Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Histology"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Gastrointestinal cancer
Histopathologic and Molecular Biomarkers of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Treatment Response among Patients with Microsatellite Instability‒High Colon Cancer
Jaewon Hyung, Eun Jeong Cho, Jihun Kim, Jwa Hoon Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Chang Ohk Sung, Sun Young Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(4):1175-1190.   Published online January 12, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.1133
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Recent clinical trials have reported response rates < 50% among patients treated with programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for microsatellite instability‒high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), and factors predicting treatment response have not been fully identified. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment response among patients with MSI-H CRC.
Materials and Methods
MSI-H CRC patients enrolled in three clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea) were screened and classified into two groups according to treatment response. Their histopathologic features and expression of 730 immune-related genes from the NanoString platform were evaluated, and a machine learning–based classification model was built to predict treatment response among MSI-H CRCs patients.
Results
A total of 27 patients (15 responders, 12 non-responders) were included. A high degree of lymphocytic/neutrophilic infiltration and an expansile tumor border were associated with treatment response and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), while mucinous/signet-ring cell carcinoma was associated with a lack of treatment response and short PFS. Gene expression profiles revealed that the interferon-γ response pathway was enriched in the responder group. Of the top eight differentially expressed immune-related genes, PRAME had the highest fold change in the responder group. Higher expression of PRAME was independently associated with better PFS along with histologic subtypes in the multivariate analysis. The classification model using these genes showed good performance for predicting treatment response.
Conclusion
We identified histologic and immune-related gene expression characteristics associated with treatment response in MSI-H CRC, which may contribute to optimal patient stratification.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Relationship of PRAME Expression with Clinicopathologic Parameters and Immunologic Markers in Melanomas: In Silico Analysis
    Yasemin Cakir, Banu Lebe
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2025; 33(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • Exploration of the regulatory mechanism of norcantharidin on sine oculis homeobox homolog 4 in colon cancer using transcriptome sequencing and bioinformatic
    Fanqin Zhang, Chao Wu, Jingyuan Zhang, Zhihong Huang, Antony Stalin, Yiyan Zhai, Shuqi Liu, Jiarui Wu
    Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers to predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hang Yu, Qingquan Liu, Keting Wu, Shuang Tang
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Insight into the Peculiarities of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon – a Narrative Review
    Loredana Farcaș, Diana Voskuil-Galoș
    Journal of Medical and Radiation Oncology.2024; 4(7): 1.     CrossRef
  • High serum IL-6 correlates with reduced clinical benefit of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hannah Yang, Beodeul Kang, Yeonjung Ha, Sung Hwan Lee, Ilhwan Kim, Hyeyeong Kim, Won Suk Lee, Gwangil Kim, Sanghoon Jung, Sun Young Rha, Vincent E. Gaillard, Jaekyung Cheon, Chan Kim, Hong Jae Chon
    JHEP Reports.2023; 5(4): 100672.     CrossRef
  • Identification of ZBTB4 as an immunological biomarker that can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer
    Zhe Yang, Feiran Chen, Feng Wang, Xiubing Chen, Biaolin Zheng, Xiaomin Liao, Zhejun Deng, Xianxian Ruan, Jing Ning, Qing Li, Haixing Jiang, Shanyu Qin
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma: A Comparison of 3 Scoring Methods in a Cohort of Jordanian Patients
    Heyam A. Awad, Maher A. Sughayer, Jumana M. Obeid, Yaqoot N. Heilat, Ahmad S. Alhesa, Reda M. Yousef, Nabil M. Hasasna, Shafiq A. Masoud, Tareq Saleh
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2023; 31(6): 379.     CrossRef
  • Systemic Delivery of a STING Agonist‐Loaded Positively Charged Liposome Selectively Targets Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Suppresses Tumor Angiogenesis
    Eun‐Jin Go, Hannah Yang, Wooram Park, Seung Joon Lee, Jun‐Hyeok Han, So Jung Kong, Won Suk Lee, Dong Keun Han, Hong Jae Chon, Chan Kim
    Small.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Review of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Context of Cancer Treatment
    Norah A. Alturki
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(13): 4301.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing head and neck tumor management with artificial intelligence: Integration and perspectives
    Nian-Nian Zhong, Han-Qi Wang, Xin-Yue Huang, Zi-Zhan Li, Lei-Ming Cao, Fang-Yi Huo, Bing Liu, Lin-Lin Bu
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2023; 95: 52.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for prediction of response to cancer immunotherapy
    Yuhan Yang, Yunuo Zhao, Xici Liu, Juan Huang
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2022; 87: 137.     CrossRef
  • 6,730 View
  • 262 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Lung and Thoracic cancer
Selection Strategies and Practical Application of BRAF V600E-Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Inwoo Hwang, Yoon-La Choi, Hyunwoo Lee, Soohyun Hwang, Boram Lee, Hobin Yang, Chaithanya Chelakkot, Joungho Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):782-792.   Published online November 23, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.843
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The incidence of BRAF V600E mutation in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is lower than 2%, which poses difficulties in finding legitimate patients for targeted therapy. We investigated the predictive factors pertaining to BRAF V600E and the effectiveness of the VE1 antibody as a screening method for patient selection.
