Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Brigatinib"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Lung and Thoracic cancer
First-Line Alectinib vs. Brigatinib in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement: Real-World Data
Youngkyung Jeon, Sehhoon Park, Hyun Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):61-69.   Published online July 14, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.461
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Alectinib and brigatinib are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinases (ALKs) that are widely used as first-line therapy for treating ALK-positive advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of a head-to-head comparison of these drugs as first-line therapies, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of alectinib and brigatinib.
Materials and Methods
Patients who received alectinib or brigatinib as the first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were evaluated for clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), intracranial ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.
Results
Of 208 patients who received either alectinib or brigatinib as a first-line treatment, 176 received alectinib and 32 received brigatinib. At the data cutoff point, the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 18.3) in the brigatinib group and 27.5 months (95% CI, 24.6 to 30.4) in the alectinib group. The ORR was 92.5% with alectinib and 93.8% for brigatinib. The intracranial ORR rates were 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (10/10), respectively. The rate of PFS at 12 months was comparable between the alectinib group and the brigatinib groups (84.4% vs. 84.1%, p=0.64), and the median TTNT, PFS, and OS were not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse events were usually mild, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was rare (alectinib 4.5% vs. brigatinib 6.25%).
Conclusion
Alectinib and brigatinib had similar clinical benefits when used as the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement in the real world.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive advanced ALK+ NSCLC: Integrated analysis of the ALTA-1L and J-ALTA trials
    D. Ross Camidge, Shunichi Sugawara, Masashi Kondo, Hye Ryun Kim, Myung-Ju Ahn, James C.H. Yang, Ji-Youn Han, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Ki Hyeong Lee, Angelo Delmonte, Kentarou Kudou, Takayuki Asato, Bradley Hupf, Florin Vranceanu, Robert J. Fram, Yuichiro O
    Lung Cancer.2025; 201: 108424.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of First-Line Treatment with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase and ROS1 Protoncogene Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients—Real-World Evidence of Two Polish Cancer Centers
    Michał Gil, Kinga Winiarczyk, Paweł Krawczyk, Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk, Aleksandra Łomża-Łaba, Adrian Obara, Łukasz Gajek, Katarzyna Reszka, Andrzej Tysarowski, Jarosław Buczkowski, Izabela Chmielewska, Tomasz Jankowski, Magdalena Szuba-Gil, Maciej Strzemski
    Cancers.2025; 17(7): 1253.     CrossRef
  • Oncogenic Fusions in NSCLC: From Mechanisms to Clinical Applications
    Nyein Wint Yee Theik, Suset Almuinas De Armas, Daniel Rosas, Amy Kiamos, Nyein Nyein Thaw Dar, Ahmed Shoreibah, Atif Hussein, Luis E. Raez
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(8): 3802.     CrossRef
  • Real World Data on the Efficacy of Brigatinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Experience
    Vesna Ćeriman Krstić, Natalija Samardžić, Mihailo Stjepanović, Spasoje Popević, Tatjana Adžić-Vukičević, Sofija Glumac, Ruža Stević, Dragana Marić, Marta Velinović, Milena Jovanović, Branislav Ilić, Milija Gajić, Nikola Čolić, Katarina Lukić, Brankica Mil
    Cancers.2025; 17(18): 3084.     CrossRef
  • Real‐World Outcomes of Brigatinib Compared to Alectinib as a Second‐Line Therapy After Crizotinib in Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Positive Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    Min Jee Kim, Hyun Seok Kwak, Eun Nim Koh, Cheol‐Kyu Park, Young‐Chul Kim, In‐Jae Oh, Seung Joon Kim, Jun Hyeok Lim, Jeong‐Seon Ryu, Chang Min Choi
    Thoracic Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bridging the Gap between Trial Adverse Events and Real-World Data
    Sang Hyuk Kim, Hyun Lee, Dong Won Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 972.     CrossRef
  • Real‐world evidence of brigatinib as second‐line treatment after crizotinib for ALK+ non‐small cell lung cancer using South Korean claims data (K‐AREAL)
    Jeong Eun Lee, Jin Hyun Nam, Sun Hong Kwon, Bo Kyung Kim, Seung Min Ha
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Alectinib versus Platinum‐Based Chemotherapy in Resected ALK‐Positive Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer in the Chinese Health Care System
    Qiran Wei, Yifang Liang, Jiahui Mao, Xin Guan
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,702 View
  • 645 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP