Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
11 "Yeon-Joo Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Breast cancer
Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Node-Negative Breast Cancer of 5 cm or Larger Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis (KROG 20-03)
Kyubo Kim, Jinhong Jung, Haeyoung Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Ji Hyun Chang, Su Ssan Kim, Won Park, Jee Suk Chang, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Ik Jae Lee, Jong Hoon Lee, Hae Jin Park, Jihye Cha, Juree Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Taeryool Koo, Jeanny Kwon, Jin Hee Kim, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Yeon-Joo Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):497-504.   Published online August 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.933
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
To evaluate the role of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors undergoing mastectomy
Materials and Methods
Medical records of 274 patients from 18 institutions treated with mastectomy between January 2000 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 202 patients underwent PMRT, while 72 did not. Two hundred and forty-one patients (88.0%) received systemic chemotherapy, and 172 (62.8%) received hormonal therapy. Patients receiving PMRT were younger, more likely to have progesterone receptor-positive tumors, and received adjuvant chemotherapy more frequently compared with those without PMRT (p <0.001, 0.018, and <0.001, respectively). Other characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups.
Results
With a median follow-up of 95 months (range, 1-249), there were 9 locoregional recurrences, and 20 distant metastases. The 8-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 98.0% with PMRT and 91.3% without PMRT (p=0.133), and the 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 91.8% with PMRT and 73.9% without PMRT (p=0.008). On multivariate analysis incorporating age, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and PMRT, the absence of lymphovascular invasion and the receipt of PMRT were associated with improved DFS (p=0.025 and 0.009, respectively).
Conclusion
Locoregional recurrence rate was very low in node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors treated with mastectomy regardless of the receipt of PMRT. However, PMRT was significantly associated with improved DFS. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Outcomes with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy for pT3N0‐1M0 breast cancer: An institutional experience
    Xinxin Rao, Xuanyi Wang, Kairui Jin, Yilan Yang, Xu Zhao, Zhe Pan, Weiluo Lv, Zhen Zhang, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Yu, Xiaomao Guo
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of radiotherapy on patients with pathological stage IIB breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: A cohort study
    Yi-Ying Pan, Tzu-Yu Lai, Cheng-Ying Shiau, Ling-Ming Tseng, I-Chun Lai, Yu-Ming Liu, Pin-I Huang
    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2024; 87(2): 202.     CrossRef
  • Post-mastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: from historic dogmas to practical expert agreements based on a large literature review of surgical and radiation therapy considerations
    Yazid Belkacemi, Meena S. Moran, Burcu Celet Ozden, Yazan Masannat, Fady Geara, Mohamed Albashir, Nhu Hanh To, Kamel Debbi, Mahmoud El Tamer
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 200: 104421.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer
    Ke Liu, Jia-Yi Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2024; 24(12): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy: Applications and Advancements
    Jessica L. Thompson, Steven G. Allen, Cecilia Pesavento, Corey W. Speers, Jacqueline S. Jeruss
    Current Breast Cancer Reports.2022; 14(3): 75.     CrossRef
  • 7,391 View
  • 206 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy after Primary Tumor Resection in De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 19-02)
Yeon Joo Kim, Yeon-Joo Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Ik Jae Lee, Jeanny Kwon, Kyubo Kim, Jihye Cha, Myungsoo Kim, In Young Jo, Jung Hoon Kim, Jaehyeon Park, Jin Hee Kim, Juree Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Su Ssan Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):478-487.   Published online July 12, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.632
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing planned primary tumor resection (PTR) and to identify the subgroup of patients who would most benefit from PORT.
Materials and Methods
This study enrolled 426 patients with dnMBC administered PTR alone or with PORT. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), respectively.
Results
The median follow-up time was 53.7 months (range, 3.1 to 194.4). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 73.2% and 32.0%, respectively. For OS, clinical T3/4 category, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), postoperative chemotherapy alone were significantly poor prognostic factors, and administration of PORT failed to show its significance. Regarding PFS, PORT was a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.82; p < 0.001), in addition to T1/2 category, ≤ 5 metastases, and non-TNBC. According to the multivariate analyses of OS in the PORT group, we divided the patients into three groups (group 1, T1/2 and non-TNBC [n=193]; group 2, T3/4 and non-TNBC [n=171]; and group 3, TNBC [n=49]), and evaluated the effect of PORT. Although PORT had no significance for OS in all subgroups, it was a significant factor for good prognosis regarding PFS in groups 1 and 2, not in group 3.
