Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
9 "Chemoradiation"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Gastrointestinal cancer
One-Week versus Two-Week Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Curative Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Comparative Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trials
Soo-Yoon Sung, Dae Yong Kim, Hong Seok Jang, Tae Hyun Kim, Hee Chul Park, Eui Kyu Chie, Taek-Keun Nam, Sung Hwan Kim, Jong Hoon Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(3):918-926.   Published online February 27, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1646
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The optimal short-course chemotherapeutic regimen for rectal cancer has not been clearly defined until now. KROG 10-01 and KROG 11-02 prospective trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 1- and 2-week chemoradiotherapy (CRT), respectively.
Materials and Methods
Patients eligible for KROG 10-01 and KROG 11-02 involved those with clinical T3-4N0-2M0 rectal cancers. They received preoperative CRT and total mesorectal excision. Patients in KROG 10-01 received radiation of 25 Gy in 5 fractions during 1 week with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Patients in KROG 11-02 received radiation of 33 Gy in 10 fractions for 2 weeks with oral capecitabine.
Results
A total of 150 patients consisting of 70 patients from KROG 10-01 and 80 patients from KROG 11-02 were collectively analyzed. With a median follow-up time of 89.2 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 86.5% in 1-week CRT and 85.3% in 2-week CRT (p=0.841). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 83.5% in 1-week CRT and 77.1% in 2-week CRT (p=0.448). One patient (1.4%) in 1-week CRT and 11 patients (13.8%) in 2-week CRT exhibited pathologic complete regression (ypT0N0M0) after radiotherapy (p=0.006). One-week CRT had significantly higher acute hematologic (12.8% vs. 3.8%, p=0.040) and nonhematologic (38.6% vs. 16.3%, p=0.002) toxicity than 2-week CRT.
Conclusion
Both 1- and 2-week schedules of CRT showed favorable survival outcomes after 7 years of follow-up. But, 2-week course achieved more increased tumor response and decreased acute toxicity than 1-week course.
  • 2,818 View
  • 146 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
Close layer
Gynecologic cancer
Effect of Waiting Time from Pathological Diagnosis to Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer on Overall Survival
Kyoung Won Noh, Bomi Kim, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Yoo-Young Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):245-252.   Published online April 15, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.023
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of waiting time, from diagnosis to initiation of definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), on overall survival in cervical cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
Patients with cervical cancer who were treated with definitive CCRT between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Time from initial pathological diagnosis to definitive CCRT was analyzed both as a continuous variable (per day) and as a categorical variable in two groups (group 1 ≤ median, group 2 > median). Patients with a waiting time of more than 60 days were excluded.
Results
The median waiting time was 14 days (0-60). There were differences between group 1 and group 2 in age and chemotherapy regimens. However, no significant difference was found in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, cell type, or the number of cycles of chemotherapy received during CCRT. A longer waiting time was associated with poorer overall survival on the Kaplan-Meier curve (group 1 vs. group 2, p=0.042). On multivariate analysis, intervals as either a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR], 1.023; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006 to 1.040; p=0.007) or a categorical variable (HR, 1.513; 95% CI, 1.073 to 2.134; p=0.018), FIGO stage, cell type, and the number of cycles of chemotherapy received during CCRT were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
Conclusion
A shorter waiting time from pathological diagnosis to definitive CCRT showed benefit on overall survival. Our findings suggest that an effort to minimize waiting times should be recommended in cervical cancer patients who are candidates for CCRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of waiting time for radiotherapy after last induction chemotherapy on prognosis of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kui‐Xuan Zhu, Ting Ding, Yi‐Min E, Hong‐Wei Yang, Rui‐Ping Wu, Run‐Jia Liu, Ling‐Li Zhou, Wen‐Jie Fu, Mei‐Ping Jiang, Xiao‐Li Wang
    Head & Neck.2024; 46(5): 1189.     CrossRef
  • An Innovative Thermal Imaging Prototype for Precise Breast Cancer Detection: Integrating Compression Techniques and Classification Methods
    Khaled S. Ahmed, Fayroz F. Sherif, Mohamed S. Abdallah, Young-Im Cho, Shereen M. ElMetwally
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(8): 764.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer: A nationwide population-based study
    Amy P. Hack, Ronald P. Zweemer, Trudy N. Jonges, Femke van der Leij, Cornelis G. Gerestein, Max Peters, Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Peter S.N. van Rossum
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 165(2): 339.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching
    Chi-Son Chang, Ji Song Min, Ki Hyeon Song, Chel Hun Choi, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Yoo-Young Lee
    Cancers.2022; 14(16): 3863.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes following treatment delays among patients with early-stage female cancers: a nationwide study
