Clinical Significance of Protein Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 and Somatostatin Receptors in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Hee Sung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Woo Ho Kim

doi:10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.181

Cancer Research and Treatment > Volume 43(3); 2011 > Article

Kim, Lee, and Kim: Clinical Significance of Protein Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 and Somatostatin Receptors in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Original Article

Published online: September 30, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.181

Clinical Significance of Protein Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 and Somatostatin Receptors in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Hee Sung Kim, MD, PhD¹, Hye Seung Lee, MD, PhD², Woo Ho Kim, MD, PhD³

¹Department of Pathology, KEPCO Medical Foundation, Hanil General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

²Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

³Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Woo Ho Kim, MD, PhD. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongeon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
Tel: 82-2-740-8269, Fax: 82-2-765-5600, woohokim@snu.ac.kr

Received May 21, 2011 Accepted July 28, 2011

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0):

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was undertaken to evaluate the significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) overexpression and the expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Materials and Methods

Two hundred and forty-seven cases of GEP-NET, comprising 86 foregut and 156 hindgut primary NETs, and 5 metastatic NETs in the liver, were studied retrospectively with immunohistochemistry for COX2, chromogranin A, Ki-67, SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5.

Results

COX2 overexpression was observed in 54%(126 of 234), and SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 positivity in 84%(196 of 233), 72%(168 of 233), and 55%(128 of 232), respectively. COX2 overexpression was found to be positively correlated with Ki-67 labeling index and inversely correlated with the expression of SSTR subtypes. In addition, the expression of SSTR subtypes was tightly correlated in any comparative pairs. A significant inverse correlation was found between COX2 and SSTR2 expression in the foregut, but not hindgut NETs. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that COX2 overexpression (p=0.003) and high Ki-67 labeling index (p<0.001) were associated with poor overall survival (OS), whereas expression of SSTR2 (p<0.001) was associated with better OS of GEP-NET patients. Multivariate analysis revealed negative SSTR2 expression as an independent prognostic marker in GEP-NET patients (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that expression of SSTR subtypes is associated with favorable prognosis, whereas COX2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in GEP-NETs. Taken together, COX2 could be a possible therapeutic target in some subsets of GEP-NETs.

Key words: Cyclooxygenase-2, Somatostatin receptors, Neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate from the neuroendocrine cell system, have widely divergent clinical presentations and are relatively infrequent, constituting only approximately 2% of all neoplasms; they are typically indolent, slow-growing tumors [1]. GEP-NETs occur in approximately 1.95-2.50 per 100,000 population and pancreatic endocrine tumors occur in approximately 1 per 100,000 population and represent 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms [2].

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) is expressed in neuroendocrine cells of human colonic mucosa [3], and in cell lines derived from NETs, including metastatic carcinoids of the pancreas. The neuroendocrine tumor cells express COX2, and furthermore, their growth is inhibited by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX2 selective inhibitors) [4]. A few reports have found that COX2 expression was associated with poor prognosis of midgut carcinoid tumors or reported high COX2 expression in the advancing edge of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors [5]. Ohike and Morohoshi [6] reported that the distribution of COX2-positive cells tended to be similar to the distribution of Ki-67-positive cells in pancreatic NETs, and that there was a close relationship between COX2 expression and tumor proliferative activity.

The small cyclic peptide hormone somatostatin is present in the human body in 2 molecular forms, i.e., somatostatin-14 (consisting of 14 amino acids) and somatostatin-28 (28 amino acids). It exerts diverse biologic effects through interaction with specific somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) located in target tissues. SSTRs are a family of 5 widely distributed G protein-coupled receptors, including subtypes SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5, which characteristically consist of a single polypeptide chain with 7 transmembrane-spanning domains, extracellular domains with ligand binding sites and intracellular domains with sites linked to the activation of second messengers. SSTRs mediate different intracellular signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis [7].

The inhibitory effects of either somatostatin or its analogs, mediated via SSTRs, are linked with several intracellular systems, i.e., inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, resulting in a decrease in intracellular cyclic AMP levels; reduction of Ca²⁺ influxes, resulting in reduced intracellular Ca²⁺ levels; and, in a number of tissues, stimulation of tyrosine phosphatase activity. Long-acting somatostatin analogs have been used for more than 10 years to treat endocrine tumors. Their high receptor-binding affinity is the basis for both diagnostic uses, like scintigraphy or positron emission tomography scans, and therapeutic procedures [8]. A large variety of primary tumors and their metastases can express a high density of SSTRs. Pituitary tumors, endocrine pancreatic tumors and carcinoids express multiple SSTR subtypes, but SSTR2 predominance was found in 90% of carcinoids and 80% of endocrine pancreatic tumors. It has been recently shown that treatment of non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumor with the somatostatin analog octreotide can stabilize the disease in approximately 40% of cases [9,10].

To study the clinical significance of the expression of COX2 and SSTR subtypes in GEP-NETs, we analyzed immunostaining findings for COX2 and SSTR subtypes in 247 patients with GEP-NET.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients

The formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues of patients treated from 1989 to 2008 were retrieved from the archives at the Department of Pathology at Seoul National University Hospitals in Seoul and Bundang, Korea. The inclusion criteria were primary or metastatic GEP-NET diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection, and the exclusion criteria were neuroendocrine tumor of appendiceal origin or metastatic neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin.

Two hundred and forty-seven patients (mean age, 53 years; range, 21 to 88 years) were included in this study. Among them, follow-up and survival information was obtained for 194 patients. The mean follow-up period was 44 months (range, 1 to 140 months), as of September 2010. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board committee of Seoul National University Hospital (C-1012-027-343). Patient survival data, including dates and causes of death, were obtained from the Korean Central Cancer Registry at the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Standard histopathological examinations included assessment of the pathological tumor stage, according to the criteria described in the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual [11]. Histologic classifications were performed as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [12].

2. Tissue array preparation

Tissues obtained from patients were routinely fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. After screening the available slides for each case, we selected a paraffin block that was well fixed and contained a representative section of the tumor. One tissue column (2.0 mm in diameter) was obtained from each selected paraffin block and arranged in separate new paraffin blocks with 60 holes, using a trephine apparatus (Superbiochips Laboratories, Seoul, Korea). Thus, tissue array blocks containing tumor tissues (2 mm in diameter) were produced from all samples. Microarray blocks were then sectioned at 4 µm and processed for immunohistochemical staining. After removing paraffin with xylene, the sections were rehydrated with graded ethanol and immersed in Tris-buffered saline.

3. Immunohistochemistry

Immunostainings for COX2, Ki-67, chromogranin A (CgA), SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 were performed using Bond Polymer Refine Detection kits (Leica Microsytems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK) and Leica BOND-MAX autostainer (Leica Microsystems) with the following antibodies: COX2 (1 : 100, CX229, mouse monoclonal, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), Ki-67 (1 : 100, MIB-1, mouse monoclonal, DAKO, Carpentaria, CA), CgA (1 : 100, M0869, mouse monoclonal, DAKO), SSTR1 (1 : 100, ab2366, rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), SSTR2 (1 : 100, MAB4224, mouse monoclonal, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), and SSTR5 (1 : 100, PAB0299, rabbit polyclonal, Abnova, Jhongli, Taoyuan, Taiwan), respectively.

Immunoreactivity for COX2 was evaluated in tumor cells using a semi-quantitative system, based on the sum of staining intensity (0=negative staining, 1=weak, 2=intermediate, 3=strong staining) and positive cell percentage scores (0=0%, 1=1-25%, 2=26-50%, 3≥50%). Thus, scores from 0-3 assigned for staining intensity and percentage scores were added to obtain an overall score (maximum 6). With regard to COX2 staining, scores of 0-4 (negative or low expression) were considered negative and scores of 5-6 (high expression) as positive [5,13]. For CgA, samples displaying any nuclear staining in tumor cells were scored as positive; for SSTR1, samples showing any cytoplasm or nuclear staining were scored as positive; for SSTR2, samples showing membranous staining in >50% of tumor cells with moderate staining were scored as positive; finally, for SSTR5, samples displaying cytoplasmic staining in >50% tumor cells were scored as positive. Ki-67 staining was performed in all 247 patients on tissue array and grade was obtained in 232 patients. The number of cells that stained for Ki-67 were expressed as percentages; thus, the Ki-67 labeling index was graded as G1 if the number of positive cells was ≤2%, G2 when 3-20%, and G3 when >20%.

4. Statistical analyses

Spearman's rank correlation was performed for analyses of 6 protein expressions in GEP-NETs. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared using the log rank test. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted using overall survival (OS) data. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariate analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Factors included in the multivariate analysis for OS were pathologic stage (confined within organ vs. advanced stage), histology (well-differentiated NET or well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma vs. poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma or mixed type), lymphatic invasion (negative vs. positive), Ki-67 labeling index (G1 vs. G2 or G3), COX2 (no overexpression vs. overexpression), and SSTR2 (positive vs. negative). Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS ver. 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

1. Clinicopathologic profiles of GEP-NET patients

Patient characteristics by tumor site are summarized in Table 1. Tumor sites of NET in those patients were, as follows: 86 foregut (49 stomach, 29 duodenum, 8 pancreas), 156 hindgut (18 colon, 138 rectum), and 5 metastatic tumors in the liver (3 colon primary, 2 pancreas primary). Two hundred and twenty-five (91%) of 247 tumors were confined within an organ, and 21 (9%) tumors were in an advanced stage: 9 foregut, 7 hindgut primary tumors, and 5 liver metastatic tumors. Synchronous cancer was associated in 19 (22%) foregut and 5 (3%) hindgut primary tumors. Histologically poor differentiation was observed in 20 (23%) foregut tumors, 14 (9%) hindgut primary tumors, and 1 (20%) metastatic liver tumor. The proportion of patient death was significantly higher in foregut patients than in hindgut patients (33% [22 of 66] vs. 5% [8 of 123], p<0.001).

2. Results of immunostaining in GEP-NET tissues

Intracellular localization of proteins was shown, as follows: COX2 and SSTR5 in the cytoplasm, CgA, Ki-67, and SSTR1 in the nuclei, and SSTR2 in the membrane of tumor cells (Fig. 1). Overall, COX2 overexpression was observed in 54% (126 of 234), CgA positivity in 35% (82 of 232), SSTR1 expression in 84% (196 of 233), SSTR2 expression in 72% (168 of 233), and SSTR5 expression in 55% (128 of 232). Ki-67 labeling index was obtainable in 232 cases and scored as G1 in 65% (150 cases), G2 in 27% (63 cases), and G3 in 8% (19 cases). COX2 overexpression showed significant association with poor differentiation, higher stage, and lymphatic invasion. Ki-67 labeling index was higher in foregut NETs, poorly differentiated NETs, and NETs with lymphatic invasion. In terms of primary tumor site, rates of CgA positivity and G2 or G3 grade Ki-67 were higher in foregut tumors; in contrast, expression of all SSTR subtypes was higher in hindgut tumors (Table 2).

All of SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR5 expression was significantly associated with better differentiation, lower pathologic stage, and absence of lymphatic invasion. Among the 3 SSTR subtypes, primary site-specific difference was noted for SSTR5, which was higher in hindgut NETs than in foregut NETs (Table 2).

Correlation analysis in the expression of 6 proteins used in this study was performed. Strong correlations were noted in any comparative pairs of SSTR1, SSTR2, or SSTR5 expression (ρ>0.3, p<0.001). An inverse correlation between COX2 and SSTR2 expression was noted in foregut NETs (ρ=-0.3, p=0.002).

3. Survival analyses by protein expression

Kaplan-Meier analyses showed decreased mean OS for patients with COX2 overexpression (92 months vs. 127 months, p=0.003) and patients with G2 or G3 grades Ki-67 labeling indices (82 months vs. 126 months, p<0.001). In contrast, SSTR2 expression was found to be significantly associated with better mean OS (127 months vs. 66 months, p<0.001) (Fig. 2). SSTR1 expression (55 months vs. 120 months, p<0.001) and SSTR5 expression (101 months vs. 118 months, p=0.003) were also associated with better mean OS.

Multivariate regression analysis with variables including pathologic stage, histology, Ki-67 labeling index, lymphatic invasion, COX2 overexpression, and SSTR2 expression was performed. Stage (hazard ratio, 4.836; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.997 to 11.710; p<0.001), Ki-67 labeling index (hazard ratio, 2.863; 95% CI, 1.096 to 7.476; p=0.032), and negative SSTR2 expression were independent prognostic markers in GEP-NETs (hazard ratio, 6.565; 95% CI, 2.412 to 17.872; p<0.001); however, histologic type, presence of lymphatic invasion, or COX2 overexpression were not independent prognostic markers (Table 3).

