Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Lymph node excision"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Improve Post-mastectomy Overall or Disease-Free Survival among Breast Cancer Patients with 1-3 Positive Nodes
Ji Hyeon Joo, Su Ssan Kim, Byung Ho Son, Seung Do Ahn, Jin Hong Jung, Eun Kyung Choi, Sei Hyun Ahn, Jong Won Lee, Hee Jeong Kim, Beom Seok Ko
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1011-1021.   Published online October 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.438
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be avoidable for breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive lymph nodes (LN) after breast-conserving therapy. However, the effects of ALND after mastectomy remain unclear because radiation is not routinely used. Herein, we compared the benefits of post-mastectomy ALND versus sentinel node biopsy (SNB) alone for breast cancer patients with 1-3 metastatic LNs.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,697 patients with pN1 disease who underwent mastectomy during 2000-2015 were identified from an institutional database. Outcomes were compared using the inverse probability of treatment weighted method.
Results
Patients who underwent SNB tended to have smaller tumors, a lower histology grade, a lower number of positive LNs, and better immunohistochemical findings. After correcting all confounding factors regarding patient, tumor, and adjuvant treatment, the SNB and ALND groups did not differ in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis and locoregional recurrence. The 10-year DFS and OS rates were 83% and 84%, respectively, during a median follow-up period of 93 months.
Conclusion
ALND did not improve post-mastectomy survival outcomes among patients with N1 breast cancer, even after adjusting for all histopathologic and treatment-related factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Female Patients With T3-4c Breast Cancer and 1-2 Positive Lymph Nodes: A Population-Based Cohort Study
    Hanzhao Yang, Yadong Sun, Peili Wang, Jianghua Qiao, Chengzheng Wang, Zhenzhen Liu
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2024; 24(3): e126.     CrossRef
  • Axillary management in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Changzai Li, Pan Zhang, Jie Lv, Wei Dong, Baoshan Hu, Jinji Zhang, Hongcheng Zhu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reevaluating Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Total Mastectomy for Low Axillary Burden Breast Cancer: Insights from a Meta-Analysis including the SINODAR-ONE Trial
    Munaser Alamoodi, Neill Patani, Kinan Mokbel, Umar Wazir, Kefah Mokbel
    Cancers.2024; 16(4): 742.     CrossRef
  • RecurIndex-Guided postoperative radiotherapy with or without Avoidance of Irradiation of regional Nodes in 1–3 node-positive breast cancer (RIGAIN): a study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled prospective, phase III trial
    Jing Liu, Yuting Tan, Zhuofei Bi, Suning Huang, Na Zhang, An-du Zhang, Lina Zhao, Yu Wang, Zibin Liang, Yu Hou, Xiangying Xu, Jianying Chen, Fei Wang, Xiaowen Lan, Xiao Lin, Xiaoxue Zhang, Wenyi Zhou, Xuting Ye, Jian-gui Guo, Xiaohong Wang, Ran Ding, Jiay
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(7): e078049.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic analysis of further axillary dissection in breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy
    Xueyi Zhao, Liu Yang, Congbo Cao, Zhenchuan Song
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy
    Damiano GENTILE, Corrado TINTERRI
    Minerva Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can Axillary Lymph Node Dissection be Omitted in Breast Cancer Patients with Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes Undergoing Mastectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Real‐World Evidence
    Fulong Chen, Xiaowen Li, Xianjun Lin, Lijia Chen, Zhaoling Lin, Hao Wu, Jishang Chen
    World Journal of Surgery.2023; 47(10): 2446.     CrossRef
  • De-implementation of Axillary Dissection in Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
    Laura D. Leonard, Thiago B. de Araujo, Christopher Quinn, Madeline B. Thomas, Laurel Beaty, Nicole M. Mott, Kathryn Colborn, Alicia A. Heelan, Sarah E. A. Tevis, Nicole Christian, Gretchen Arhendt, Ana L. Gleisner
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(9): 5692.     CrossRef
  • A multi-dimensional nomogram to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1–2HR+ breast cancer
    Ke Xiang, Jialin Chen, Yu Min, Hang Chen, Jiaxin Yang, Daixing Hu, Yuling Han, Guobing Yin, Yang Feng
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with one to two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: sub-analysis of the SINODAR-ONE multicentre randomized clinical trial and reopening of enrolm
    Corrado Tinterri, Giuseppe Canavese, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Alberto Bottini, Andrea Sagona, Giulia Caraceni, Alberto Testori, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Carla Dani, Luca Boni, Paolo Bruzzi, Bethania Fernandes, Marta Scorsetti, Alberto Zambell
    British Journal of Surgery.2023; 110(9): 1143.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu-Jia Fan, Jin-Cheng Li, De-Miao Zhu, Hai-Long Zhu, Yi Zhao, Xin-Bing Zhu, Gang Wu, Ting-ting Bai
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factores predictivos de metástasis en ganglios no centinela en el cáncer de mama con ganglio centinela positivo
    Mariana Peyroteo, Rita Canotilho, Ana Margarida Correia, Catarina Baía, Cátia Ribeiro, Paulo Reis, Abreu de Sousa
    Cirugía Española.2022; 100(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1-2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes
    Olga Kantor, Jessica Means, Samantha Grossmith, Tanujit Dey, Jennifer R. Bellon, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Tari A. King
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(2): 972.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors of non-sentinel lymph node disease in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node
    Mariana Peyroteo, Rita Canotilho, Ana Margarida Correia, Catarina Baía, Cátia Ribeiro, Paulo Reis, Abreu de Sousa
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2022; 100(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Axilla lymph node dissection can be safely omitted in patients with 1–2 positive sentinel nodes receiving mastectomy: a large multi-institutional study and a systemic meta-analysis
    Weiqi Gao, Shuangshuang Lu, Yufei Zeng, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 196(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of survival outcomes between axillary conservation and axillary lymph node dissections in N1 early breast cancer: a propensity-matched SEER analysis
    Nisha Wu, Xiaohan Su, Qiao Tan, Jing Luo, Yewei Yuan, Lingmi Hou, Junyan Li
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2022; 25(4): 1091.     CrossRef
  • Surgeon Bias in the Management of Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes
    Brittany J. Mathias, James Sun, Weihong Sun, Jun-Min Zhou, William J. Fulp, Christine Laronga, M. Catherine Lee, John V. Kiluk
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2021; 21(1): 74.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Axillary Dissection Among Patients With Sentinel Node–Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy
    James Sun, Brittany J. Mathias, Christine Laronga, Weihong Sun, Jun-Min Zhou, William J. Fulp, John V. Kiluk, M. Catherine Lee
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.2021; 19(1): 40.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of the Use of Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with T1/2N0M0 Breast Cancer and Tumour-Involved Sentinel Lymph Nodes Undergoing Mastectomy: A Cohort Study
    André Hennigs, Fabian Riedel, Manuel Feißt, Melitta Köpke, Mahdi Rezai, Ulrike Nitz, Mareike Moderow, Michael Golatta, Christof Sohn, Jörg Heil
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(8): 2435.     CrossRef
  • 8,837 View
  • 326 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Which Patients with Isolated Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Will Truly Benefit from Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Colon Cancer?
Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):712-719.   Published online July 14, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.100
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The prognosis of patientswith colon cancer and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) is poor. We analyzed the prognostic factors of extramesenteric lymphadenectomy for colon cancer patients with isolated PALNM.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with PALNM who underwent curative resection between October 1988 and December 2009.
Results
In univariate analyses, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were higher in patients with ≤ 7 positive para-aortic lymph node (PALN) (36.5% and 27.5%) than in those with > 7 PALN (14.3% and 14.3%; p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 was also correlated with a lower 5-year OS and DFS rate of 21.5% and 11.7% compared with those with CEA ≤ 5 (46.3% and 41.4%; p=0.122 and 0.039, respectively). Multivariate analysis found that the number of positive PALN (hazard ratio [HR], 3.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.309 to 8.275; p=0.011) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and the number of positive PALN (HR, 2.484; 95% CI, 0.993 to 6.211; p=0.052) and preoperative CEA level (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 0.940 to 4.057; p=0.073) were marginally independent prognostic factors for DFS. According to our prognostic model, the 5-year OS and DFS rate increased to 59.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and CEA level ≤ 5.
Conclusion
PALN dissection might be beneficial in carefully selected patients with a low CEA level and less extensive PALNM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection
    Shin Emoto, Yosuke Fukunaga, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroshi Kawachi, Shuhei Sano, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Masashi Ueno
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(4): 356.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence
    Rémi Grange, Pascal Rousset, Nicolas Williet, Mathias Guesnon, Laurent Milot, Guillaume Passot, Jean-Marc Phelip, Bertrand Le Roy, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2378.     CrossRef
  • Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer: Predicting Pathologic Lymph Node Positivity and Optimizing Outcomes
    Neal Bhutiani, Kentaro Ochiai, Muhammad O. Awiwi, Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas, Abhineet Uppal, Oliver Peacock, Craig Messick, Michael G. White, John M. Skibber, Brian K. Bednarski, Y. Nancy You, George J. Chang, Harmeet Kaur, Tsuyoshi Konishi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(9): 5962.     CrossRef
  • Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer
    Anne-Sophie Dulac, Pietro Genova, Olivier Benoit, Cindy Neuzillet, Mostapha El Hajjam, Jean-François Emile, Frédérique Peschaud, Renato Micelli Lupinacci
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1306.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Sono Ito, Yusuke Kinugasa, Shinichi Yamauchi, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa, Soichiro Ishihara, Akio Shiomi, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Takeshi Suto, Hiroki Takahashi, Michio Itabashi, Manabu Shiozawa, Masaya Hiyoshi, Takaya Kobatake, Koji Komori, Hiroyuki Egi
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(11): 1423.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcome After Resection of Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Multivisceral Colorectal Cancer
    Christopher Berlin, Geoffroy Andrieux, Magdalena Menzel, Gabriel J. Stöger, Andreas Gengenbach, Luisa Schäfer, Hans C. Hillebrecht, Rebecca Kesselring, Uyen-Thao Le, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Philipp A. Holzner
    Cancers.2024; 16(22): 3741.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes after synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Conor Aylward, Jawed Noori, Jack Tyrrell, Niall O'sullivan, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(4): 645.     CrossRef
  • Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review
    Michael G. Fadel, Mosab Ahmed, Gianluca Pellino, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris Tekkis, David Nicol, Christos Kontovounisios, Erik Mayer
    Cancers.2023; 15(2): 455.     CrossRef
  • The management of clinically suspicious para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Yeng Kwang Tay, Swetha Prabhakaran, Joseph C Kong
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 19(6): 596.     CrossRef
  • Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Rong-Chang Wang, Jian-Qi Wang, Xiao-Yu Zhou, Chu-lin Zhong, Jin-Xu Chen, Jing-Song Chen
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of Extraperitoneal Metastases on the Curative-Intent Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
    Frédéric Schell, Amaniel Kefleyesus, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Guillaume Passot, Pascal Rousset, Alhadeedi Omar, Laurent Villeneuve, Julien Péron, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 4444.     CrossRef
  • Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qingwei Ren, Yanyan Chen, Xuejun Shao, Lanzhong Guo, Xinxin Xu
    European Journal of Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes after Surgical Resection for Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer
    Takayuki Okuno, Masaya Hiyoshi, Yuusuke Kyoden, Junji Yamamoto
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(7): 460.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Jun Woo Bong, Sanghee Kang, Pyoungjae Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 271.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Jennifer Redfern, Agastya Patel, Thomas Satyadas, Minas Baltatzis
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors of survival of colorectal cancer patients after para-aortic lymph node metastasis
    Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazushige Kawai, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Shinya Abe, Hirofumi Sonoda, Koji Murono, Junko Kishikawa, Yuzo Nagai, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Anzai, Soichiro Ishihara
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(3): 520.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 661.     CrossRef
  • Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pengyue Zhao, Xingpeng Yang, Yang Yan, Jiaqi Yang, Songyan Li, Xiaohui Du
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of enlarged paraaortic lymph nodes detected during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Jaram Lee, Hyeong-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients
    G.N. Piozzi, H. Park, T.H. Lee, J.S. Kim, H.B. Choi, S.J. Baek, J.M. Kwak, J. Kim, S.H. Kim
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 2069.     CrossRef
  • Effect of lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with isolated synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis
    Sung Chul Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2584.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351.     CrossRef
  • Is 18F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hamid Dahmarde, Fateme Parooie, Morteza Salarzaei
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes after resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in left-sided colon and rectal cancer
    Junichi Sakamoto, Heita Ozawa, Hiroki Nakanishi, Shin Fujita, Norikatsu Miyoshi
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0241815.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcome and prognostic factors for patients with para-aortic lymph node dissection in left-sided colorectal cancer
    Kota Sahara, Jun Watanabe, Atsushi Ishibe, Yusuke Suwa, Hirokazu Suwa, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(6): 1121.     CrossRef
  • 16,067 View
  • 329 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Value of Axillary Nodal Ratio after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Se Hyun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Tae-Yong Kim, Seock-Ah Im, In Sil Choi, Yee Soo Chae, Sun Kyung Baek, Seok Yun Kang, Sarah Park, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Yoon Ji Choi, Soohyeon Lee, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yeon-Hee Park, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin-Hee Ahn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jee Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1373-1381.   Published online March 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.475
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis is based on the data of 814 patientswith stage II/III breast cancer treated with four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel before surgery. We evaluated the clinical significance of LNR (3 categories: low 0-0.20 vs. intermediate 0.21-0.65 vs. high 0.66-1.00) using a Cox proportional regression model.
Results
A total of 799 patients underwent breast surgery. Pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 129 patients (16.1%) (hormone receptor [HR] +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] –, 34/373 [9.1%]; HER2+, 45/210 [21.4%]; triple negative breast cancer, 50/216 [23.1%]). The mean numbers of involved LN and retrieved LN were 2.70 (range, 0 to 42) and 13.98 (range, 1 to 64), respectively. The mean LNR was 0.17 (low, 574 [71.8%]; intermediate, 170 [21.3%]; high, 55 [6.9%]). In univariate analysis, LNR showed significant association with a worse relapse-free survival (3-year relapse-free survival rate 84.8% in low vs. 66.2% in intermediate vs. 54.3% in high; p < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, LNR did not show significant association with recurrence after adjusting for other clinical factors (age, histologic grade, subtype, ypT stage, ypN stage, lymphatic or vascular invasion, and pCR). In subgroup analysis, the LNR system had good prognostic value in HR+/HER2– subtype.
Conclusion
LNR is not superior to ypN stage in predicting clinical outcome of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the prognostic value of the LNR system in HR+/HER2– patients is notable and worthy of further investigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
    Zhe Wang, Wei Chong, Huikun Zhang, Xiaoli Liu, Yawen Zhao, Zhifang Guo, Li Fu, Yongjie Ma, Feng Gu
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic role of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A dose-response meta-analysis
    Jinzhao Liu, Yifei Li, Weifang Zhang, Chenhui Yang, Chao Yang, Liang Chen, Mingjian Ding, Liang Zhang, Xiaojun Liu, Guozhong Cui, Yunjiang Liu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic implications of regression of metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Yul Ri Chung, Ji Won Woo, Soomin Ahn, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, Mijung Jang, Sun Mi Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, So Yeon Park
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using a novel T-lymph node ratio model to evaluate the prognosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients who received preoperative radiotherapy followed by mastectomy
    Yang Wang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Song Liu, Weifang Tang, Hong Gao, Xucai Zheng, Shikai Hong, Shengying Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(42): e8203.     CrossRef
  • The genetic variants in the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway predict susceptibility and CE(A)F chemotherapy response to breast cancer and clinical outcomes
    Xiang Li, Ruishan Zhang, Zhuangkai Liu, Shuang Li, Hong Xu
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(12): 20252.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Inner Quadrant Involvement in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ji Hyun Chang, Wan Jeon, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2016; 19(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • 11,622 View
  • 163 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Effectiveness of Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Prediction of Axillary Nodal Status in 111 Patients with Breast Cancer
Jeong Hyun Yang, Hae Kyung Lee, Seok Jin Nam
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(5):951-955.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Recently, results of many trials that intend to decide the axillary status through more conservative procedures are reported. One of these is sentinel node biopsy. This method is regarded as reasonable and selective. Some investigators tend to omit axillary dissection in the patient who is determined to have negative node clinically and negative result in sentinel node biopsy procedure. This study was designed to know how accurate the sentinel node biopsy method can predict axillary nodal status.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
The patients group was selected from Department of Surgery at SMC, consisting of 111 patients with surgically curable breast cancer from Sept. 1995 to Apr. 1997. Isosulfan blue was injected in the center of mass and the margins of 4 quadrant under the general anesthesia. Axillary dissection was done 5 minutes after injection to identify the stained lymphatics. When stained lymphatics were identified, dissection was performed along the lymphatics bidirectionally to detect the stained lymph node nearest to the primary tumor (sentinel node). After frozen biopsy of sentinel node, routine axillary node dissection was performed. Results of frozen biopsy were compared with the final pathologic results.
RESULTS
Sentinel node was detected in 80 of the 111 cases (72.1%) and there were 44 (55.0%) axillary metastasis cases in sentinel node detection group. In 14 of 44 cases, sentinel node was only positive. In 5 of 41, sentinel node were falsely negative for malignancy. Negative predictive value of the method is 87.8% (36/41).
CONCLUSION
Sentinel node biopsy method can predict the axillary nodal status in patients with breast cancer. This method can lead to more conservative treatment, eventually omitting axillary nodal dissection in selected patients.
  • 2,576 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP