichiro Nakachi, Shinnosuke Ikemura, Shigenari Nukaga, Keiko Ohgino, Aoi Kuroda, Hideki Terai, Keita Masuzawa, Taro Shinozaki, Kota Ishioka, Yohei Funatsu, Hidefumi Koh, Koichi Fukunaga, Kenzo Soejima
Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 7497. CrossRef
LENT Score: Predicting the Survival of Malignant Pleural Effusion – A Prospective Study of Three Years
Sara Raimundo, Ana Isabel Loureiro, Fortunato Vieira, Ana Fernandes
Archivos de Bronconeumología.2020; 56(7): 465. CrossRef
Current applications of molecular testing on body cavity fluids
Daniel Pinto, Fernando Schmitt
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2020; 48(9): 840. CrossRef
Gene Alterations in Paired Supernatants and Precipitates from Malignant Pleural Effusions of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Jianqiang Li, Xingliang Li, Wenxian Wang, Yang Shao, Yiping Zhang, Zhengbo Song
Translational Oncology.2020; 13(8): 100784. CrossRef
Progression of malignant pleural effusion during the early stage of gefitinib treatment in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma involving complex driver gene mutations
Ning Liu, Min Yu, Tao Yin, Yong Jiang, Xuelian Liao, Jie Tang, Yanying Li, Diyuan Qin, Dan Li, Yongsheng Wang
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
LENT Score: Predicting the Survival of Malignant Pleural Effusion – A Prospective Study of Three Years
Sara Raimundo, Ana Isabel Loureiro, Fortunato Vieira, Ana Fernandes
Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition).2020; 56(7): 465. CrossRef
Recent Developments in the Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions: a Narrative Review
Clifford E. Coile, Jessie G. Harvey, Michal Senitko
Current Pulmonology Reports.2020; 9(4): 164. CrossRef
Detecting EGFR mutations and ALK/ROS1 rearrangements in non‐small cell lung cancer using malignant pleural effusion samples
Yi Yao, Min Peng, Qinglin Shen, Qinyong Hu, Hongyun Gong, Qingqing Li, Zhongliang Zheng, Bin Xu, Yingge Li, Yi Dong
Thoracic Cancer.2019; 10(2): 193. CrossRef
Making cold malignant pleural effusions hot: driving novel immunotherapies
Pranav Murthy, Chigozirim N. Ekeke, Kira L. Russell, Samuel C. Butler, Yue Wang, James D. Luketich, Adam C. Soloff, Rajeev Dhupar, Michael T. Lotze
OncoImmunology.2019; 8(4): e1554969. CrossRef
Novel insights into the systemic treatment of lung cancer malignant pleural effusion
Claire Tissot, Pierre Gay, Clément Brun, Marios E. Froudarakis
The Clinical Respiratory Journal.2019; 13(3): 131. CrossRef
Proceedings of the American Society of Cytopathology companion session at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual meeting, part 2: effusion cytology with focus on theranostics and diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma
Momin T. Siddiqui, Fernando Schmitt, Andrew Churg
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.2019; 8(6): 352. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma-Associated Malignant Pleural Effusion and Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):908-916. Published online September 19, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.378

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
NOTES
REFERENCES

EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma-Associated Malignant Pleural Effusion and Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Fig. 1. Flow diagram. MPE, malignant pleural effusion; EGFR TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Fig. 2. Progression-free survival according to EGFR mutation status in cell blocks of malignant pleural effusion. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; WT, wildtype; MT, mutant-type; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