Materials and Methods
The study was designed into two steps. In a first group, BRAF-mutated NSCLCs were identified from sequencing data to determine the features of BRAF V600E mutation. The results of the first group helped the collection of adenocarcinomas with a papillary or micropapillary pattern but without EGFR or ALK alterations as a second group so that the frequency of BRAF V600E mutation could be calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of the VE1 were compared with BRAF V600E status.
Results
Among 39 BRAF-mutated NSCLCs in the first group, 20 (51%) were V600E. BRAF V600E mutation was more common in female patients and showed no significant correlation with smoking status. Nineteen cases were adenocarcinomas without EGFR and ALK alterations. The most common patterns of invasion were papillary and micropapillary along with central fibrosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the VE1 were 90.0% and 92.3%, respectively. In the second group, 6.7% of cases were VE1-positive, indicating that the prevalence was significantly higher than that reported in previous studies (0.3-1.8%).
Conclusion
BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLCs could be enriched with the application of clinicopathologic parameters, which are not perfect. Therefore, additional VE1 immunohistochemistry may be useful as a screening method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer
    László József Tóth, Attila Mokánszki, Gábor Méhes
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • BRAF V600E Mutation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korean Patients
    Hyo Yeong Ahn, Chang Hun Lee, Min Ki Lee, Jung Seop Eom, Yeon Joo Jeong, Yeong Dae Kim, Jeong Su Cho, Jonggeun Lee, So Jeong Lee, Dong Hoon Shin, Ahrong Kim
    Medicina.2023; 59(6): 1085.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Liquid Biopsies Positive for EGFR Mutations on Overall Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    Jonnathan Roldan Ruiz, Marta Fuentes Gago, Luis Chinchilla Tabora, Idalia Gonzalez Morais, José Sayagués, Mar Abad Hernández, Maria Cordovilla Pérez, Maria Ludeña de la Cruz, Edel del Barco Morillo, Marta Rodriguez Gonzalez
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(14): 2347.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry in non–small cell lung cancers: a multi-institutional study by 15 pathologists in Korea
    Sunhee Chang, Yoon-La Choi, Hyo Sup Shim, Geon Kook Lee, Seung Yeon Ha
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2022; 56(6): 334.     CrossRef
  • 6,660 View
  • 170 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Head and Neck cancer
Re-irradiation with Moderate Hypo-fractionation Using Intensity Modulated Photon or Proton Radiation Therapy in Locally Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Nasopharynx
Heerim Nam, Yong Chan Ahn, Kyungmi Yang, Dongryul Oh, Jae Myoung Noh
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):96-108.   Published online March 26, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1349
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients following moderate hypo-fractionation re-irradiation (re-RT).
Materials and Methods
Sixty locally recurrent NPC patients underwent hypo-fractionation re-RT. Forty-eight point three percentage had rT3-4, and 30.0% did keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with or without intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), was used in 66.7% of patients.