Conclusion
PORT was associated with a significantly better PFS in patients with dnMBC who underwent PTR. Patients with clinical T1/2 category and non-TNBC benefited most from PORT, while those with TNBC showed little benefit.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Letter to the editor for the article“Tumor margin irregularity degree is an important preoperative predictor of adverse pathology for clinical T1/2 renal cell carcinoma and the construction of predictive model”
    Yaping Miao, Lexin Wang, Ping Chen, Jiaan Lu, Guanhu Yang, Hao Chi
    World Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic differences and the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy between post‐chemotherapy ypT1‐2ypN1 and de novo pT1‐2N1 breast cancer
    Tian Yang, Xiaorong Zhong, Jun Wang, Zhongzheng Xiang, Yuanyuan Zeng, Siting Yu, Zelei Dai, Ningyue Xu, Ting Luo, Lei Liu
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(7): 8112.     CrossRef
  • Impact of high dose radiotherapy for breast tumor in locoregionally uncontrolled stage IV breast cancer: a need for a risk-stratified approach
    Nalee Kim, Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Tae Gyu Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Yeon Hee Park, Ji-Yeon Kim
    Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning predicts the prognosis of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases
    Chaofan Li, Mengjie Liu, Jia Li, Weiwei Wang, Cong Feng, Yifan Cai, Fei Wu, Xixi Zhao, Chong Du, Yinbin Zhang, Yusheng Wang, Shuqun Zhang, Jingkun Qu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Influencing Prognosis in Patients with De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Meilin Zhang, Zining Jin, Yingying Xu, Bo Chen, Jian Song, Muyao Li, Feng Jin, Ang Zheng
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,630 View
  • 175 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of Breast Conserving Surgery Followed by Radiation Therapy with Mastectomy Alone for Pathologic N1 Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 1418)
Gyu Sang Yoo, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1041-1051.   Published online November 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.424
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We compared the oncologic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy (BCS+RT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) under anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) regimens and investigated the role of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) breast cancer treated by mastectomy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 2,011 patients with pN1 breast cancer who underwent BCS+RT or MRM alone at 12 institutions between January 2006 and December 2010. Two-to-one propensity score matching was performed for balances in variables between the groups.
Results
The median follow-up duration for the total cohort was 69 months (range, 1 to 114 months). After propensity score matching, 1,074 patients (676 in the BCS+RT group and 398 in the MRM-alone group) were analyzed finally. The overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, and regional failure-free survival (RFFS) curves of the BCS+RT group vs. MRM-alone group were not significantly different. The subgroup analysis revealed that in the group with both lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and histologic grade (HG) III, the BCS+RT showed significantly superior RFFS (p=0.008). Lymphedema (p=0.007) and radiation pneumonitis (p=0.031) occurred more frequently in the BCS+RT group than in the MRM-alone group, significantly.
