Conventional Cisplatin-Based Combination Chemotherapy Is Effective in the Treatment of Metastatic Spermatocytic Seminoma with Extensive Rhabdomyosarcomatous Transformation

Yumun Jeong; Jaekyung Cheon; Tae-Oh Kim; Doo-Ho Lim; Sunpyo Lee; Young-Mi Cho; Jun Hyuk Hong; Jae Lyun Lee

doi:10.4143/crt.2014.049

Abstract

A 52-year-old man was presented with a huge left testicular mass and palpable cervical lymphadenopathy with retroperitoneal lymph node enlargement on an abdominal computed tomography. A left radical orchiectomy and an ultrasound-guided neck node biopsy were performed. A pathological examination revealed spermatocytic seminoma with extensive rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation, a condition known to be highly resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. The patient received four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) chemotherapy. A repeat computed tomography revealed a substantial regression consistent with a partial response. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was attempted, which revealed rhabdomyosarcoma; however, complete microscopic resection was not achieved. After surgery, the residual abdominal lymph node progressed and salvage paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy was employed, which again achieved a partial response. Here, we present a first case report of a spermatocytic seminoma with extensive rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation and multiple metastatic lymphadenopathies that showed a favorable response to platinum-based systemic chemotherapy.

Key words: Seminoma, Drug therapy, Radiotherapy

Introduction

The most common testicular neoplasms are germ cell tumors, either seminomas or nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Spermatocytic seminoma (SS) is a rarer germ cell tumor that accounts for approximately 1%-2% of all testicular tumors and 3%-7% of seminomas. SS is an indolent neoplasm, characterized by long duration of symptoms, presentation at early stages, and low risk of distant metastasis [1]. Metastatic SS constitutes less than 0.5% of metastatic germ cell tumors and has a biological course that is rarely complicated by sarcomatous transformation [2], which is clinically characterized by a rapid increase in tumor size and higher possibility of metastatic disease [3]. The sarcomatous component of SS is presented mostly as rhabdomyosarcoma, as well as some others [4]; all of which are known to be resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Metastatic SS with sarcomatous transformation is extremely rare, with just seven cases clearly documented in the literature to date, and is reported to be highly resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy with only a 5-month median survival after diagnosis [5]. We here present a first case report of SS with extensive rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation and multiple metastatic lymphadenopathies that showed a promising response to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Case Report

A 52-year-old male was presented at our hospital in March 2012 with complaints of severe pelvic pain and a palpable neck node, which had started 3 months previously. The patient had a large left testicular mass that had been growing slowly for 3 years before this presentation. Before undergoing an orchiectomy, this testicular mass was 9 cm in size. Tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein and betahuman chorionic gonadotropin) were within normal limits, but his lactate dehydrogenase was elevated to 514 IU/L (normal range, 120 to 250 IU/L). Computed tomography imaging revealed multiple conglomerated lymph nodes in the left neck level V, retroperitoneal, and left common/external iliac spaces with an invasion of the left ureter by the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (the largest measuring 11 cm at the left para-aortic area), causing hydronephrosis.

The patient underwent a left radical orchiectomy. The orchiectomy specimen was a grossly well-defined lobulated soft mass, which extended to the tunica albicans and epididymis and was histologically revealed as SS with massive rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation (Fig. 1). An ultrasound-guided neck biopsy was performed and the histological features of the lymph node were similar to those of the testicular mass, which suggests metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. A hematoxylin and eosin stain revealed cellular features of SS (Fig. 2A) and high-grade alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with focal dense pink cytoplasm (Fig. 2B). Desmin and myogenin staining were absent in the SS component (Fig. 2C), but were strong in the rhabdomyosarcoma component (Fig. 2D), which occupied 70% of the tumor mass.

Immediately after the orchiectomy, the patient received first-line chemotherapy with a combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP). After four cycles of VIP, computed tomography imaging revealed a marked decrease in the size of the left para-aortic lymph node (3 cm) (Fig. 3B) and ablation of pelvic or neck nodes. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) was recommended due to disease activity on positron emission tomography imaging. However, the patient was initially reluctant to undergo surgical resection. Unfortunately, but as expected, retroperitoneal lymph node (aortocaval and left para-aortic lymph nodes) involvement was found to have progressed on a follow-up computed tomography, and the patient finally consented to surgery. RPLND was attempted but complete resection was not possible due to adherence of the lymph nodes to the renal vessel and aorta (Fig. 3C). The pathology revealed SS with rhabdomycosarcomatous transformation.