Results
With the median follow-up of 22 months (range, 2 to 254 months), 31 patients (51.7%) died, 38 (63.3%) developed further treatment failure, and 30 (50.0%) developed ≥ grade 3 toxicity (including seven grade 5) at time of analysis. The 2- and 5-year rates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, and ≥ grade 3 toxicity-free survival were 57.9% and 45.8%, 64.1% and 52.5%, and 54.8% and 44.9%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, worse factors for overall survival (OS) were iT3-4 (p=0.010) and age at re-RT ≥ 53 years (p=0.003), those for local failure-free survival (LFFS) were rT3-4 (p=0.022) and rN0-1 (p=0.035), and those for toxicity-free survival (TFS) were iT3-4 (p=0.020) and re-IMRT/IMPT (p=0.030), respectively. Cumulative dose or fraction size ≥ 3 Gy at re-RT, however, showed no significance for OS, LFFS and TFS.
Conclusion
Current re-RT with modern RT techniques by moderate hypo-fractionation scheme seemed feasible in treating locally recurrent NPC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Case Report: Unresectable recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer treated with immuno oncology
    Fabiano Flauto, Rosa Maria Di Crescenzo, Vincenzo Damiano
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Envisioning an Italian Head and Neck Proton Therapy Model-Based Selection: Challenge and Opportunity
    Giulia Fontana, Matteo Pepa, Anna Maria Camarda, Mimoza Strikchani, Michela Meregaglia, Alessandro Vai, Alfredo Mirandola, Barbara Vischioni, Andrea Pella, Guido Baroni, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Marta Scorsetti, Marco Cianchetti, Elisa D’Angelo, Pie
    International Journal of Particle Therapy.2025; 16: 100745.     CrossRef
  • Radiation oncology for the rhinologist
    Helena Levyn, Fan Yang, Nancy Y. Lee
    Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery.2024; 32(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Identifying the prognostic value of MRI-based tumor response and predicting the risk of radio-resistance in re-radiotherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zi-Jian Lu, Ting Liu, Jie-Yi Lin, Sheng-Ting Pei, Ling Guo, Sai-Lan Liu, Hai-Qiang Mai
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2023; 183: 109635.     CrossRef
  • Low-dose radiotherapy effects the progression of anti-tumor response
    Lei Gao, Anqi Zhang
    Translational Oncology.2023; 35: 101710.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Hypofractionation in Proton Therapy
    Alexandre Santos, Scott Penfold, Peter Gorayski, Hien Le
    Cancers.2022; 14(9): 2271.     CrossRef
  • Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Xingzhe Li, Sarin Kitpanit, Anna Lee, Dennis Mah, Kevin Sine, Eric J. Sherman, Lara A. Dunn, Loren S. Michel, James Fetten, Kaveh Zakeri, Yao Yu, Linda Chen, Jung Julie Kang, Daphna Y. Gelblum, Sean M. McBride, Chiaojung J. Tsai, Nadeem Riaz, Nancy Y. Lee
    JAMA Network Open.2021; 4(6): e2113205.     CrossRef
  • 6,868 View
  • 201 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Long-term Outcome of Chondrosarcoma: A Single Institutional Experience
Srimanth Bindiganavile, Ilkyu Han, Ji Yeon Yun, Han-Soo Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):897-903.   Published online February 12, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.135
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The prognostic factors of chondrosarcoma remain uncertain as only a few large studies with long-term follow-up have been reported. The aim of this study was to analyze oncological outcomes and prognostic factors.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective review of oncological outcomes and prognostic factors was performed on 125 consecutive chondrosarcoma patients who underwent surgery at our institution.
Results
Overall survival was 91.6%±2.5%, 84.1%±3.8%, and 84.1%±3.8% at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. Among the histological types, dedifferentiated type showed the worst survival (p < 0.001). As for conventional type chondrosarcoma, histologic grade and anatomical location predicted outcome, with high-grade with axial location having the worst outcome (p < 0.001). In contrast, low-grade chondrosarcoma of appendicular skeleton could be treated safely by intralesional curettage.
