Which Patients with Isolated Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Will Truly Benefit from Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Colon Cancer?

Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim

doi:10.4143/crt.2017.100

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 50(3); 2018 > Article

Original Article Which Patients with Isolated Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Will Truly Benefit from Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Colon Cancer?: Sung Uk Bae, MD, MS^1,2, Hyuk Hur, MD, PhD², Byung Soh Min, MD, PhD², Seung Hyuk Baik, MD, PhD², Kang Young Lee, MD, PhD², Nam Kyu Kim, MD, PhD, FACS^2,; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2018;50(3):712-719.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.100
Published online: July 14, 2017

¹Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea

²Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Nam Kyu Kim, MD, PhD, FACS Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: 82-2-2228-2117 Fax: 82-2-313-8289 E-mail: namkyuk@yuhs.ac

*This study was presented at the 42th Annual Meeting of the Korean Cancer Association, June 16-17, 2016, Seoul, Korea.

• Received: February 24, 2017 • Accepted: July 6, 2017

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

16,067 Views
329 Download
25 Web of Science
25 Crossref
27 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The prognosis of patientswith colon cancer and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) is poor. We analyzed the prognostic factors of extramesenteric lymphadenectomy for colon cancer patients with isolated PALNM.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with PALNM who underwent curative resection between October 1988 and December 2009.
Results
In univariate analyses, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were higher in patients with ≤ 7 positive para-aortic lymph node (PALN) (36.5% and 27.5%) than in those with > 7 PALN (14.3% and 14.3%; p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 was also correlated with a lower 5-year OS and DFS rate of 21.5% and 11.7% compared with those with CEA ≤ 5 (46.3% and 41.4%; p=0.122 and 0.039, respectively). Multivariate analysis found that the number of positive PALN (hazard ratio [HR], 3.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.309 to 8.275; p=0.011) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and the number of positive PALN (HR, 2.484; 95% CI, 0.993 to 6.211; p=0.052) and preoperative CEA level (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 0.940 to 4.057; p=0.073) were marginally independent prognostic factors for DFS. According to our prognostic model, the 5-year OS and DFS rate increased to 59.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and CEA level ≤ 5.
Conclusion
PALN dissection might be beneficial in carefully selected patients with a low CEA level and less extensive PALNM.
Key words: Colonic neoplasms, Lymph nodes, Lymph node excision, Lymphatic metastasis

Introduction

Isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis (PALNM) occurs in up to 2% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and is regarded as a poor prognostic factor [1,2]. Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system classifies CRC with metastasis to PALNs as M1 disease, the clinical characteristics of it have not been comprehensively elucidated and there is no consensus on the treatment strategy for isolated PALNM in CRC [3].

The complete response rate in colon cancer patients with PALNM remains low despite newly developed chemotherapeutic agents and it is difficult to control the progression of disease without surgical intervention [1]. In CRC patients with hepatic or pulmonary metastases, aggressive hepatic or lung resection has become a standard strategy when R0 resection can be achieved. However, the role of PALN dissection (PALND) has not been established due to its low incidence, postoperative morbidity, and advances in the field of chemotherapy.

Previously, we reported that the oncologic outcomes of colon cancer with isolated PALNM were comparable with outcomes of metastatectomy for liver metastasis and suggested that upfront primary tumor resection with extended lymphadenectomy may be justified in selected patients [4]. However, only a few patients have any benefit from extensive dissection and the key factors in subsets of patients with PALNM that may experience oncologic benefits from PALND remain unknown.

The description of prognostic factors for pathological PALNM allows the identification of patients who may benefit from PALND while sparing other patients from the morbidity of extensive lymphadenectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors and to develop a prognostic model of extraregional lymphadenectomy for colon cancer with isolated PALNM.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients

From our prospectively collected database, a total of 1,082 patients who underwent curative surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma with pathological lymph node metastasis at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, were included. With the following exclusion criteria, 49 patients who received a pathologic diagnosis of isolated synchronous PALNM were included in this study: (1) distant metastases other than to PALNM, (2) lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, and (3) nodal metastasis above the renal vessels. Clinicopathologic data including age, sex, body mass index, location of tumor, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), postoperative chemotherapy, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, tumor differentiation, the numbers of total and positive PALN, and survival data were obtained.

