Sang Hun Song, Jaewon Lee, Young Hwii Ko, Jong Wook Kim, Seung Il Jung, Seok Ho Kang, Jinsung Park, Ho Kyung Seo, Hyung Joon Kim, Byong Chang Jeong, Tae-Hwan Kim, Se Young Choi, Jong Kil Nam, Ja Yoon Ku, Kwan Joong Joo, Won Sik Jang, Young Eun Yoon, Seok Joong Yun, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jong Jin Oh
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1337-1345. Published online April 17, 2023
Purpose Outcome analysis of urachal cancer (UraC) is limited due to the scarcity of cases and different staging methods compared to urothelial bladder cancer (UroBC). We attempted to assess survival outcomes of UraC and compare to UroBC after stage-matched analyses.
Materials and Methods Total 203 UraC patients from a multicenter database and 373 UroBC patients in single institution from 2000 to 2018 were enrolled (median follow-up, 32 months). Sheldon stage conversion to corresponding TNM staging for UraC was conducted for head-to-head comparison to UroBC. Perioperative clinical variables and pathological results were recorded. Stage-matched analyses for survival by stage were conducted.
Results UraC patients were younger (mean age, 54 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), with 163 patients (80.3%) receiving partial cystectomy and 23 patients (11.3%) radical cystectomy. UraC was more likely to harbor ≥ pT3a tumors (78.8% vs. 41.8%). While 5-year recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were comparable between two groups (63.4%, 67%, and 62.1% in UraC and 61.5%, 75.9%, and 67.8% in UroBC, respectively), generally favorable prognosis for UraC in lower stages (pT1-2) but unfavorable outcomes in higher stages (pT4) compared to UroBC was observed, although only 5-year CSS in ≥ pT4 showed statistical significance (p=0.028). Body mass index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.929), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.921), pathologic T category (HR, 3.846), and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.993) were predictors of CSS for all patients.
Conclusion Despite differing histology, UraC has comparable prognosis to UroBC with relatively favorable outcome in low stages but worse prognosis in higher stages. The presented system may be useful for future grading and risk stratification of UraC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical Presentation and Targeted Interventions in Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Case Series and Review of Emerging Therapies Akshay Mathavan, Akash Mathavan, Rodrigo Murillo-Alvarez, Kriti Gera, Urszula Krekora, Aaron J. Winer, Mohit Mathavan, Ellery Altshuler, Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2024; 22(1): 67. CrossRef
Robotic‐assisted approaches to urachal carcinoma: A comprehensive systematic review of the safety and efficacy outcomes Caio Vinícius Suartz, Lucas Motta Martinez, Pedro Henrique Brito, Carlos Victori Neto, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Luiz Antonio Assan Botelho, Fábio Pescarmona Gallucci, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro‐Filho BJUI Compass.2024; 5(3): 327. CrossRef
Soo Young Jeong, Hyea Park, Myeong Seon Kim, Jun Hyeok Kang, E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Tae Joong Kim, Jeong Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk Soo Bae, Chel Hun Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):516-523. Published online October 29, 2019
Purpose
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion).
Results
A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage.
Conclusion
In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer due to oxidative stress Amir Asotić, Memić Asotić, Muhamed Memić, Kerim Asotić, Amra Asotić Sanamed.2024; 19(1): 39. CrossRef
Investigating and Analyzing Prognostic Factors and Their Impact on Recurrent Cervical Cancers Ashish Uke, Shweta B Dahake, Anurag Luharia, Monika Luharia, Gaurav V Mishra, Chanrashekhar Mahakalkar Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively Shuang Dong, Yan-Qing Peng, Ya-Nan Feng, Xiao-Ying Li, Li-Ping Gong, Shuang Zhang, Xiao-Shan Du, Li-Tao Sun BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Giuseppe Angelico, Damiano Arciuolo, Emma Bragantini, Antonio Travaglino, Michele Valente, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Stefania Sfregola, Alessia Piermattei, Federica Cianfrini, Paola Roberti, Gian Franco Za Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1137. CrossRef
Identification of lymph node metastasis in pre‐operation cervical cancer patients by weakly supervised deep learning from histopathological whole‐slide biopsy images Qingqing Liu, Nan Jiang, Yiping Hao, Chunyan Hao, Wei Wang, Tingting Bian, Xiaohong Wang, Hua Li, Yan zhang, Yanjun Kang, Fengxiang Xie, Yawen Li, XuJi Jiang, Yuan Feng, Zhonghao Mao, Qi Wang, Qun Gao, Wenjing Zhang, Baoxia Cui, Taotao Dong Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(17): 17952. CrossRef
Roles of DWI and T2-weighted MRI volumetry in the evaluation of lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer Y. Wang, X. Chen, H. Pu, Y. Yuan, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Li Clinical Radiology.2022; 77(3): 224. CrossRef
Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Mu Xu, Xiaoyan Xie, Liangzhi Cai, Yongjin Xie, Qiao Gao, Pengming Sun Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Miriam Dolciami, Silvia Capuani, Veronica Celli, Alessandra Maiuro, Angelina Pernazza, Innocenza Palaia, Violante Di Donato, Giusi Santangelo, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Paolo Ricci, Carlo Della Rocca, Carlo Catalano, Lucia Manganaro Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 638. CrossRef