Conclusion
Histological type was significantly associated with the outcome of chondrosarcoma. For the conventional type, histologic grade and anatomical location predicted outcome, with highgrade with axial location having the worst outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rare malignant primary spinal chondrosarcoma: A case report
    Ahmad Fitrah, Btari Magistra Pancaputri, Andreas Klemens Wienanda, Atta Kuntara, Abdul Kadir Hadar, Muhammad Naseh Sajadi Budi Irawan, Ahmad Ramdan, Anglita Yantisetiasti
    Radiology Case Reports.2025; 20(2): 949.     CrossRef
  • Atypical cartilaginous tumor imaging findings in the distal phalanx of the left thumb: case report and literature review
    Hong Wang, Xinyi Tang, Yuting Wang, Xiaoyan Peng, Yujia Yang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and Management of Positive Margins in Chondrosarcoma With Soft Tissue Extension: A Case Series and Review of Literature
    Austin Yu, Trevor Poulson, Zachary Butler, Matthew Demetrious, Steven Gitelis, Alan T. Blank
    Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel machine‐learning prediction tools for overall survival of patients with chondrosarcoma: Based on recursive partitioning analysis
    Xiong‐Gang Yang, Shan‐Shan Yang, Yi Bao, Qi‐Yang Wang, Zhi Peng, Sheng Lu
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short‐to‐Mid‐Term Outcomes of Ipsilateral Femoral Head Autograft Combined with Uncemented Total Hip Replacement for Partial Periacetabular Defects Following Tumor Resection
    Mengzhang Xie, Qiang Ye, Taojun Gong, Zhuangzhuang Li, Yitian Wang, Minxun Lu, Yi Luo, Li Min, Chongqi Tu, Yong Zhou
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(12): 2950.     CrossRef
  • The Importance of Patient Systemic Health Status in High-Grade Chondrosarcoma Prognosis: A National Multicenter Study
    Veroniek M. van Praag, Dominique Molenaar, Guus A. H. Tendijck, Gerard R. Schaap, Paul C. Jutte, Ingrid C. M. van der Geest, Marta Fiocco, Michiel A. J. van de Sande
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3484.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Chondrosarcoma with Positive Margins and Extraosseous Extension on Patient Outcomes
    Austin Yu, Trevor Poulson, Zachary Butler, Matthew Demetrious, Matthew Colman, Steven Gitelis, Alan T. Blank
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Residual Tumor after Chondrosarcoma Surgery: Clinical Case
    Denis V. Chernyaev, Valery A. Kozin, Ruslan A. Zukov
    Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Classification of Chondrosarcoma: From Characteristic to Challenging Imaging Findings
    Jun-Ho Kim, Seul Ki Lee
    Cancers.2023; 15(6): 1703.     CrossRef
  • Chondrosarcoma of the Proximal Humerus: Does the Margin Affect Survival?
    Gilber Kask, Minna K. Laitinen, Michael C. Parry, Jose I. Albergo, Jonathan D. Stevenson, German Farfalli, Luis Aponte-Tinao, Robert Grimer, Vaiyapuri Sumathi, Lee M. Jeys
    Cancers.2023; 15(8): 2337.     CrossRef
  • Multi-modality management of chondrosarcoma of scapula: A case report and review of literature
    Ramakant Tiwari, Bharti Devnani, Balamurugan Thirunavukkarasu, Puneet Pareek, Prateek Daga, Amit Kumar
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2023; 35: 100710.     CrossRef
  • Fracture risk after intralesional curettage of atypical cartilaginous tumors
    Gitte G. J. Krebbekx, Felix J. Fris, G. R. Schaap, J. A. M. Bramer, F. G. M. Verspoor, Stein J. Janssen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A machine learning-based model for clinical prediction of distal metastasis in chondrosarcoma: a multicenter, retrospective study
    Jihu Wei, Shijin Lu, Wencai Liu, He Liu, Lin Feng, Yizi Tao, Zhanglin Pu, Qiang Liu, Zhaohui Hu, Haosheng Wang, Wenle Li, Wei Kang, Chengliang Yin, Zhe Feng
    PeerJ.2023; 11: e16485.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging after Fluorescent-Guided Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Sarcoma
    Feredun Azari, Gregory T Kennedy, Kevin Zhang, Elizabeth Bernstein, Robert G Maki, Colleen Gaughan, Doraid Jarrar, Taine Pechet, John Kucharczuk, Sunil Singhal
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2022; 234(5): 748.     CrossRef
  • Chondrosarcoma patient characteristics, management, and outcomes based on over 5,000 cases from the National Cancer Database (NCDB)
    Taylor D. Ottesen, Blake N. Shultz, Alana M. Munger, Michael Amick, Courtney S. Toombs, Gary E. Friedaender, Jonathan N. Grauer, Tomoki Nakamura
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(7): e0268215.     CrossRef
  • Benign and low-grade cartilaginous tumors: an update on differential diagnosis
    C. Dilara Savci-Heijink, Arjen H.G. Cleven, Judith V.M.G. Bovée
    Diagnostic Histopathology.2022; 28(12): 501.     CrossRef
  • Chondrosarcomas of the small bones: analysis of 44 patients
    Jan Lesenský, Zdenek Jr Matejovsky, Josef Vcelak, Martin Ostadal, Marta Hosova, Cathy Bavelou, Spyros Sioutis, Achilles Bekos, Andreas F. Mavrogenis
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2021; 31(8): 1597.     CrossRef
  • Malignant Cartilage-Forming Tumors
    Meera Hameed
    Surgical Pathology Clinics.2021; 14(4): 605.     CrossRef
  • Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review
    Claudia Deckers, Maarten J Steyvers, Gerjon Hannink, H W Bart Schreuder, Jacky W J de Rooy, Ingrid C M Van Der Geest
    Acta Orthopaedica.2020; 91(4): 471.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors and survival in conventional chondrosarcoma: A single institution review
    Yi-Chou Chen, Po-Kuei Wu, Chao-Ming Chen, Shang-Wen Tsai, Cheng-Fong Chen, Wei-Ming Chen
    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2020; 83(7): 669.     CrossRef
  • Nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer‐specific survival of chondroblastic osteosarcoma patients
    Zhongyang Gao, Songlin Zhou, Hui Song, Yiqun Wang, Xijing He
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 122(8): 1676.     CrossRef
  • Prevalencia en México del tumor de células gigantes, osteosarcoma y condrosarcoma (2013-2017)
    R  Alejos-Gómez, N  Méndez-Domínguez, C Rivas-Berny
    Acta Ortopédica Mexicana.2020; 34(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • Condrosarcoma de húmero proximal. Resultados clínicos y oncológicos a largo plazo
    J.I. Albergo, G.L. Farfalli Luis, M.A. Ayerza, D.L. Muscolo, L.A. Aponte-Tinao
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2019; 63(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes after an initial experience of computer-navigated resection of primary pelvic and sacral bone tumours
    R. Nandra, G. Matharu, J. Stevenson, M. Parry, R. Grimer, L. Jeys
    The Bone & Joint Journal.2019; 101-B(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Proximal humerus chondrosarcoma. Long-term clinical and oncological outcomes
    J.I. Albergo, G.L. Farfalli Luis, M.A. Ayerza, D.L. Muscolo, L.A. Aponte-Tinao
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition).2019; 63(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of traditional clinical parameters and inflammatory biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma: a retrospective study of 150 patients in a single center
    Kehan Xu, Bo Li, Quan Huang, Dongjie Jiang, Haitao Sun, Nanzhe Zhong, Wei Wan, Haifeng Wei, Jianru Xiao
    European Spine Journal.2019; 28(6): 1468.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival and cancer‐specific survival in patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma
    Li Chen, Cheng Long, Jiaxin Liu, Xin Duan, Zhou Xiang
    Cancer Medicine.2019; 8(12): 5438.     CrossRef
  • Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation
    Michiel E. R. Bongers, Quirina C. B. S. Thio, Aditya V. Karhade, Merel L. Stor, Kevin A. Raskin, Santiago A. Lozano Calderon, Thomas F. DeLaney, Marco L. Ferrone, Joseph H. Schwab
    Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2019; 477(10): 2296.     CrossRef
  • Current aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of enchondroma and low-grade intraosseous chondrosarcoma of the long bones
    V. A. Derzhavin, A. I. Khalimon, V. Yu. Karpenko, A. V. Bukharov, A. V. Yadrina, I. S. Pestin, P. V. Goiubev
    Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A.Gertsena.2019; 8(5): 385.     CrossRef
  • Survival and prognostic factors in conventional G1 chondrosarcoma
    Julian Fromm, Alexander Klein, Andrea Baur-Melnyk, Thomas Knösel, Lars Lindner, Christof Birkenmaier, Falk Roeder, Volkmar Jansson, Hans Roland Dürr
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pelvic chondro-sarcoma and erectile dysfunction: A challenging surgical case
    Sameh Fayek GamalEl Din, Ahmed Fathy Abo Sief, Emad Awny Fawzy, Mohamed Abd El Fatah, Wessam Gamal Abo Senna
    Revista Internacional de Andrología.2018; 16(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Chondrosarcoma
    Shelvin Kumar Vadi, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Arun Kumar Reddy Gorla, Ashwani Sood, Rajender Kumar Basher, Apurva Sood, Nandita Kakkar, Ramesh K. Sen
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2018; 43(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma in the Dog and Cat: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
    Arathi Vinayak, Deanna R. Worley, Stephen J. Withrow, Dustin S. Adams, Barbara E. Powers
    Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.2018; 54(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Chondrosarcoma: A Rare Misfortune in Aging Human Cartilage? The Role of Stem and Progenitor Cells in Proliferation, Malignant Degeneration and Therapeutic Resistance
    Karen Boehme, Sabine Schleicher, Frank Traub, Bernd Rolauffs
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(1): 311.     CrossRef
  • Sorafenib in patients with progressed and refractory bone tumors
    Anna Raciborska, Katarzyna Bilska
    Medical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Structure-activity relationship study of hypoxia-activated prodrugs for proteoglycan-targeted chemotherapy in chondrosarcoma
    Donia Ghedira, Aurélien Voissière, Caroline Peyrode, Jamil Kraiem, Yvain Gerard, Elise Maubert, Magali Vivier, Elisabeth Miot-Noirault, Jean-Michel Chezal, Farhat Farhat, Valérie Weber
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2018; 158: 51.     CrossRef
  • Survival and prognostic factors in conventional central chondrosarcoma
    Julian Fromm, Alexander Klein, Andrea Baur-Melnyk, Thomas Knösel, Lars Lindner, Christof Birkenmaier, Falk Roeder, Volkmar Jansson, Hans Roland Dürr
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can Machine-learning Techniques Be Used for 5-year Survival Prediction of Patients With Chondrosarcoma?
    Quirina C. B. S. Thio, Aditya V. Karhade, Paul T. Ogink, Kevin A. Raskin, Karen De Amorim Bernstein, Santiago A. Lozano Calderon, Joseph H. Schwab
    Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research.2018; 476(10): 2040.     CrossRef
  • Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: clinical outcomes and current treatment
    Johnathan R. Lex, Scott Evans, Jonathan D. Stevenson, Michael Parry, Lee M. Jeys, Robert J. Grimer
    Clinical Sarcoma Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is It Possible and Safe to Perform Acetabular-preserving Resections for Malignant Neoplasms of the Periacetabular Region?
    Ying-lee Lam, Raymond Yau, Kenneth W. Y. Ho, Ka-lok Mak, Sin-tak Fong, Timothy Y. C. So
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®.2017; 475(3): 656.     CrossRef
  • Chondrosarcoma of the Osseous Spine
    Armin Arshi, Justin Sharim, Don Y. Park, Howard Y. Park, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Hamed Yazdanshenas, Arya N. Shamie
    Spine.2017; 42(9): 644.     CrossRef
  • Radiologic follow‐up of untreated enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumors in the long bones
    Claudia Deckers, Bart H.W. Schreuder, Gerjon Hannink, Jacky W.J. de Rooy, Ingrid C.M. van der Geest
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016; 114(8): 987.     CrossRef
  • 13,948 View
  • 151 Download
  • 45 Web of Science
  • 42 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP