Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Comparative outcomes of simple versus radical hysterectomy in patients with and without very low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: An exploratory analysis from the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CX.5/SHAPE trial
  Se Ik Kim, Jae-Weon Kim, Janice S. Kwon, Sarah E. Ferguson, Alexandra Sebastianelli, Paul Bessette, Sven Mahner, Tristan Gauthier, Cor de Kroon, Willemien van Driel, Karin Williamson, Frederic Goffin, Stephan Polterauer, Brynhildur Eyjólfsdóttir, Jung-Yun
  Gynecologic Oncology.2026; 205: 37.     CrossRef
• Patient-centered valuation of minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer: a discrete choice experiment
  Jeongyun Kim, Jieun Jang, Sokbom Kang
  Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Laparoscopic type 3 radical hysterectomy with enclosed colpotomy using the Bakay technique for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective case series
  Gamze Savci, Eda Adeviye Sahin, Hanifi Sahin, Mehmet Faruk Olcenoglu, Kadir Bakay, Turan Sahin
  BMC Women's Health.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Effects of spinal versus general anesthesia on serum oxidative stress markers and cytokine release after abdominal hysterectomy: a non-randomized trial
  Morteza Hashemian, Shahrzad Sahebdad-Khabisi, Zahra Honarvar, Zohreh Torabinejad, Hosein Taravati, Fatemeh Doost Mohammadi, Ladan Amirkhosravi
  Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Internal Validation of Predictive Models for Recurrence-Free Survival and Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Figo Stages I–IV Cervical Cancer
  Jorge Cea García, Francisco Márquez Maraver, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez, Laura Ríos-Pena, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez
  Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Lymph Node Yield, Positivity Ratio, and Overall Survival in Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Carcinoma Cervix: A Retrospective Analysis
  Subbiah Shanmugam, Jagadish Singh, Mohanasundaram Natarajan
  Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Research Progress on the Therapeutic Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery without Uterine Ma-nipulator on Cervical Cancer
  潇予 刘
  Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(08): 13249.     CrossRef
• Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
  Greg Marchand, Ahmed Taher Masoud, Ahmed Abdelsattar, Alexa King, Hollie Ulibarri, Julia Parise, Amanda Arroyo, Catherine Coriell, Sydnee Goetz, Carmen Moir, Atley Moberly, Malini Govindan
  Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study
  Xiaohui Teng, Shan Kang, Weili Li, Hongmei Ding, Bin Ling, Lin Zhu, Danbo Wang, Jinghe Lang, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen
  Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2023; 49(6): 1592.     CrossRef
• The sealing effect of magnetic-sealing uterine manipulator in isolated uterus from patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a pre-clinical study
  Xue Zhou, Dongxin Liang, Qing Li, Lanbo Zhao, Yadi Bin, Feng Ma, Rongqian Wu, Yi Lv, Qiling Li
  Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• External Validation of the eCura System for Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer with Noncurative Endoscopic Resection
  Hyo-Joon Yang, Young-Il Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Kee Don Choi, Sang Gyun Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Jie-Hyun Kim, Sung Kwan Shin, Hyuk Lee, Wan Sik Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Il Ju Choi
  Gut and Liver.2023; 17(4): 537.     CrossRef
• Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO stages I–IV Cervical Cancer
  Jorge Cea García, Francisco Márquez Maraver, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez, Laura Ríos-Pena, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez
  Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
  Si Sun, Jing Cai, Ruixie Li, Yujia Wang, Jing Zhao, Yuhui Huang, Linjuan Xu, Qiang Yang, Zehua Wang
  Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(3): 623.     CrossRef
• Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy
  Rüdiger Klapdor, Hermann Hertel, Laura Delebinski, Peter Hillemanns
  Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 305(1): 215.     CrossRef
• Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study
  Zhiqiang Li, Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu, Anwei Lu, Hongwei Zhao, Xuemei Zhan, Hui Duan, Pengfei Li, Weidong Zhao, Jilong Yao, Donglin Li, Haixia Jiang, Mubiao Liu, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang
  Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 305(2): 449.     CrossRef
• Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy
  J. Kampers, E. Gerhardt, P. Sibbertsen, T. Flock, H. Hertel, R. Klapdor, M. Jentschke, P. Hillemanns
  Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(2): 295.     CrossRef
• Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH
  R. Wojdat, E. Malanowska, Harald Krentel
  BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
  Mengting Zhang, Wei Dai, Yuexiu Si, Yetan Shi, Xiangyuan Li, Ke Jiang, Jingyi Shen, Liying Ying
  Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer
  Wei Huang, Yina Wang, Fanchun Yang, Ning Luo, Guihai Ai, Yuliang Wu, Zhongping Cheng
  Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2022; 11(1): 17.     CrossRef
• Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019
  Danuta Vasilevska, Dominika Vasilevska, Andrzej Semczuk, Vilius Rudaitis
  Medicina.2022; 58(4): 553.     CrossRef
