Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Neoplasm staging"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Genitourinary cancer
TNM-Based Head-to-Head Comparison of Urachal Carcinoma and Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Stage-Matched Analysis of a Large Multicenter National Cohort
Sang Hun Song, Jaewon Lee, Young Hwii Ko, Jong Wook Kim, Seung Il Jung, Seok Ho Kang, Jinsung Park, Ho Kyung Seo, Hyung Joon Kim, Byong Chang Jeong, Tae-Hwan Kim, Se Young Choi, Jong Kil Nam, Ja Yoon Ku, Kwan Joong Joo, Won Sik Jang, Young Eun Yoon, Seok Joong Yun, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jong Jin Oh
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1337-1345.   Published online April 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.417
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Outcome analysis of urachal cancer (UraC) is limited due to the scarcity of cases and different staging methods compared to urothelial bladder cancer (UroBC). We attempted to assess survival outcomes of UraC and compare to UroBC after stage-matched analyses.
Materials and Methods
Total 203 UraC patients from a multicenter database and 373 UroBC patients in single institution from 2000 to 2018 were enrolled (median follow-up, 32 months). Sheldon stage conversion to corresponding TNM staging for UraC was conducted for head-to-head comparison to UroBC. Perioperative clinical variables and pathological results were recorded. Stage-matched analyses for survival by stage were conducted.
Results
UraC patients were younger (mean age, 54 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), with 163 patients (80.3%) receiving partial cystectomy and 23 patients (11.3%) radical cystectomy. UraC was more likely to harbor ≥ pT3a tumors (78.8% vs. 41.8%). While 5-year recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were comparable between two groups (63.4%, 67%, and 62.1% in UraC and 61.5%, 75.9%, and 67.8% in UroBC, respectively), generally favorable prognosis for UraC in lower stages (pT1-2) but unfavorable outcomes in higher stages (pT4) compared to UroBC was observed, although only 5-year CSS in ≥ pT4 showed statistical significance (p=0.028). Body mass index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.929), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.921), pathologic T category (HR, 3.846), and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.993) were predictors of CSS for all patients.
Conclusion
Despite differing histology, UraC has comparable prognosis to UroBC with relatively favorable outcome in low stages but worse prognosis in higher stages. The presented system may be useful for future grading and risk stratification of UraC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Presentation and Targeted Interventions in Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Case Series and Review of Emerging Therapies
    Akshay Mathavan, Akash Mathavan, Rodrigo Murillo-Alvarez, Kriti Gera, Urszula Krekora, Aaron J. Winer, Mohit Mathavan, Ellery Altshuler, Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2024; 22(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Robotic‐assisted approaches to urachal carcinoma: A comprehensive systematic review of the safety and efficacy outcomes
    Caio Vinícius Suartz, Lucas Motta Martinez, Pedro Henrique Brito, Carlos Victori Neto, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Luiz Antonio Assan Botelho, Fábio Pescarmona Gallucci, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro‐Filho
    BJUI Compass.2024; 5(3): 327.     CrossRef
  • 3,760 View
  • 208 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
Soo Young Jeong, Hyea Park, Myeong Seon Kim, Jun Hyeok Kang, E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Tae Joong Kim, Jeong Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk Soo Bae, Chel Hun Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):516-523.   Published online October 29, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion).
Results
A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage.
Conclusion
In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer due to oxidative stress
    Amir Asotić, Memić Asotić, Muhamed Memić, Kerim Asotić, Amra Asotić
    Sanamed.2024; 19(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Investigating and Analyzing Prognostic Factors and Their Impact on Recurrent Cervical Cancers
    Ashish Uke, Shweta B Dahake, Anurag Luharia, Monika Luharia, Gaurav V Mishra, Chanrashekhar Mahakalkar
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively
    Shuang Dong, Yan-Qing Peng, Ya-Nan Feng, Xiao-Ying Li, Li-Ping Gong, Shuang Zhang, Xiao-Shan Du, Li-Tao Sun
    BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors
    Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Giuseppe Angelico, Damiano Arciuolo, Emma Bragantini, Antonio Travaglino, Michele Valente, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Stefania Sfregola, Alessia Piermattei, Federica Cianfrini, Paola Roberti, Gian Franco Za
    Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1137.     CrossRef
  • Identification of lymph node metastasis in pre‐operation cervical cancer patients by weakly supervised deep learning from histopathological whole‐slide biopsy images
    Qingqing Liu, Nan Jiang, Yiping Hao, Chunyan Hao, Wei Wang, Tingting Bian, Xiaohong Wang, Hua Li, Yan zhang, Yanjun Kang, Fengxiang Xie, Yawen Li, XuJi Jiang, Yuan Feng, Zhonghao Mao, Qi Wang, Qun Gao, Wenjing Zhang, Baoxia Cui, Taotao Dong
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(17): 17952.     CrossRef
  • Roles of DWI and T2-weighted MRI volumetry in the evaluation of lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer
    Y. Wang, X. Chen, H. Pu, Y. Yuan, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Li
    Clinical Radiology.2022; 77(3): 224.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer
    Mu Xu, Xiaoyan Xie, Liangzhi Cai, Yongjin Xie, Qiao Gao, Pengming Sun
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Miriam Dolciami, Silvia Capuani, Veronica Celli, Alessandra Maiuro, Angelina Pernazza, Innocenza Palaia, Violante Di Donato, Giusi Santangelo, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Paolo Ricci, Carlo Della Rocca, Carlo Catalano, Lucia Manganaro
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 638.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric
    Yuan-Kai Cheng, Shih-Hsun Kuo, Heng-Hsuan Yen, Jing-Hu Wu, Yu-Chieh Chen, Ming-Yii Huang
    Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer?
    Njål Lura, Kari S. Wagner-Larsen, David Forsse, Jone Trovik, Mari K. Halle, Bjørn I. Bertelsen, Øyvind Salvesen, Kathrine Woie, Camilla Krakstad, Ingfrid S. Haldorsen
    Insights into Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer
    Chao Ran, Jian Sun, Yunhui Qu, Na Long
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Four-Gene Prognostic Signature as a Risk Biomarker in Cervical Cancer
    Jun Wang, Hua Zheng, Yatian Han, Geng Wang, Yanbin Li, Cuida Meng
    International Journal of Genomics.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • 10,375 View
  • 223 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Validation of the 8th AJCC Cancer Staging System for Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Korean Nationwide Surgery Database
Yunghun You, Jin-Young Jang, Song Cheol Kim, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Chol Kyoon Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Jae Do Yang, Woo Jung Lee, Tae Ho Hong, Keun Soo Ahn, Chi-Young Jeong, Hyeon Kook Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Young Hoon Roh, Hee Joon Kim, Hongbeom Kim, In Woong Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1639-1652.   Published online April 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.023
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) included several significant changes. We aim to evaluate this staging system compared to the 7th edition AJCC staging system and European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) system.
Materials and Methods
We used Korean nationwide surgery database (2000-2014). Of 972 patients who had undergone surgery for PNET, excluding patients diagnosed with ENETS/World Health Organization 2010 grade 3 (G3), only 472 patients with accurate stage were included.
Results
Poor discrimination in overall survival rate (OSR) was noted between AJCC 8th stage III and IV (p=0.180). The disease-free survival (DFS) curves of 8th AJCC classification were well separated between all stages. Compared with stage I, the hazard ratio of II, III, and IV was 3.808, 13.928, and 30.618, respectively (p=0.007, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The curves of OSR and DFS of certain prognostic group in AJCC 7th and ENETS overlapped. In ENETS staging system, no significant difference in DFS between stage IIB versus IIIA (p=0.909) and IIIA versus IIIB (p=0.291). In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002), perineural invasion (p=0.003), and grade (p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for DFS.
Conclusion
This is the first large-scale validation of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for PNET. The revised 8th system provides better discrimination compared to that of the 7th edition and ENETS TNM system. This supports the clinical use of the system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Eric Rupe, Mahmoud Diab, LeeAnn Xoubi, Noha Kabeel, Ajaykumar Morani, Albert Klekers, Priya Bhosale
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2025; 60(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis
    Matteo Tacelli, Manuel Gentiluomo, Paolo Biamonte, Justo P. Castano, Maja Cigrovski Berković, Mauro Cives, Sanja Kapitanović, Ilaria Marinoni, Sonja Marinovic, Ilias Nikas, Lenka Nosáková, Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo, Eleonora Pellè, Aurel Perren, Jonathan Str
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2025; 112: 112.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of CT-based radiomics in grade 1–2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Subin Heo, Hyo Jung Park, Hyoung Jung Kim, Jung Hoon Kim, Seo Young Park, Kyung Won Kim, So Yeon Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, Jae Ho Byun, Song Cheol Kim, Hee Sang Hwang, Seung Mo Hong
    Cancer Imaging.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Contemporary Approaches to the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Akash Kartik, Valerie L. Armstrong, Chee-Chee Stucky, Nabil Wasif, Zhi Ven Fong
    Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1501.     CrossRef
  • Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study
    Juwan Kim, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyong Hwang, Chang Moo Kang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NON-FUNCTIONING SPORADIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, André Luis Montagnini, Jessica Okubo, Ana Gabriela Vivarelli Fernandes, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Paulo Herman, José Jukemura
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Venous invasion and lymphatic invasion are correlated with the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm
    Sho Kiritani, Junichi Arita, Yuichiro Mihara, Rihito Nagata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Kaneko, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
    Surgery.2023; 173(2): 365.     CrossRef
  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on Staging and Therapeutic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Aleksander Kosmala, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Thomas Lindner, Kerstin Michalski, Andreas Schirbel, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Weich, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence and outcomes of non‐functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours post‐resection: an Australian retrospective, multicentre cohort study
    Sean Lim, Lynn Chong, Saania Peeroo, Olukunle Onasanya, Evelyn He, Simon Banting, Daniel Croagh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(1-2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a supplementary condition of eighth AJCC staging system for stage II hepatocellular carcinoma
    Min Li, Linquan Wu, Shuaiwu Luo, Yaran Liu, Chi Sun, Enliang Li, Jiakun Wang, Bowen Li, Zhihao Huang, Jin Ge, Jun Lei, Fan Zhou, Wenjun Liao
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(7): 1217.     CrossRef
