Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Concurrent chemoradiation"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Gynecologic cancer
Effect of Waiting Time from Pathological Diagnosis to Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer on Overall Survival
Kyoung Won Noh, Bomi Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Yoo-Young Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):245-252.   Published online April 15, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.023
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of waiting time, from diagnosis to initiation of definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), on overall survival in cervical cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
Patients with cervical cancer who were treated with definitive CCRT between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Time from initial pathological diagnosis to definitive CCRT was analyzed both as a continuous variable (per day) and as a categorical variable in two groups (group 1 ≤ median, group 2 > median). Patients with a waiting time of more than 60 days were excluded.
Results
The median waiting time was 14 days (0-60). There were differences between group 1 and group 2 in age and chemotherapy regimens. However, no significant difference was found in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, cell type, or the number of cycles of chemotherapy received during CCRT. A longer waiting time was associated with poorer overall survival on the Kaplan-Meier curve (group 1 vs. group 2, p=0.042). On multivariate analysis, intervals as either a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR], 1.023; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006 to 1.040; p=0.007) or a categorical variable (HR, 1.513; 95% CI, 1.073 to 2.134; p=0.018), FIGO stage, cell type, and the number of cycles of chemotherapy received during CCRT were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
Conclusion
A shorter waiting time from pathological diagnosis to definitive CCRT showed benefit on overall survival. Our findings suggest that an effort to minimize waiting times should be recommended in cervical cancer patients who are candidates for CCRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of waiting time for radiotherapy after last induction chemotherapy on prognosis of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kui‐Xuan Zhu, Ting Ding, Yi‐Min E, Hong‐Wei Yang, Rui‐Ping Wu, Run‐Jia Liu, Ling‐Li Zhou, Wen‐Jie Fu, Mei‐Ping Jiang, Xiao‐Li Wang
    Head & Neck.2024; 46(5): 1189.     CrossRef
  • An Innovative Thermal Imaging Prototype for Precise Breast Cancer Detection: Integrating Compression Techniques and Classification Methods
    Khaled S. Ahmed, Fayroz F. Sherif, Mohamed S. Abdallah, Young-Im Cho, Shereen M. ElMetwally
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(8): 764.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer: A nationwide population-based study
    Amy P. Hack, Ronald P. Zweemer, Trudy N. Jonges, Femke van der Leij, Cornelis G. Gerestein, Max Peters, Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Peter S.N. van Rossum
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 165(2): 339.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching
    Chi-Son Chang, Ji Song Min, Ki Hyeon Song, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Yoo-Young Lee
    Cancers.2022; 14(16): 3863.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes following treatment delays among patients with early-stage female cancers: a nationwide study
    Yu Min, Zheran Liu, Rendong Huang, Ruidan Li, Jing Jin, Zhigong Wei, Ling He, Yiyan Pei, Ning Li, Yongllin Su, Xiaolin Hu, Xingchen Peng
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,266 View
  • 197 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Responses and Prognostic Indicators of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Dong-Soo Lee, Yeon-Sil Kim, Jin-Hyoung Kang, Sang-Nam Lee, Young-Kyoun Kim, Myung-Im Ahn, Dae-Hee Han, Ie-Ryung Yoo, Young-Pil Wang, Jae-Gil Park, Sei-Chul Yoon, Hong-Seok Jang, Byung-Oak Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2011;43(1):32-41.   Published online March 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.1.32
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2005 to June 2009, 51 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation for 3 different aims: locally advanced stage III, locally recurrent disease, and postoperative gross residual NSCLC. Median age was 63 years. Distribution of stages by the 6th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) was as follows: IIIA (37.3%), IIIB (56.9%). Chemotherapy was administered every week concurrently with radiation using one of the following regimens: paclitaxel (60 mg/m2), docetaxel+cisplatin (20 mg/m2+20 mg/m2), cisplatin (30 mg/m2). Total radiation dose was 16-66.4 Gy (median, 59.4 Gy).
RESULTS
Median follow-up duration was 40.8 months. The overall response rate was 84.3% with 23 complete responses. The median survival duration for the overall patient group was 17.6 months. The 3-year survival rate was 17.8%. A total of 21 patients had recurrent disease at the following sites: loco-regional sites (23.6%), distant organs (27.5%). In the multivariate analysis of the overall patient group, a clinical tumor response (p=0.002) was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis of the definitive chemoradiation arm, the use of consolidation chemotherapy (p=0.022), biologically equivalent dose (BED)10 (p=0.007), and a clinical tumor response (p=0.030) were the significant prognostic factors for OS.The median survival duration of the locally recurrent group and the postoperative gross residual group were 26.4 and 23.9 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that clinical tumor response was significantly associated with OS in the overall patient group. Further investigations regarding the optimal radiation dose in the definitive chemoradiation and the optimal treatment scheme in locally recurrent NSCLC would be required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A scoping review on population-centered indicators for cancer care continuum
    Vasuki Rajaguru, Jieun Jang, Jeoung A. Kwon, Jae Hyun Kim, Jaeyong Shin, Mison Chun
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Consolidation chemotherapy may improve survival for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy - retrospective analysis of 203 cases
    Lipin Liu, Nan Bi, Zhe Ji, Junling Li, Jingbo Wang, Xiaozhen Wang, Zhouguang Hui, Jima Lv, Jun Liang, Zongmei Zhou, Yan Wang, Weibo Yin, Luhua Wang
    BMC Cancer.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment-related Lymphopenia in Patients With Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Jian L. Campian, Xiaobu Ye, Malcolm Brock, Stuart A. Grossman
    Cancer Investigation.2013; 31(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • Does Pneumonectomy Have a Role in the Treatment of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?
    Asad A. Shah, Mathias Worni, Christopher R. Kelsey, Mark W. Onaitis, Thomas A. D'Amico, Mark F. Berry
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2013; 95(5): 1700.     CrossRef
  • Thrombocytosis and immunohistochemical expression of connexin 43 at diagnosis predict survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy
    Gangjun Du, Yingming Yang, Yaping Zhang, Ting Sun, Weijie Liu, Yingying Wang, Jiahuan Li, Houyun Zhang
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2013; 71(4): 893.     CrossRef
  • 11,255 View
  • 67 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Preliminary Results of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Concurrent High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sang wook Lee, Eun Kyung Choi, Suk Joong Oh, Cheol Won Suh, Sang We Kim, Jung Shin Lee, Dong Soon Kim, Won Dong Kim, Woo Seong Kim, Sang Do Lee, Jong Hoon Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Kyoung Ju Kim, Young Ju Noh
Cancer Res Treat. 2002;34(5):345-351.   Published online October 31, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2002.34.5.345
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To investigate the feasibility, toxicity and response rate, of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin in stage III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between May 1999 and December 2000, 80 patients with stage III NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective protocol. Radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 70.2 Gy (daily fraction of 1.8 Gy for 5 days), over an 8 week period, on the gross tumor volume, combined with chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and 20 mg/m2 cisplatin per week for 8 consecutive weeks. All patients received 3-D conformal radiotherapy using CT-simulated planning. Acute toxicities were evaluated by the RTOG scale. The median follow-up period was 16 months, ranging from 3 to 29 months.
RESULTS
Of the 80 patients, 71 received treatment per protocol, with minor variation of protocol delivery. The median age of the patients was 60 years. Karnofsky Performance status were 100 and 90 in 62 patients, and 80 and 70 in 9, respectively. Weight loss of less than 5% for 6 months was observed in 22 patients. The response to treatment was evaluated from the radiological findings. Complete and partial responses were observed in 8 and 51 patients, respectively. Ultimately, 82% of patients (included complete responses: 8 cases) obtained more than a partial response. Although, radiation induced esophagitis was the most common treatment related toxicity, occurring in 44 patients (69%), severe radiation esophagitis like, grade 3, was observed in only 3 patients, and the most acute toxicities had completely recovered 1 month following treatment. The overall 2-year actuarial and progression free survivals were 56 and 45%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
This combined modality has activity with manageable toxicity and 23 months in mean survival time in patients with stage III NSCLC. A longer follow up will be required to realise the expected higher survival of these results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Locally-Advanced Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Early Closure due to Lack of Efficacy
    Se Hoon Park, Mi Kyung Kim, Sun Young Kyung, Young-Hee Lim, Chang Hyeok An, Jeong Woong Park, Seong Hwan Jeong, Jae Woong Lee, Kyu Chan Lee, Eun Kyung Cho, Soo Mee Bang, Dong Bok Shin, Jae Hoon Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2004; 36(5): 293.     CrossRef
  • 4,376 View
  • 18 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP