Purpose
Widely used breast cancer risk-prediction tools are based on data from Western countries, but risk factors may differ for Asian women. Hence, we aimed to develop a risk assessment tool for breast cancer in Asian women using a nationwide, population-based mammographic screening cohort.
Materials and Methods
Women aged ≥40 years who underwent breast cancer screening and general health examination in 2009 were included. Age, body mass index (BMI), breast density, lifestyle and reproductive factors, and comorbidities were used to develop 5-year breast cancer risk-prediction models for premenopausal (n=771,856) and postmenopausal (n=1,108,047) women at baseline. The best-fit risk prediction model was constructed using backward stepwise selection in a Cox proportional hazards model and was transformed into a risk score nomogram. The performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration.
Results
In premenopausal women, high BMI, low parity, short breastfeeding period, early age at menarche, high breast density, a history of benign breast masses, and family history of breast cancer contributed to the risk prediction of breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, age, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, late-onset menopause, and hormone replacement therapy use were additional risk predictors of breast cancer. Our risk-prediction model showed a concordant statistic of 0.58 (0.57–0.59) for premenopausal women and 0.64 (0.63–0.65) for postmenopausal women. The calibration plot demonstrated good correlations for both models.
Conclusion
Our breast cancer risk-prediction model demonstrated performance comparable to that of Western countries, especially among postmenopausal women. This provides a foundation for implementing risk-based screening recommendations in Asian women.
Purpose The association of physical activity with the risk of bladder cancer remains inconsistent among Asian populations. We aimed to examine the association in a large Japanese cohort.
Materials and Methods In a population-based prospective cohort study, a total of 50,374 Japanese adults aged 40-79 years without a history of cancer or cardiovascular disease who had information on physical activity from self-administrated questionnaires were used for analysis. We performed Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident bladder cancer after adjusting for several potential confounders.
Results During the median 17.5 years of follow-up, 153 incident bladder cancers (116 men and 37 women) were identified. After the multivariable adjustment, HRs (95% CI) of bladder cancer concerning those with recreational sports participation of 1-2 hr/wk, 3-4 hr/wk, and 5 hr/wk and more were 0.67 (0.38-1.20), 0.79 (0.36-1.74), and 0.28 (0.09-0.89), respectively (p for trend=0.017). Compared with mostly sitting at the workplace, occupational physical activity of standing and walking were associated with a lower risk of bladder cancer (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.85]). Hours of daily walking were not associated with the risk. The lower risk of bladder cancer was more evident for recreational sports (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.10 to 1.00]), and for occupational standing and walking activity at work (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.98]) among men.
Conclusion Recreational sports participation and occupational physical activity were inversely associated with the risk of bladder cancer among Japanese, especially in men.
Purpose We investigated the consistent efficacy and safety of eflapegrastim, a novel long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in Koreans and Asians compared with the pooled population of two global phase 3 trials.
Materials and Methods Two phase 3 trials (ADVANCE and RECOVER) evaluated the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose eflapegrastim (13.2 mg/0.6 mL [3.6 mg G-CSF equivalent]) compared to pegfilgrastim (6 mg based on G-CSF) in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of eflapegrastim compared to pegfilgrastim in mean duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1, in Korean and Asian subpopulations.
Results Among a total of 643 patients randomized to eflapegrastim (n=314) or pegfilgrastim (n=329), 54 Asians (29 to eflapegrastim and 25 to pegfilgrastim) including 28 Koreans (14 to both eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim) were enrolled. The primary endpoint, DSN in cycle 1 in the eflapegrastim arm was non-inferior to the pegfilgrastim arm in Koreans and Asians. The DSN difference between the eflapegrastim and pegfilgrastim arms was consistent across populations: –0.120 days (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.227 to –0.016), –0.288 (95% CI, –0.714 to 0.143), and –0.267 (95% CI, –0.697 to 0.110) for pooled population, Koreans and Asians, respectively. There were few treatment-related adverse events that caused discontinuation of eflapegrastim (1.9%) or pegfilgrastim (1.5%) in total and no notable trends or differences across patient populations.
Conclusion This study may suggest that eflapegrastim showed non-inferior efficacy and similar safety compared to pegfilgrastim in Koreans and Asians, consistently with those of pooled population.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of Prophylactic Efficacy of Eflapegrastim and Pegteograstim for Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX Eui Seon Lee, Min Jung Geum, Jong Hee Ko, Jae Song Kim, Eun Sun Son, Yun Mi Yu Journal of Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists.2024; 41(3): 253. CrossRef
Purpose
We evaluated study outcomes in patients enrolled in Asian regions in the phase III EMBRACA trial of talazoparib vs. chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative germline BRCA1/2-mutated advanced breast cancer who received prior chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to talazoparib 1 mg/day or chemotherapy (physician’s choice). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. This post-hoc analysis evaluated efficacy/safety endpoints in the ITT population of patients enrolled in Asian regions.
Results
Thirty-three patients were enrolled at Asian sites (talazoparib, n=23; chemotherapy, n=10). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable with the overall EMBRACA population. In Asian patients, median PFS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0, 15.2) for talazoparib and 7.1 months (95% CI, 1.2, not reached) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95% CI, 0.22, 2.44]). Objective response rate was numerically higher for talazoparib vs. chemotherapy (62.5% [95% CI, 35.4, 84.8] vs. 25.0% [95% CI, 3.2, 65.1]). Median overall survival was 20.7 months (95% CI, 9.4, 40.1) versus 21.2 months (95% CI, 2.7, 35.0) months (HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.49, 4.05]). In Asian patients, fewer grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), grade 3/4 SAEs, and AEs resulting in dose reduction/discontinuation occurred with talazoparib than chemotherapy; for talazoparib, the frequency of these events was lower in Asian patients versus overall EMBRACA population.
Conclusion
In this subgroup analysis, talazoparib numerically improved efficacy versus chemotherapy and was generally well tolerated in Asian patients, with fewer grade 3/4 TEAEs, SAEs, and TEAEs leading to dose modification vs. the overall EMBRACA population.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer arising in patients with or without BRCA2 mutation: different biological phenotype and similar prognosis Pu-Chun Li, Yi-Fan Zhu, Jia-Ni Pan, Qiao-Yan Zhu, Yu-Yang Liao, Xiao-Wen Ding, Lin-Feng Zheng, Wen-Ming Cao Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Detection and analysis of the safety profile of talazoparib based on FAERS database Mufei Tang, Peiyan Liu, Linzhe Du, Yuanyuan Li, Jinjin Chen, Yang Li Expert Opinion on Drug Safety.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Facing inevitable PARPis resistance: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for breast cancer treatment Haixia Liu, Xiaohui Chen, Yimin Jia, Hengyi Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Guoxiang Liu, Yang Luo Interdisciplinary Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Sustained delivery of PARP inhibitor Talazoparib for the treatment of BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer Shicheng Yang, Allen Green, Needa Brown, Alexis Robinson, Merline Senat, Bryanna Testino, Daniela M. Dinulescu, Srinivas Sridhar Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer S.-A. Im, A. Gennari, Y.H. Park, J.H. Kim, Z.-F. Jiang, S. Gupta, T.H. Fadjari, K. Tamura, M.Y. Mastura, M.L.T. Abesamis-Tiambeng, E.H. Lim, C.-H. Lin, A. Sookprasert, N. Parinyanitikul, L.-M. Tseng, S.-C. Lee, P. Caguioa, M. Singh, Y. Naito, R.A. Hukom, ESMO Open.2023; 8(3): 101541. CrossRef
Molecular Biology Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Zhiying Zhang, Rui Zhang, Donghai Li Biologics: Targets and Therapy.2023; Volume 17: 113. CrossRef
Development of the PARP inhibitor talazoparib for the treatment of advanced BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated breast cancer Evthokia A. Hobbs, Jennifer K. Litton, Timothy A. Yap Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2021; : 1. CrossRef
Jii Bum Lee, Hyung Soon Park, Sejung Park, Hyo Jin Lee, Kyung A Kwon, Young Jin Choi, Yu Jung Kim, Chung Mo Nam, Nam Hoon Cho, Beodeul Kang, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1578-1588. Published online April 16, 2019
Purpose
Temsirolimus is effective in the treatment for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) with poor prognosis. We aim to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of temsirolimus in treatment of naïve Asian patients with metastatic/recurrent nccRCC.
Materials and Methods
From January 2008 to July 2017, data of treatment-naïve, metastatic/recurrent nccRCC patients, who were treated with temsirolimus according to the standard protocol, were collected. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and tolerability of temsirolimus.
Results
Forty-four metastatic/recurrent nccRCC patients, 10 from prospective and 34 from retrospective groups, were enrolled; 24 patients (54%) were papillary type, and other histology subtypes included 11 chromophobes (25%), two collecting ducts (5%), one Xp11.2 translocation (2%), and six others (14%). The median PFS and OS were 7.6 months and 17.6 months, res-pectively. ORR was 11% and disease control rate was 83%. Patients with prior nephrectomy had longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.42; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.45; p < 0.001). Compared to favorable/intermediate prognosis group, poor prognosis group had shorter median PFS (4.7 months vs. 7.6 months [HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.39 to 6.12; p=0.005]) and median OS (9.2 months vs. 17.6 months [HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.23 to 6.56; p=0.015]).
Conclusion
Temsirolimus not only benefits poor-risk nccRCC patients, but it is also effective in favorable or intermediate-risk group in Asians. Temsirolimus was well-tolerated with manageable adverse events.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A perspective on the application of macrocyclic design strategies in antitumor drugs Yan-Hong Li, Yu-Kang Lin, Jian-Fan Cai, Zhong-Kai Zou, Pei-Liang Zhao Bioorganic Chemistry.2025; 156: 108190. CrossRef
Advances in non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma management: From heterogeneous biology to treatment options Nathaniel R. Wilson, Yusuf Acikgoz, Elshad Hasanov International Journal of Cancer.2024; 154(6): 947. CrossRef
Cancer stem cells and angiogenesis Yanru Yang, Jingyu Guo, Mingyang Li, Guangxin Chu, Hai Jin, Jing Ma, Qingge Jia Pathology - Research and Practice.2024; 253: 155064. CrossRef
Renal cancer: signaling pathways and advances in targeted therapies Aimin Jiang, Jinxin Li, Ziwei He, Ying Liu, Kun Qiao, Yu Fang, Le Qu, Peng Luo, Anqi Lin, Linhui Wang MedComm.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of systemic treatments for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yaping Zhang, Jian Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Hui Wang, Xiaoli Chen, Jianfeng Hong, Hongming Fang Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China Jingyang Lin, Qingxia Fang, Xiaochun Zheng, Meng Li PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281402. CrossRef
Targeted Literature Review of Outcomes to Initial Systemic Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Observational Studies Shawna R. Calhoun, Manish Sharma, Chung-Han Lee Kidney Cancer.2023; 7(1): 123. CrossRef
Purpose
The phase 3 randomized SQUIRE study revealed significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (neci+GC) than for gemcitabine and cisplatin alone (GC) in 1,093 patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This post hoc subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of neci+GC among East Asian (EA) patients enrolled in the study.
Materials and Methods
All patients received up to six 3-week cycles of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8, 1,250 mg/m²) and cisplatin (day 1, 75 mg/m²). Patients in the neci+GC arm also received necitumumab (days 1 and 8, 800 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from stratified Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
In EA patients, there were improvements for neci+GC (n=43) versus GC (n=41) in OS (HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.484 to 1.341) and PFS (HR, 0.720; 95% CI, 0.439 to 1.180), consistent with the results for non-EA patients observed in the present study. The overall safety data were consistent between EA and non-EA patients. A numerically higher proportion of patients experienced serious adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and AEs with an outcome of death for neci+GC versus GC in EA patients and EA patients versus non-EA patients for neci+GC.
Conclusion
Although limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis, these findings are consistent with those of the overall study and suggest that neci+GC offers a survival advantage and favorable benefit/risk for EA patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Phytochemicals intended for anticancer effects at preclinical levels to clinical practice: Assessment of formulations at nanoscale for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy The Hong Phong Nguyen, V. Bharath Kumar, Vinoth Kumar Ponnusamy, Thi Thu Thao Mai, Phuong Tran Nhat, Kathirvel Brindhadevi, Arivalagan Pugazhendhi Process Biochemistry.2021; 104: 55. CrossRef
Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis Irena Ilic, Sandra Sipetic, Jovan Grujicic, Milena Ilic Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2020; 26(6): 1331. CrossRef
Recent progress in systemic treatment for lung cancer Jeffrey W. Clark, Dan L. Longo Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine.2018; 24(4): 355. CrossRef
Necitumumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical controversies Vincenzo di Noia, Ettore D’Argento, Sara Pilotto, Giulia Grizzi, Mario Caccese, Roberto Iacovelli, Giampaolo Tortora, Emilio Bria Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy.2018; 18(9): 937. CrossRef
SELECT-3: a phase I study of selumetinib in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in the first-line setting Alastair Greystoke, Nicola Steele, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Fiona Blackhall, Noor Md Haris, Colin R Lindsay, Raffaele Califano, Mark Voskoboynik, Yvonne Summers, Karen So, Dana Ghiorghiu, Angela W Dymond, Stuart Hossack, Ruth Plummer, Emma Dean British Journal of Cancer.2017; 117(7): 938. CrossRef
Purpose
This subgroup analysis of a phase II trial was conducted to assess possible ethnicity-based trends in efficacy and safety in East Asian (EA) and non-EA populations with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
Never-smoker patients (n=240) with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC included 133 EA patients randomized to pemetrexed supplemented with dexamethasone, folic acid, and vitamin B12 plus erlotinib (pemetrexed-erlotinib) (n=41), erlotinib (n=49), or pemetrexed (n=43), and 107 non-EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-erlotinib (n=37), erlotinib (n=33), or pemetrexed (n=37). The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was analyzed using a multivariate Cox model.
Results
Consistent with the results of the overall study, a statistically significant difference in PFS among the three arms was noted in the EA population favoring pemetrexed-erlotinib (overall p=0.003) as compared with either single-agent arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.79; p=0.004 vs. erlotinib; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.70; p=0.001 vs. pemetrexed). The EA patients treated with pemetrexed-erlotinib achieved a longer median PFS (7.4 months) compared with erlotinib (4.5 months) and pemetrexed (4.0 months). The PFS results also numerically favored pemetrexed-erlotinib in the non-EA population (overall p=0.210) (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.05; p=0.078 vs. erlotinib; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.32; p=0.320 vs. pemetrexed) (median PFS: pemetrexed-erlotinib, 6.7 months; erlotinib, 3.0 months; pemetrexed, 4.4 months).
Conclusion
The PFS results from this subset analysis in both EA and non-EA populations are consistent with the results in the overall population. The PFS advantage for pemetrexed-erlotinib is significant compared with the single agents in EA patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association of Hypokalemia Incidence and Better Treatment Response in NSCLC Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on Anti-EGFR Targeted Therapy Clinical Trials Jiawei Zhou, Jianling Bai, Yuanping Yue, Xin Chen, Theis Lange, Dongfang You, Yang Zhao Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Non-Smoking-Associated Lung Cancer: A distinct Entity in Terms of Tumor Biology, Patient Characteristics and Impact of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Elisabeth Smolle, Martin Pichler Cancers.2019; 11(2): 204. CrossRef
Pemetrexed versus Gefitinib as Second-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials Huiyu Wang, Zunjing Zhang, Feng Liu, Miaoying Zhou, Handi Lv Pteridines.2019; 30(1): 171. CrossRef
A Review of Regimens Combining Pemetrexed With an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in the Treatment of Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer James Chih-Hsin Yang, Tony Mok, Baohui Han, Mauro Orlando, Tarun Puri, Keunchil Park Clinical Lung Cancer.2018; 19(1): 27. CrossRef
Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Pharmacodynamic Separation of Pemetrexed and Intercalated Erlotinib Versus Pemetrexed Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous, Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Tianhong Li, Bilal Piperdi, William V. Walsh, Mimi Kim, Laurel A. Beckett, Rasim Gucalp, Missak Haigentz, Venu G. Bathini, Huiyu Wen, Kaili Zhou, Patricia B. Pasquinelli, Srikanth Gajavelli, Meera Sreedhara, Xianhong Xie, Primo N. Lara, David R. Gandara, Clinical Lung Cancer.2017; 18(1): 60. CrossRef
Erlotinib intercalating pemetrexed/cisplatin versus erlotinib alone in Chinese patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective, non-randomised, concurrent controlled trial (NCT01578668) Haihong Yang, Qiuhua Deng, Yuan Qiu, Jun Huang, Yubao Guan, Fengnan Wang, Xin Xu, Xinyun Yang ESMO Open.2017; 2: e000112. CrossRef
Gene mutation discovery research of non-smoking lung cancer patients due to indoor radon exposure Jung Ran Choi, Seong Yong Park, O Kyu Noh, Young Wha Koh, Dae Ryong Kang Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lessons Learned Dae Ho Lee, Vichien Srimuninnimit, Rebecca Cheng, Xin Wang, Mauro Orlando Cancer Research and Treatment.2015; 47(4): 549. CrossRef