Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Korean Adults

Seung-Kwon Myung; Chan Wha Lee; Jeonghee Lee; Jeongseon Kim; Hyeon Suk Kim

doi:10.4143/crt.2015.310

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 49(1); 2017 > Article

Original Article Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Korean Adults: Seung-Kwon Myung, MD, PhD^1,2,3,4, Chan Wha Lee, MD^2,5,, Jeonghee Lee, MS⁴, Jeongseon Kim, PhD^1,4,, Hyeon Suk Kim, PhD⁶; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2017;49(1):70-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.310
Published online: June 23, 2016

¹Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

²Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

³Department of Family Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

⁴Molecular Epidemiology Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea

⁵Department of Radiology, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang Korea

⁶School of Nursing, Shinhan University, Dongducheon, Korea

Correspondence: Chan Wha Lee, MD Department of Radiology, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea
Tel: 82-31-920-2639 Fax: 82-31-920-2606 E-mail: cwlee@ncc.re.kr

Co-Correspondence: Jeongseon Kim, PhD Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea
Tel: 82-31-920-2570 Fax: 82-31-920-2579 E-mail: jskim@ncc.re.kr

• Received: August 17, 2015 • Accepted: June 6, 2016

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

15,108 Views
442 Download
51 Web of Science
47 Crossref
56 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
Although the incidence of thyroid cancer in Korea has rapidly increased over the past decade, few studies have investigated its risk factors. This study examined the risk factors for thyroid cancer in Korean adults.
Materials and Methods
The study design was a hospital-based case-control study. Between August 2002 and December 2011, a total of 802 thyroid cancer cases out of 34,211 patients screened from the Cancer Screenee. Cohort of the National Cancer Center in South Korea were included in the analysis. A total of 802 control cases were selected from the same cohort, and matched individually (1:1) by age (±2 years) and area of residence for control group 1 and additionally by sex for control group 2.
Results
Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis using the control group 1 showed that females and those with a family history of thyroid cancer had an increased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas ever-smokers and those with a higher monthly household income had a decreased risk of thyroid cancer. On the other hand, the analysis using control group 2 showed that a family history of cancer and alcohol consumption were associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas higher body mass index (BMI) and family history of thyroid cancer were associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that females, those with a family history of thyroid cancer, those with a higher BMI, non-smokers, non-drinkers, and those with a lower monthly household income have an increased risk of developing thyroid cancer.
Key words: Thyroid neoplasms, Smoking, Alcohols, Risk factors, Case-control studies

Introduction

According to the World Cancer Report 2014, thyroid cancer is one of the less frequent cancers worldwide [1]. Its incidence, however, has increased almost two-fold over the past few decades, due mainly to the increased detection of thyroid cancer using thyroid ultrasonography [1,2]. In particular, the incidence rate of thyroid cancer in South Korea in 2011 was 15 times higher than in 1993 [3].

Although the precise causes of thyroid cancer remain unclear, a few risk factors, such as exposure to radiation, sex (women), and a diet low in iodine (follicular thyroid cancer) are known to increase the risk of thyroid cancer [4]. Recently, several lifestyle factors have been suggested to have an association with the risk of developing thyroid cancer from the findings of observational studies. According to Schmid et al.’s meta-analysis [5] of case-control and cohort studies in 2013, there was no overall significant association between physical activity and thyroid cancers, even though subgroup analyses revealed inconsistent findings according to the study design. In 2012, Zhao et al. [6] reported that overweight and obesity increased the risk of thyroid cancer significantly (by 18%) from the findings of a meta-analysis of seven cohort studies. On the contrary, unlike other cancers, a pooled analysis of five prospective studies in the United States suggested that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption were associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer [7]. In addition, Cho and Kim [8] reported that the risk of thyroid cancer was decreased by 21% in ever-smokers compared to never-smokers when they performed a meta-analysis of 31 observational studies [8].

As described before, the age-standardized incidence of thyroid cancer in Korea women (88.6 per 100,000) has increased rapidly and is the highest among all countries in the world (20 per 100,000 for the United States, 12.7 for Australia, and 6.1 per 100,000 for world) [9]. Despite this, few studies have reported the risk factors for thyroid cancer in Korean adults. Moreover, the sample sizes of previous case-control studies on this issue were small.

This study examined the risk factors for thyroid cancer in Korean adults using a hospital-based case-control study.

Materials and Methods

1. Study population

A large hospital-based case-control study was conducted using the data from the Cancer Screenee Cohort of the National Cancer Center in South Korea. All participants were men and women aged between 30 and 70 years, who underwent health screening examinations including thyroid ultrasonography. All the participants were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire about their sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, education, occupation, household income, and marital status), cigarette smoking habits, alcohol drinking habits, and their regular exercise habits. A total of 34,211 participants provided written informed consent for study participation between August 2002 and December 2011.

2. Case and control selection

The thyroid cancer cases were defined based on the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) (code C73) and were ascertained by a linkage to the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) database, which has been used to identify the incidence of cancer in Korea. Among the 828 thyroid cancer patients, a total of 802 patients were finally selected after excluding those who did not answer the questionnaire.

The controls were selected from the same cohort with 34,211 participants, who underwent health screening examinations including thyroid ultrasonography. Among the potential controls (n=31,453) who were not diagnosed with any cancer including thyroid cancer, 2,962 participants were excluded due to missing questionnaires or insufficient information on their residential areas. From the remaining 28,491 participants, using an incidence density sampling method, one control was selected randomly for each thyroid cancer case from the appropriate risk sets consisting of all study participants, free of cancer. Those in control group 1 were matched individually to the cases according to age (within 2 years) and residential area (Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheong, Jeolla, Gyeongsang, Jeju, North America, and other Asian countries). In control group 1, sex was not included as a matching variable to determine if sex is associated with the risk of thyroid cancer. In addition, the controls for control group 2 were matched to cases by age (within 2 years), residential areas Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheong, Jeolla, Gyeongsang, Jeju, North America, and other Asian countries), and also sex to reduce the confounding effect of sex. A total of 802 incident cases and 802 controls were included for the final analysis. The study procedure including the linkage to the KCCR database was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center (NCC2014-0096).

3. Statistical methods

To assess the association between the risk factors and thyroid cancer, conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using univariate and multivariate analyses. The multivariate conditional logistic regression models were adjusted for sex (female vs. male), body mass index (BMI, kg/m²: < 23, 23-25, ≥ 25), family history of cancer (first degree relative: yes vs. no), family history of thyroid cancer (first degree relative: yes vs. no), education (college or above, high school vs. middle school or below), occupation (agriculture/laborer/unemployed/others, sales/service, profession/office worker vs. housewife), monthly household income (> $3,706 or $1,853-$3,706 vs. < $1,853), marital status (divorced/widowed, unmarried vs. married), alcohol consumption (ever-drinker, current drinker, former drinker vs. non-drinker), and smoking status (ever-smoker, current smoker, former smoker vs. non-smoker). In addition, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend was conducted to investigate the relationship between increasing exposure to smoking and thyroid cancer risk. All the analyses were performed for both control groups 1 and 2. The goodness of fit of a model was measured by the generalized R² statistic that Allison discussed [10] as follows:

R2=1-e-(LRT/n)

, where likelihood ratio test statistic (LRT)=–2logL(0)– [–2logL(p)], n is the sample size, logL(0) is the log-likelihood for a null model with no covariates, and logL(p) is the log-likelihood for the fitted model with p covariates. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS ver. 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Table 1 lists the distribution of the general characteristics among the 1,604 participants with thyroid cancer (n=802) and control cases (n=802) in the control group 1 according to sex, BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. In univariate analysis, females (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.38 to 3.71), family history of thyroid cancer (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.87 to 7.09), and divorced or widowed (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.54 to 3.67) were associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas a family history of cancer, higher education levels, other occupations (other than housewife), higher monthly household incomes, alcohol consumption, and ever-smokers were associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (Table 1).

Table 1 also lists the findings from multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status. The results showed that females (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.45) and a family history of thyroid cancer (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.73 to 11.15) were more likely to have an increased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas higher household incomes (> $3,706 vs. < $1,853; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.98) and ever-smokers (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86) were more likely to have a decreased risk of thyroid cancer. On the other hand, there was no significant association observed with BMI, family history of cancer, education levels, occupational, marital status, and alcohol consumption.

In multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis according to the smoking history, compared to non-smokers, there was a dose-response relationship in the ever-smokers between the years of cigarette smoking and a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.50 for ≤ 10 years; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.95 for 11-20 years; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.95 for 21-30 years; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.10 for > 30 years; p-value for trend=0.019) (Table 2). On the other hand, no dose-response relationship was observed for the age when they started to smoke and the number of daily cigarette smoking.

Table 3 lists the general characteristics of the study participants with the same case group and the control group 2 in univariate analysis and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis. In multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis, a family history of cancer and alcohol consumption were associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas a higher BMI and a family history of thyroid cancer were associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. Unlike the findings from multivariate analysis using control group 1, smoking was not associated with a risk of thyroid cancer.

Discussion

This hospital-based case-control study found that females and those with a family history of thyroid cancer had an increased risk of thyroid cancer. In contrast, ever-smokers and those with higher household incomes were more likely to have a lower risk of thyroid cancer. In particular, an inverse dose-response association was observed between the years of cigarette smoking and the thyroid cancer risk. When the analysis was performed using the control group matched by sex as well as age and residential areas, alcohol consumption was significantly associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer.

Overall, these findings are consistent with those of previous studies and reports on the general characteristics and risk factors of thyroid cancer. According to the GLOBOCAN 2012 of the International Agency of Research on Cancer, the age-standardized incidence rate of thyroid cancer worldwide was approximately 3.2 times higher in women than in men: 6.1 per 100,000 and 1.9 per 100,000, respectively [11]. In addition, the incidence data obtained from the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database showed that age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 were 102.4 in women and 23.0 in men [12], which were approximately 4.5 times higher in women than in men. These results show that thyroid cancer is 3-4 times more common in women than in men. This study also showed that the risk of thyroid cancer was more than 2 times higher in women than in men.

The reasons for the difference in incidence between men and women is unclear. However, estrogen, which is one of the two main female sex hormones, might explain the sex difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer. Several studies have shown that the estrogen levels might be associated with the risk of thyroid cancer. For example, although the frequency of differentiated thyroid cancer (papillary or parafollicular thyroid cancer) in girls was similar to that in boys up to the age of 12 years, with the onset of puberty, it increased in girls [13]. In addition, pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer [14,15]. The onset of puberty and pregnancy are associated with increased levels of estrogen. In contrast, the incidence of thyroid cancer was highest in the late 40s and early 50s (perimenopause) and decreased thereafter (postmenopause) [12]. During these periods, the estrogen levels start to decrease rapidly and level off. As a potential mechanism for the impact of estrogen on the increased risk of thyroid cancer, several experimental studies have shown that 17β-estradiol (E2, predominant estrogen during reproductive periods) is a potent stimulating agent of both benign and malignant thyroid cells [16-18]. E2 acts via a classical genomic pathway mediated through the estrogen receptors α and β (ERα and ERβ) and a non-genomic pathway by membrane-associated estrogen receptor [19]. Both pathways are operative in benign and malignant thyroid tissues, even though the detection of ERs in normal thyroid tissues, thyroid adenomas, goiters, and thyroid carcinomas by immunohistochemical staining or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction varies between 0% and 100% of samples [18,19]. Nevertheless, the influence of estrogen on the development of thyroid cancer is still unclear. Further detailed studies will be necessary to confirm the association between estrogen and thyroid cancer.

A family history of thyroid cancer was also found to be associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. The increased risk of differentiated thyroid cancer was associated with a family history of thyroid cancer from the previous observational studies [20]. In addition, a recent population-based cohort study with 63,495 first-degree relatives of 11,206 non-medullary thyroid cancer patients reported a three-fold increase over the general population risk (standardized incidence ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.4) [21].

Interestingly, in contrast to most of common cancers, this study showed that smoking was associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (ever-smoker vs. non-smoker; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This finding is consistent with those from previous meta-analyses of case-control studies. In 2003, a pooled analysis of 14 case-control studies reported a reduced risk of thyroid cancer in current smokers [22]. In addition, a recent meta-analysis published in 2014 demonstrated an inverse association in subgroup meta-analysis of case-control studies (ever-smoker vs. non-smoker; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88) [8]. Similarly, in a pooled analysis of five prospective studies, smoking was associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer in current smokers compared to never smokers (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.85) [7].

Several potential biological mechanisms have been suggested to explain the reduced risk of thyroid cancer in smokers. First, smoking can lead to lower levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), which plays an important role in the development of thyroid cancer [23]. Second, smoking has an anti-estrogenic effect, which can result in a reduced risk of thyroid cancer [19]. Finally, smokers are less likely to be overweight or obese, which might be associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. In 2012, a meta-analysis of seven cohort studies found that overweight and obesity were linked to an 18% increased risk of thyroid cancer in men and women [6].

In the present findings, higher household incomes were more likely to have a decreased risk of thyroid cancer (> $3,706 vs. < $1,853; OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.98). On the other hand, previous studies have reported that higher socioeconomic status (SES) groups were more likely to show an increased risk of thyroid cancer compared to lower SES groups in the United States [24]. In particular, the incidence of thyroid cancer showed a less pronounced increase in low SES groups (6.7% per year) than that in the high SES groups (8.6% per year) in the United States. White Americans showed a steady increase in both the low and high SES groups, while African-Americans and Hispanics with a higher SES showed a more noticeable increase compared to the lower SES groups from 1995 to 2008 [24]. This issue may reflect the limitation in accessing health care services in low SES groups and minorities due to the low health insurance coverage [24]. This discrepancy cannot be explained at present; therefore, further studies will be required.

Additionally, alcohol consumption was found to be significantly associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer when the analysis was performed using the control group matched by sex as well as age and residential areas. This finding is consistent with those from the previous pooled analysis of five cohort studies published in 2012 [7]. The possible biological mechanisms include decreased levels of TSH and the direct toxic effects of alcohol consumption [25,26].

This study has several limitations. First, the thyroid cancer cases were not confirmed based on the medical records and chart reviews. The thyroid cancer cases were ascertained by a linkage to the KCCR database based on the ICD-O (code C73), which may lead to ascertainment bias. Therefore, the specific type of thyroid cancer could not be defined in each case. On the other hand, it would be reasonable to assume that most of the cases included in the present study were papillary thyroid cancers because 94.2% of all incident thyroid cancers from 1997 to 2011 were papillary thyroid cancer according to the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database [27]. Second, the controls were also not confirmed from their medical records and chart reviews. On the other hand, the possibility of ascertainment bias might be minimal, if any, because the KCCR database covers almost all incident cancer cases, including thyroid cancer nationwide in Korea. Therefore, there would be little likelihood of the thyroid cancer cases being included in the control group of this study. Third, due to a lack of data, this study was unable to investigate the influence of previous exposure to radiation on thyroid cancer, which is a proven risk factor for thyroid cancer. Finally, recall bias might still exist as some data were collected retrospectively. In addition, these findings might not be applicable to the general population because the participants included in this study were recruited from one specific hospital screening center.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the second largest case-control study on the risk factors of thyroid cancer since Kreiger and Parkes’s study in 2000 [28]. Therefore, this study provides more precision on this issue than most previous individual studies.

Conclusion

This hospital-based case-control study found that females, higher BMI, and those with a family history of thyroid cancer were significantly associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer, whereas ever-smokers, drinkers, and those with higher household incomes were associated with a decreased risk of thyroid cancer. Nevertheless, these findings should be explored in further larger epidemiological studies with a higher level of evidence, such as prospective cohort studies.

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1D1A1A09058684) and from the National Cancer Center of Korea (NCC1510040).

Table 1.

General characteristics of the study participants with the control group 1 in univariate analysis and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

Variable	Control^a) (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^b)
Sex
Male	432 (53.9)	229 (28.6)	1.00	1.00
Female	370 (46.1)	573 (71.5)	2.97 (2.38-3.71)	2.08 (1.26-3.45)
BMI (kg/m²)
< 23	307 (38.3)	309 (38.5)	1.00	1.00
23-25	218 (27.2)	221 (27.6)	1.01 (0.79-1.29)	1.21 (0.85-1.72)
> 25	277 (34.5)	272 (33.9)	0.98 (0.77-1.23)	1.23 (0.88-1.72)
Family history of cancer^c)
No	211 (26.3)	246 (30.7)	1.00	1.00
Yes	585 (72.9)	543 (67.7)	0.79 (0.63-0.99)	0.74 (0.54-1.02)
Missing	6 (0.8)	13 (1.6)
Family history of thyroid cancer^c)
No	785 (97.9)	748 (93.3)	1.00	1.00
Yes	11 (1.4)	41 (5.1)	3.64 (1.87-7.09)	4.39 (1.73-11.15)
Missing	6 (0.8)	13 (1.6)
Education
Middle school or below	121 (15.1)	139 (17.3)	1.00	1.00
High school	263 (32.8)	260 (32.4)	0.82 (0.60-1.12)	1.06 (0.66-1.69)
College or above	409 (51.0)	350 (43.6)	0.67 (0.49-0.92)	1.19 (0.72-1.97)
Missing	9 (1.1)	53 (6.6)
Occupation
Housewife	228 (28.4)	349 (43.5)	1.00	1.00
Profession/Office worker	329 (41.0)	229 (28.6)	0.46 (0.36-0.59)	1.11 (0.26-1.76)
Sales/Service	122 (15.2)	100 (12.5)	0.55 (0.40-0.76)	1.07 (0.66-1.71)
Agriculture/Laborer/Unemployed/Others	114 (14.2)	80 (10.0)	0.47 (0.32-0.66)	0.99 (0.56-1.76)
Missing	9 (1.1)	44 (5.5)
Monthly household income
< $1,853^d)	82 (10.2)	107 (13.3)	1.00	1.00
$1,853-$3,706	221 (27.6)	224 (27.9)	0.65 (0.44-0.97)	0.72 (0.44-1.19)
> $3,706	429 (53.5)	329 (41.0)	0.49 (0.33-0.71)	0.59 (0.36-0.98)
Missing	70 (8.7)	142 (17.7)
Marital status
Married	741 (92.4)	674 (84.0)	1.00	1.00
Unmarried	26 (3.2)	25 (3.1)	1.01 (0.55-1.87)	0.70 (0.31-1.62)
Divorced/Widowed	35 (4.4)	74 (9.2)	2.38 (1.54-3.67)	1.67 (0.87-3.22)
Missing	0	29 (3.6)
Alcohol consumption
Non-drinker	236 (29.4)	360 (44.9)	1.00	1.00
Former drinker	30 (3.7)	45 (5.6)	1.05 (0.63-1.76)	1.79 (0.87-3.71)
Current drinker	520 (64.8)	373 (46.5)	0.46 (0.36-0.57)	0.92 (0.66-1.30)
Ever-drinker	550 (49.0)	418 (25.7)	0.50 (0.40-0.61)	0.81 (0.63-1.06)
Missing	16 (2.0)	24 (3.0)
Smoking status
Non-smoker	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
Former smoker	178 (22.2)	109 (13.6)	0.43 (0.33-0.58)	0.75 (0.48-1.17)
Current smoker	215 (26.8)	97 (12.1)	0.29 (0.22-0.40)	0.49 (0.31-0.78)
Ever-smoker	393 (49.0)	206 (25.7)	0.34 (0.27-0.43)	0.62 (0.44-0.86)
Missing	27 (3.4)	49 (6.1)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

^a) Matched to cases by age (within 2 years) and residential areas,

^b) Adjusted for BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; R²=0.1277,

^c) First degree relatives,

^d) $1=1,079 Korean won (as of April 26, 2015).

Table 2.

Association between the risk of thyroid cancer and smoking history, such as age at starting to smoke, years of cigarette smoking, and number of daily cigarette smoking in multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

Variable	Control (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^a)
Age at starting to smoke
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 18	74 (9.2)	31 (3.9)	0.26 (0.17-0.42)	0.52 (0.29-0.93)
19-24	223 (27.8)	121 (15.1)	0.36 (0.28-0.48)	0.76 (0.52-1.12)
≥ 25	54 (6.7)	28 (3.5)	0.38 (0.23-0.62)	0.57 (0.33-1.01)
Missing	69 (8.6)	75 (9.4)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.133
Years of cigarette smoking
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 10	40 (5.0)	34 (4.2)	0.60 (0.37-0.99)	0.87 (0.50-1.50)
11-20	122 (15.2)	58 (7.2)	0.33 (0.23-0.47)	0.61 (0.39-0.95)
21-30	128 (16.0)	62 (7.7)	0.30 (0.20-0.43)	0.59 (0.37-0.95)
> 30	71 (8.9)	29 (3.6)	0.29 (0.18-0.47)	0.62 (0.35-1.10)
Missing	59 (7.4)	72 (9.0)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.019
No. of cigarettes/day
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 10	110 (13.7)	58 (7.2)	0.35 (0.25-0.50)	0.61 (0.40-0.93)
11-20	180 (22.4)	101 (12.6)	0.39 (0.29-0.52)	0.84 (0.56-1.26)
21-30	48 (6.0)	16 (2.0)	0.23 (0.12-0.41)	0.42 (0.22-0.82)
> 30	25 (3.1)	11 (1.4)	0.27 (0.13-0.56)	0.61 (0.26-1.42)
Missing	57 (7.1)	69 (8.6)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.071

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

^a) Adjusted for sex, body mass index, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, smoking status, and alcohol consumption; R²=0.1070.

Table 3.

General characteristics of the study participants with the control group 2 in univariate analysis and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

Variable	Control^a) (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^b)
Sex
Male	229 (28.6)	229 (28.6)	-	-
Female	573 (71.5)	573 (71.5)	-	-
BMI (kg/m²)
< 23	353 (44.0)	309 (38.5)	1.00	1.00
23-25	225 (28.1)	221 (27.6)	1.14 (0.89-1.46)	1.28 (0.98-1.68)
> 25	224 (27.9)	272 (33.9)	1.11 (1.11-1.80)	1.42 (1.09-1.85)
Family history of cancer^c)
No	187 (23.3)	246 (30.7)	1.00	1.00
Yes	606 (75.6)	543 (67.7)	0.66 (0.52-0.83)	0.63 (0.49-0.81)
Missing	9 (1.1)	13 (1.6)
Family history of thyroid cancer^c)
No	787 (98.1)	748 (93.3)	1.00	1.00
Yes	6 (0.8)	41 (5.1)	8.00 (3.16-20.27)	9.41 (3.61-24.51)
Missing	9 (1.1)	13 (1.6)
Education
Middle school or below	159 (19.8)	139 (17.3)	1.00	1.00
High school	276 (34.4)	260 (32.4)	1.08 (0.80-1.45)	1.19 (0.86-1.66)
College or above	353 (44.0)	350 (43.6)	1.15 (0.85-1.57)	1.29 (0.90-1.86)
Missing	14 (1.8)	53 (6.6)
Occupation
Housewife	344 (42.9)	349 (43.5)	1.00	1.00
Profession/Office worker	229 (28.6)	229 (28.6)	0.94 (0.70-1.24)	0.87 (0.63-1.20)
Sales/Service	113 (14.1)	100 (12.5)	0.84 (0.61-1.17)	0.77 (0.53-1.10)
Agriculture/Laborer/Unemployed/Others	101 (12.6)	80 (10.0)	0.75 (0.53-1.07)	0.69 (0.47-1.02)
Missing	15 (1.9)	44 (5.5)
Monthly household income
< $1,853^d)	103 (12.8)	107 (13.3)	1.00	1.00
$1,853-$3,706	215 (26.8)	224 (27.9)	0.99 (0.71-1.38)	0.95 (0.66-1.39)
> $3,706	389 (48.5)	329 (41.0)	0.79 (0.57-1.08)	0.71 (0.49-1.03)
Missing	95 (11.9)	142 (17.7)
Marital status
Married	710 (88.5)	674 (84.0)	1.00	1.00
Unmarried	20 (2.5)	25 (3.1)	1.33 (0.72-2.44)	1.31 (0.68-2.50)
Divorced/Widowed	70 (8.7)	74 (9.2)	1.21 (0.84-1.75)	1.25 (0.84-1.86)
Missing	2 (0.3)	29 (3.6)
Alcohol consumption
Non-drinker	298 (37.2)	360 (44.9)	1.00	1.00
Former drinker	34 (4.2)	45 (5.6)	1.06 (0.66-1.71)	1.13 (0.68-1.88)
Current drinker	455 (56.7)	373 (46.5)	0.61 (0.48-0.78)	0.64 (0.49-0.82)
Ever-drinker	489 (61.0)	418 (25.7)	1.21 (0.62-2.35)	0.68 (0.53-0.87)
Missing	15 (1.9)	24 (3.0)
Smoking status
Non-smoker	541 (67.5)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
Former smoker	104 (13.0)	109 (13.6)	0.97 (0.66-1.45)	0.97 (0.63-1.48)
Current smoker	114 (14.2)	97 (12.1)	0.79 (0.55-1.13)	0.82 (0.55-1.22)
Ever-smoker	218 (27.2)	206 (25.7)	0.86 (0.63-1.19)	0.88 (0.62-1.25)
Missing	43 (5.4)	49 (6.1)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

^a) Matched to cases by age (within 2 years), residential areas, and sex,

^b) Adjusted for BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; R²=0.0711,

^c) First degree relatives,

^d) $1=1,079 Korean won (as of April 26, 2015).

REFERENCES

1. Stewart BW, Wild CP. World cancer report 2014. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014.
2. Wartofsky L. Increasing world incidence of thyroid cancer: increased detection or higher radiation exposure? Hormones (Athens). 2010;9:103–8. Article PubMed
3. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Korea's thyroid-cancer "epidemic": screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1765–7. Article PubMed
4. What are the risk factors for thyroid cancer? [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2015. [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/thyroid-cancer/detailedguide/thyroid-cancer-risk-factors
5. Schmid D, Behrens G, Jochem C, Keimling M, Leitzmann M. Physical activity, diabetes, and risk of thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28:945–58. Article PubMed
6. Zhao ZG, Guo XG, Ba CX, Wang W, Yang YY, Wang J, et al. Overweight, obesity and thyroid cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Int Med Res. 2012;40:2041–50. Article PubMed
7. Kitahara CM, Linet MS, Beane Freeman LE, Check DP, Church TR, Park Y, et al. Cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, and thyroid cancer risk: a pooled analysis of five prospective studies in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:1615–24. Article PubMed PMC
8. Cho YA, Kim J. Thyroid cancer risk and smoking status: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25:1187–95. Article PubMed
9. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr
10. Allison PD. Survival analysis using the SAS: a practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1995.
11. Thyroid: ASR (W) per 100,000, all ages [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. [cited 2016 May 1]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/bar_sex_site.asp?selection=27240&title=Thyroid&statistic=2&populations=6&window=1&grid=1&info=1&color1=5&color1e=&color2=4&color2e=&submit=%C2%A0Execute%C2%A0
12. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:127–41. Article PubMed PMC PDF
13. Farahati J, Bucsky P, Parlowsky T, Mader U, Reiners C. Characteristics of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in children and adolescents with respect to age, gender, and histology. Cancer. 1997;80:2156–62. Article PubMed
14. Rossing MA, Voigt LF, Wicklund KG, Daling JR. Reproductive factors and risk of papillary thyroid cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:765–72. Article PubMed
15. Horn-Ross PL, Canchola AJ, Ma H, Reynolds P, Bernstein L. Hormonal factors and the risk of papillary thyroid cancer in the California Teachers Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1751–9. Article PubMed PMC
16. Zeng Q, Chen GG, Vlantis AC, van Hasselt CA. Oestrogen mediates the growth of human thyroid carcinoma cells via an oestrogen receptor-ERK pathway. Cell Prolif. 2007;40:921–35. Article PubMed PMC
17. Kumar A, Klinge CM, Goldstein RE. Estradiol-induced proliferation of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer cells is mediated by estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Int J Oncol. 2010;36:1067–80. Article PubMed
18. Manole D, Schildknecht B, Gosnell B, Adams E, Derwahl M. Estrogen promotes growth of human thyroid tumor cells by different molecular mechanisms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1072–7. Article PubMed
19. Derwahl M, Nicula D. Estrogen and its role in thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21:T273–83. Article PubMed
20. Xu L, Li G, Wei Q, El-Naggar AK, Sturgis EM. Family history of cancer and risk of sporadic differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:1228–35. Article PubMed PMC
21. Fallah M, Pukkala E, Tryggvadottir L, Olsen JH, Tretli S, Sundquist K, et al. Risk of thyroid cancer in first-degree relatives of patients with non-medullary thyroid cancer by histology type and age at diagnosis: a joint study from five Nordic countries. J Med Genet. 2013;50:373–82. Article PubMed
22. Mack WJ, Preston-Martin S, Dal Maso L, Galanti R, Xiang M, Franceschi S, et al. A pooled analysis of case-control studies of thyroid cancer: cigarette smoking and consumption of alcohol, coffee, and tea. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:773–85. Article PubMed
23. Jorde R, Sundsfjord J. Serum TSH levels in smokers and non-smokers. The 5th Tromso study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;114:343–7. Article PubMed
24. Reitzel LR, Nguyen N, Li N, Xu L, Regan SD, Sturgis EM. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence in Texas from 1995 to 2008 by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity. Thyroid. 2014;24:556–67. Article PubMed PMC
25. Balhara YP, Deb KS. Impact of alcohol use on thyroid function. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:580–7. Article PubMed PMC
26. Knudsen N, Bulow I, Laurberg P, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Jorgensen T. Alcohol consumption is associated with reduced prevalence of goitre and solitary thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;55:41–6. Article PubMed
27. Oh CM, Jung KW, Won YJ, Shin A, Kong HJ, Lee JS. Age-period-cohort analysis of thyroid cancer incidence in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47:362–9. Article PubMed PMC PDF
28. Kreiger N, Parkes R. Cigarette smoking and the risk of thyroid cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1969–73. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Narrative overview of possible preventive measures for differentiated thyroid carcinomas
Maria Eduarda de Castro, Lucas Leite Cunha, Laura Sterian Ward
Heliyon.2025; 11(1): e41284. CrossRef
Ocular motor cranial neuropathy and risk of thyroid cancer: A Korean population-based study
Jaeryung Kim, Kyung-Ah Park, Kyungdo Han, Jin-Hyung Jung, Sei Yeul Oh, Soolienah Rhiu, Xing Xiong,
PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0319872. CrossRef
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer Among Young Adults in South Korea
Hyemi Kwon, Kyung-Do Han, Sun Joon Moon, Se Eun Park, Eun-Jung Rhee, Won-Young Lee
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2024; 109(3): e1095. CrossRef
Current and future of immunotherapy for thyroid cancer based on bibliometrics and clinical trials
Ke Wang, Ying Zhang, Yang Xing, Hong Wang, Minghua He, Rui Guo
Discover Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Thyroid Cancer Prevalence, Risk Exposure, and Clinical Features Among Transgender Female Veterans
John David Christensen, Hiba T Basheer, Jose Joaquin Lado Abeal
Journal of the Endocrine Society.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Thyroid Malignancy in Patients Who Underwent Thyroidectomy for Multinodular Goiter and Solitary Thyroid Nodule
Desalew Gedamu, Tariku Shimels, Daniel Kassie, Zewditu Chanyalew, Mebrahtu Eyasu
JCO Global Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Emerging Strategies in Thyroid Cancer Immunotherapy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
Daniel Alejandro Estrella Cornejo, Meylin Yalitza Carriel Alvarado, Norma Susana Chávez Villagómez, Alberto Dario Díaz Parra, María Fernanda Navas Espinosa
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología.2024; 4: 1241. CrossRef
Prevalence of Thyroid Nodules and Predictive Factors for their Malignancy: Is there any Correlation between Level of TSH and Type of Malignancy?: A Cross Sectional Study
Leila Moradi, Mohsen Hani Tabaei Zavareh, Ferdos Zaman, Anahita Shareghi Bruojeni, Seyed Amir Mohammad Taravati, Hossein Naderi Boldaji, Koushan Rostami, Seyedeh Ghazal Shahrokh
Advanced Biomedical Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Research Progress on Risk Factors of Thyroid Cancer
丽焦
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(08): 400. CrossRef
Relationship between Serum Levels of Selenium and Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Runhua Hao, Ping Yu, Lanlan Gui, Niannian Wang, Da Pan, Shaokang Wang
Nutrition and Cancer.2023; 75(1): 14. CrossRef
Oxidative stress mediates the associations between phthalate exposures and thyroid cancer/benign nodule risk
Chong Liu, Long-Qiang Wang, Min Zhang, Yan-Ling Deng, Qiong Luo, Er-Nan Liu, Pan-Pan Chen, Yu Miao, Pan Yang, Qiang Zeng
Environmental Pollution.2023; 326: 121462. CrossRef
Selenium and thyroid diseases
Fei Wang, Chunyu Li, Shaoxin Li, Lili Cui, Junyu Zhao, Lin Liao
Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules – Diagnosis and management strategies
Tapoi Dana Antonia, Lambrescu Ioana Maria, Gheorghisan-Galateanu Ancuta-Augustina
Pathology - Research and Practice.2023; 246: 154516. CrossRef
Evaluation of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Results: A Single Center Experience
Baris KARAGÜN
Acta Medica Alanya.2023; 7(1): 34. CrossRef
Thyroid Nodules and Obesity
Elpida Demetriou, Maria Fokou, Savvas Frangos, Panagiotis Papageorgis, Panayiotis A. Economides, Aliki Economides
Life.2023; 13(6): 1292. CrossRef
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and the associated thyroid cancer risk: A case-control study in China
Haoran Li, Ming Yang, Jing Yang, Samuel Seery, Chaoying Ma, Yi Liu, Xiaoguang Zhang, Ang Li, Huicai Guo
Chemosphere.2023; 337: 139411. CrossRef
Interaction between Genetic Risks and Socioeconomic Factors on Thyroid Cancer: Evidence from 0.5 Million UK Biobank Participants
Yu Li, Yongle Zhan, Wei Mao, Baoxin Wang, Pin Dong, Rong Na
Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5028. CrossRef
Thyroid Cancer Diagnostics Related to Occupational and Environmental Risk Factors: An Integrated Risk Assessment Approach
Gabriela Maria Berinde, Andreea Iulia Socaciu, Mihai Adrian Socaciu, Andreea Cozma, Armand Gabriel Rajnoveanu, Gabriel Emil Petre, Doina Piciu
Diagnostics.2022; 12(2): 318. CrossRef
Ferroptosis-Related APOE, BCL3 and ALOX5AP Gene Polymorphisms are Associated with the Risk of Thyroid Cancer
Zhifu Xiao, Haixia Zhao
Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine.2022; Volume 15: 157. CrossRef
The Effect of Gout on Thyroid Cancer Incidence: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort
So Young Kim, Dae Myoung Yoo, Mi Jung Kwon, Ji Hee Kim, Joo-Hee Kim, Woo Jin Bang, Sung Kyun Kim, Hyo Geun Choi
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(6): 887. CrossRef
Seaweed and Iodine Intakes and SLC5A5 rs77277498 in Relation to Thyroid Cancer
Tung Hoang, Eun Kyung Lee, Jeonghee Lee, Yul Hwangbo, Jeongseon Kim
Endocrinology and Metabolism.2022; 37(3): 513. CrossRef
Thyroid Diseases and Thyroid Asymptomatic Dysfunction in People Living With HIV
Cristina Micali, Ylenia Russotto, Benedetto Maurizio Celesia, Laura Santoro, Andrea Marino, Giovanni Francesco Pellicanò, Giuseppe Nunnari, Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo
Infectious Disease Reports.2022; 14(5): 655. CrossRef
Thyroid Cancer and Psoriasis: A Nested Case–Control Study
So Young Kim, Dae Myoung Yoo, Juyong Chung, Hyo Geun Choi
Diagnostics.2022; 12(10): 2297. CrossRef
Association between Obesity Indexes and Thyroid Cancer Risk in Korean Women: Nested Case–Control Study
Yoonyoung Jang, Taehwa Kim, Brian H. S. Kim, Boyoung Park
Cancers.2022; 14(19): 4712. CrossRef
Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Prospective Cohort Study in Korea
Anh Quynh Bui, Madhawa Gunathilake, Jeonghee Lee, Eun Kyung Lee, Jeongseon Kim
Thyroid.2022; 32(11): 1402. CrossRef
Association Between Genetic Risk, Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle Behavior, and Thyroid Cancer Risk
Xiuming Feng, Fei Wang, Wenjun Yang, Yuan Zheng, Chaoqun Liu, Lulu Huang, Longman Li, Hong Cheng, Haiqing Cai, Xiangzhi Li, Xing Chen, Xiaobo Yang
JAMA Network Open.2022; 5(12): e2246311. CrossRef
Insufficient iodine nutrition may affect the thyroid cancer incidence in China
Lijun Fan, Fangang Meng, Yunyan Gao, Peng Liu
British Journal of Nutrition.2021; 126(12): 1852. CrossRef
Thyroid cancer and its associated factors: A population‐based case‐control study
Mohammad Taher Parad, Mohammad Fararouei, Ali Reza Mirahmadizadeh, Sima Afrashteh
International Journal of Cancer.2021; 149(3): 514. CrossRef
Evaluation of the relationship between previous statin use and thyroid cancer using Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort data
So Young Kim, Young Shin Song, Jee Hye Wee, Chanyang Min, Dae Myoung Yoo, Chang-Ho Lee, Chang Myeon Song, Bumjung Park, Hyo Geun Choi
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Association among Body Mass Index, Genetic Variants of FTO, and Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study of the Cancer Screenee Cohort in Korea
Tung Hoang, Dayoung Song, Jeonghee Lee, Eun Kyung Lee, Yul Hwangbo, Jeongseon Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(3): 857. CrossRef
Reproductive and menstrual factors for papillary thyroid cancer risk: A case-control study in Chinese women
Jia-liu He, Chi Zhang, Ming-jun Hu, Hua-bing Wu, Xue-lei Lu, Jia-hu Hao, Fen Huang
Cancer Epidemiology.2021; 73: 101964. CrossRef
Advanced thyroid carcinomas: neural network analysis of ultrasonographic characteristics
Michael Cordes, Theresa Ida Götz, Elmar Wolfgang Lang, Stephan Coerper, Torsten Kuwert, Christian Schmidkonz
Thyroid Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Thyroid Cancer: Meta-Analysis
Joon-Hyop Lee, Young Jun Chai, Ka Hee Yi
Endocrinology and Metabolism.2021; 36(3): 590. CrossRef
Epidemiologic, Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Cytological Features of Thyroid Nodules in Predicting Malignancy Risk: A Retrospective Study of 442 French Afro-Caribbean Patients
Johan Joseph-Auguste, Lucien Lin, Magalie Demar, Olivier Duffas, Vincent Molinie, Caroline Sulpicy, Marie-Josée Dorival, Olivier Luxembourger, Nadia Sabbah
International Journal of Endocrinology.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Serous BMP8A has Clinical Significance in the Ultrasonic Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer and Promotes Thyroid Cancer Cell Progression
Kun Liu, Min Gao, Dongdong Qin, Hongjun Wang, Qixiu Lu
Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets.2020; 20(4): 591. CrossRef
Association between Family Histories of Thyroid Cancer and Thyroid Cancer Incidence: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study Data
Soo-Hwan Byun, Chanyang Min, Hyo-Geun Choi, Seok-Jin Hong
Genes.2020; 11(9): 1039. CrossRef
Obesity is positively related and tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption are negatively related to an increased risk of thyroid cancer
Soo-Youn An, So Young Kim, Dong Jun Oh, Chanyang Min, Songyoung Sim, Hyo Geun Choi
Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Radiation and Second Primary Thyroid Cancer Following Index Head and Neck Cancer
Katherine M. Polednik, Matthew C. Simpson, Eric Adjei Boakye, Kahee A. Mohammed, John J. Dombrowski, Mark A. Varvares, Nosayaba Osazuwa‐Peters
The Laryngoscope.2019; 129(4): 1014. CrossRef
Active and Passive Smoking, BRAFV600E Mutation Status, and the Risk of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Large-Scale Case-Control and Case-Only Study
Kyoung-Nam Kim, Yunji Hwang, Kyungsik Kim, Kyu Eun Lee, Young Joo Park, June Young Choi, Do Joon Park, BeLong Cho, Daehee Kang, Sue K. Park
Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(4): 1392. CrossRef
Association of obesity with the clinicopathological features of thyroid cancer in a large, operative population
Sitong Zhao, Xiaomeng Jia, Xiaojing Fan, Ling Zhao, Ping Pang, Yajing Wang, Yukun Luo, Fulin Wang, Guoqing Yang, Xianling Wang, Weijun Gu, Li Zang, Yu Pei, Jin Du, Jianming Ba, Jingtao Dou, Yiming Mu, Zhaohui Lyu
Medicine.2019; 98(50): e18213. CrossRef
Bethesda thyroid categories and family history of thyroid disease
D. Kust, J. Staničić, N. Mateša
Clinical Endocrinology.2018; 88(3): 468. CrossRef
Thyroid cancer among female workers in Korea, 2007–2015
Seonghoon Kang, Jinho Song, Taehwan Koh, One Park, Jong-Tae Park, Won-Jin Lee
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Cigarette smoking and thyroid cancer risk: a cohort study
Ara Cho, Yoosoo Chang, Jiin Ahn, Hocheol Shin, Seungho Ryu
British Journal of Cancer.2018; 119(5): 638. CrossRef
Interplay between Body Size Measures and Thyroid Cancer Aggressiveness: A Retrospective Analysis
Thaís Gomes de Melo, Ligia Vera Montali da Assumpção, Denise Engelbrecht Zantut-Wittmann
International Journal of Endocrinology.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Genetic variations in TAS2R3 and TAS2R4 bitterness receptors modify papillary carcinoma risk and thyroid function in Korean females
Jeong-Hwa Choi, Jeonghee Lee, Sarah Yang, Eun Kyung Lee, Yul Hwangbo, Jeongseon Kim
Scientific Reports.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
The Relationship Between Human Development Index and Its Components with Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Using the Decomposition Approach
Mokhtar Soheylizad, Salman Khazaei, Ensiyeh Jenabi, Ali Delpisheh, Yousef Veisani
International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Modern view on the risk factors for malignant tumors of the thyroid gland: a systematic review
В. І. Ткаченко, Я. Ю. Рімар
Family medicine.2018; (3): 57. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Korean Adults

Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(1):70-78. Published online June 23, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.310

XML Download

Top of article

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
NOTES
REFERENCES

Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Korean Adults

Variable	Control^a) (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^b)
Sex
Male	432 (53.9)	229 (28.6)	1.00	1.00
Female	370 (46.1)	573 (71.5)	2.97 (2.38-3.71)	2.08 (1.26-3.45)
BMI (kg/m²)
< 23	307 (38.3)	309 (38.5)	1.00	1.00
23-25	218 (27.2)	221 (27.6)	1.01 (0.79-1.29)	1.21 (0.85-1.72)
> 25	277 (34.5)	272 (33.9)	0.98 (0.77-1.23)	1.23 (0.88-1.72)
Family history of cancer^c)
No	211 (26.3)	246 (30.7)	1.00	1.00
Yes	585 (72.9)	543 (67.7)	0.79 (0.63-0.99)	0.74 (0.54-1.02)
Missing	6 (0.8)	13 (1.6)
Family history of thyroid cancer^c)
No	785 (97.9)	748 (93.3)	1.00	1.00
Yes	11 (1.4)	41 (5.1)	3.64 (1.87-7.09)	4.39 (1.73-11.15)
Missing	6 (0.8)	13 (1.6)
Education
Middle school or below	121 (15.1)	139 (17.3)	1.00	1.00
High school	263 (32.8)	260 (32.4)	0.82 (0.60-1.12)	1.06 (0.66-1.69)
College or above	409 (51.0)	350 (43.6)	0.67 (0.49-0.92)	1.19 (0.72-1.97)
Missing	9 (1.1)	53 (6.6)
Occupation
Housewife	228 (28.4)	349 (43.5)	1.00	1.00
Profession/Office worker	329 (41.0)	229 (28.6)	0.46 (0.36-0.59)	1.11 (0.26-1.76)
Sales/Service	122 (15.2)	100 (12.5)	0.55 (0.40-0.76)	1.07 (0.66-1.71)
Agriculture/Laborer/Unemployed/Others	114 (14.2)	80 (10.0)	0.47 (0.32-0.66)	0.99 (0.56-1.76)
Missing	9 (1.1)	44 (5.5)
Monthly household income
< $1,853^d)	82 (10.2)	107 (13.3)	1.00	1.00
$1,853-$3,706	221 (27.6)	224 (27.9)	0.65 (0.44-0.97)	0.72 (0.44-1.19)
> $3,706	429 (53.5)	329 (41.0)	0.49 (0.33-0.71)	0.59 (0.36-0.98)
Missing	70 (8.7)	142 (17.7)
Marital status
Married	741 (92.4)	674 (84.0)	1.00	1.00
Unmarried	26 (3.2)	25 (3.1)	1.01 (0.55-1.87)	0.70 (0.31-1.62)
Divorced/Widowed	35 (4.4)	74 (9.2)	2.38 (1.54-3.67)	1.67 (0.87-3.22)
Missing	0	29 (3.6)
Alcohol consumption
Non-drinker	236 (29.4)	360 (44.9)	1.00	1.00
Former drinker	30 (3.7)	45 (5.6)	1.05 (0.63-1.76)	1.79 (0.87-3.71)
Current drinker	520 (64.8)	373 (46.5)	0.46 (0.36-0.57)	0.92 (0.66-1.30)
Ever-drinker	550 (49.0)	418 (25.7)	0.50 (0.40-0.61)	0.81 (0.63-1.06)
Missing	16 (2.0)	24 (3.0)
Smoking status
Non-smoker	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
Former smoker	178 (22.2)	109 (13.6)	0.43 (0.33-0.58)	0.75 (0.48-1.17)
Current smoker	215 (26.8)	97 (12.1)	0.29 (0.22-0.40)	0.49 (0.31-0.78)
Ever-smoker	393 (49.0)	206 (25.7)	0.34 (0.27-0.43)	0.62 (0.44-0.86)
Missing	27 (3.4)	49 (6.1)

Variable	Control (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^a)
Age at starting to smoke
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 18	74 (9.2)	31 (3.9)	0.26 (0.17-0.42)	0.52 (0.29-0.93)
19-24	223 (27.8)	121 (15.1)	0.36 (0.28-0.48)	0.76 (0.52-1.12)
≥ 25	54 (6.7)	28 (3.5)	0.38 (0.23-0.62)	0.57 (0.33-1.01)
Missing	69 (8.6)	75 (9.4)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.133
Years of cigarette smoking
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 10	40 (5.0)	34 (4.2)	0.60 (0.37-0.99)	0.87 (0.50-1.50)
11-20	122 (15.2)	58 (7.2)	0.33 (0.23-0.47)	0.61 (0.39-0.95)
21-30	128 (16.0)	62 (7.7)	0.30 (0.20-0.43)	0.59 (0.37-0.95)
> 30	71 (8.9)	29 (3.6)	0.29 (0.18-0.47)	0.62 (0.35-1.10)
Missing	59 (7.4)	72 (9.0)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.019
No. of cigarettes/day
Never smoking	382 (47.6)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
≤ 10	110 (13.7)	58 (7.2)	0.35 (0.25-0.50)	0.61 (0.40-0.93)
11-20	180 (22.4)	101 (12.6)	0.39 (0.29-0.52)	0.84 (0.56-1.26)
21-30	48 (6.0)	16 (2.0)	0.23 (0.12-0.41)	0.42 (0.22-0.82)
> 30	25 (3.1)	11 (1.4)	0.27 (0.13-0.56)	0.61 (0.26-1.42)
Missing	57 (7.1)	69 (8.6)
p-value for trend			< 0.001	0.071

Variable	Control^a) (n=802)	Case (n=802)	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)^b)
Sex
Male	229 (28.6)	229 (28.6)	-	-
Female	573 (71.5)	573 (71.5)	-	-
BMI (kg/m²)
< 23	353 (44.0)	309 (38.5)	1.00	1.00
23-25	225 (28.1)	221 (27.6)	1.14 (0.89-1.46)	1.28 (0.98-1.68)
> 25	224 (27.9)	272 (33.9)	1.11 (1.11-1.80)	1.42 (1.09-1.85)
Family history of cancer^c)
No	187 (23.3)	246 (30.7)	1.00	1.00
Yes	606 (75.6)	543 (67.7)	0.66 (0.52-0.83)	0.63 (0.49-0.81)
Missing	9 (1.1)	13 (1.6)
Family history of thyroid cancer^c)
No	787 (98.1)	748 (93.3)	1.00	1.00
Yes	6 (0.8)	41 (5.1)	8.00 (3.16-20.27)	9.41 (3.61-24.51)
Missing	9 (1.1)	13 (1.6)
Education
Middle school or below	159 (19.8)	139 (17.3)	1.00	1.00
High school	276 (34.4)	260 (32.4)	1.08 (0.80-1.45)	1.19 (0.86-1.66)
College or above	353 (44.0)	350 (43.6)	1.15 (0.85-1.57)	1.29 (0.90-1.86)
Missing	14 (1.8)	53 (6.6)
Occupation
Housewife	344 (42.9)	349 (43.5)	1.00	1.00
Profession/Office worker	229 (28.6)	229 (28.6)	0.94 (0.70-1.24)	0.87 (0.63-1.20)
Sales/Service	113 (14.1)	100 (12.5)	0.84 (0.61-1.17)	0.77 (0.53-1.10)
Agriculture/Laborer/Unemployed/Others	101 (12.6)	80 (10.0)	0.75 (0.53-1.07)	0.69 (0.47-1.02)
Missing	15 (1.9)	44 (5.5)
Monthly household income
< $1,853^d)	103 (12.8)	107 (13.3)	1.00	1.00
$1,853-$3,706	215 (26.8)	224 (27.9)	0.99 (0.71-1.38)	0.95 (0.66-1.39)
> $3,706	389 (48.5)	329 (41.0)	0.79 (0.57-1.08)	0.71 (0.49-1.03)
Missing	95 (11.9)	142 (17.7)
Marital status
Married	710 (88.5)	674 (84.0)	1.00	1.00
Unmarried	20 (2.5)	25 (3.1)	1.33 (0.72-2.44)	1.31 (0.68-2.50)
Divorced/Widowed	70 (8.7)	74 (9.2)	1.21 (0.84-1.75)	1.25 (0.84-1.86)
Missing	2 (0.3)	29 (3.6)
Alcohol consumption
Non-drinker	298 (37.2)	360 (44.9)	1.00	1.00
Former drinker	34 (4.2)	45 (5.6)	1.06 (0.66-1.71)	1.13 (0.68-1.88)
Current drinker	455 (56.7)	373 (46.5)	0.61 (0.48-0.78)	0.64 (0.49-0.82)
Ever-drinker	489 (61.0)	418 (25.7)	1.21 (0.62-2.35)	0.68 (0.53-0.87)
Missing	15 (1.9)	24 (3.0)
Smoking status
Non-smoker	541 (67.5)	547 (68.2)	1.00	1.00
Former smoker	104 (13.0)	109 (13.6)	0.97 (0.66-1.45)	0.97 (0.63-1.48)
Current smoker	114 (14.2)	97 (12.1)	0.79 (0.55-1.13)	0.82 (0.55-1.22)
Ever-smoker	218 (27.2)	206 (25.7)	0.86 (0.63-1.19)	0.88 (0.62-1.25)
Missing	43 (5.4)	49 (6.1)

Table 1. General characteristics of the study participants with the control group 1 in univariate analysis and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

Matched to cases by age (within 2 years) and residential areas,

Adjusted for BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; R²=0.1277,

First degree relatives,

$1=1,079 Korean won (as of April 26, 2015).

Table 2. Association between the risk of thyroid cancer and smoking history, such as age at starting to smoke, years of cigarette smoking, and number of daily cigarette smoking in multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Adjusted for sex, body mass index, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, smoking status, and alcohol consumption; R²=0.1070.

Table 3. General characteristics of the study participants with the control group 2 in univariate analysis and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

Matched to cases by age (within 2 years), residential areas, and sex,

Adjusted for BMI, family history of cancer, family history of thyroid cancer, education, occupation, monthly household income, marital status, alcohol consumption, and smoking status; R²=0.0711,

First degree relatives,

$1=1,079 Korean won (as of April 26, 2015).