2. Preoperative staging and treatment

Preoperative staging evaluation was performed using chest X-ray and abdominal and chest computed tomography (CT) scan. For PALNM diagnosis, abdominal CT scan was mainly used and positron emission tomogram (PET) was performed in selected cases where the diagnosis of PALNM by CT was uncertain. We considered a PALN to be radiologically positive if a lymph node at the region between the left renal vein and the bilateral common iliac vessels was 0.5 cm at the short-axis diameter, with spiculated borders or showing a mottled heterogenic pattern according to the preoperative abdominal CT scan or had fludeoxyglucose uptake on PET-CT. In addition to the standard extent of lymph node dissection, all lymphovascular tissues along the aortocaval area between the left renal vein and the bilateral common iliac vessels were removed in patients with advanced colon cancer with radiologically suspected metastatic PALN. Postoperative chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen or oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil [FOLFOX]) was administered 3-4 weeks after surgery for 6 months.

3. Evaluation parameters and statistical analyses

The classification system of the AJCC sixth edition was used to determine pathological tumor depth (pT), the number of metastasized lymph nodes (pN), and cancer stage. PALN was defined as the presence of involved lymph nodes in the region between the bilateral common iliac vessels and left renal vein. All patients received postoperative clinical examinations, measurement of serum CEA levels, and chest X-rays every 3 months, and a chest/abdominal CT every 6 months over a period of 3 years. After 3 years, the follow-up interval was changed to 6 months. Recurrence was defined as the presence of a histologically and/or radiologically confirmed tumor. Overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of the latest follow-up visit or the date of death due to any cause, and disease-free survival (DFS) time was defined as the time from surgery to any type of recurrence. Patients who died from other causes or were alive without progression or recurrence at the most recent follow-up were treated as censored in the analysis of DFS time. Five-year survival rate was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival rates among subgroups. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis and independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Age (≤ 60 or > 60 years), sex (female or male), tumor depth (T1, T2 or T3, T4), number of positive PALNs (≤ 7 or > 7), and preoperative CEA level (≤ 5 or > 5) were included as covariates. The results of the Cox model analysis are reported using HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Data are expressed as means with standard deviation. p-values of less than 0.05 were defined to indicate a statistically significant difference.

4. Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital (IRB No. 2017-2432-001) and performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent was waived.

Results

1. Patient characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the 49 patients with pathologically positive PALN who underwent PALND for colonic cancer. The mean age was 57.5±11.5 years; 20 patients (40.8%) were women and 29 (59.2%) men. Body mass index was 23.7±2.8. One tumor (2.0%) was located in the cecum, five (10.2%) in the ascending colon, five (10.2%) in the descending colon, and 38 (77.6%) in the sigmoid colon. The mean CEA level before the operation was 23.7±37.4 ng/mL and the CEA level measured 7 days after curative resection was 7.4±13.0 ng/mL. Of the total 49 patients, 47 (95.9%) received chemotherapy after curative resection.

2. Pathologic outcomes

Pathologic characteristics of the tumors are summarized in Table 1. There was one T2 tumor (2.0%), 43 T3 tumors (87.8%), and five T4 tumors (10.1%). The moderately differentiated type (69.4%) was the most common histological type, followed by poorly differentiated (12.2%), mucinous (10.2%), and well differentiated (8.2%). The mean numbers of total and positive lymph nodes were 38.2±22.0 and 15.6±15.1, respectively. The mean numbers of total harvested and metastatic PALNs were 6.9±5.2 and 3.9±4.0, respectively.

3. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses of prognostic factors

The median survival time was 37 months (range, 6 to 169 months). Five-year OS and DFS rates were 33.9% and 26.5%, respectively. Table 2 summarizes the univariate analysis. Univariate analyses revealed that the number of positive PALN and the preoperative CEA level were significantly associated with OS and DFS (Table 2). Fig. 1 describes patient survival according to the number of positive PALN and preoperative CEA level. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were higher in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN (36.5% and 27.5%) than in those with > 7 PALN (14.3% and 14.3%; p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively) (Fig. 1A and B). Preoperative CEA level > 5 also adversely affected patient prognosis, with a lower 5-year OS and DFS rate at 21.5% and 11.7% observed in patients with CEA level > 5 compared to those with CEA level ≤ 5 (collectively at 46.3% and 41.4%, p=0.122 and p=0.039) (Fig. 1C and D). Multivariate analysis showed the number of positive PALN (HR, 3.291; 95% CI, 1.309 to 8.275; p=0.011) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and the number of positive PALN (HR, 2.484; 95% CI, 0.993 to 6.211; p=0.052) and preoperative CEA level (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 0.940 to 4.057; p=0.073) as marginally independent prognostic factors for DFS (Table 3). According to our prognostic model with two prognostic factors, the 5-year OS and DFS rate increased to 59.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and a CEA level ≤ 5 (Fig. 1E and F). The 5-year OS and DFS rates of patients with CEA level ≤ 5 and > 7 positive PALN or CEA level > 5 and ≤ 7 positive PALN were 24.9% and 13.2%, respectively. The 5-year OS and DFS rates of patients with CEA level > 5 and > 7 positive PALN were 0% and 0%, respectively.

Discussion

In the context of hepatic metastasis in colorectal cancer, upfront primary tumor resection with metastasectomy is recommended in surgically amenable metastasis (lesions ≤ 4, absence of bilobar metastasis, and radiologically negative periportal lymph nodes) [5]. In the current prognostic analyses of 49 colon cancer patients with pathological PALNM who underwent extraregional lymphadenectomy, our results show that PALND may be justified in highly selected patients. We have found that an elevated preoperative CEA level and a greater number of positive PALN indicates a poor survival outcome and the subgroup of patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and a CEA level ≤ 5 might still benefit from surgery. Thus, systematic PALND should be considered as a treatment option in those patients.

Ogura et al. [6] attempted to establish a prognostic model for visible PALNM with CRC and reported that lymphovascular invasion, nodal status, elevated preoperative CEA level, and visible PALNs ≥ 10 mm were independent prognostic factors for patients with visible PALNs, although that model could not predict pathologic PALNM. Choi et al. [1] observed that the presence of two or fewer PALN metastases was a good indication for PALND in 24 CRC patients with isolated PALNM based on their univariate analysis; however, there were no data regarding pathologic PALNM and no significant prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis. In our study, we tried to develop a prognostic model using multivariate analysis for pathologically identified PALNM after extensive lymphadenectomy in colon cancer.

Preoperative serum levels of the tumor marker CEA, which represent serum tumor burden, are of prognostic significance. CEA levels ≥ 5.0 ng/mL have an adverse effect on survival that is independent of tumor stage [7-9]. Hokuto et al. [10] reported that a serum CEA level of ≥ 20 ng/mL was one of the prognostic factors for DFS in patients with ≥ 4 colorectal liver metastases and a systematic review assessing prognostic factors for patients undergoing lung metastasectomy showed that a prethoracotomy associated elevation in CEA level was associated with poor survival [11]. In this study, elevated preoperative CEA level was identified to be an independent risk predictor for oncologic outcomes, which is consistent with the prior results in the literature.

Lymph node involvement is one of the strongest predictors of outcome following surgical resection of CRC [12-16]. Moreover, we found that the long-term oncologic outcomes were significantly better in the regional lymph node metastasis group than in the PALNM group, which means that the location of the metastatic lymph node also matters [4]. In the present study, the 5-year survival rate was poor in patients with a large number of positive PALN, which was identified as an independent prognostic factor after PALND. Thus, PALND should be considered as a treatment option in patients with a relatively smaller number of infiltrated lymph nodes.

The availability of increasingly effective systemic chemotherapy has prompted interest in preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IV CRC [17]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might play a role in evaluating the natural history of metastatic disease, which then enables the surgeon to decide whether to proceed with surgery or to continue palliative chemotherapy in cases of CRC with PALNM. An expert review further emphasized the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the selection of candidates for PALND because tumor regression after treatment may imply a favorable biology, thereby selecting for patients more likely to benefit from PALND [18]. Currently, we have discussed treatment plans based on a multidisciplinary approach for these patients and most of them were recommended to receive upfront systemic chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for both the primary tumor and extraregional lymph nodes (PALN).

A multimodality approach including perioperative chemotherapy may be needed to improve survival of patients with colon cancer with isolated PALNM and the treatment strategy should be individualized according to the characteristics of the disease. Our results suggest that upfront primary tumor resection with extended lymphadenectomy may be justified in patients with low CEA levels and less extensive PALNM, based on our prognostic model (Fig. 2). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be an initial targeted treatment for colon cancer with an elevated CEA level or extensive PALNM. Primary tumor resection with or without PALND should be performed after neoadjuvant treatment based on tumor response. Treatment of progressive disease with elevated CEA level and extensive PALNM even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be converted to palliative chemotherapy with other additional treatments such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, tomotherapy, and robotic linear accelerators.

There are several limitations to this study, including a single institutional experience, the small sample size due to the rarity of this metastatic pattern, and its retrospective analysis. In addition, new biologic chemotherapeutic regimens were not used in most of the patients, and therefore, we could not analyze the prognostic factors after neoadjuvant treatment.

PALND might be beneficial in carefully selected patients with low CEA levels and less extensive PALNM.

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2014R1A5A2010008).

This work was supported by the Student’s Association of the Graduate School of Yonsei University funded by the Graduate School of Yonsei University.

Fig. 1.

(A) Five-year overall survival (OS) of patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) according to the number of positive para-aortic lymph node (PALN). (B) Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) according to the number of positive PALN. (C) Five-year OS according to the preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. (D) Five-year DFS according to the preoperative CEA level. (E) Five-year OS according to the prognostic model. (F) Five-year DFS according to the prognostic model.

Fig. 2.

Suggested treatment strategy for colon cancer with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis. PALNM, para-aortic lymph node metastasis; PTR, primary tumor resection; PALND, para-aortic lymph node dissection; CTX, chemotherapy.

Table 1.

Characteristics of colon cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=49)
Sex
Male	29 (59.2)
Female	20 (40.8)
Age, mean±SD (yr)	57.5±11.5
Body mass index, mean±SD (kg/m²)	23.7±2.8
Location of tumor
Cecum	1 (2.0)
Ascending colon	5 (10.2)
Descending colon	5 (10.2)
Sigmoid colon	38 (77.6)
Preoperative CEA, mean±SD (ng/mL)	23.7±37.4
POD 7 CEA, mean±SD (ng/mL)	7.4±13.0
Adjuvant chemotherapy	47 (95.9)
Tumor stage
T2	1 (2.0)
T3	43 (87.8)
T4	5 (10.2)
Histology
Well differentiated	4 (8.2)
Moderately differentiated	34 (69.4)
Poorly differentiated	6 (12.2)
Mucinous	5 (10.2)
Total retrieved LNs, mean±SD	38.2±22.0
Positive retrieved LNs, mean±SD	15.6±15.1
Total para-aortic LNs, mean±SD	6.9±5.2
Positive para-aortic LNs, mean±SD	3.9±4.0

SD, standard deviation; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; POD, postoperative day; LN, lymph node.

Table 2.

Prognostic factors of 5-year survival by univariate analysis

Prognostic factor	No. (n=49)	OS (%)	p-value	DFS (%)	p-value
Age (yr)
≤ 60	28	30.8	0.813	19.8	0.830
> 60	21	31.4		28.6
Sex
Male	29	28.5	0.257	22.2	0.872
Female	20	35.0		25.0
Tumor stage
T1 and T2	6	33.3	0.954	33.3	0.584
T3 and T4	43	30.7		21.7
Histology
Well and moderately	43	31.7	0.590	22.5	0.667
Poorly and mucinous	6	25.0		33.3
Positive retrieved PALNs
≤ 7	42	36.5	0.010	27.5	0.027
> 7	7	14.3		14.3
Preoperative CEA
≤ 5	19	46.3	0.122	41.4	0.039
> 5	30	21.5		11.7

OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; PALN, para-aortic lymph node; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

Table 3.