Postoperatively, the residual lymph node involvement progressed, and second-line chemotherapy with a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) was administered. The patient achieved a near complete response after four cycles of TIP (1.5-cm-sized remnant left para-aortic lymph node) (Fig. 3D). For curative purposes, we considered re-operation or autologous stem cell transplantation for the residual tumor, but the plan was frustrated by its unresectability and the failure of peripheral blood stem cell collection. As an alternative, the patient underwent radiotherapy to the remnant left para-aortic lymph nodes (total, 60 Gy). At the time of writing, he remains under careful observation with no evidence of disease.

Discussion

First described by Masson in 1946 [6], SS is a rare testicular germ cell tumor with well-defined histopathological features. It is characterized by an indolent course with a long duration of symptoms, such as slow painless testicular enlargement for several years, extremely low metastatic potential, and a good prognosis. However, sarcomatous transformation, which occurs in approximately 6% of cases, triggers a sudden rapid increase in the size of the tumor and may result in poor prognosis [3,7].

In our present case, the patient had a gradual testicular enlargement for 3 years, followed by a rapidly expanding neck node for 3 months. Histological analysis revealed a high-grade rhabdomyosarcoma. Hypotheses have been previously proposed to explain the histogenesis of sarcomatous elements and their relationship to SS. One of the most plausible theories is that sarcomatous transformation is an “anaplastic transformation” or “dedifferentiation” of a well-differentiated SS. The characteristic course of this tumor is slow enlargement of the testis initially, followed by a rapid increase in size, and it favors sarcomatous dedifferentiation as the underlying mechanism [8].

The treatment of choice for non-metastatic SS is orchiectomy, followed by surveillance. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy is rarely recommended in SS cases due to low risks of relapse and metastasis. However, a sarcomatous component in a non-metastatic disease confers a much higher risk of metastasis, and precise treatment modalities have yet to be established in these cases. Only four cases of localized SS with sarcomatous transformation have been reported thus far and none of the affected patients showed recurrence of distant metastasis after radical orchiectomy [5]. This suggests that this treatment approach was appropriate even in the presence of a sarcomatous component.

However, if metastases develop in SS cases, the prognosis is very poor, even with the aggressive multimodal approach [2]. In the iterature, five such patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy, and all responded poorly and died shortly (within 3 to 14 months) after diagnosis (Table 1) [9-11]. However, we report a first case of SS with extensive rhabdomyosarcoma transformation and with huge cervical and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, which responded dramatically well to the initial VIP combination chemotherapy after radical orchiectomy. The cervical lymph node was ablated and the retroperitoneal lymph node shrank to a residual size of 3 cm.

Post-chemotherapy surgery was attempted in our current patient, which revealed only a rhabdomyosarcoma component; however, complete resection could not be achieved due to its severe adhesion to the adjacent organs, including the major vessels. Shortly after RRLND, there was a progression of the residual disease. However, salvage chemotherapy with TIP regimen produced a dramatic response, with a residual tumor reduction to 1.5 cm. After radiotherapy for the residual retroperitoneal lymph node, the patient achieved complete response and remains free from disease progression at the time of writing this report. Therefore, we feel that although there is no sound rationale for consolidative radiotherapy to treat residual tumors in seminoma [12], based on the pattern of disease progression, such as increase in size and invasion of adjacent organs at the existing sites rather than new metastases, adequate loco-regional disease control by radiotherapy may be beneficial in treating SS with rhabdomyosarcoma differentiation when surgical resection fails.

Based on the outcomes in our current case with metastatic SS with rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation, a cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic approach with surgical resection of the residual disease can be effective. The mechanism underlying this unusual and dramatic response to platinum-based chemotherapy is not clear. Furthermore, cooperative research on adequate therapies and prognoses is therefore needed for this extremely rare disease.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Fig. 1.

Testis in the study patient was replaced by a well-defined lobulated soft mass that extended to the tunica albicans and epididymis, with a yellowish-white color, smooth surface, focal hemorrhage, and necrosis.

Fig. 2.

(A) Spermatocytic seminomatous component (H&E staining, ×400). (B) Undifferentiated spindle cell rhabdomyosarcomatous component exhibiting a marked pleomorphism and prominent nucleoli with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (H&E staining, ×400). (C) Seminomatous component, with tumor cells showing negativity for desmin (immunoperoxidase, ×400). (D) Sarcomatous component, with tumor cells showing strong positivity for desmin (immunoperoxidase, ×400).

Fig. 3.

(A) The initial para-aortic lymph node size was about 11 cm (arrows). (B) After a first-line chemotherapy (VIP#4), the residual abdominal para-aortic lymph node size was about 3 cm (arrow). (C) Retroperitoneal lymph node involvement progressed. After a retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (January 28, 2013), left para-aortic lymph node was about 4 cm in size (circle). (D) After the second-line chemotherapy (TIP#4), a deceased left para-aortic lymph node was seen (about 1.5 cm in size, circle) and the patient showed a near complete response. VIP, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin; TIP, paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin.

Table 1.

Summary of the published case reports on metastatic spermatocytic seminoma with sarcomatous transformation, treated with systemic chemotherapy

	Author	Age (yr)	Chemotherapy regimen	Metastatic disease	Response	Outcome (survival after diagnosis)
1	Trivedi et al. (2011) [9]	43	Cisplatin+bleomycin+etoposide	Lung	Never achieved	10 mo
2	Chelly et al. (2006)[2]	50	Not reported	Liver	Not reported	3 mo
3	Robinson et al. (2007) [10]	44	First line: VIP^a) Second line: not reported	Bone	Never achieved	5 mo
4	Floyd et al. (1988) [11]	42	First line: CISCA II^b) alternating with VB-4^c) Second line: cisplatin+dactinomycin+bleomycin+ etoposide	Lung, para-aortic lymph nodes	Initially, partial response (50% reduction in the size of pulmonary nodule), no further response	12 mo
5	Floyd et al. (1988) [11]	56	First line: CYVADIC^d) Second line: CISCA II^b) Third line: vincristine+cisplatin+dactinomycin Forth line: cisplatin+etoposide	Lung, liver, retroperitoneal lymph node	Slight reduction during 2 cycles, no further response	14 mo

^a) VIP: etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin,

^b) CISCA II: cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin,

^c) VB-4: vinblastine and bleomycin,

^d) CYVADIC: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dacarbazine.

References

1. Talerman A. Spermatocytic seminoma: clinicopathological study of 22 cases. Cancer. 1980;45:2169–76.

2. Chelly I, Mekni A, Gargouri MM, Bellil K, Zitouna M, Horchani A, et al. Spermatocytic seminoma with rhadomyosarcomatous contingent. Prog Urol. 2006;16:218–20.

3. Matoska J, Talerman A. Spermatocytic seminoma associated with rhabdomyosarcoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990;94:89–95.

4. Malagon HD, Valdez AM, Moran CA, Suster S. Germ cell tumors with sarcomatous components: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 46 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1356–62.

5. Wetherell D, Lawrentschuk N, Gyomber D. Spermatocytic seminoma with sarcoma: an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in localized disease. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:884–7.

6. Masson P. A study of seminomas. Rev Can Biol. 1946;5:361–87.

7. Chung PW, Bayley AJ, Sweet J, Jewett MA, Tew-George B, Gospodarowicz MK, et al. Spermatocytic seminoma: a review. Eur Urol. 2004;45:495–8.

8. True LD, Otis CN, Rosai J, Scully RE, Delprado W. Spermatocytic seminoma of testis with sarcomatous transformation. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12:806.

9. Trivedi P, Pasricha S, Gupta A. Spermatocytic seminoma associated with undifferentiated sarcoma: a rare case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54:138–40.

10. Robinson A, Bainbridge T, Kollmannsberger C. A spermatocytic seminoma with rhabdomyosarcoma transformation and extensive metastases. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30:440–1.

11. Floyd C, Ayala AG, Logothetis CJ, Silva EG. Spermatocytic seminoma with associated sarcoma of the testis. Cancer. 1988;61:409–14.

12. Duchesne GM, Stenning SP, Aass N, Mead GM, Fossa SD, Oliver RT, et al. Radiotherapy after chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma: a diminishing role. MRC Testicular Tumour Working Party. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33:829–35.