    Yu Min, Zheran Liu, Rendong Huang, Ruidan Li, Jing Jin, Zhigong Wei, Ling He, Yiyan Pei, Ning Li, Yongllin Su, Xiaolin Hu, Xingchen Peng
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,546 View
  • 189 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Carcinoembryonic Antigen Improves the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prediction of Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Patients with Rectal Cancer
Gyu Sang Yoo, Hee Chul Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Won Kyung Cho, Young Suk Park, Joon Oh Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Woo Yong Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Yoon Ah Park, Kyoung Doo Song, Seok-Hyung Kim, Sang Yun Ha
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):446-454.   Published online September 25, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.261
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in improving the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of pathologic response after the neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) for patients with rectal cancer.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 524 rectal cancer patients who underwent NCRT and total mesorectal excision between January 2009 and December 2014. The performances of MRI with or without CEA parameters (initial CEA and CEA dynamics) for prediction of pathologic tumor response grade (pTRG) were compared by receiver-operating characteristic analysis with DeLong’s method. Cox regression was used to identify the independent factors associated to pTRG and disease-free survival (DFS) after NCRT.
Results
The median follow-up was 64.0 months (range, 3.0 to 113.0 months). On multivariate analysis, poor tumor regression grade on MRI (mrTRG; p < 0.001), initial CEA (p < 0.001) and the mesorectal fascia involvement on MRI before NCRT (mrMFI; p=0.054) showed association with poor pTRG. The mrTRG plus CEA parameters showed significantly improved performances in the prediction of pTRG than mrTRG alone. All of mrTRG, mrMFI, and initial CEA were also identified as independent factors associated with DFS. The initial CEA further discriminated DFS in the subgroups with good mrTRG or that without mrMFI.
Conclusion
The CEA parameters significantly improved the performance of MRI in the prediction of pTRG after NCRT for patients with rectal cancer. The DFS was further discriminated by initial CEA level in the groups with favorable MRI parameters.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia involvement
    Jeong Ha Lee, Nalee Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Gyu Sang Yoo, Hee Chul Park, Woo-Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Joon Oh Park, Seung Tae Kim, Young Suk Park, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2024; 42(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer using nomograms based on MRI tumour regression grade
    S. Qin, Y. Chen, K. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhou, W. Zhao, P. Xin, Q. Wang, S. Lu, H. Wang, N. Lang
    Cancer/Radiothérapie.2024; 28(4): 341.     CrossRef
  • Body composition parameters combined with blood biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging predict responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Jianguo Yang, Qican Deng, Zhenzhou Chen, Yajun Chen, Zhongxue Fu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment blood biomarkers combined with magnetic resonance imaging predict responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Xinyu Shi, Min Zhao, Bo Shi, Guoliang Chen, Huihui Yao, Junjie Chen, Daiwei Wan, Wen Gu, Songbing He
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication and management of rectal cancer with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: A radiation oncologist’s perspective
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Hee Chul Park, Jeong Il Yu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High-Resolution T2-Weighted MRI to Evaluate Rectal Cancer: Why Variations Matter
    Kirsten L Gormly
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2021; 22(9): 1475.     CrossRef
  • MRI Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: 2020 Guide for Practice from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology
    Seong Ho Park, Seung Hyun Cho, Sang Hyun Choi, Jong Keon Jang, Min Ju Kim, Seung Ho Kim, Joon Seok Lim, Sung Kyoung Moon, Ji Hoon Park, Nieun Seo
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2020; 21(7): 812.     CrossRef
  • 6,864 View
  • 177 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Impact of Chemoradiation on Prognosis in Stage IVB Cervical Cancer with Distant Lymphatic Metastasis
Hee Seung Kim, Taehun Kim, Eung Seok Lee, Hak Jae Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Weon Kim, Yong Sang Song, Noh Hyun Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45(3):193-201.   Published online September 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.45.3.193
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine whether chemoradiation (CCR) is efficient for improving prognosis, compared with systemic chemotherapy (SC), in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer who have distant lymphatic metastasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among 2,322 patients with cervical cancer between January 2000 and March 2010, 43 patients (1.9%) had stage IVB disease. After exclusion of 19 patients due to insufficient data and hematogenous metastasis, 24 patients (1%) who received CCR (n=10) or SC (n=14) were enrolled. We compared tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and disease recurrence between CCR and SC.
