At the last paragraph of the discussion section of paper titled "Clinical responses and prognostic indicators of concurrent chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer" published in volume 43, number 1, March 2011 page 32-41, inequality sign was mistyped.

It was printed as "Thus, a follow up study including a larger cohort should be performed. In our study, patients treated with BED10≥70 showed a better OS when compared to those with BED10≥70, and this was the independent prognostic factor associated with improved OS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.184; 95% confidence interval, 1.644 to 23.259; p=0.007)."

It should be revised as follows:

"Thus, a follow up study including a larger cohort should be performed. In our study, patients treated with BED10≥70 showed a better OS when compared to those with BED10<70, and this was the independent prognostic factor associated with improved OS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.184; 95% confidence interval, 1.644 to 23.259; p=0.007)."

We apologize to readers for leading to confusion on the interpretation of the results.

*DOI of original article: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.1.32