The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric Yuan-Kai Cheng, Shih-Hsun Kuo, Heng-Hsuan Yen, Jing-Hu Wu, Yu-Chieh Chen, Ming-Yii Huang Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer? Njål Lura, Kari S. Wagner-Larsen, David Forsse, Jone Trovik, Mari K. Halle, Bjørn I. Bertelsen, Øyvind Salvesen, Kathrine Woie, Camilla Krakstad, Ingfrid S. Haldorsen Insights into Imaging.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer Chao Ran, Jian Sun, Yunhui Qu, Na Long World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel Four-Gene Prognostic Signature as a Risk Biomarker in Cervical Cancer Jun Wang, Hua Zheng, Yatian Han, Geng Wang, Yanbin Li, Cuida Meng International Journal of Genomics.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Yunghun You, Jin-Young Jang, Song Cheol Kim, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Chol Kyoon Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Jae Do Yang, Woo Jung Lee, Tae Ho Hong, Keun Soo Ahn, Chi-Young Jeong, Hyeon Kook Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Young Hoon Roh, Hee Joon Kim, Hongbeom Kim, In Woong Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1639-1652. Published online April 19, 2019
Purpose
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) included several significant changes. We aim to evaluate this staging system compared to the 7th edition AJCC staging system and European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) system.
Materials and Methods
We used Korean nationwide surgery database (2000-2014). Of 972 patients who had undergone surgery for PNET, excluding patients diagnosed with ENETS/World Health Organization 2010 grade 3 (G3), only 472 patients with accurate stage were included.
Results
Poor discrimination in overall survival rate (OSR) was noted between AJCC 8th stage III and IV (p=0.180). The disease-free survival (DFS) curves of 8th AJCC classification were well separated between all stages. Compared with stage I, the hazard ratio of II, III, and IV was 3.808, 13.928, and 30.618, respectively (p=0.007, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The curves of OSR and DFS of certain prognostic group in AJCC 7th and ENETS overlapped. In ENETS staging system, no significant difference in DFS between stage IIB versus IIIA (p=0.909) and IIIA versus IIIB (p=0.291). In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002), perineural invasion (p=0.003), and grade (p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for DFS.
Conclusion
This is the first large-scale validation of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for PNET. The revised 8th system provides better discrimination compared to that of the 7th edition and ENETS TNM system. This supports the clinical use of the system.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Imaging Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Eric Rupe, Mahmoud Diab, LeeAnn Xoubi, Noha Kabeel, Ajaykumar Morani, Albert Klekers, Priya Bhosale Seminars in Roentgenology.2025; 60(1): 31. CrossRef
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis Matteo Tacelli, Manuel Gentiluomo, Paolo Biamonte, Justo P. Castano, Maja Cigrovski Berković, Mauro Cives, Sanja Kapitanović, Ilaria Marinoni, Sonja Marinovic, Ilias Nikas, Lenka Nosáková, Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo, Eleonora Pellè, Aurel Perren, Jonathan Str Seminars in Cancer Biology.2025; 112: 112. CrossRef
Prognostic value of CT-based radiomics in grade 1–2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Subin Heo, Hyo Jung Park, Hyoung Jung Kim, Jung Hoon Kim, Seo Young Park, Kyung Won Kim, So Yeon Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, Jae Ho Byun, Song Cheol Kim, Hee Sang Hwang, Seung Mo Hong Cancer Imaging.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Contemporary Approaches to the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Akash Kartik, Valerie L. Armstrong, Chee-Chee Stucky, Nabil Wasif, Zhi Ven Fong Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1501. CrossRef
Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study Juwan Kim, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyong Hwang, Chang Moo Kang World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
NON-FUNCTIONING SPORADIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, André Luis Montagnini, Jessica Okubo, Ana Gabriela Vivarelli Fernandes, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Paulo Herman, José Jukemura ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Venous invasion and lymphatic invasion are correlated with the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm Sho Kiritani, Junichi Arita, Yuichiro Mihara, Rihito Nagata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Kaneko, Kiyoshi Hasegawa Surgery.2023; 173(2): 365. CrossRef
Impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on Staging and Therapeutic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors Aleksander Kosmala, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Thomas Lindner, Kerstin Michalski, Andreas Schirbel, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Weich, Rudolf A. Werner Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(1): 35. CrossRef
Recurrence and outcomes of non‐functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours post‐resection: an Australian retrospective, multicentre cohort study Sean Lim, Lynn Chong, Saania Peeroo, Olukunle Onasanya, Evelyn He, Simon Banting, Daniel Croagh ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(1-2): 160. CrossRef
Validation of a supplementary condition of eighth AJCC staging system for stage II hepatocellular carcinoma Min Li, Linquan Wu, Shuaiwu Luo, Yaran Liu, Chi Sun, Enliang Li, Jiakun Wang, Bowen Li, Zhihao Huang, Jin Ge, Jun Lei, Fan Zhou, Wenjun Liao European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(7): 1217. CrossRef
A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery Xiao-Ya Shi, Yan Wang, Xuan Zhou, Meng-Li Xie, Qian Ma, Gan-Xin Wang, Jing Zhan, Yi-Ming Shao, Bai Wei Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of CXCR4-Directed PET/CT on Staging and Proposed Oncologic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors Alexander Weich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas Schirbel, Marieke Heinrich, Andreas K. Buck, Steven P. Rowe, Aleksander Kosmala, Rudolf A. Werner Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(7): 586. CrossRef
Lifestyle, clinical and histological indices-based prediction models for survival in cancer patients: a city-wide prospective cohort study in China Ce Sun, Huan Xu, Suixiang Wang, Ke Li, Pengzhe Qin, Boheng Liang, Lin Xu Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(12): 9965. CrossRef
A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Yong-Jin Park, Young Suk Park, Seung Tae Kim, Seung Hyup Hyun Molecular Imaging and Biology.2023; 25(5): 897. CrossRef
Prognostic validity of the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition staging system for well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Hebin Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hang Zhang, Jun Liu, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Feng Peng, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu, Jikuan Jin, Yi Wu, Abu HPB.2022; 24(5): 681. CrossRef
Comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using data from the KOTUS-BP national database: overcoming selection bias and the necessity of definite indications Hongbeom Kim, Jin Seok Heo, Chang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Sung-Sik Han, Yong Hoon Kim, Hyeon Kook Lee, Young-Dong Yu, In Seok Choi, Jae Do Yang, Younghoon Roh, Seong-Ryong Kim, Junchul Chung, Sang Hwa Song, HPB.2022; 24(10): 1804. CrossRef
Fate of Surgical Patients with Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study Using Multi-Institutional Registries In Woong Han, Jangho Park, Eun Young Park, So Jeong Yoon, Gang Jin, Dae Wook Hwang, Kuirong Jiang, Wooil Kwon, Xuefeng Xu, Jin Seok Heo, De-Liang Fu, Woo Jung Lee, Xueli Bai, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Yin-Mo Yang, Keun Soo Ahn, Chunhui Yuan, Hyeon Kook Lee, Bei Sun, Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1038. CrossRef
Development and Validation of a Modified Eighth AJCC Staging System for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Xu-Feng Zhang, Feng Xue, Zheng Wu, Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Eleftherios Makris, Flavio Rocha, Zaheer Kanji, Sharon Weber, Alexander Fisher, Ryan Fields, Bradley A. Krasnick, Kamran Idrees, Paula M. Smith, Cliff Cho, Megan Beems, Yi Ly Annals of Surgery.2022; 275(6): e773. CrossRef
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center Sara Coelho, Cláudia Costa, Ana Paula Santos, Pedro Souteiro, Joana Oliveira, Júlio Oliveira, Isabel Azevedo, Isabel Torres, Maria José Bento Endocrine Oncology.2022; 2(1): 32. CrossRef
Surgical Outcomes, Long-Term Survivals and Staging Systems of World Health Organization G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Min Yang, Lin Zeng, Shengzhong Hou, Bole Tian, Shuguang Jin, Yi Zhang Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(18): 5253. CrossRef
Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis Jinghua Chen, Qichen Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Yujuan Jiang, Zhen Huang, Jianguo Zhou, Hong Zhao, Jianqiang Cai Current Oncology.2022; 30(1): 344. CrossRef
Clinical value of 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET/CT in the diagnosis and detection of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis Huan Ma, Ying Kan, Ji-gang Yang Acta Radiologica.2021; 62(9): 1217. CrossRef
Surgical Strategy Based on Radiological 3D Reconstruction in a Giant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Interdisciplinary Approach Gabriel Fridolin Hess, Savas Deniz Soysal, Guillaume Nicolas, Martin Bolli, Christoph Johannes Zech, Alexandar Tzankov, Emanuel Christ, Michael Montemurro, Otto Kollmar, Tahsin Colak Case Reports in Surgery.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update Xiaoyan Liao, Dongwei Zhang Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2021; 145(5): 543. CrossRef
Insights of Outcome after Resection of Small Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, Julia Fray Ribeiro, Thiago Costa Ribeiro, Ricardo Jureidini, Guilherme Naccache Namur, Thiago Nogueira Costa, Telesforo Bacchella, Ivan Cecconello, Jose Celso Ardengh Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
New staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms combining TNM stage and WHO grade classification [ ] Min Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hebin Wang, Yahui Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jun Liu, Hang Zhang, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu, Cancer Letters.2021; 518: 207. CrossRef
Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insight into a Rare Histology Samantha M. Ruff, Oliver Standring, Grace Wu, Anna Levy, Sandeep Anantha, Elliot Newman, Martin S. Karpeh, William Nealon, Gary B. Deutsch, Matthew J. Weiss, Danielle K. DePeralta Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(13): 8318. CrossRef
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management Zu-Yi Ma, Yuan-Feng Gong, Hong-Kai Zhuang, Zi-Xuan Zhou, Shan-Zhou Huang, Yi-Ping Zou, Bo-Wen Huang, Zhong-Hai Sun, Chuan-Zhao Zhang, Yun-Qiang Tang, Bao-Hua Hou World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(19): 2305. CrossRef
Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Hong-Yu Chen, Ya-Liang Zhou, Yong-Hua Chen, Xing Wang, Hao Zhang, Neng-Wen Ke, Xu-Bao Liu, Chun-Lu Tan World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(25): 3638. CrossRef
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification Lokesh Khanna, Srinivasa R. Prasad, Abhijit Sunnapwar, Sainath Kondapaneni, Anil Dasyam, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Umber Salman, Alia Nazarullah, Venkata S. Katabathina RadioGraphics.2020; 40(5): 1240. CrossRef
Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Ashley L. Titan, Jeffrey A. Norton, Andrea T. Fisher, Deshka S. Foster, E. John Harris, David J. Worhunsky, Patrick J. Worth, Monica M. Dua, Brendan C. Visser, George A. Poultsides, Michael T. Longaker, Robert T. Jensen JAMA Network Open.2020; 3(11): e2024318. CrossRef
Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(12): 1029. CrossRef
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‒determined lymph nodal necrosis (LNN) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and explore the feasibility of an N-classification system based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system.
Materials and Methods
The MRI scans of 616 patients with newly diagnosed stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC who were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were reviewed.
Results
Multivariate analysis showed that LNN was an independent negative prognostic predictor of distant metastasis free survival (hazard ratio, 1.634; 95% confidence interval, 1.023 to 2.609; p=0.040) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.154; 95% confidence interval, 1.282 to 3.620; p=0.004). Patients of classification N1 disease with LNN were reclassified as classification N2, and classification N2 disease with LNN as classification N3 in the proposed N-classification system. Correlation with death and distant failure was significant, and the total difference between N1 and N3 was wider with the proposed system.
Conclusion
MRI-determined LNN is an independent negative prognostic factor for NPC. The proposed N classification system is powerfully predictive.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Identifying adverse nodal features associated with poor prognosis in stage IB nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on the 9th AJCC/UICC staging system: Implications for treatment intensification Jing Zhong, Hongye Chen, Xinlan Chen, Ning Ma, Yuan Huang, Shaojun Lin, Jianji Pan, Yunbin Chen, Tianzhu Lu, Youping Xiao, Peng Shi, Hanchuan Xu, Qiaojuan Guo Radiotherapy and Oncology.2025; 205: 110747. CrossRef
Advanced image-identified extranodal extension of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in the refinement of N classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma Wei Jiang, Gao-Yuan Wang, Guan-Jie Qin, Wu-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ya-Qian Han, Feng Lei, Liang-Fang Shen, Kun-Yu Yang, Chun-Yan Cui, Ling-Long Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Lei Chen, Rui Guo, Ling Li, Zheng Wu, Gui-Qiong Xu, Qin Zhou, Jing Huang, Shao-Hui Huang, Cell Reports Medicine.2025; 6(2): 101942. CrossRef
Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging: from the 7th to the 9th Edition of the TNM System and Future Outlook Binhao Wu, Xiaozhong Chen, Caineng Cao Current Oncology Reports.2025; 27(3): 322. CrossRef
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on the Different Grades of Cervical Lymph Node Necrosis to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Run-Zhi Wang, Li-Ru Zhu, Yao-Can Xu, Mei-Wen Chen, Zhong-Guo Liang, Kai-Hua Chen, Ling Li, Xiao-Dong Zhu Academic Radiology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Matted Lymph Nodes on MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Prognostic Factor and Potential Indication for Induction Chemotherapy Benefits Annan Dong, Siyu Zhu, Huali Ma, Xiaoyu Wei, Wenjie Huang, Guangying Ruan, Lizhi Liu, Yunxian Mo, Fei Ai Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 59(6): 1976. CrossRef
Statistical and machine learning methods for cancer research and clinical practice: A systematic review Laura Lopez-Perez, Eleni Georga, Carlo Conti, Victor Vicente, Rebeca García, Leandro Pecchia, Dimitris Fotiadis, Lisa Licitra, Maria Fernanda Cabrera, Maria Teresa Arredondo, Giuseppe Fico Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2024; 92: 106067. CrossRef
The Prognostic Value of Serum Sialic Acid in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study Zetan Chen, Gang Wu, Xiangying Lin, Xiaopeng Huang, Shuai Zhang, Kaihua Chen, Zhongguo Liang, Xiaodong Zhu Cancer Management and Research.2024; Volume 16: 215. CrossRef
A prognostic nomogram incorporating tumor size and lymph node size for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma Qi Yi, Jiazuo Cai, Yunen Lin, Zimei Hu, Jie Lin, Zhong Huang, Wei Liu, Ronghui Zheng, YaWei Yuan, Chengcong Chen American Journal of Otolaryngology.2023; 44(2): 103717. CrossRef
Intra- and peritumoral MRI radiomics assisted in predicting radiochemotherapy response in metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal cancer Hao Xu, Ai Wang, Chi Zhang, Jing Ren, Peng Zhou, Jieke Liu BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Construction of Prognostic Nomogram in Patients with N3-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Wenmiao Cao, Xiaoxin Li, Jianqi Yang, Enming Xing, Wenjuan Wu, Yizhi Ge, Buhai Wang ORL.2023; 85(4): 195. CrossRef
Detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of FDG PET/MR Yongfeng Piao, Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2022; 279(1): 353. CrossRef
A nonendemic analysis of the patterns and prognosis of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas in older patients aged ≥ 65 years Baoqiu Liu, Mingxing Zhang, Yanqing Cao, Zhe Wang, Xicheng Wang Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis on staging imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Qi-Yong H. Ai, Kuo Feng Hung, Tiffany Y. So, Frankie K. F. Mo, Wing Tsung Anthony Chin, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B. Y. Ma, Michael Ying, Ann D. King Cancer Imaging.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus Endostar compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study Yuanxiu Yin, Ziyan Zhou, Zhiru Li, Mingjun Shen, Yating Qin, Chaolin Yang, Rensheng Wang, Min Kang Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
FMISO-Based Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Martin Dolezel, Marek Slavik, Tomas Blazek, Tomas Kazda, Pavel Koranda, Lucia Veverkova, Petr Burkon, Jakub Cvek Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(8): 1245. CrossRef
Prognostic value of the cervical lymph node necrosis ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Ying Bin, Zhen Meng, Lu-Lu Huang, Xue-Ying Hu, Jun-Mei Song, Yi-Ting Xie, Min Kang, Ren-Sheng Wang Radiotherapy and Oncology.2022; 177: 185. CrossRef
Influence of tumor necrosis on treatment sensitivity and long-term survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Shao-Bo Liang, Lu-Si Chen, Xing-Li Yang, Dan-Ming Chen, Dong-Hui Wang, Chun-Yan Cui, Chuan-Bo Xie, Li-Zhi Liu, Xiang-Ying Xu Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 155: 219. CrossRef
Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis Wanpeng Li, Hanyu Lu, Huan Wang, Li Hu, Xicai Sun, Hongmeng Yu, Dehui Wang Head & Neck.2021; 43(8): 2353. CrossRef
Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Wai Tong Ng, Raymond K. Y. Tsang, Jonathan J. Beitler, Remco de Bree, Andrés Coca‐Pelaz, Avraham Eisbruch, Orlando Guntinas‐Lichius, Anne W. M. Lee, Antti A. Mäkitie, William M. Mendenhall, Sandra Nuyts, Alessandra Rinaldo, K. Thomas Robbins, Juan P. Rodr Head & Neck.2021; 43(6): 1949. CrossRef
MRI-based radiomics as response predictor to radiochemotherapy for metastatic cervical lymph node in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Hao Xu, Jieke Liu, Ying Huang, Peng Zhou, Jing Ren The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: a population-based retrospective study Man Xu, Jian Zang, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Xuqi Li BMJ Open.2021; 11(8): e045417. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with N3 disease Xiaoshuang Niu, Fen Xue, Peiyao Liu, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He Translational Oncology.2021; 14(12): 101216. CrossRef
Prognostic value and the potential role of treatment options for cervical lymph node necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Kuiyuan Liu, Siting Lin, Liangru Ke, Weixiong Xia, Chun Zhang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Mengyun Qiang, Xi Chen, Jia Liu, Chuanmiao Xie, Xiang Guo, Xing Lv Oral Oncology.2020; 109: 104864. CrossRef
The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions Si-Qi Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Cheng Xu, Rui Guo, Wen-Fei Li, Ling-Long Tang, Ying Sun, Jun Ma Chinese Medical Journal.2020; 133(17): 2044. CrossRef
Prognostic and Treatment Guiding Significance of MRI-Based Tumor Burden Features and Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Xi Chen, Xun Cao, Bingzhong Jing, Weixiong Xia, Liangru Ke, Yanqun Xiang, Kuiyuan Liu, Mengyun Qiang, Chixiong Liang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Wangzhong Li, Jingjing Miao, Guoying Liu, Zhuochen Cai, Shuhui Lv, Xiang Guo, Chaofeng Li, Xing Lv Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Patterns and Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis on Distant Metastasis and Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study, 2006–2015 Yali Xu, Taoyuan Huang, Liqin Fan, Wei Jin, Xiaoming Chen, Jinhai Chen Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Screening of key miRNAs and evaluation of their diagnostic and prognostic values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Xianlu Zhuo, Wei Zhou, Huiping Ye, Dairong Li, Aoshuang Chang, Yongzhong Wu, Qi Zhou Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Jeong Il Yu, Do Hoon Lim, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Seung Tae Kim, Su Jin Lee, Sung Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Heejin Yoo, Kyunga Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):876-885. Published online October 1, 2018
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare prognostic differentiation performances of the 7th and the 8th edition of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,633 GC patients who underwent curative D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone (CA) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) from 2004 to 2013 were included. Concordance index (c-index) was applied to compare the discriminatory ability.
Results
In the 8th edition, migration of stage was detected in 248 patients (15.2%). Among them, 121 patients were up-staged while 127 patients were down-staged. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the discriminatory ability between the 7th and 8th editions. The new edition of staging system, however, showed a trend of better prognostic performance not only in recurrence-free survival (c-index=0.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.762 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.740; 95% CI, 0.712 to 0.768 in the 8th edition; p=0.14), but also in overall survival (c-index=0.717; 95% CI, 0.688 to 0.745 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.722; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.751 in the 8th edition; p=0.19), especially in stage III. This finding was repeated in the subgroup analysis regardless of adjuvant CA or CCRT.
Conclusion
Generally, the 8th edition of AJCC staging system had failed to show a superior discriminatory ability for curatively D2 resected GC patients than the 7th edition, although there was a trend of better prognostic performance of the new edition, regardless of adjuvant treatment method.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3 Hongyu Zhang, Nan Sun, Feng Li, Qiyang Wang, Zhao Sun, Yawei Zhang, Lei Wang, Chunlin Zhao, Yang Fu Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study Chao Cai, Cheng Chen, Xiuli Lin, Huihui Zhang, Mingming Shi, Xiaolei Chen, Weisheng Chen, Didi Chen Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system Kailai Yin, Xuanhong Jin, Yang Pan, Mengli Zi, Yingsong Zheng, Yubo Ma, Chuhong Pang, Kang liu, Jinxia Chen, Yizhou Wei, Dujiang Liu, Xiangdong Cheng, Li Yuan Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(8): 1283. CrossRef
A Comprehensive Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma Styliani Mantziari, Penelope St Amour, Francesco Abboretti, Hugo Teixeira-Farinha, Sergio Gaspar Figueiredo, Caroline Gronnier, Dimitrios Schizas, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1628. CrossRef
Normalization weighted combination scores re-evaluate TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database Junpeng Wu, Hao Wang, Xin Yin, Yufei Wang, Zhanfei Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yingwei Xue International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed Ri-Sheng Zhao, Yi-Nan Liu, Wei-Gang Dai, Si-Le Chen, Jin-Ning Ye, Er-Tao Zhai, Shi-Rong Cai, Jian-Hui Chen Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma C.R. Akshatha, Smitha Bhat, R. Sindhu, Dharini Shashank, Sarana Rose Sommano, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Shashanka K. Prasad Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(9): 5371. CrossRef
Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park, Jeeyun Lee, Changhoon Choi, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Seung Tae Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Heewon Han, Kyunga Kim, Sung Kim, Do Hoon Lim Cancers.2020; 12(4): 943. CrossRef
Purpose
This study was conducted is to identify the prognostic value and staging categories of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–detected intracranial extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to determine whether it is necessary to subclassify the T4 classification NPC.
Materials and Methods
A total of 335 nonmetastatic T4 classificationNPC patientswith MRI treated between March 2004 and June 2011 by radical IMRTwere included. The T4 classification patientswere subclassified into two grades (T4a, without intracranial extension vs. T4b, with intracranial extension) according to the site of invasion.
Results
The frequency of intracranial extensionwas 40.9% (137 of 335 patients). Multivariate analysis identified subclassification (T4a vs. T4b) as an independent prognostic factor for local failure-free survival (p=0.049; hazard ratio [HR], 0.498) and overall survival (p=0.004; HR, 0.572); however, it had no effect on regional failure-free survival or distant failure-free survival (p > 0.050).
Conclusion
For patients with T4 classification NPC, those with MRI-detected intracranial extension are more likely to experience local failure and death afterIMRT than patientswithout intracranial extension. According to the site of invasion, subclassification of T4 patients as T4a or T4b has prognostic value in NPC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prognostic value of MR-detected mandibular nerve involvement: potential indication for future individual induction chemotherapy in T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma Wenjie Huang, Shuqi Li, Chao Luo, Zhiying Liang, Shumin Zhou, Haojiang Li, Yi Cai, Shaobo Liang, Guangying Ruan, Peiqiang Cai, Lizhi Liu Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5951. CrossRef
The application of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with pterygopalatine fossa invasion Bi Zhou, Zhuoyue Tang, Liang Lv, Jiayi Yu, Xiaojiao Li, Chao Yang, Shifeng Xiang, Zuhua Song, Dan Zhang Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2023; 96: 38. CrossRef
MRI-based random survival Forest model improves prediction of progression-free survival to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma Wei Pei, Chen Wang, Hai Liao, Xiaobo Chen, Yunyun Wei, Xia Huang, Xueli Liang, Huayan Bao, Danke Su, Guanqiao Jin BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Significance of boost dose for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with residual primary lesion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy Zhaodong Fei, Ting Xu, Xiufang Qiu, Mengying Li, Taojun Chen, Li Li, Chaoxiong Huang, Chuanben Chen Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(7): 2047. CrossRef
Can Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging be Used to Differentiate Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma From Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma? Zongqiong Sun, Shudong Hu, Yuxi Ge, Linfang Jin, Jianfeng Huang, Weiqiang Dou Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2021; 53(4): 1140. CrossRef
Detailed analysis of recovery process of cranial nerve palsy after IMRT-based comprehensive treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Jian Zang, Yan Li, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Bingxin Hou, Min Yao, Lina Zhao, Mei Shi Radiation Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Orbital Metastases: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Treatment Outcomes Paolo Palmisciano, Gianluca Ferini, Christian Ogasawara, Waseem Wahood, Othman Bin Alamer, Aditya D. Gupta, Gianluca Scalia, Alexandra M. G. Larsen, Kenny Yu, Giuseppe E. Umana, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh, Ali S. Haider Cancers.2021; 14(1): 94. CrossRef
Prognostic efficacy of extensive invasion of primary tumor volume for T3-4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy Fen Xue, Dan Ou, Xiaomin Ou, Xin Zhou, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He Oral Oncology.2020; 100: 104478. CrossRef
Clinical outcomes for nasopharyngeal cancer with intracranial extension after taxane‐based induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy in the modern era Sarbani Ghosh‐Laskar, Avinash Pilar, Carlton Johnny, Kumar Prabhash, Amit Joshi, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Tejpal Gupta, Ashwini Budrukkar, Vedang Murthy, Monali Swain, Vanita Noronha, Vijay Maruthi Patil, Prathamesh Pai, Deepa Nair, Devendra Arvind Chaukar, S World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2020; 6(1): 25. CrossRef
Impact of Paranasal Sinus Invasion on Oncologic and Dosimetric Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy—Implications for Risk Stratification and Planning Optimization Xin Zhou, Xiayun He, Fen Xue, Xiaomin Ou, Chaosu Hu Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans Jiayun Chen, Weijie Cui, Qi Fu, Haojia Zhang, Xiaodong Huang, Fei Han, Wenlong Xia, Bin Liang, Jianrong Dai Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.2020; 21(11): 37. CrossRef
Paranasal Sinus Invasion in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 73. CrossRef
Grading of MRI–detected skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull-base invasion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen Radiation Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Locoregional extension and patterns of failure for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial extension Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen Oral Oncology.2018; 79: 27. CrossRef
Dosimetric comparison and observation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma Rongqiang Pan, Jingming Wang, Feng Qi, Ruizhen Liu Oncology Letters.2017; 14(4): 4741. CrossRef
Purpose
Anorectal malignant melanomas (AMM) are rare and have poor survival. The study aims to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMM, and to devise a staging system predictive of survival outcome.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective study of 28 patients diagnosed with, and treated for AMM. Patients classified by clinical staging of mucosal melanoma (MM) were reclassified via rectal and anal TNM staging. Survival outcomes were compared among patients grouped by the three different staging systems.