  • A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery
    Xiao-Ya Shi, Yan Wang, Xuan Zhou, Meng-Li Xie, Qian Ma, Gan-Xin Wang, Jing Zhan, Yi-Ming Shao, Bai Wei
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of CXCR4-Directed PET/CT on Staging and Proposed Oncologic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Alexander Weich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas Schirbel, Marieke Heinrich, Andreas K. Buck, Steven P. Rowe, Aleksander Kosmala, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(7): 586.     CrossRef
  • Lifestyle, clinical and histological indices-based prediction models for survival in cancer patients: a city-wide prospective cohort study in China
    Ce Sun, Huan Xu, Suixiang Wang, Ke Li, Pengzhe Qin, Boheng Liang, Lin Xu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(12): 9965.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
    Yong-Jin Park, Young Suk Park, Seung Tae Kim, Seung Hyup Hyun
    Molecular Imaging and Biology.2023; 25(5): 897.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic validity of the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition staging system for well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hebin Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hang Zhang, Jun Liu, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Feng Peng, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu, Jikuan Jin, Yi Wu, Abu
    HPB.2022; 24(5): 681.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using data from the KOTUS-BP national database: overcoming selection bias and the necessity of definite indications
    Hongbeom Kim, Jin Seok Heo, Chang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Sung-Sik Han, Yong Hoon Kim, Hyeon Kook Lee, Young-Dong Yu, In Seok Choi, Jae Do Yang, Younghoon Roh, Seong-Ryong Kim, Junchul Chung, Sang Hwa Song,
    HPB.2022; 24(10): 1804.     CrossRef
  • Fate of Surgical Patients with Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study Using Multi-Institutional Registries
    In Woong Han, Jangho Park, Eun Young Park, So Jeong Yoon, Gang Jin, Dae Wook Hwang, Kuirong Jiang, Wooil Kwon, Xuefeng Xu, Jin Seok Heo, De-Liang Fu, Woo Jung Lee, Xueli Bai, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Yin-Mo Yang, Keun Soo Ahn, Chunhui Yuan, Hyeon Kook Lee, Bei Sun,
    Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1038.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Modified Eighth AJCC Staging System for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Xu-Feng Zhang, Feng Xue, Zheng Wu, Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Eleftherios Makris, Flavio Rocha, Zaheer Kanji, Sharon Weber, Alexander Fisher, Ryan Fields, Bradley A. Krasnick, Kamran Idrees, Paula M. Smith, Cliff Cho, Megan Beems, Yi Ly
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 275(6): e773.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center
    Sara Coelho, Cláudia Costa, Ana Paula Santos, Pedro Souteiro, Joana Oliveira, Júlio Oliveira, Isabel Azevedo, Isabel Torres, Maria José Bento
    Endocrine Oncology.2022; 2(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes, Long-Term Survivals and Staging Systems of World Health Organization G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Min Yang, Lin Zeng, Shengzhong Hou, Bole Tian, Shuguang Jin, Yi Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(18): 5253.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis
    Jinghua Chen, Qichen Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Yujuan Jiang, Zhen Huang, Jianguo Zhou, Hong Zhao, Jianqiang Cai
    Current Oncology.2022; 30(1): 344.     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET/CT in the diagnosis and detection of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huan Ma, Ying Kan, Ji-gang Yang
    Acta Radiologica.2021; 62(9): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Strategy Based on Radiological 3D Reconstruction in a Giant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Interdisciplinary Approach
    Gabriel Fridolin Hess, Savas Deniz Soysal, Guillaume Nicolas, Martin Bolli, Christoph Johannes Zech, Alexandar Tzankov, Emanuel Christ, Michael Montemurro, Otto Kollmar, Tahsin Colak
    Case Reports in Surgery.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of extracellular volume fraction with equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Hiromichi Iwaya, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Shinichi Hashimoto, Shiroh Tanoue, Machiko Kawahira, Makoto Hinokuchi, Toshihiro Fujita, Yuga Komaki, Shiho Arima, Fumisato Sasaki, Shuji Kanmura, Michiyo Higashi, Kiichi Tamada, Akio Ido
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(4): 779.     CrossRef
  • The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update
    Xiaoyan Liao, Dongwei Zhang
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2021; 145(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Insights of Outcome after Resection of Small Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, Julia Fray Ribeiro, Thiago Costa Ribeiro, Ricardo Jureidini, Guilherme Naccache Namur, Thiago Nogueira Costa, Telesforo Bacchella, Ivan Cecconello, Jose Celso Ardengh
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • New staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms combining TNM stage and WHO grade classification [ ]
    Min Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hebin Wang, Yahui Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jun Liu, Hang Zhang, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu,
    Cancer Letters.2021; 518: 207.     CrossRef
  • Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insight into a Rare Histology
    Samantha M. Ruff, Oliver Standring, Grace Wu, Anna Levy, Sandeep Anantha, Elliot Newman, Martin S. Karpeh, William Nealon, Gary B. Deutsch, Matthew J. Weiss, Danielle K. DePeralta
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(13): 8318.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management
    Zu-Yi Ma, Yuan-Feng Gong, Hong-Kai Zhuang, Zi-Xuan Zhou, Shan-Zhou Huang, Yi-Ping Zou, Bo-Wen Huang, Zhong-Hai Sun, Chuan-Zhao Zhang, Yun-Qiang Tang, Bao-Hua Hou
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(19): 2305.     CrossRef
  • Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hong-Yu Chen, Ya-Liang Zhou, Yong-Hua Chen, Xing Wang, Hao Zhang, Neng-Wen Ke, Xu-Bao Liu, Chun-Lu Tan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(25): 3638.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification
    Lokesh Khanna, Srinivasa R. Prasad, Abhijit Sunnapwar, Sainath Kondapaneni, Anil Dasyam, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Umber Salman, Alia Nazarullah, Venkata S. Katabathina
    RadioGraphics.2020; 40(5): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Ashley L. Titan, Jeffrey A. Norton, Andrea T. Fisher, Deshka S. Foster, E. John Harris, David J. Worhunsky, Patrick J. Worth, Monica M. Dua, Brendan C. Visser, George A. Poultsides, Michael T. Longaker, Robert T. Jensen
    JAMA Network Open.2020; 3(11): e2024318.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies
    Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(12): 1029.     CrossRef
  • 10,493 View
  • 254 Download
  • 34 Web of Science
  • 33 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Value and Staging Classification of Lymph Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1222-1230.   Published online December 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.595
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‒determined lymph nodal necrosis (LNN) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and explore the feasibility of an N-classification system based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system.
Materials and Methods
The MRI scans of 616 patients with newly diagnosed stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC who were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were reviewed.
Results
Multivariate analysis showed that LNN was an independent negative prognostic predictor of distant metastasis free survival (hazard ratio, 1.634; 95% confidence interval, 1.023 to 2.609; p=0.040) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.154; 95% confidence interval, 1.282 to 3.620; p=0.004). Patients of classification N1 disease with LNN were reclassified as classification N2, and classification N2 disease with LNN as classification N3 in the proposed N-classification system. Correlation with death and distant failure was significant, and the total difference between N1 and N3 was wider with the proposed system.
Conclusion
MRI-determined LNN is an independent negative prognostic factor for NPC. The proposed N classification system is powerfully predictive.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identifying adverse nodal features associated with poor prognosis in stage IB nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on the 9th AJCC/UICC staging system: Implications for treatment intensification
    Jing Zhong, Hongye Chen, Xinlan Chen, Ning Ma, Yuan Huang, Shaojun Lin, Jianji Pan, Yunbin Chen, Tianzhu Lu, Youping Xiao, Peng Shi, Hanchuan Xu, Qiaojuan Guo
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2025; 205: 110747.     CrossRef
  • Advanced image-identified extranodal extension of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in the refinement of N classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wei Jiang, Gao-Yuan Wang, Guan-Jie Qin, Wu-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ya-Qian Han, Feng Lei, Liang-Fang Shen, Kun-Yu Yang, Chun-Yan Cui, Ling-Long Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Lei Chen, Rui Guo, Ling Li, Zheng Wu, Gui-Qiong Xu, Qin Zhou, Jing Huang, Shao-Hui Huang,
    Cell Reports Medicine.2025; 6(2): 101942.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging: from the 7th to the 9th Edition of the TNM System and Future Outlook
    Binhao Wu, Xiaozhong Chen, Caineng Cao
    Current Oncology Reports.2025; 27(3): 322.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on the Different Grades of Cervical Lymph Node Necrosis to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Run-Zhi Wang, Li-Ru Zhu, Yao-Can Xu, Mei-Wen Chen, Zhong-Guo Liang, Kai-Hua Chen, Ling Li, Xiao-Dong Zhu
    Academic Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Matted Lymph Nodes on MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Prognostic Factor and Potential Indication for Induction Chemotherapy Benefits
    Annan Dong, Siyu Zhu, Huali Ma, Xiaoyu Wei, Wenjie Huang, Guangying Ruan, Lizhi Liu, Yunxian Mo, Fei Ai
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 59(6): 1976.     CrossRef
  • Statistical and machine learning methods for cancer research and clinical practice: A systematic review
    Laura Lopez-Perez, Eleni Georga, Carlo Conti, Victor Vicente, Rebeca García, Leandro Pecchia, Dimitris Fotiadis, Lisa Licitra, Maria Fernanda Cabrera, Maria Teresa Arredondo, Giuseppe Fico
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2024; 92: 106067.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Value of Serum Sialic Acid in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Zetan Chen, Gang Wu, Xiangying Lin, Xiaopeng Huang, Shuai Zhang, Kaihua Chen, Zhongguo Liang, Xiaodong Zhu
    Cancer Management and Research.2024; Volume 16: 215.     CrossRef
  • A prognostic nomogram incorporating tumor size and lymph node size for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Qi Yi, Jiazuo Cai, Yunen Lin, Zimei Hu, Jie Lin, Zhong Huang, Wei Liu, Ronghui Zheng, YaWei Yuan, Chengcong Chen
    American Journal of Otolaryngology.2023; 44(2): 103717.     CrossRef
  • Intra- and peritumoral MRI radiomics assisted in predicting radiochemotherapy response in metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal cancer
    Hao Xu, Ai Wang, Chi Zhang, Jing Ren, Peng Zhou, Jieke Liu
    BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Construction of Prognostic Nomogram in Patients with N3-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Wenmiao Cao, Xiaoxin Li, Jianqi Yang, Enming Xing, Wenjuan Wu, Yizhi Ge, Buhai Wang
    ORL.2023; 85(4): 195.     CrossRef
  • Detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of FDG PET/MR
    Yongfeng Piao, Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2022; 279(1): 353.     CrossRef
  • A nonendemic analysis of the patterns and prognosis of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas in older patients aged ≥ 65 years
    Baoqiu Liu, Mingxing Zhang, Yanqing Cao, Zhe Wang, Xicheng Wang
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis on staging imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi-Yong H. Ai, Kuo Feng Hung, Tiffany Y. So, Frankie K. F. Mo, Wing Tsung Anthony Chin, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B. Y. Ma, Michael Ying, Ann D. King
    Cancer Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus Endostar compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study
    Yuanxiu Yin, Ziyan Zhou, Zhiru Li, Mingjun Shen, Yating Qin, Chaolin Yang, Rensheng Wang, Min Kang
    Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FMISO-Based Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Martin Dolezel, Marek Slavik, Tomas Blazek, Tomas Kazda, Pavel Koranda, Lucia Veverkova, Petr Burkon, Jakub Cvek
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(8): 1245.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of the cervical lymph node necrosis ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ying Bin, Zhen Meng, Lu-Lu Huang, Xue-Ying Hu, Jun-Mei Song, Yi-Ting Xie, Min Kang, Ren-Sheng Wang
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2022; 177: 185.     CrossRef
  • Influence of tumor necrosis on treatment sensitivity and long-term survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Shao-Bo Liang, Lu-Si Chen, Xing-Li Yang, Dan-Ming Chen, Dong-Hui Wang, Chun-Yan Cui, Chuan-Bo Xie, Li-Zhi Liu, Xiang-Ying Xu
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 155: 219.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis
    Wanpeng Li, Hanyu Lu, Huan Wang, Li Hu, Xicai Sun, Hongmeng Yu, Dehui Wang
    Head & Neck.2021; 43(8): 2353.     CrossRef
  • Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wai Tong Ng, Raymond K. Y. Tsang, Jonathan J. Beitler, Remco de Bree, Andrés Coca‐Pelaz, Avraham Eisbruch, Orlando Guntinas‐Lichius, Anne W. M. Lee, Antti A. Mäkitie, William M. Mendenhall, Sandra Nuyts, Alessandra Rinaldo, K. Thomas Robbins, Juan P. Rodr
    Head & Neck.2021; 43(6): 1949.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based radiomics as response predictor to radiochemotherapy for metastatic cervical lymph node in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Hao Xu, Jieke Liu, Ying Huang, Peng Zhou, Jing Ren
    The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: a population-based retrospective study
    Man Xu, Jian Zang, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Xuqi Li
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(8): e045417.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with N3 disease
    Xiaoshuang Niu, Fen Xue, Peiyao Liu, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(12): 101216.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value and the potential role of treatment options for cervical lymph node necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kuiyuan Liu, Siting Lin, Liangru Ke, Weixiong Xia, Chun Zhang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Mengyun Qiang, Xi Chen, Jia Liu, Chuanmiao Xie, Xiang Guo, Xing Lv
    Oral Oncology.2020; 109: 104864.     CrossRef
  • The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
    Si-Qi Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Cheng Xu, Rui Guo, Wen-Fei Li, Ling-Long Tang, Ying Sun, Jun Ma
    Chinese Medical Journal.2020; 133(17): 2044.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and Treatment Guiding Significance of MRI-Based Tumor Burden Features and Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Xi Chen, Xun Cao, Bingzhong Jing, Weixiong Xia, Liangru Ke, Yanqun Xiang, Kuiyuan Liu, Mengyun Qiang, Chixiong Liang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Wangzhong Li, Jingjing Miao, Guoying Liu, Zhuochen Cai, Shuhui Lv, Xiang Guo, Chaofeng Li, Xing Lv
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patterns and Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis on Distant Metastasis and Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study, 2006–2015
    Yali Xu, Taoyuan Huang, Liqin Fan, Wei Jin, Xiaoming Chen, Jinhai Chen
    Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Screening of key miRNAs and evaluation of their diagnostic and prognostic values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Xianlu Zhuo, Wei Zhou, Huiping Ye, Dairong Li, Aoshuang Chang, Yongzhong Wu, Qi Zhou
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,387 View
  • 171 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node–Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols
Jeong Il Yu, Do Hoon Lim, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Seung Tae Kim, Su Jin Lee, Sung Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Heejin Yoo, Kyunga Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):876-885.   Published online October 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.401
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare prognostic differentiation performances of the 7th and the 8th edition of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,633 GC patients who underwent curative D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone (CA) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) from 2004 to 2013 were included. Concordance index (c-index) was applied to compare the discriminatory ability.
