CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Jin Hee Kim, Kyungjoo Kim, Seo Jin Park, Jung-Yun Lee, Kidong Kim, Myong Cheol Lim, Jae Weon Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;51(2):788-796.   Published online 2018 September 11    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.120

Excel Download

Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;51(2):788-796   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Vaginal Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 1996;62(3):336-339   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Re: Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
European Urology. 2019;75(5):875   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparative surgical outcomes between robotic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 2018;149:111-112   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 2004;92(1):277-283   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The survival rate of abdominal radical trachelectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer ≥2 cm
Gynecologic Oncology. 2016;141:117   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

A phase III randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic (TLRH) or robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Preliminary quality-of-life outcomes
Gynecologic Oncology. 2014;133:11-12   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
PLOS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0131170   Crossref logo
Link1

Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer: Our Experience
Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2009;16(5):1316-1323   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy for Invasive Cervical Cancer
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2011;18(6):S3   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Cancer Res Treat has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.