Results
The three staging systems were equated with similar figures for 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with stage I disease. Patients (n=19) diagnosed with MM stage II disease were reclassified by rectal TNM staging into three subgroups: IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. For these patients, both 5-year OS and 5-year DFS differed significantly between the subgroups IIIA and IIIC (OS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 66.7% vs. 0%, p=0.002; DFS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 51.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The accuracy of prognosis in patients diagnosed with AMM and lymph node metastasis has improved by using rectal TNM staging, which includes information regarding the number of lymph node metastases.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Survival and Prognosis for Patients with Rectal Melanomas in the United States: A SEER-Based Study Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Runda Wu, Shan Tong, Zhongqi Mao Journal of Investigative Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Incidence and survival of patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a population-based study Yu Du, Xiaona Chang, Xiangxiang Li, Shugang Xing International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Melanoma anorrectal primario: reporte de un caso y revisión de una neoplasia infrecuente Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Felipe Vera-Polanía, Juan Antonio Trejos Naranjo, Julian Ernesto Parga Bermudez, William Otero Regino Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2023; 38(4): 504. CrossRef
A New Anorectal Melanoma Cell Line Derived from a Primary Human Rectal Tumor Seiichi Shinji, Yuuki Shichi, Takeshi Yamada, Goro Takahashi, Ryo Ohta, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akihisa Matsuda, Kazuhide Yonaga, Takuma Iwai, Kohki Takeda, Koji Ueda, Sho Kuriyama, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Yoshibumi Ueda, Norihiko Sasaki, Kimimasa Takahashi, Ryuji Journal of Nippon Medical School.2022; 89(4): 368. CrossRef
Difficulties in diagnosing anorectal melanoma: A case report and review of the literature Raluca Cristina Apostu, Elena Stefanescu, Radu Razvan Scurtu, Gabriel Kacso, Radu Drasovean World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(36): 11369. CrossRef
Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Patients with Anorectal Malignant Melanoma; Results of Nine Cases in a Single Institution Tomoyuki Nagaoka, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Eiji Shinozaki, Yosuke Fukunaga Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(2): 192. CrossRef
Management and outcomes of primary anorectal melanoma in the United States Hari Menon, Roshal R Patel, Taylor R Cushman, Arya Amini, Steven N Seyedin, Anngela C Adams, Chi Lin, Vivek Verma Future Oncology.2020; 16(8): 329. CrossRef
Melanoma anal, una patología radicalmente distinta al melanoma cutáneo, con un pronóstico infausto Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler Cirugía Española.2020; 98(8): 491. CrossRef
Anal Melanoma, a Radically Different Pathology to the Cutaneous Melanoma, With an Infaustic Forecast Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler Cirugía Española (English Edition).2020; 98(8): 491. CrossRef
Beyond adenocarcinoma: MRI of uncommon rectal neoplasms and mimickers David D. B. Bates, Maria Clara Fernandes de Paula, Natally Horvat, Shannon Sheedy, Chandana Lall, Zahra Kassam, Perry Pickhardt, Neeraj Lalwani, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Iva Petkovska Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3581. CrossRef
Prognostic factors in primary anorectal melanoma: a clinicopathological study of 60 cases in China Min Ren, Yawen Lu, Jiaojie Lv, Xuxia Shen, Jincheng Kong, Bo Dai, Yunyi Kong Human Pathology.2018; 79: 77. CrossRef
PURPOSE There are various lymph node-based staging systems.
Nevertheless, there is debate over the use of parameters such as the number of involved lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio. As a possible option, the distribution of metastatic lymph nodes may have a prognostic significance in rectal cancer. This study is designed to evaluate the impact of distribution-weighted nodal staging on oncologic outcome in rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS From a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database of our institution, a total of 435 patients who underwent a curative low anterior resection for mid and upper rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the location of apical metastatic nodes. A location-weighted prognostic score was calculated by a scoring model using a logistic regression test for location based-statistical weight to number of lymph nodes. All cases were categorized in quartiles from lymph node I to lymph node IV using this protocol. RESULTS The location of lymph node metastasis was an independent factor that was associated with a poor prognostic outcome (p<0.001). Based on this result, the location-weighted-nodal prognostic scoring model did not show lesser significant results (p<0.0001) in both overall survival and cancer-free survival analyses. CONCLUSION The location of apical nodes among the metastatic nodes does not have a lesser significant impact on oncologic result in patients with advanced rectal cancer.
A location-weighted prognostic scoring model, which considered the numbers of involved lymph nodes as the rate of significance according to the location, may more precisely predict the survival outcome in patients with lymph node metastasis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival Xing Huang, Hao Liu, Xiangqi Liao, Zhigang Xiao, Zhongcheng Huang, Guoxin Li Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 241. CrossRef
Chemical shift effect predicting lymph node status in rectal cancer using high-resolution MR imaging with node-for-node matched histopathological validation Hongmei Zhang, Chongda Zhang, Zhaoxu Zheng, Feng Ye, Yuan Liu, Shuangmei Zou, Chunwu Zhou European Radiology.2017; 27(9): 3845. CrossRef
Prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in Stage III colorectal cancer F. Bao, L.‐y. Zhao, A. I. Balde, H. Liu, J. Yan, T.‐t. Li, H. Chen, G.‐x. Li Colorectal Disease.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Impact of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Stage III Colon Cancer Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Yosuke Fukunaga, Masami Arai, Masashi Ueno World Journal of Surgery.2015; 39(12): 3008. CrossRef
Five-year outcomes of preoperative chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma in Saudi population: single-institutional experience Eyad Fawzi AlSaeed, Mutahir Tunio, Ahmad Zubaidi, Omar Al-Obaid, Abdullah Kamal Ahmed, Omar Abdulmohsen Al-Omar, Emad Ahmed Abid, Mohammed Jaber Alsiwat Annals of Saudi Medicine.2015; 35(1): 23. CrossRef