Prognostic factors of 5-year survival by multivariate analysis

Prognostic factor	Overall survival		Disease-free survival
Prognostic factor	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value
Age
> 60 yr vs. ≤ 60 yr	0.885 (0.434-1.806)	0.738	1.049 (0.534-2.061)	0.889
Sex
Female vs. male	0.745 (0.353-1.571)	0.440	0.859 (0.416-1.773)	0.682
Tumor stage
T3 and T4 vs. T1 and T2	0.816 (0.276-2.413)	0.713	1.108 (0.382-3.217)	0.850
Histology
Poorly and mucinous vs. well and moderately	1.660 (0.553-4.986)	0.366	1.299 (0.443-3.807)	0.634
Positive retrieved PALNs
> 7 vs. ≤ 7	3.291 (1.309-8.275)	0.011	2.484 (0.993-6.211)	0.052
Preoperative CEA
> 5 vs. ≤ 5	1.575 (0.738-3.361)	0.241	1.953 (0.940-4.057)	0.073

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; PALN, para-aortic lymph node; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

REFERENCES

1. Choi PW, Kim HC, Kim AY, Jung SH, Yu CS, Kim JC. Extensive lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with isolated paraaortic lymph node metastasis below the level of renal vessels. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:66–71. Article PubMed
2. Gagniere J, Dupre A, Chabaud S, Peyrat P, Meeus P, Rivoire M. Retroperitoneal nodal metastases from colorectal cancer: curable metastases with radical retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in selected patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:731–7. Article PubMed
3. Greene FL. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2002;87:13–5.
4. Bae SU, Han YD, Cho MS, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, et al. Oncologic outcomes of colon cancer patients with extraregional lymph node metastasis: comparison of isolated paraaortic lymph node metastasis with resectable liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1562–8. Article PubMed PDF
5. Khatri VP, Petrelli NJ, Belghiti J. Extending the frontiers of surgical therapy for hepatic colorectal metastases: is there a limit? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8490–9. Article PubMed
6. Ogura A, Akiyoshi T, Takatsu Y, Nagata J, Nagasaki T, Konishi T, et al. The significance of extended lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer with isolated synchronous extraregional lymph node metastasis. Asian J Surg. 2017;40:254–61. Article PubMed
7. Wiggers T, Arends JW, Volovics A. Regression analysis of prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:33–41. Article PubMed
8. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after curative resection for colorectal cancer: clinical significance of the preoperative level. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3087–93. Article PubMed
9. Thirunavukarasu P, Sukumar S, Sathaiah M, Mahan M, Pragatheeshwar KD, Pingpank JF, et al. C-stage in colon cancer: implications of carcinoembryonic antigen biomarker in staging, prognosis, and management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:689–97. Article PubMed PDF
10. Hokuto D, Nomi T, Yamato I, Yasuda S, Obara S, Yoshikawa T, et al. The prognosis of liver resection for patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases has not improved in the era of modern chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114:959–65. Article PubMed
11. Gonzalez M, Poncet A, Combescure C, Robert J, Ris HB, Gervaz P. Risk factors for survival after lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:572–9. Article PubMed
12. Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB 3rd, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:157–63. Article PubMed
13. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41. Article PubMed PDF
14. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2912–9. Article PubMed
15. Jang KU, Kim CW, Kim KH, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim TW, et al. Prognostic factors in terms of the number of metastatic nodules in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32:92–100. Article PubMed PMC
16. Park SJ, Lee KY, Kim SY. Clinical significance of lymph node micrometastasis in stage I and II colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40:75–80. Article PubMed PMC PDF
17. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1208–15. Article PubMed
18. Albandar MH, Cho MS, Bae SU, Kim NK. Surgical management of extra-regional lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16:503–13. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection
Shin Emoto, Yosuke Fukunaga, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroshi Kawachi, Shuhei Sano, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Masashi Ueno
Surgery Today.2024; 54(4): 356. CrossRef
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence
Rémi Grange, Pascal Rousset, Nicolas Williet, Mathias Guesnon, Laurent Milot, Guillaume Passot, Jean-Marc Phelip, Bertrand Le Roy, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2378. CrossRef
Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer: Predicting Pathologic Lymph Node Positivity and Optimizing Outcomes
Neal Bhutiani, Kentaro Ochiai, Muhammad O. Awiwi, Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas, Abhineet Uppal, Oliver Peacock, Craig Messick, Michael G. White, John M. Skibber, Brian K. Bednarski, Y. Nancy You, George J. Chang, Harmeet Kaur, Tsuyoshi Konishi
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(9): 5962. CrossRef
Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer
Anne-Sophie Dulac, Pietro Genova, Olivier Benoit, Cindy Neuzillet, Mostapha El Hajjam, Jean-François Emile, Frédérique Peschaud, Renato Micelli Lupinacci
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1306. CrossRef
Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Sono Ito, Yusuke Kinugasa, Shinichi Yamauchi, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa, Soichiro Ishihara, Akio Shiomi, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Takeshi Suto, Hiroki Takahashi, Michio Itabashi, Manabu Shiozawa, Masaya Hiyoshi, Takaya Kobatake, Koji Komori, Hiroyuki Egi
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(11): 1423. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcome After Resection of Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Multivisceral Colorectal Cancer
Christopher Berlin, Geoffroy Andrieux, Magdalena Menzel, Gabriel J. Stöger, Andreas Gengenbach, Luisa Schäfer, Hans C. Hillebrecht, Rebecca Kesselring, Uyen-Thao Le, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Philipp A. Holzner
Cancers.2024; 16(22): 3741. CrossRef
Survival outcomes after synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
Conor Aylward, Jawed Noori, Jack Tyrrell, Niall O'sullivan, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(4): 645. CrossRef
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review
Michael G. Fadel, Mosab Ahmed, Gianluca Pellino, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris Tekkis, David Nicol, Christos Kontovounisios, Erik Mayer
Cancers.2023; 15(2): 455. CrossRef
The management of clinically suspicious para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Yeng Kwang Tay, Swetha Prabhakaran, Joseph C Kong
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 19(6): 596. CrossRef
Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Rong-Chang Wang, Jian-Qi Wang, Xiao-Yu Zhou, Chu-lin Zhong, Jin-Xu Chen, Jing-Song Chen
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of Extraperitoneal Metastases on the Curative-Intent Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
Frédéric Schell, Amaniel Kefleyesus, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Guillaume Passot, Pascal Rousset, Alhadeedi Omar, Laurent Villeneuve, Julien Péron, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 4444. CrossRef
Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Qingwei Ren, Yanyan Chen, Xuejun Shao, Lanzhong Guo, Xinxin Xu
European Journal of Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes after Surgical Resection for Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer
Takayuki Okuno, Masaya Hiyoshi, Yuusuke Kyoden, Junji Yamamoto
Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(7): 460. CrossRef
Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer
Jun Woo Bong, Sanghee Kang, Pyoungjae Park
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 271. CrossRef
Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature
Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Jennifer Redfern, Agastya Patel, Thomas Satyadas, Minas Baltatzis
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive factors of survival of colorectal cancer patients after para-aortic lymph node metastasis
Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazushige Kawai, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Shinya Abe, Hirofumi Sonoda, Koji Murono, Junko Kishikawa, Yuzo Nagai, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Anzai, Soichiro Ishihara
International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(3): 520. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta
Cancers.2022; 14(3): 661. CrossRef
Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pengyue Zhao, Xingpeng Yang, Yang Yan, Jiaqi Yang, Songyan Li, Xiaohui Du
BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic significance of enlarged paraaortic lymph nodes detected during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study
Jaram Lee, Hyeong-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients
G.N. Piozzi, H. Park, T.H. Lee, J.S. Kim, H.B. Choi, S.J. Baek, J.M. Kwak, J. Kim, S.H. Kim
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 2069. CrossRef
Effect of lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with isolated synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis
Sung Chul Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2584. CrossRef
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef
Is 18F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hamid Dahmarde, Fateme Parooie, Morteza Salarzaei
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Oncologic outcomes after resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in left-sided colon and rectal cancer
Junichi Sakamoto, Heita Ozawa, Hiroki Nakanishi, Shin Fujita, Norikatsu Miyoshi
PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0241815. CrossRef
Long-term outcome and prognostic factors for patients with para-aortic lymph node dissection in left-sided colorectal cancer
Kota Sahara, Jun Watanabe, Atsushi Ishibe, Yusuke Suwa, Hirokazu Suwa, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(6): 1121. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.