• The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis
  Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
  Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(10): 7114.     CrossRef
• Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
  I.-Ning Chen, I.-Te Wang, Hsueh-Yu Mu, J.-Timothy Qiu, Wei-Min Liu, Ching-Wen Chang, Yen-Hsieh Chiu
  Cancers.2022; 14(9): 2117.     CrossRef
• Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study
  Sabrina Piedimonte, Gregory R. Pond, Marie Plante, Gregg Nelson, Janice Kwon, Alon Altman, Tomer Feigenberg, Laurie Elit, Susie Lau, Jeanelle Sabourin, Karla Willows, Christa Aubrey, Ji-Hyun Jang, Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin, Norah Cockburn, Nora-Beth Saunders, Sar
  Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 166(2): 230.     CrossRef
• The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
  Mario M. Leitao, Qin C. Zhou, Benny Brandt, Alexia Iasonos, Vasileios Sioulas, Katherine Lavigne Mager, Mark Shahin, Shaina Bruce, Destin R. Black, Carrie G. Kay, Meeli Gandhi, Maira Qayyum, Jennifer Scalici, Nathaniel L. Jones, Rajesh Paladugu, Jubilee B
  Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 166(3): 417.     CrossRef
• New Insights in the Diagnosis of Rare Adenocarcinoma Variants of the Cervix—Case Report and Review of Literature
  Cristina Secosan, Oana Balint, Aurora Ilian, Lavinia Balan, Ligia Balulescu, Andrei Motoc, Delia Zahoi, Dorin Grigoras, Laurentiu Pirtea
  Healthcare.2022; 10(8): 1410.     CrossRef
• Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
  Seongmin Kim, Kyung Jin Min, Sanghoon Lee, Jin Hwa Hong, Jae Yun Song, Jae Kwan Lee, Nak Woo Lee
  Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 174.     CrossRef
• Risk factors of lymph node metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer
  Hyo-Joon Yang, Jae-Young Jang, Sang Gyun Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Su Youn Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Youn
  Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(1): 168.     CrossRef
• Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer larger than 2 cm
  Hyo-Joon Yang, Su Youn Nam, Byung-Hoon Min, Ji Yong Ahn, Jae-Young Jang, Jung Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Young-Il
  Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(2): 435.     CrossRef
• Conditional relative survival of cervical cancer: a Korean National Cancer Registry Study
  Dong Wook Shin, Jaeman Bae, Johyun Ha, Kyu-Won Jung
  Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Accuracy of preoperative cross-sectional imaging in cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery
  S. Allison Staley, Katherine R. Tucker, Paola A. Gehrig, Leslie H. Clark
  Gynecologic Oncology.2021; 160(2): 384.     CrossRef
• Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study
  François Zaccarini, Anna Santy, Yohann Dabi, Vincent Lavoue, Xavier Carcopino, Sofiane Bendifallah, Amélie Benbara, Pierre Collinet, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Emilie Raimond, Olivier Graesslin, Lobna Ouldamer, Emile Daraï, Cyrille Huchon, François Golfier, Cyril
  Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction.2021; 50(2): 102046.     CrossRef
• Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis
  Juliana Rodriguez, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, James Saenz, David Ortiz Isla, Gabriel Jaime Rendon Pereira, Diego Odetto, Fabio Martinelli, Vladimir Villoslada, Ignacio Zapardiel, Lina Maria Trujillo, Milagros Perez, Marcela Hernandez, Jose Martin Saadi, Fr
  International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2021; 31(4): 504.     CrossRef
• Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith, Tiffany Nicole Jones, Diana Miao, Amanda Nickles Fader
  Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2021; 28(3): 544.     CrossRef
• Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm
  Zhiqiang Li, Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu, Hui Duan, Mubiao Liu, Yan Xu, Pengfei Li, Wenling Zhang, Haixia Jiang, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang
  European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 2125.     CrossRef
• Cervical Cancer Surgery
  Fan Chun Yang, Wei Huang, Weihong Yang, Jie Liu, Guihai Ai, Ning Luo, Jing Guo, Peng Teng Chua, Zhongping Cheng
  Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2021; 10(2): 75.     CrossRef
• Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups
  Johanna Kampers, E. Gerhardt, P. Sibbertsen, T. Flock, R. Klapdor, H. Hertel, M. Jentschke, P. Hillemanns
  Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2021; 304(3): 577.     CrossRef
• The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
  Hyeongsu Kim, Ho Jin Jeong, Bo Wook Kim, Jong Ha Hwang
  Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Long-term Outcomes of Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer with Positive Horizontal Margins after Endoscopic Resection
  Hyo-Joon Yang, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Ji Yong Ahn, Jae-Young Jang, Joo Hyun Lim, Su Youn Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Young
  Gut and Liver.2021; 15(5): 723.     CrossRef
• Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies
  Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
  Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(4): 1509.     CrossRef
• Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004–2015
  Cong Liang, Ping Liu, Zhumei Cui, Zhiqing Liang, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang, Chunlin Chen
  Gynecologic Oncology.2020; 156(1): 115.     CrossRef
• Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?
  Stefano Greggi, Gennaro Casella, Felice Scala, Francesca Falcone, Serena Visconti, Cono Scaffa
  Current Oncology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
  Benny Brandt, Vasileios Sioulas, Derman Basaran, Theresa Kuhn, Katherine LaVigne, Ginger J. Gardner, Yukio Sonoda, Dennis S. Chi, Kara C. Long Roche, Jennifer J. Mueller, Elizabeth L. Jewell, Vance A. Broach, Oliver Zivanovic, Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, Mario
  Gynecologic Oncology.2020; 156(3): 591.     CrossRef
• Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach
  Alexander Melamed, Pedro T. Ramirez
  Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.2020; 32(1): 22.     CrossRef
• Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
  Roni Nitecki, Pedro T. Ramirez, Michael Frumovitz, Kate J. Krause, Ana I. Tergas, Jason D. Wright, J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Alexander Melamed
  JAMA Oncology.2020; 6(7): 1019.     CrossRef
• Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China
  Ting wen yi Hu, Yue Huang, Na Li, Dan Nie, Zhengyu Li
  International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2020; 30(8): 1143.     CrossRef
• Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  Tanitra Tantitamit, Kuan-Gen Huang, Chyi-Long Lee
  Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(4): 481.     CrossRef
• Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer
  Giorgio Bogani, Antonino Ditto, Valentina Chiappa, Ciro Pinelli, Cristina Sonetto, Francesco Raspagliesi
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2020; 151(1): 43.     CrossRef
• Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
  Yizi Wang, Bo Li, Fang Ren, Zixuan Song, Ling Ouyang, Kuiran Liu
  Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Laparoscopic regional radical hysterectomy showed promising clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer
  Weihong Yang, Rong Chen, Caixia Li, Li Li, Ning Luo, Zhongping Cheng
  Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2020; 9(4): 220.     CrossRef
• A Retrospective Comparison of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early and Advanced Cancer of the Cervix, in the Post-LACC Era
  Subbiah Shanmugam, Sujay Susikar, Syed Afroze Hussain, T. Bharanidharan, Rajiv Michael
  Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1–IIA2 cervical cancer
  Se Ik Kim, Jae Hyun Cho, Aeran Seol, Young Im Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song
  Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 153(1): 3.     CrossRef
• Minimally-Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cancer of the Cervix: The Perspective of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC)
  James R. Bentley
  Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.2019; 41(2): 143.     CrossRef
• Hystérectomie radicale à effraction minimale pour le traitement d'un cancer du col de l'utérus : point de vue de la GOC
  James R. Bentley
  Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.2019; 41(2): 146.     CrossRef
• Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis
  Christhardt Köhler, Hermann Hertel, Jörg Herrmann, Simone Marnitz, Peter Mallmann, Giovanni Favero, Andrea Plaikner, Peter Martus, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Achim Schneider
  International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(5): 845.     CrossRef
• After the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) survey
  Miseon Kim, Yong Beom Kim, Jae-Weon Kim
  Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea
  Se Ik Kim, Maria Lee, Sungyoung Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Hee Seung Kim, Kidong Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Hong No, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song, Yong Beom Kim
  Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 155(1): 75.     CrossRef