Results
In the 8th edition, migration of stage was detected in 248 patients (15.2%). Among them, 121 patients were up-staged while 127 patients were down-staged. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the discriminatory ability between the 7th and 8th editions. The new edition of staging system, however, showed a trend of better prognostic performance not only in recurrence-free survival (c-index=0.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.762 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.740; 95% CI, 0.712 to 0.768 in the 8th edition; p=0.14), but also in overall survival (c-index=0.717; 95% CI, 0.688 to 0.745 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.722; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.751 in the 8th edition; p=0.19), especially in stage III. This finding was repeated in the subgroup analysis regardless of adjuvant CA or CCRT.
Conclusion
Generally, the 8th edition of AJCC staging system had failed to show a superior discriminatory ability for curatively D2 resected GC patients than the 7th edition, although there was a trend of better prognostic performance of the new edition, regardless of adjuvant treatment method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3
    Hongyu Zhang, Nan Sun, Feng Li, Qiyang Wang, Zhao Sun, Yawei Zhang, Lei Wang, Chunlin Zhao, Yang Fu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study
    Chao Cai, Cheng Chen, Xiuli Lin, Huihui Zhang, Mingming Shi, Xiaolei Chen, Weisheng Chen, Didi Chen
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system
    Kailai Yin, Xuanhong Jin, Yang Pan, Mengli Zi, Yingsong Zheng, Yubo Ma, Chuhong Pang, Kang liu, Jinxia Chen, Yizhou Wei, Dujiang Liu, Xiangdong Cheng, Li Yuan
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(8): 1283.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma
    Styliani Mantziari, Penelope St Amour, Francesco Abboretti, Hugo Teixeira-Farinha, Sergio Gaspar Figueiredo, Caroline Gronnier, Dimitrios Schizas, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer
    Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1628.     CrossRef
  • Normalization weighted combination scores re-evaluate TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database
    Junpeng Wu, Hao Wang, Xin Yin, Yufei Wang, Zhanfei Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yingwei Xue
    International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed
    Ri-Sheng Zhao, Yi-Nan Liu, Wei-Gang Dai, Si-Le Chen, Jin-Ning Ye, Er-Tao Zhai, Shi-Rong Cai, Jian-Hui Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma
    C.R. Akshatha, Smitha Bhat, R. Sindhu, Dharini Shashank, Sarana Rose Sommano, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Shashanka K. Prasad
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(9): 5371.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer
    Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park, Jeeyun Lee, Changhoon Choi, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Seung Tae Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Heewon Han, Kyunga Kim, Sung Kim, Do Hoon Lim
    Cancers.2020; 12(4): 943.     CrossRef
  • 11,656 View
  • 230 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Intracranial Extension in the T4 Classification Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Caineng Cao, Jingwei Luo, Li Gao, Junlin Yi, Xiaodong Huang, Suyan Li, Jianping Xiao, Zhong Zhang, Guozhen Xu
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):518-525.   Published online August 24, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.299
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study was conducted is to identify the prognostic value and staging categories of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–detected intracranial extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to determine whether it is necessary to subclassify the T4 classification NPC.
Materials and Methods
A total of 335 nonmetastatic T4 classificationNPC patientswith MRI treated between March 2004 and June 2011 by radical IMRTwere included. The T4 classification patientswere subclassified into two grades (T4a, without intracranial extension vs. T4b, with intracranial extension) according to the site of invasion.
Results
The frequency of intracranial extensionwas 40.9% (137 of 335 patients). Multivariate analysis identified subclassification (T4a vs. T4b) as an independent prognostic factor for local failure-free survival (p=0.049; hazard ratio [HR], 0.498) and overall survival (p=0.004; HR, 0.572); however, it had no effect on regional failure-free survival or distant failure-free survival (p > 0.050).
Conclusion
For patients with T4 classification NPC, those with MRI-detected intracranial extension are more likely to experience local failure and death afterIMRT than patientswithout intracranial extension. According to the site of invasion, subclassification of T4 patients as T4a or T4b has prognostic value in NPC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of MR-detected mandibular nerve involvement: potential indication for future individual induction chemotherapy in T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wenjie Huang, Shuqi Li, Chao Luo, Zhiying Liang, Shumin Zhou, Haojiang Li, Yi Cai, Shaobo Liang, Guangying Ruan, Peiqiang Cai, Lizhi Liu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5951.     CrossRef
  • The application of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with pterygopalatine fossa invasion
    Bi Zhou, Zhuoyue Tang, Liang Lv, Jiayi Yu, Xiaojiao Li, Chao Yang, Shifeng Xiang, Zuhua Song, Dan Zhang
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2023; 96: 38.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based random survival Forest model improves prediction of progression-free survival to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wei Pei, Chen Wang, Hai Liao, Xiaobo Chen, Yunyun Wei, Xia Huang, Xueli Liang, Huayan Bao, Danke Su, Guanqiao Jin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of boost dose for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with residual primary lesion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Zhaodong Fei, Ting Xu, Xiufang Qiu, Mengying Li, Taojun Chen, Li Li, Chaoxiong Huang, Chuanben Chen
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(7): 2047.     CrossRef
  • Can Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging be Used to Differentiate Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma From Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma?
    Zongqiong Sun, Shudong Hu, Yuxi Ge, Linfang Jin, Jianfeng Huang, Weiqiang Dou
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2021; 53(4): 1140.     CrossRef
  • Detailed analysis of recovery process of cranial nerve palsy after IMRT-based comprehensive treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Jian Zang, Yan Li, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Bingxin Hou, Min Yao, Lina Zhao, Mei Shi
    Radiation Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Locoregional Extension Patterns of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Detected by FDG PET/MR
    Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Orbital Metastases: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Treatment Outcomes
    Paolo Palmisciano, Gianluca Ferini, Christian Ogasawara, Waseem Wahood, Othman Bin Alamer, Aditya D. Gupta, Gianluca Scalia, Alexandra M. G. Larsen, Kenny Yu, Giuseppe E. Umana, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh, Ali S. Haider
    Cancers.2021; 14(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic efficacy of extensive invasion of primary tumor volume for T3-4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Fen Xue, Dan Ou, Xiaomin Ou, Xin Zhou, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He
    Oral Oncology.2020; 100: 104478.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes for nasopharyngeal cancer with intracranial extension after taxane‐based induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy in the modern era
    Sarbani Ghosh‐Laskar, Avinash Pilar, Carlton Johnny, Kumar Prabhash, Amit Joshi, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Tejpal Gupta, Ashwini Budrukkar, Vedang Murthy, Monali Swain, Vanita Noronha, Vijay Maruthi Patil, Prathamesh Pai, Deepa Nair, Devendra Arvind Chaukar, S
    World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2020; 6(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Paranasal Sinus Invasion on Oncologic and Dosimetric Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy—Implications for Risk Stratification and Planning Optimization
    Xin Zhou, Xiayun He, Fen Xue, Xiaomin Ou, Chaosu Hu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Jiayun Chen, Weijie Cui, Qi Fu, Haojia Zhang, Xiaodong Huang, Fei Han, Wenlong Xia, Bin Liang, Jianrong Dai
    Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.2020; 21(11): 37.     CrossRef
  • Paranasal Sinus Invasion in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Grading of MRI–detected skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull-base invasion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Radiation Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Locoregional extension and patterns of failure for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial extension
    Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen
    Oral Oncology.2018; 79: 27.     CrossRef
  • Dosimetric comparison and observation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Rongqiang Pan, Jingming Wang, Feng Qi, Ruizhen Liu
    Oncology Letters.2017; 14(4): 4741.     CrossRef
  • 11,023 View
  • 163 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Preliminary Suggestion about Staging of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma May Be Used to Predict Prognosis
Won Young Chae, Jong Lyul Lee, Dong-Hyung Cho, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Roh, Jin Cheon Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):240-249.   Published online March 6, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.305
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Anorectal malignant melanomas (AMM) are rare and have poor survival. The study aims to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMM, and to devise a staging system predictive of survival outcome.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective study of 28 patients diagnosed with, and treated for AMM. Patients classified by clinical staging of mucosal melanoma (MM) were reclassified via rectal and anal TNM staging. Survival outcomes were compared among patients grouped by the three different staging systems.