EGFR Mutation Status in Lung Adenocarcinoma-Associated Malignant Pleural Effusion and Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Characteristic	No. of patients (n=40)
Age at diagnosis (yr)
Median	71 (42-94)
Sex
Male	15 (37.5)
Female	25 (62.5)
ECOG performance status
0	3 (7.5)
1	36 (90.0)
2	1 (2.5)
Smoking history
Never smoker	25 (62.5)
Former and current smoker	11 (27.5)
Unknown	4 (10.0)
Size of the pleural effusion
Small	13 (32.5)
Moderate	11 (27.5)
Large	8 (20.0)
Massive	8 (20.0)
EGFR TKI therapy
1st line	27 (67.5)
2nd line	11 (27.5)
≥ 3rd line	2 (5.0)
Generation EGFR TKI
1st	34 (85.0)
2nd	4 (10.0)
3rd	2 (5.0)

Response	Total (n=36)	EGFR mutation status of LA-MPEs
Response	Total (n=36)	EGFR MT (n=26)	EGFR WT (n=10)	p-value
Best overall response
PR	22 (61.1)	21 (80.8)	1 (10.0)	< 0.001
SD	5 (13.9)	1 (3.8)	4 (40.0)
PD	9 (25.0)	4 (15.4)	5 (50.0)

	EGFR MT in LA-MPE (n=26)		p-value
	Target lesions	Pleural effusion	p-value
Best overall response
CR	0	4 (15.4)	0.007
PR	23 (88.5)	12 (46.2)
SD	1 (3.8)	3 (11.5)
PD	2 (7.7)	7 (26.9)
Objective response	23 (88.5)	16 (61.5)	0.026

	EGFR mutation status of LA-MPEs (n=40)	EGFR mutation status of primary lung adenocarcinoma (n=23)	p-value
EGFR mutation status
EGFR WT	11 (27.5)	4 (17.4)	0.060
EGFR MT	29 (72.5)	19 (82.6)
Exon 19 deletion	17 (58.6)	12 (63.2)
Exon 21 L858R	9 (31.0)	5 (26.3)
Exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R	2 (6.9)	2 (10.5)
Exon 21 L861R	1 (3.4)	0

Case	Patient characteristic			EGFR mutation status		Response
Case	Sex	Age (yr)	Smoking	Primary lung adenocarcinoma	LA-MPEs	Target lesions	Pleural effusion
1	F	71	Never	L858R	L858R	PR	CR
2	M	42	Current	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
3	M	81	Former	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
4	F	59	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
5	F	77	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PR
6	M	81	Current	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	No	PR
7	F	52	Never	L858R	Exon 19 del/L858R	PR	SD
8	F	46	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	No	SD
9	F	66	Never	L858R	L858R	PR	PD
10	M	87	Former	Exon 19 del/L858R	L858R	PR	PD
11	M	82	Former	Exon 19 del/L858R	Exon 19 del	PR	PD
12	M	58	Former	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PR	PD
13	F	68	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	SD	PD
14	F	68	Never	Exon 19 del	Exon 19 del	PD	PD
15	M	62	Former	WT	Exon 19 del/L858R	PR	PD
16	F	62	Current	L858R	WT	SD	PR
17	F	72	Never	Exon 19 del	WT	PD	PD
18	M	71	Former	Exon 19 del	WT	SD	SD
19	F	94	Never	L858R	WT	SD	PD
20	M	62	Never	L858R	WT	SD	PD
21	M	71	Former	WT	WT	SD	PD
22	F	81	Never	WT	WT	No	PR
23	M	71	Current	WT	WT	PD	PD

Table 1. Patient characteristics

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Table 2. Tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Values are presented as number (%). EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; MT, mutant type; WT, wild type; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.

Table 3. Comparison of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors between target lesions and pleural effusions in patients with EGFR MT-MPE

Values are presented as number (%). EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MPE, malignant pleural effusion; MT, mutant type; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.

Table 4. EGFR mutation status in malignant pleural effusion and primary lung adenocarcinoma

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; WT, wild type; MT, mutant type.

Table 5. Comparison of EGFR mutation status among patients with malignant pleural effusions and primary lung adenocarcinomas

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; LA-MPE, lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion; PR, partial response; CR, complete response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; WT, wild type.