Discussion

The present series consisted of 86 (35%) foregut primary, 156 (63%) hindgut primary, and 5 (2%) liver metastatic NETs. In 225 (91%) cases, tumors were confined to an organ, and in 21 (9%) cases, tumors were either locally advanced or metastatic. Midgut carcinoid tumor was not included in the present study, which reflects the low prevalence of midgut carcinoid tumors in Asia [14].

The presence of COX2-immunoreactive neuroendocrine cells was observed not only in the large intestine, but also in the stomach, duodenum, and small intestine [3]. A few authors have reported that elevated COX2 expression was involved in the tumorigenesis of pancreatic endocrine [6,15] and gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors [5], and that COX inhibitors are currently being developed for chemopreventive purposes and as adjuvant drugs for the treatment of several human malignancies. NET appear to be an attractive target for such therapies, because of their low proliferative capacity and relative resistance to both chemotherapy and bio-therapeutic modalities, such as interferon-alpha or somatostatin therapy. In a cell culture model of COX2-expressing neuroendocrine neoplasia, they found that COX2 up-regulated the expression and bioactivity of CgA. They also showed that the COX inhibitor sulindac had direct antiproliferative effects on GEP-NET cell lines, as well as colon cancer cell lines [4].

Some links between COX2 and somatostatin, such as extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase, a downstream molecule in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway induced by SSTR binding, have been reported [16]. Furthermore, rofecoxib and octreotide were found to have synergic antineoplastic effects in vitro in SGC-7901 cells (a gastric cancer cell line) and in xenografts in nude mice [17], and human gastric adenocarcinoma growth was found to be inhibited preoperatively by a combination of celecoxib and octreotide [18].

The placebo-controlled, prospective randomized study group reported that the long-acting octreotide showed substantial antitumor effect and longer progression-free survival than placebo in patients with well-differentiated NETs and a low tumor burden [19]. The antineoplastic activity of somatostatin analogs has also been demonstrated in several experimental models, both in vivo and in vitro. Mitosis inhibition was mediated by SSTRs 2 and 5 and resulted in cell cycle arrest [20]. Similarly, the loss of the SSTR2 expression in some human adenocarcinomas seemed to be responsible for losing the regulation of cell proliferation [21].

There are a few reports that suggest the need for indications for somatostatin analog treatment and for predictive markers of treatment response and somatostatin analog resistance. Slaby et al. [22] examined the gene expression of SSTR subtypes by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the correlations between those expression and the outcome of GEP-NET treatment with somatostatin analogs, and found that only SSTR4 was significantly associated with the stabilization of disease during somatostatin analog therapy. In contrast, Toboada et al. [23] showed that elevated tumor expression of SSTR1, SSTR2, and dopamine receptor 2 may help improve responsiveness to somatostatin analogs.

SSTR expression in GEP endocrine tumors is heterogeneous. The types most commonly detected are SSTR1 and 2, followed by SSTR3 and 5, and then by SSTR4, which is poorly represented in GEP-NETs [24]. A correlative immunohistochemical and RT-PCR analysis showed that SSTRs 1-5 were heterogeneously expressed in GEP endocrine tumors and that immunohistochemistry was a reliable tool to detect SSTRs 2, 3, and 5 in both surgical and biopsy specimens [24].

In our series, the overall positive rates of SSTRs in GEP-NETs were 84% for SSTR1, 72% for SSTR2, and 55% for SSTR5. The expression of all 3 subtypes was more frequently observed in well-differentiated NETs, hindgut primary NETs, and NETs with a low pathologic stage. Further stratified analysis in a larger series is required to examine the clinical utilization of the expression of SSTRs in the treatment of GEP-NETs as a predictive marker for response to somatostatin analog treatment.

The present study showed that COX2 overexpression in GEP-NETs is associated with aggressive pathologic variables and poor OS. In contrast, the expression of SSTR subtypes is shown to be associated with better OS. Furthermore, inverse correlations were noted between the expression of COX2 and SSTRs in GEP-NETs. Our results also suggest that COX2 could be a therapeutic target in a selected subset of GEP-NETs.

Conclusion

This study showed that COX2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis, whereas expressions of SSTRs 1, 2, and 5 are associated with favorable prognosis in GEP-NETs. These results suggest that COX2 could be considered as a possible therapeutic target in some subsets of GEP-NETs.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hye Jung Lee and Seung Hee Jung for their technical assistance with the tissue array construction and immunohistochemical studies.

The research was supported by the Korean Cancer Association Novartis Research Grant.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

References

1. Oberg K, Eriksson B. Endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19:753–781. PMID: 16253899

2. Plöckinger U, Rindi G, Arnold R, Eriksson B, Krenning EP, de Herder WW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumours: a consensus statement on behalf of the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS). Neuroendocrinology. 2004;80:394–424. PMID: 15838182

3. Nakajima T, Hamanaka K, Fukuda T, Oyama T, Kashiwabara K, Sano T. Why is cyclooxygenase-2 expressed in neuroendocrine cells of the human alimentary tract? Pathol Int. 1997;47:889–891. PMID: 9503473

4. Detjen KM, Welzel M, Wiedenmann B, Rosewicz S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit growth of human neuroendocrine tumor cells via G1 cell-cycle arrest. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:844–853. PMID: 14566837

5. Cadden I, Johnston BT, Turner G, McCance D, Ardill J, McGinty A. An evaluation of cyclooxygenase-2 as a prognostic biomarker in mid-gut carcinoid tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2007;86:104–111. PMID: 17700013

6. Ohike N, Morohoshi T. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in pancreatic endocrine tumors: association with tumor progression and proliferation. Pathol Int. 2001;51:770–777. PMID: 11881729

7. Volante M, Bozzalla-Cassione F, Papotti M. Somatostatin receptors and their interest in diagnostic pathology. Endocr Pathol. 2004;15:275–291. PMID: 15681851

8. Eriksson B, Oberg K. Summing up 15 years of somatostatin analog therapy in neuroendocrine tumors: future outlook. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(Suppl 2):S31–S38. PMID: 10399030

9. Missiaglia E, Dalai I, Barbi S, Beghelli S, Falconi M, della Peruta M, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: expression profiling evidences a role for AKT-mTOR pathway. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:245–255. PMID: 19917848

10. Butturini G, Bettini R, Missiaglia E, Mantovani W, Dalai I, Capelli P, et al. Predictive factors of efficacy of the somatostatin analogue octreotide as first line therapy for advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006;13:1213–1221. PMID: 17158766

11. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 2002. 6th edNew York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

12. Solcia E, Klöppel G, Sobin LH. International histological classification of tumours. 2000. 2nd edBerlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 38–74.

13. Kostopoulos I, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Gogas H, Papadopoulos S, Malamou-Mitsi V, Scopa CD, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of HER-2 and VEGF in breast cancer patients participating in a randomized study with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;96:251–261. PMID: 16538542

14. Ito T, Sasano H, Tanaka M, Osamura RY, Sasaki I, Kimura W, et al. Epidemiological study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:234–243. PMID: 20058030

15. Okami J, Nakamori S, Yamamoto H, Sakon M, Tsujie M, Hayashi N, et al. An immunohistochemical study of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in endocrine tumors of the pancreas. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21:569–576. PMID: 12636104

16. Kwon KS, Chae HJ. Sodium salicylate inhibits expression of COX-2 through suppression of ERK and subsequent NF-kappaB activation in rat ventricular cardiomyocytes. Arch Pharm Res. 2003;26:545–553. PMID: 12934647

17. Tang C, Liu C, Zhou X, Wang C. Enhanced inhibitive effects of combination of rofecoxib and octreotide on the growth of human gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;112:470–474. PMID: 15382074

18. Huang MT, Chen ZX, Wei B, Zhang B, Wang CH, Huang MH, et al. Preoperative growth inhibition of human gastric adenocarcinoma treated with a combination of celecoxib and octreotide. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007;28:1842–1850. PMID: 17959037

19. Rinke A, Müller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Klose KJ, Barth P, Wied M, et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4656–4663. PMID: 19704057

20. Schally AV, Nagy A. Chemotherapy targeted to cancers through tumoral hormone receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:300–310. PMID: 15350601

21. Buscail L, Saint-Laurent N, Chastre E, Vaillant JC, Gespach C, Capella G, et al. Loss of sst2 somatostatin receptor gene expression in human pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:1823–1827. PMID: 8620499

22. Slaby O, Sachlova M, Bednarikova M, Fabian P, Svoboda M, Vytopilova S, et al. Gene expression of somatostatin receptor 4 predicts clinical outcome of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogs. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2010;25:237–243. PMID: 20423238

23. Taboada GF, Neto LV, Luque RM, Córdoba-Chacón J, de Oliveira Machado E, de Carvalho DP, et al. Impact of gsp oncogene on the mRNA content for somatostatin and dopamine receptors in human somatotropinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2011;93:40–47. PMID: 21079388

24. Papotti M, Bongiovanni M, Volante M, Allìa E, Landolfi S, Helboe L, et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor types 1-5 in 81 cases of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors. A correlative immunohistochemical and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. Virchows Arch. 2002;440:461–475. PMID: 12021920

Fig. 1

Immunostaining results of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), Ki-67, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 1, 2, and 5. In neuroendocrine tumors, COX2 and SSTR5 are localized in the cytoplasm, Ki-67 and SSTR1 are in the nuclei, and SSTR2 is in the membrane. First column, negative; second column, moderate positive; third column, strong positive; fourth column, high power field of strong positive (immunohistochemical staining with DAB, first three columns,×200; fourth column,×400).

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival in 194 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. (A) Cyclooxygenase-2: solid line, no overexpression; dotted line, overexpression. (B) Ki-67: solid line, G1; dotted line, G2 or G3. (C) Somatostatin receptor 2: solid line, positive; dotted line, negative.

Table 1

Clinicopathologic features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

		Total	Foregut	Hindgut	Liver metastasis	p-value
Gender	Female	97 (39)	34 (40)	62 (40)	1 (20)	0.672
	Male	150 (61)	52 (60)	94 (60)	4 (80)
Treatment	Endoscopic biopsy	155 (63)	27 (31)	128 (82)	0 (0)	＜0.001
	Surgical resection	92 (37)	59 (69)	28 (18)	5 (100)
Stage	Confined within organ	225 (92)	76 (89)	149 (96)	0 (0)	＜0.001
	Invasion of adjacent organ	8 (3)	6 (7)	2 (1)	0 (0)
	Distant metastasis	13 (5)	3 (4)	5 (3)	5 (100)
Synchronous cancer	Absent	223 (90)	67 (78)	151 (97)	5 (100)	＜0.001
	Present	24 (10)	19 (22)	5 (3)	0 (0)
Histology	WDNET	181 (73)	49 (57)	132 (85)	0 (0)	＜0.001
	WDNEC	31 (13)	17 (20)	10 (6)	4 (80)
	PDNEC	17 (7)	7 (8)	9 (6)	1 (20)
	Mixed exo- and endocrine carcinoma	18 (7)	13 (15)	5 (3)	0 (0)
Mitoses (per 10 HPF)	0-1	32 (13)	11 (13)	21 (13)	0 (0)	0.272
	2-20	2 (1)	2 (2)	0 (0)	0 (0)
	＞20	4 (2)	3 (4)	1 (1)	0 (0)
	Unknown	209 (34)	70 (81)	134 (86)	5 (100)
Lymphatic invasion	Negative	207 (84)	64 (74)	139 (89)	4 (80)	0.012
	Positive	40 (16)	22 (26)	17 (11)	1 (20)
Vascular invasion	Negative	216 (87)	71 (83)	142 (91)	3 (60)	0.028
	Positive	31 (13)	15 (17)	14 (9)	2 (40)
Lymph node metastasis	Negative	45 (52)	36 (63)	6 (22)	3 (100)	0.001
	Positive	42 (48)	21 (37)	21 (78)	0 (0)
Follow-up	Alive	162 (66)	44 (51)	116 (74)	2 (40)	＜0.001
	Dead	32 (13)	22 (26)	8 (5)	2 (40)
	Unknown	53 (21)	20 (23)	32 (21)	1 (20)

Table 2

Correlations between protein expression and pathologic variables in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

			Tumor site				Histology					Stage				Lymphatic invasion

		Total	Foregut	Hindgut	Liver metastasis	p-value	WDNET	WDNEC	PDNEC	Mixed	p-value	Confined within organ	Invasion to adjacent organ	Distant metastasis	p-value	Negative	Positive	p-value
	Total	235	79	150	5		170	31	17	17		212	8	13		196	39
COX2	Negative	108 (46)	33 (42)	74 (49)	1 (20)	0.273	93 (55)	11 (35)	1 (6)	3 (18)	＜0.001	104 (49)	1 (12)	3 (23)	0.028	104 (53)	4 (10)	＜0.001
	Positive	126 (54)	46 (58)	76 (51)	4 (80)		76 (45)	20 (65)	16 (94)	14 (82)		108 (51)	7 (88)	10 (77)		91 (47)	35 (90)
CgA	Negative	150 (65)	23 (29)	125 (84)	2 (40)	＜0.001	110 (65)	16 (52)	12 (75)	12 (80)	0.203	136 (65)	6 (75)	7 (54)	0.596	125 (64)	25 (69)	0.513
	Positive	82 (35)	56 (71)	23 (16)	3 (60)		60 (35)	15 (48)	4 (25)	3 (20)		74 (35)	2 (25)	6 (46)		71 (36)	11 (31)
Ki-67	G1:≤2%	150 (65)	40 (51)	106 (71)	4 (80)	0.005	130 (77)	17 (55)	2 (11)	1 (6)	＜0.001	140 (67)	3 (38)	6 (46)	0.118	141 (73)	9 (24)	＜0.001
	G2: 3-20%	63 (27)	25 (32)	37 (25)	1 (20)		37 (22)	11 (35)	11 (65)	4 (25)		55 (26)	4 (50)	4 (31)		45 (23)	18 (47)
	G3:＞20%	19 (8)	13 (17)	6 (4)	0 (0)		1 (1)	3 (10)	4 (24)	11 (69)		15 (7)	1 (13)	3 (23)		8 (4)	11 (29)
SSTR1	Negative	37 (16)	18 (23)	18 (12)	1 (20)	0.092	11 (7)	9 (29)	5 (29)	12 (71)	＜0.001	29 (14)	4 (50)	3 (23)	0.016	22 (11)	15 (38)	＜0.001
	Positive	196 (84)	60 (77)	132 (88)	4 (80)		157 (93)	22 (71)	12 (71)	5 (29)		182 (86)	4 (50)	10 (77)		172 (89)	24 (62)
SSTR2	Negative	65 (28)	29 (37)	35 (23)	1 (20)	0.098	26 (15)	12 (39)	13 (76)	14 (87)	＜0.001	54 (26)	6 (75)	4 (31)	0.009	39 (20)	26 (68)	＜0.001
	Positive	168 (72)	50 (63)	114 (77)	4 (80)		143 (85)	19 (61)	4 (24)	2 (13)		157 (74)	2 (25)	9 (69)		156 (80)	12 (32)
SSTR5	Negative	104 (45)	47 (60)	53 (36)	4 (80)	0.001	60 (36)	20 (65)	10 (59)	14 (82)	＜0.001	89 (42)	7 (87)	7 (54)	0.033	81 (42)	23 (59)	0.051
	Positive	128 (55)	31 (40)	96 (64)	1 (20)		107 (64)	11 (35)	7 (41)	3 (18)		121 (58)	1 (13)	6 (46)		112 (58)	16 (41)

Values are presented as number (%). WDNET, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor; WDNEC, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; PDNEC, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; Mixed, mixed exo- and endocrine carcinoma; COX2, cyclooxygenase-2; CgA, chromogranin A; SSTR, somatostatin receptor.

Table 3

Multivariate analysis for overall survival in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

		No.	Hazard ratio	95% CI	p-value
Stage	Confined within organ	163
	Advanced stage	19	4.836	1.997-11.710	＜0.001
Histology	WDNET or WDNEC	156
	PDNEC or Mixed type	26	0.733	0.275-1.952	0.534
Lymphatic invasion	Negative	151
	Positive	31	2.681	0.975-7.371	0.056
Ki-67	G1	116
	G2 or G3	66	2.863	1.096-7.476	0.032
COX2 overexpression	No	73
	Yes	109	1.046	0.337-3.248	0.937
SSTR2	Positive	131
	Negative	51	6.565	2.412-17.872	＜0.001

CI, confidence interval; WDNET, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor; WDNEC, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; PDNEC, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; COX2, cyclooxygenase-2; SSTR, somatostatin receptor.