Results
The three staging systems were equated with similar figures for 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with stage I disease. Patients (n=19) diagnosed with MM stage II disease were reclassified by rectal TNM staging into three subgroups: IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. For these patients, both 5-year OS and 5-year DFS differed significantly between the subgroups IIIA and IIIC (OS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 66.7% vs. 0%, p=0.002; DFS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 51.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The accuracy of prognosis in patients diagnosed with AMM and lymph node metastasis has improved by using rectal TNM staging, which includes information regarding the number of lymph node metastases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival and Prognosis for Patients with Rectal Melanomas in the United States: A SEER-Based Study
    Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Runda Wu, Shan Tong, Zhongqi Mao
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and survival of patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a population-based study
    Yu Du, Xiaona Chang, Xiangxiang Li, Shugang Xing
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Melanoma anorrectal primario: reporte de un caso y revisión de una neoplasia infrecuente
    Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Felipe Vera-Polanía, Juan Antonio Trejos Naranjo, Julian Ernesto Parga Bermudez, William Otero Regino
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2023; 38(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • A New Anorectal Melanoma Cell Line Derived from a Primary Human Rectal Tumor
    Seiichi Shinji, Yuuki Shichi, Takeshi Yamada, Goro Takahashi, Ryo Ohta, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akihisa Matsuda, Kazuhide Yonaga, Takuma Iwai, Kohki Takeda, Koji Ueda, Sho Kuriyama, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Yoshibumi Ueda, Norihiko Sasaki, Kimimasa Takahashi, Ryuji
    Journal of Nippon Medical School.2022; 89(4): 368.     CrossRef
  • Difficulties in diagnosing anorectal melanoma: A case report and review of the literature
    Raluca Cristina Apostu, Elena Stefanescu, Radu Razvan Scurtu, Gabriel Kacso, Radu Drasovean
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(36): 11369.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Patients with Anorectal Malignant Melanoma; Results of Nine Cases in a Single Institution
    Tomoyuki Nagaoka, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Eiji Shinozaki, Yosuke Fukunaga
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(2): 192.     CrossRef
  • Management and outcomes of primary anorectal melanoma in the United States
    Hari Menon, Roshal R Patel, Taylor R Cushman, Arya Amini, Steven N Seyedin, Anngela C Adams, Chi Lin, Vivek Verma
    Future Oncology.2020; 16(8): 329.     CrossRef
  • Melanoma anal, una patología radicalmente distinta al melanoma cutáneo, con un pronóstico infausto
    Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española.2020; 98(8): 491.     CrossRef
  • Anal Melanoma, a Radically Different Pathology to the Cutaneous Melanoma, With an Infaustic Forecast
    Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2020; 98(8): 491.     CrossRef
  • Beyond adenocarcinoma: MRI of uncommon rectal neoplasms and mimickers
    David D. B. Bates, Maria Clara Fernandes de Paula, Natally Horvat, Shannon Sheedy, Chandana Lall, Zahra Kassam, Perry Pickhardt, Neeraj Lalwani, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Iva Petkovska
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3581.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors in primary anorectal melanoma: a clinicopathological study of 60 cases in China
    Min Ren, Yawen Lu, Jiaojie Lv, Xuxia Shen, Jincheng Kong, Bo Dai, Yunyi Kong
    Human Pathology.2018; 79: 77.     CrossRef
  • 16,157 View
  • 190 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A Distribution Weighted Prognostic Scoring Model for Node Status in Advanced Rectal Cancer
Kwang-Hee Yeo, Ho Hyun Kim, Dong-Yi Kim, Young-Jin Kim, Jae-Kyun Ju
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):41-47.   Published online January 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.41
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
There are various lymph node-based staging systems. Nevertheless, there is debate over the use of parameters such as the number of involved lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio. As a possible option, the distribution of metastatic lymph nodes may have a prognostic significance in rectal cancer. This study is designed to evaluate the impact of distribution-weighted nodal staging on oncologic outcome in rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database of our institution, a total of 435 patients who underwent a curative low anterior resection for mid and upper rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the location of apical metastatic nodes. A location-weighted prognostic score was calculated by a scoring model using a logistic regression test for location based-statistical weight to number of lymph nodes. All cases were categorized in quartiles from lymph node I to lymph node IV using this protocol.
RESULTS
The location of lymph node metastasis was an independent factor that was associated with a poor prognostic outcome (p<0.001). Based on this result, the location-weighted-nodal prognostic scoring model did not show lesser significant results (p<0.0001) in both overall survival and cancer-free survival analyses.
CONCLUSION
The location of apical nodes among the metastatic nodes does not have a lesser significant impact on oncologic result in patients with advanced rectal cancer. A location-weighted prognostic scoring model, which considered the numbers of involved lymph nodes as the rate of significance according to the location, may more precisely predict the survival outcome in patients with lymph node metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival
    Xing Huang, Hao Liu, Xiangqi Liao, Zhigang Xiao, Zhongcheng Huang, Guoxin Li
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 241.     CrossRef
  • Chemical shift effect predicting lymph node status in rectal cancer using high-resolution MR imaging with node-for-node matched histopathological validation
    Hongmei Zhang, Chongda Zhang, Zhaoxu Zheng, Feng Ye, Yuan Liu, Shuangmei Zou, Chunwu Zhou
    European Radiology.2017; 27(9): 3845.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in Stage III colorectal cancer
    F. Bao, L.‐y. Zhao, A. I. Balde, H. Liu, J. Yan, T.‐t. Li, H. Chen, G.‐x. Li
    Colorectal Disease.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Stage III Colon Cancer
    Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Yosuke Fukunaga, Masami Arai, Masashi Ueno
    World Journal of Surgery.2015; 39(12): 3008.     CrossRef
  • Five-year outcomes of preoperative chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma in Saudi population: single-institutional experience
    Eyad Fawzi AlSaeed, Mutahir Tunio, Ahmad Zubaidi, Omar Al-Obaid, Abdullah Kamal Ahmed, Omar Abdulmohsen Al-Omar, Emad Ahmed Abid, Mohammed Jaber Alsiwat
    Annals of Saudi Medicine.2015; 35(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • 10,721 View
  • 52 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP