Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Lung and Thoracic cancer

Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases: A Network Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: Qing Yin, Longguo Dai, Ruizhu Sun, Ping Ke, Liya Liu, Bo Jiang; Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):803-816. Published online October 25, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.764

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with liver metastases.
Materials and Methods
English literature was retrieved from the PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and European Society for Medical Oncology databases from January 2015 to January 2021. We pooled the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) using an NMA and ranked treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Publication bias was evaluated by Begg’s and Egger’s tests. STATA 15.0 was used for the sensitivity analysis, and the remaining statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.2.
Results
Nine eligible phase III randomized controlled trials were included, including 1,141 patients with liver metastases. Pembrolizumab+chemotherapy ranked highest, followed by atezolizumab+bevacizumab+chemotherapy and nivolumab. However, no significant difference in OS rates was observed across these three treatments (HR, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 2.22 for pembrolizumab+chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab+bevacizumab+chemotherapy; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.57 for pembrolizumab+chemotherapy vs. nivolumab). Regarding the PFS rate, atezolizumab+bevacizumab+chemotherapy and pembro-lizumab+chemotherapy ranked highest and no significant difference was observed between them (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.70 for atezolizumab+bevacizumab+chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab+chemotherapy).
Conclusion
Pembrolizumab+chemotherapy, atezolizumab+bevacizumab+chemotherapy, and nivolumab were superior to other treatments in NSCLC patients with liver metastases. These new findings may help clinicians better select therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with liver metastases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with liver metastases
Fan-jie Qu, Yi Zhou, Shuang Wu
British Journal of Cancer.2024; 130(2): 165. CrossRef
Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma
Daisuke Hazama, Kenji Nakahama, Hiroaki Kodama, Akito Miyazaki, Koichi Azuma, Yosuke Kawashima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Ito, Yoshimasa Shiraishi, Keita Miura, Takayuki Takahama, Satoshi Oizumi, Yoshinobu Namba, Satoshi Ikeda, Hiroshige Yoshioka, Asuka Tsuya, Y
JTO Clinical and Research Reports.2024; 5(1): 100613. CrossRef
Evolving landscape of treatments targeting the microenvironment of liver metastases in non-small cell lung cancer
Lingling Zhu, Xianzhe Yu, Xiaojun Tang, Chenggong Hu, Lei Wu, Yanyang Liu, Qinghua Zhou
Chinese Medical Journal.2024; 137(9): 1019. CrossRef
Treatment Options for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Liver Metastases
Vesna Ćeriman Krstić, Natalija Samardžić, Milija Gajić, Milan Savić, Biljana Šeha, Marina Roksandić Milenković, Dragana Jovanović
Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2024; 46(12): 13443. CrossRef
Assessing the Relationship Between Liver Metastases and the Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Huilin Xu, Pingpo Ming, Zhenyu Zhao, Nan Zhao, Dingjie Zhou, Xixian Tang, Dedong Cao
Integrative Cancer Therapies.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Liver metastases and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Handai Xia, Wengang Zhang, Yuqing Zhang, Xiaoling Shang, Yanguo Liu, Xiuwen Wang
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef

7,743 View
254 Download
7 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Gastrointestinal cancer

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Jesang Yu, Dong Hwan Kim, Jungbok Lee, Yong Moon Shin, Jong Hoon Kim, Sang Min Yoon, Jinhong Jung, Jin Cheon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Tae Won Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Sun Young Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin-hong Park, So Yeon Kim; Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):850-859. Published online October 13, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.674

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and to determine the favorable treatment modality according to tumor characteristics.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the records of 222 colorectal cancer patients with 330 CRLM who underwent RFA (268 tumors in 178 patients) or SBRT (62 tumors in 44 patients) between 2007 and 2014. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox models were used by adjusting with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
Results
The median follow-up duration was 30.5 months. The median tumor size was significantly smaller in the RFA group than in the SBRT group (1.5 cm vs 2.3 cm, p<0.001). In IPTW-adjusted analysis, difference in treatment modality was not associated with significant differences in 1-year and 3-year recurrence-free survival (35% vs 43%, 22% vs 23%; p=0.198), overall survival (96% vs 91%, 58% vs 56%; p=0.508), and freedom from local progression (FFLP; 90% vs 72%, 78% vs 60%; p=0.106). Significant interaction effect between the treatment modality and tumor size was observed for FFLP (p=0.001). In IPTW-adjusted subgroup analysis of patients with tumor size >2 cm, the SBRT group had a higher FFLP compared with the RFA group (HR, 0.153; p<0.001).
Conclusion
SBRT and RFA showed similar local control in the treatment of patients with CRLM. Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for local control and SBRT may be preferred for larger tumors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Ablative techniques in colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review, descriptive summary of practice, and recommendations for optimal data reporting
Wee Han Ng, Catarina Machado, Alice Rooney, Robert Jones, Jonathan Rees, Samir Pathak
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(2): 109487. CrossRef
Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers
Clayton T. Marcinak, Patrick B. Schwartz, Mustafa M. Basree, Newton Hurst, Michael Bassetti, Jeremy D. Kratz, Nataliya V. Uboha
American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases: a pooled analysis following the estro/eortc consensus recommendations
D. Pezzulla, G. Chiloiro, E. M. Lima, G. Macchia, C. Romano, S. Reina, G. Panza, S. Cilla, A. G. Morganti, F. Cellini, M. A. Gambacorta, F. Deodato
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.2024; 41(5): 667. CrossRef
Interventionelle Therapieoptionen bei oligometastasierten Tumoren
Max Seidensticker
Forum.2024; 39(5): 340. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of B-ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiong Zhang, Hong-Yi Zhu, Ming Yuan
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(9): 2986. CrossRef
Analysis of alkaline phosphatase and γ-glutamyltransferase after radiofrequency ablation of primary liver cancer: A retrospective study
Wen-Yu Huang, Sheng Zheng, Dan Zhu, Ying-Lang Zeng, Juan Yang, Xue-Li Zeng, Pei Liu, Shun-Ling Zhang, Ming Yuan, Zhi-Xia Wang
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(9): 2860. CrossRef
Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 4: Liver and locally recurrent rectal cancer
Hwa Kyung Byun, Gyu Sang Yoo, Soo-Yoon Sung, Jin-Ho Song, Byoung Hyuck Kim, Yoo-Kang Kwak, Yeon Joo Kim, Yeon-Sil Kim, Kyung Su Kim
Radiation Oncology Journal.2024; 42(4): 247. CrossRef
Recent trends in radiotherapy use for major cancers in Korea
Kyungmi Yang, Jeong Eun Lee, Won Park, Yong Chan Ahn, Seung Jae Huh
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 53(12): 1177. CrossRef
Combination of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases from colon adenocarcinoma: A case report
Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Angela Romano, Maria Gabriella Brizi, Luigi Sofo, Ivo Boskoski, Guido Costamagna, Fabia Attili
Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports.2023; 9: 100216. CrossRef
Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and ablative external radiotherapy for the treatment of intrahepatic malignancies: A hybrid meta-analysis
Chai Hong Rim, Jung Sue Lee, Soo Yeon Kim, Jinsil Seong
JHEP Reports.2023; 5(1): 100594. CrossRef
Metastasis-Directed Local Therapy of Hepatic Oligometastasis from Colorectal Cancer and Future Perspective in Radiation Therapy
Gyu Sang Yoo, Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Jae-Uk Jeong, Eui Kyu Chie, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun Won Um, Yong Chan Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee
Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(3): 707. CrossRef
Local Control Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Oligometastases: Lessons from a Quarter Century
Sara Mheid, Stefan Allen, Sylvia S. W. Ng, William A. Hall, Nina N. Sanford, Todd A. Aguilera, Ahmed M. Elamir, Rana Bahij, Martijn P. W. Intven, Ganesh Radhakrishna, Issa Mohamad, Jeremy De Leon, Hendrick Tan, Shirley Lewis, Cihan Gani, Teo Stanecu, Vero
Current Oncology.2023; 30(10): 9230. CrossRef
Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade
Koji Tomita, Yusuke Matsui, Mayu Uka, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Takahiro Kawabata, Kazuaki Munetomo, Shoma Nagata, Toshihiro Iguchi, Takao Hiraki
Japanese Journal of Radiology.2022; 40(10): 1035. CrossRef

8,840 View
286 Download
12 Web of Science
13 Crossref

Long-term Survival in Patients Treated with a Robotic Radiosurgical Device for Liver Metastases: Sebastian Stintzing, Jobst von Einem, Christoph Fueweger, Alfred Haidenberger, Michael Fedorov, Alexander Muavcevic; Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):187-193. Published online April 16, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.594

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Purpose
The treatment of liver metastases with local procedures is a fast progressing field. For the most, long-term survival data is missing raising questions with regard to the efficacy of such modalities when compared to surgical resection. Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife device enables the treatment of liver lesions with a single-session approach. Here we present long-term survival data to explore the curative potential of this strategy.
Materials and Methods
Patients with oligo-metastatic disease limited to the liver have been treated with single-session or hypo-fractioned radiosurgery in curative intent and prospectively followed until death. Follow-up (FU) was performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2 months after radiation and at 3-month intervals for the first 2 years. After that annual computed tomography or MRI scans were performed until 5 years post-treatment. Local recurrence in the radiated volume and recurrence outside the treated volume were used to define local and distant progression. Survival times were censored at the time of the last FU.
Results
One hundred twenty-six patients treated between 2005 and 2015 with 194 lesions were included into this study. Median FU was 30.0 months. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 55.2% had a complete remission and 11.3% a partial remission. Seventy-two point two percent recurred outside the radiated lesion and median overall survival was 35.2 months with a 3-year survival rate of 47.7%.
Conclusion
This is currently the largest cohort of stereotactic body radiation therapy treated liver lesions with a median long-term follow of 30 months. Robotic radiosurgery using a single session approach has a high efficacy to control the radiated lesion with the potential to cure patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Evidence Quality Assessment
Ilektra Kyrochristou, Ilias Giannakodimos, Maria Tolia, Ioannis Georgakopoulos, Nikolaos Pararas, Francesk Mulita, Nikolaos Machairas, Dimitrios Schizas
Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 1055. CrossRef
Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy for Liver Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines
Ciro Franzese, Alexander V. Louie, Rupesh Kotecha, Zhenwei Zhang, Matthias Guckenberger, Mi-Sook Kim, Alison C. Tree, Ben J. Slotman, Arjun Sahgal, Marta Scorsetti
Practical Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review
Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Salem Alshehri, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Syahir Mansor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Mamdouh Alqathami
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review
A. N. Moskalenko, V. K. Lyadov, I. V. Sagaydak, M. V. Chernykh, N. N. Britskaya
Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(1): 49. CrossRef
Anti-EGFR Therapy Induces EGF Secretion by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Confer Colorectal Cancer Chemoresistance
Colleen M. Garvey, Roy Lau, Alyssa Sanchez, Ren X. Sun, Emma J. Fong, Michael E. Doche, Oscar Chen, Anthony Jusuf, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Brent Larson, Shannon M. Mumenthaler
Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1393. CrossRef

7,869 View
152 Download
4 Web of Science
5 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search