RESULTS
Complete response rates were 60% and 0% after CCR and SC (p<0.01). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia was more common in patients treated with CCR (24.4% vs. 9.1%, p=0.03), whereas grade 3 or 4 neuropenia was more frequent in those treated with SC (28.4% vs. 11.1%, p=0.03). Development of grade 3 proctitis occurred as a late radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicity in only one patient (10%) treated with CCR. In addition, squamous cell carcinoma and CCR were favorable prognostic factors for improvement of PFS (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 0.17 and 0.12; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.04 to 0.80 and 0.03 to 0.61), and only CCR was significant for improvement of OS (adjusted HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.90). However, no differences in the rate and pattern of disease recurrence were observed between CCR and SC.
CONCLUSION
CCR may be more effective than SC for improving survival, and can be regarded as a feasible method with some caution regarding late RT-related toxicity for treatment of stage IVB cervical cancer with distant lymphatic metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer to Reduce Toxicity and Enhance Efficacy – an Option or a Must?: A Narrative Review
    Sea-Won Lee, Aeran Kim, Sung Jong Lee, Sung Hwan Kim, Jong Hoon Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes associated with treatment to all sites of disease in patients with stage IVB cancer of the cervix
    Shira Peleg Hasson, Shira Felder, Limor Helpman, Alexandra Taylor, Mihal Shalamov, Sireen Abuakar, Smadar Bauer, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Inbal Greenhouse, Jacob Korach, Tatiana Rabin, Jeffrey Goldstein, Akram Saad
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2023; 33(5): 683.     CrossRef
  • Definitive pelvic radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer: a systematic review
    David Viveros-Carreño, Santiago Vieira-Serna, Carlos Fernando Grillo - Ardila, Juliana Rodriguez, Nathalia Mora-Soto, Anuja Jhingran, Pedro T Ramirez, Rene Pareja
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2023; 33(7): 1057.     CrossRef
  • Definitive vs palliative pelvic radiation for patients with newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer treated with bevacizumab – An exploratory study
    Rachel L. Wiley, Ioana L. Bondre, Randa Jalloul, Ann H. Klopp, Jolyn S. Taylor, Lois M. Ramondetta
    Gynecologic Oncology Reports.2022; 40: 100963.     CrossRef
  • Survival, treatment pattern, and treatment outcome in patients with cervical cancer metastatic to distant lymph nodes
    Haoliang Lin, Dongyan Wang, Hui Li, Chuling Wu, Fengqian Zhang, Zhongqiu Lin, Tingting Yao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dynamic Nomogram Based on the Metastatic Number and Sites and Therapy Strategies Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Metastatic Cervical Cancer
    Yuan Ma, Jing Li, Xinyue Tan, Mengjiao Cai, Xiaozhi Zhang, Jinlu Ma
    International Journal of Women's Health.2022; Volume 14: 1807.     CrossRef
  • Significance of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Cervical Cancer
    Satomi Hattori, Nobuhisa Yoshikawa, Kazumasa Mogi, Kosuke Yoshida, Masato Yoshihara, Satoshi Tamauchi, Yoshiki Ikeda, Akira Yokoi, Kimihiro Nishino, Kaoru Niimi, Shiro Suzuki, Hiroaki Kajiyama
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(3): 1663.     CrossRef
  • A Nomogram-Based Risk Classification System Predicting the Overall Survival of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IVB Cervix Uteri Carcinoma
    Wenke Yu, Lu Huang, Zixing Zhong, Tao Song, Hong'en Xu, Yongshi Jia, Jinming Hu, Huafeng Shou
    Frontiers in Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study
    Haoran Li, Yangyang Pang, Xi Cheng
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intensity modulated radiation therapy boost in locally-advanced cervical cancer in the absence of brachytherapy
    Roberta Lazzari, Giulia Riva, Matteo Augugliaro, Andrea Vavassori, Samantha Dicuonzo, Federica Cattani, Stefania Comi, Nicoletta Colombo, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2020; 30(5): 607.     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Survival Among Patients With Organ Metastatic Cervical Cancer
    Nobuhisa Yoshikawa, Akira Shirakawa, Kosuke Yoshida, Satoshi Tamauchi, Shiro Suzuki, Fumitaka Kikkawa, Hiroaki Kajiyama
    Nutrition in Clinical Practice.2020; 35(6): 1041.     CrossRef
  • Effect of addition of bevacizumab to chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer: a single institution experience in Korea
    Sang Hee Youn, Yeon-Joo Kim, Sang-Soo Seo, Sokbom Kang, Myong Cheol Lim, Ha Kyun Chang, Sang-Yoon Park, Joo-Young Kim
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2020; 30(6): 764.     CrossRef
  • Detection of distant metastatic disease by positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) at initial staging of cervical carcinoma
    Alexander Lin, Sirui Ma, Farrokh Dehdashti, Stephanie Markovina, Julie Schwarz, Barry Siegel, Matthew Powell, Perry Grigsby
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2019; 29(3): 487.     CrossRef
  • Score for the Overall Survival Probability of Patients With First-Diagnosed Distantly Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Novel Nomogram-Based Risk Assessment System
    Shilong Zhang, Xin Wang, Zhanming Li, Wenrong Wang, Lishun Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Special Focus on Stage IV Cervical Cancer Patients: A Decade Experience
    Sophie Espenel, Max Adrien Garcia, Julien Langrand-Escure, Alexis Vallard, Jane Chloé Trone, Chloé Rancoule, Nicolas Vial, Pablo Moreno-Acosta, Céline Chauleur, Claire Boutet, Michel Peoc'h, Nathalie Prevot-Bitot, Jean Baptiste Guy, Nicolas Magné
    Oncology.2019; 97(3): 125.     CrossRef
  • Selection and identification of novel peptides specifically targeting human cervical cancer
    Xiaomin Liu, Jingwen Peng, Jie He, Qiaoran Li, Jianbin Zhou, Xiaoqiu Liang, Shengsong Tang
    Amino Acids.2018; 50(5): 577.     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy Improves the Survival of Patients With Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of SEER Database
    Kejie Huang, Mingfang Jia, Ping Li, Jianglong Han, Rui Zhang, Qin Li, Yunfeng Qiao, TangPeng Xu, Peng Ruan, Qibin Song, Yanbo Li, Zhenming Fu
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2018; 28(7): 1360.     CrossRef
  • Race and nodal disease status are prognostic factors in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer
    Shin Nishio, Koji Matsuo, Koji Yonemoto, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Masayuki Hosaka, Michiko Kodama, Takahito M. Miyake, Kimio Ushijima, Toshiharu Kamura, Shannon N. Westin, Pamela T. Soliman, Robert L. Coleman
    Oncotarget.2018; 9(64): 32321.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Survival in Patients With FIGO Stage IVB Cervical Cancer
    Tomoyuki Sasano, Seiji Mabuchi, Hiromasa Kuroda, Ryoko Takahashi, Katsumi Kozasa, Fumiaki Isohashi, Yasuo Yoshioka, Kazuhiko Ogawa, Tadashi Kimura
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2016; 26(3): 528.     CrossRef
  • Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer
    Haoran Li, Xiaohua Wu, Xi Cheng
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tailored radiotherapeutic strategies for disseminated uterine cervical cancer patients
    Jung Ho Im, Hong In Yoon, Sunghoon Kim, Eun Ji Nam, Sang Wun Kim, Ga Won Yim, Ki Chang Keum, Young Tae Kim, Gwi Eon Kim, Yong Bae Kim
    Radiation Oncology.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer of the cervix uteri
    Adriana Bermudez, Neerja Bhatla, Eric Leung
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • HER2 as a novel therapeutic target for cervical cancer
    Doo-Yi Oh, Seokhwi Kim, Yoon-La Choi, Young Jae Cho, Ensel Oh, Jung-Joo Choi, Kyungsoo Jung, Ji-Young Song, Suzie E. Ahn, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Woong-Yang Park, Jeong-Won Lee, Sangyong Song
    Oncotarget.2015; 6(34): 36219.     CrossRef
  • Biological significance and therapeutic implication of resveratrol-inhibited Wnt, Notch and STAT3 signaling in cervical cancer cells
    Peng Zhang, Hong Li, Bin Yang, Fan Yang, Lin-Lin Zhang, Qing-You Kong, Xiao-Yan Chen, Mo-Li Wu, Jia Liu
    Genes & Cancer.2014; 5(5-6): 154.     CrossRef
  • 13,538 View
  • 123 Download
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Responses and Prognostic Indicators of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Dong-Soo Lee, Yeon-Sil Kim, Jin-Hyoung Kang, Sang-Nam Lee, Young-Kyoun Kim, Myung-Im Ahn, Dae-Hee Han, Ie-Ryung Yoo, Young-Pil Wang, Jae-Gil Park, Sei-Chul Yoon, Hong-Seok Jang, Byung-Oak Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2011;43(1):32-41.   Published online March 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.1.32
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
To evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2005 to June 2009, 51 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation for 3 different aims: locally advanced stage III, locally recurrent disease, and postoperative gross residual NSCLC. Median age was 63 years. Distribution of stages by the 6th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) was as follows: IIIA (37.3%), IIIB (56.9%). Chemotherapy was administered every week concurrently with radiation using one of the following regimens: paclitaxel (60 mg/m2), docetaxel+cisplatin (20 mg/m2+20 mg/m2), cisplatin (30 mg/m2). Total radiation dose was 16-66.4 Gy (median, 59.4 Gy).
RESULTS
Median follow-up duration was 40.8 months. The overall response rate was 84.3% with 23 complete responses. The median survival duration for the overall patient group was 17.6 months. The 3-year survival rate was 17.8%. A total of 21 patients had recurrent disease at the following sites: loco-regional sites (23.6%), distant organs (27.5%). In the multivariate analysis of the overall patient group, a clinical tumor response (p=0.002) was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis of the definitive chemoradiation arm, the use of consolidation chemotherapy (p=0.022), biologically equivalent dose (BED)10 (p=0.007), and a clinical tumor response (p=0.030) were the significant prognostic factors for OS.The median survival duration of the locally recurrent group and the postoperative gross residual group were 26.4 and 23.9 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated that clinical tumor response was significantly associated with OS in the overall patient group. Further investigations regarding the optimal radiation dose in the definitive chemoradiation and the optimal treatment scheme in locally recurrent NSCLC would be required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A scoping review on population-centered indicators for cancer care continuum
    Vasuki Rajaguru, Jieun Jang, Jeoung A. Kwon, Jae Hyun Kim, Jaeyong Shin, Mison Chun
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Consolidation chemotherapy may improve survival for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy - retrospective analysis of 203 cases
    Lipin Liu, Nan Bi, Zhe Ji, Junling Li, Jingbo Wang, Xiaozhen Wang, Zhouguang Hui, Jima Lv, Jun Liang, Zongmei Zhou, Yan Wang, Weibo Yin, Luhua Wang
    BMC Cancer.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment-related Lymphopenia in Patients With Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Jian L. Campian, Xiaobu Ye, Malcolm Brock, Stuart A. Grossman
    Cancer Investigation.2013; 31(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • Does Pneumonectomy Have a Role in the Treatment of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?
    Asad A. Shah, Mathias Worni, Christopher R. Kelsey, Mark W. Onaitis, Thomas A. D'Amico, Mark F. Berry
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2013; 95(5): 1700.     CrossRef
  • Thrombocytosis and immunohistochemical expression of connexin 43 at diagnosis predict survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy
    Gangjun Du, Yingming Yang, Yaping Zhang, Ting Sun, Weijie Liu, Yingying Wang, Jiahuan Li, Houyun Zhang
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2013; 71(4): 893.     CrossRef
  • 10,903 View
  • 67 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Impact of the New AJCC Staging System and Adjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer
Shin Ae Lee, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Min Ah Park, Chang Kil Jung, Sung-Hyun Kim, Ki-Jae Park, Hong-Jo Choi, Hyung-Sik Lee, Mee Sook Roh, Jae-Seok Kim, Hyo-Jin Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(2):121-127.   Published online April 30, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.2.121
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The combination of chemoradiation and fluorouracil based chemotherapy has been the standard adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcome of patients classified by the new AJCC staging system and to compare treatment outcome of oral doxifluridine and the standard Mayo Clinic regimen after chemoradiation in advanced rectal cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

One hundred nine patients underwent curative surgical resection and chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy. 45 Gy pelvic irradiation was given to the entire pelvis and the boost radiation with 50.4 to 54 Gy, and simultaneously 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 375 mg/m2/day was given on day 1~3 and 26~28. After the completion of chemoradiation, patients were given either 6 cycles of the Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 intravenous bolus infusion on day 1~5, every 4 weeks) or oral doxifluridine (600 mg/m2/day) for 1 year.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 30 months. Among 102 evaluable patients, 38 patients (37.3%) relapsed: the locoregional recurrence in 10 patients (9.8%) and systemic relapse in 28 patients (27.5%). The systemic relapse rate was 15.6% in the stage IIA, 25.0% in the stage IIIB , and 59.1% in the stage IIIC (p=0.048). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly higher in the IIA and IIIA patients than the IIIB and IIIC patients (72% and 100% vs 48.1% and 11.2%, respectively. p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was also significantly different between in the IIA/IIIA patients and the IIIB/IIIC (67.3%/100% vs 48.4%/22.3%. p<0.001). However, the difference in DFS or OS between the oral doxifluridine group and the Mayo Clinic regimen group was not significant. Cox regression multivariate analyses showed that the new AJCC stage and tumor differentiation were significant independent prognostic factors in DFS and OS.

Conclusion

These results support that the new AJCC staging system is superior to Dukes' staging system in the prognostic stratification. Regarding DFS and OS, oral doxifluridine is comparable to the standard Mayo Clinic regimen in rectal cancer patients when combined with postoperative chemoradiation. Stage IIIC patients should be selected for aggressive therapy as they have a dismal prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Emerging Roles of Circulating Tumor DNA for Increased Precision and Personalization in Radiation Oncology
    Noah Earland, Kevin Chen, Nicholas P. Semenkovich, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Jose P. Zevallos, Aadel A. Chaudhuri
    Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2023; 33(3): 262.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a competitive risk model in patients with rectal cancer: based on SEER database
    Ruobing Hu, Xiuling Li, Xiaomin Zhou, Songze Ding
    European Journal of Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • miR-663b promotes colorectal cancer progression by activating Ras/Raf signaling through downregulation of TNK1
    Sen Hong, Zhenkun Yan, Helei Wang, Lei Ding, Yumei Song, Miaomiao Bi
    Human Cell.2020; 33(1): 104.     CrossRef
  • Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI
    Marc J. Gollub, Chandana Lall, Neeraj Lalwani, Michael H. Rosenthal
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3549.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of CD168 overexpression in colorectal cancer
    Ke Wang, Tao Zhang
    Oncology Letters.2016; 12(4): 2555.     CrossRef
  • Safety of Early Chemotherapy after a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Case-Control Study
    Seung Ho Shin, Sun-Il Lee, Dong-Jin Choi, Si-Uk Woo, Jin Kim, Byung-Wook Min, Hong-Young Moon, Seon Hahn Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(6): 429.     CrossRef
  • 9,726 View
  • 46 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Preliminary Results of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Concurrent High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sang wook Lee, Eun Kyung Choi, Suk Joong Oh, Cheol Won Suh, Sang We Kim, Jung Shin Lee, Dong Soon Kim, Won Dong Kim, Woo Seong Kim, Sang Do Lee, Jong Hoon Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Kyoung Ju Kim, Young Ju Noh
Cancer Res Treat. 2002;34(5):345-351.   Published online October 31, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2002.34.5.345
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To investigate the feasibility, toxicity and response rate, of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with paclitaxel/cisplatin in stage III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between May 1999 and December 2000, 80 patients with stage III NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective protocol. Radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 70.2 Gy (daily fraction of 1.8 Gy for 5 days), over an 8 week period, on the gross tumor volume, combined with chemotherapy. The concurrent chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and 20 mg/m2 cisplatin per week for 8 consecutive weeks. All patients received 3-D conformal radiotherapy using CT-simulated planning. Acute toxicities were evaluated by the RTOG scale. The median follow-up period was 16 months, ranging from 3 to 29 months.
RESULTS
Of the 80 patients, 71 received treatment per protocol, with minor variation of protocol delivery. The median age of the patients was 60 years. Karnofsky Performance status were 100 and 90 in 62 patients, and 80 and 70 in 9, respectively. Weight loss of less than 5% for 6 months was observed in 22 patients. The response to treatment was evaluated from the radiological findings. Complete and partial responses were observed in 8 and 51 patients, respectively. Ultimately, 82% of patients (included complete responses: 8 cases) obtained more than a partial response. Although, radiation induced esophagitis was the most common treatment related toxicity, occurring in 44 patients (69%), severe radiation esophagitis like, grade 3, was observed in only 3 patients, and the most acute toxicities had completely recovered 1 month following treatment. The overall 2-year actuarial and progression free survivals were 56 and 45%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
This combined modality has activity with manageable toxicity and 23 months in mean survival time in patients with stage III NSCLC. A longer follow up will be required to realise the expected higher survival of these results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel, Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Locally-Advanced Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Early Closure due to Lack of Efficacy
    Se Hoon Park, Mi Kyung Kim, Sun Young Kyung, Young-Hee Lim, Chang Hyeok An, Jeong Woong Park, Seong Hwan Jeong, Jae Woong Lee, Kyu Chan Lee, Eun Kyung Cho, Soo Mee Bang, Dong Bok Shin, Jae Hoon Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2004; 36(5): 293.     CrossRef
  • 4,192 View
  • 18 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
The Treatment Results of Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Jun Sang Kim, Jae Sung Kim, Ji Young Jang, Wan Hee Yoon, Kyu Sang Song, Hae Kyeung In, Moon June Cho
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2000;32(5):933-942.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To assess the tumor response, sphincter preservation, acute toxicity and survival with preoperative concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty-four patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiaton for tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation. Radiation was delivered to whole pelvis to 45 Gy followed by a boost 5.4 Gy to primary tumor site. Chemotherapy consists of concurrent 2 cycles of 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day). Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after treatment.
RESULTS
Median follow-up period and rate were 48 months and 98%, respectively. The downstaging including primary tumor and lymph node occurred in 64%. Three of 53 patients (6%) had pathologic complete response. The resectability of tumor was 98%. A sphincter preservation was possible in 61%. Three patients developed grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 skin erythema and diarrhea were 24% and 18%, respectively. The 5-year survival and local disease-free survival were 62% and 89%, respectively. Local failure and distant metastasis rate were 9% and 35%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative chemoradiation affords considerable downstaging with acceptable acute toxicity and postoperative morbidity. Also sphincter preservation is feasible by improved downstaging of tumor. This treatment could be improved local control of tumor, and may have a potential for long-term survival.
  • 3,177 View
  • 16 Download
Close layer
Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy with Cisplatin and Oral Etoposide for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Chang Won Paek, So Young Yoon, Jae Hong Seo, Chul Won Choi, Byung Soo Kim, Sang Won Shin, Yeul Hong Kim, Jae Jung Shim, Kyung Ho Kang, Jun Suk Kim, Chul Yong Kim, Myung Sun Choi, Young Ho Choi, Kwang Tak Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2000;32(4):682-689.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Prognosis of locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiation therapy alone has been disappointing. In recent years, concurrent chemoradiation therapy has potential of improving both local and metastatic disease-free survival. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the feasibility, toxicity, response rate, local control rate, and survival duration of locally advanced NSCL patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation using cisplatin and oral etoposide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled and forty-one patients were evaluable. Chemotheray consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m2/IV on days 1 and 8 and oral etoposide 100 mg/day on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 which was repeated, every 4 weeks for two cycles during radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was administered to a total dose of 6300 cGY.
RESULTS
Among 41 evaluable patients, six patients achieved complete response, and twenty had partial response, for an overall response rate of 63.4% (95% confidence interval; 48.4% to 75.4%). Stable disease was reported in 10 patients (24.4%) and another 5 (12.2%) showed disease pro gression. Overall survival rate was 76% at 1 year, 34% at 2 years. Median survival duration was 17 months (range; 3 to 41 ). Eighty-three percents of patients had radiation pneumonitis but only one patients needed medical treatment.
CONCLUSION
Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin and oral etoposide at this level is a well tolerated and feasible.
  • 3,209 View
  • 20 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP