CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Jin Hee Kim, Kyungjoo Kim, Seo Jin Park, Jung-Yun Lee, Kidong Kim, Myong Cheol Lim, Jae Weon Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;51(2):788-796.   Published online 2018 September 11    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.120

Excel Download

Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;51(2):788-796   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2021;28(5):971-981.e3   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy for Invasive Cervical Cancer
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2011;18(6):S3   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer: Our Experience
Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2009;16(5):1316-1323   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy leads to poorer prognosis compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Annals of Oncology. 2019;30:ix78   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4

Cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial
. 2021;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The survival rate of abdominal radical trachelectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer ≥2 cm
Gynecologic Oncology. 2016;141:117   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Vaginal Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 1996;62(3):336-339   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 2004;92(1):277-283   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for bulky (≥3cm) FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer
Gynecologic Oncology. 2013;130(1):e53   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Cancer Res Treat has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since October 29, 2014.