Conclusion
There are no differences in oncologic outcomes between BCS+RT and MRM-alone groups under the AT chemotherapy regimens for pN1 breast cancer. However, BCS+RT group showed superior RFFS to MRM-alone group in the patients with LVI and HG III. Adjuvant RT might be considerable for pN1 breast cancer patients with LVI and HG III.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Investigation of the clinical benefits of regular breath-holding training utilizing surface guided radiation therapy technology for patients with left breast cancer
    Hongming Li, Zheng Miao, Jie Shen, Jianing Xiao, Zhiwei Yang, Wei Tian, Xiansong Sun, Zhen Zhou, Jing Shen, Jie Qiu
    Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2025; 18(2): 101393.     CrossRef
  • 21-gene recurrence score in predicting the outcome of postoperative radiotherapy in T1-2N1 luminal breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery
    Shang-Jin Xie, Run-Jie Wang, San-Gang Wu, Fu-Xing Zhang
    The Breast.2024; 74: 103679.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Radiation Effects on Chemo-Treated BT20 and 4T1 Breast Cancer, and Neuroblastoma Cell Lines: A Study of Single and Multiple-Cell Ionization via Infrared Laser Trapping
    Mulugeta S. Goangul, Daniel B. Erenso, Ying Gao, Li Chen, Kwame O. Eshun, Gisela Alvarez, Horace T. Crogman
    Radiation.2024; 4(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Overall survival after mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: meta-analysis
    Kiran K Rajan, Katherine Fairhurst, Beth Birkbeck, Shonnelly Novintan, Rebecca Wilson, Jelena Savović, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter
    BJS Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy dosimetry and radiotherapy related complications of immediate implant-based reconstruction after breast cancer surgery
    Yu Zhang, Fuxiu Ye, Yun Teng, Jin Zheng, Chunlu Li, Ruilan Ma, Haichen Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients
    Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Manish Karamchandani, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Alexis R. Narvaez-Rojas, Michael Jonczyk, Fortunato S. Príncipe-Meneses, David Posawatz, Salvatore Nardello, Abhishek Chatterjee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(10): 6163.     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy
    Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors to identify the indication for regional nodal irradiation in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer: A joint analysis of 4,243 real-world cases from two institutions
    Guang-Yi Sun, Ge Wen, Yu-Jing Zhang, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Hui Fang, Jian-Yang Wang, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Xu-Ran Zhao, Si-Ye Chen, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Yuan Tang, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Bo Chen, Ning-Ning Lu, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chemo-treated 4T1 breast cancer cells radiation response measured by single and multiple cell ionization using infrared laser trap
    Endris Muhammed, Li Chen, Ying Gao, Daniel Erenso
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,246 View
  • 317 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Impact of Elective Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients with N1 Breast Cancer after Lumpectomy and Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy (KROG 1418): A Multicenter Case-Controlled Study
Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Seung Jae Huh, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Han-Sung Kang, In Hae Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):970-980.   Published online January 4, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.382
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of supraclavicular lymph node radiotherapy (SCNRT) on N1 breast cancer patients receiving post-lumpectomy whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We performed a case-control analysis to compare the outcomes of WBI and WBI plus SCNRT (WBI+SCNRT). Among 1,147 patients with N1 breast cancer who received post-lumpectomy radiotherapy and AT-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals, 542 were selected after propensity score matching. Patterns of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and treatment-related toxicity were compared between groups.
Results
A total of 41 patients (7.6%) were found to have recurrence. Supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) failure was detected in three patients, two in WBI and one in WBI+SCNRT. All SCN failures were found simultaneously with distant metastasis. There was no significant difference in patterns of failure or survival between groups. The 5-year DFS and DMFS for patients with WBI and WBI+SCNRT were 94.4% versus 92.6% (p=0.50) and 95.1% versus 94.5% (p=0.99), respectively. The rates of lymphedema and radiation pneumonitis were significantly higher in the WBI+SCNRT than in the WBI.
Conclusion
We did not find a benefit of SCNRT for N1 breast cancer patients receiving AT-based chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Whole-Breast Plus Regional Irradiation and Whole-Breast Irradiation Only in pN1 Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial (KROG 17-01)
    Nalee Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Yong Bae Kim
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2025; 121(2): 341.     CrossRef
  • De-escalation of regional nodal irradiation fields in pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery: retrospective real-world clinical experience
    Ji Hyun Hong, Jin-Ho Song, Kyu-Hye Choi, Shin Woo Kim, Woo-Chan Park, Jieun Lee, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Byung-Ock Choi
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The optimal regional irradiation volume for breast cancer patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of published studies
    Wei-Xiang Qi, Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Jiayi Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy
    Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What Is High-risk Breast Cancer With Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes for Regional Recurrence?
    Sang-Won Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Haeyoung Kim, Oyeon Cho, Won Park, Mison Chun
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 111(4): 992.     CrossRef
  • Regional nodal irradiation in pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation
    Shin-Hyung Park, Jae-Chul Kim
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2020; 38(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of nodal staging in breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel nodes in the Z0011 era
    Fabio Corsi, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Albasini, Daniela Bossi, Carlo Morasso, Laura Villani, Marta Truffi
    Medicine.2020; 99(35): e21721.     CrossRef
  • Locoregional recurrence patterns in women with breast cancer who have not undergone post-mastectomy radiotherapy
    Xuran Zhao, Yu Tang, Shulian Wang, Yong Yang, Hui Fang, Jianyang Wang, Hao Jing, Jianghu Zhang, Guangyi Sun, Siye Chen, Jing Jin, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ningning Lu, Hua Ren, Yexiong Li
    Radiation Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Dose Distribution in Regional Lymph Nodes in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy vs. Whole-Breast Plus Regional Lymph Node Irradiation: An In Silico Planning Study in Participating Institutions of the Phase III Randomized Trial (KROG 1701)
    Haeyoung Kim, Heejung Kim, Won Park, Jong Yun Baek, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Jee Suk Chang,
    Cancers.2020; 12(11): 3261.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Lymph-Node Ratio in Determining Supraclavicular Lymph-Node Radiation Therapy in pN1 Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Breast-Conserving Treatment (KROG 14-18): A Multicenter Study
    Jaeho Kim, Won Park, Jin Kim, Doo Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Lee, Kyung Shin, Jin Kim, Kyubo Kim, Yong Kim, Sung-Ja Ahn, Jong Lee, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Kim, Jihye Cha
    Cancers.2019; 11(5): 680.     CrossRef
  • Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23
    Kyubo Kim, Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Won Park, Seung Do Ahn, Su Ssan Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Jiyoung Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1316.     CrossRef
  • 10,759 View
  • 319 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Patients with pT1-2N1 Breast Cancer Treated with Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis (KROG 1418)
Yeon-Joo Kim, Won Park, Boram Ha, Boram Park, Jungnam Joo, Tae Hyun Kim, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Eun Sook Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin, Haeyoung Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Seung Jae Huh, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):927-936.   Published online December 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.508
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in pT1-2N1 patients treated with taxane-based chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of pathological N1 patients who were treated with modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals between January 2006 and December 2010.
Results
We identified 714 consecutive patients. The median follow-up duration was 69 months (range, 1 to 114 months) and the 5-year LRRFS, DFS, and OS rates were 97%, 94%, and 98%, respectively, in patients who received PMRT (PMRT [+]). The corresponding figures were 96%, 90%, and 96%, respectively, in patients who did not receive PMRT (PMRT [–]). PMRT had no significant impact on survival. Upon multivariable analysis, only the histological grade (HG) was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for LRRFS and DFS. In a subgroup analysis of HG 3 patients, PMRT (+) showed better DFS (p=0.081).
Conclusion
PMRT had no significant impact on LRRFS, DFS, or OS in pT1-2N1 patients treated with taxane-based chemotherapy. PMRT showed a marginal benefit for DFS in HG 3 patients. Randomized studies are needed to confirm the benefit of PMRT in high risk patients, such as those with HG 3.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Does Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy Confer Survival Benefits on Patients With 1-3 Clinically Positive Lymph Nodes Rendered Pathologically Negative After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy: Consensus from A Pooled Analysis?
    Munaser Alamoodi
    European Journal of Breast Health.2024; 20(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer
    Lin-Yu Xia, Wei-Yun Xu, Yan Zhao, Sudeep Gupta
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(6): e0270528.     CrossRef
  • Suggestion for the omission of post-mastectomy chest wall radiation therapy in patients who underwent skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Nalee Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Hae Young Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Goo-Hyun Mun, Jai-Kyong Pyon, Byung-Joon Jeon
    The Breast.2022; 66: 54.     CrossRef
  • Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes: No one size fits all
    Majd Kayali, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Arafat Tfayli, Nagi El Saghir, Philip Poortmans, Youssef H. Zeidan
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2020; 147: 102880.     CrossRef
  • The survival benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients with T1-2N1 disease according to molecular subtype
    Jinli Wei, Yizhou Jiang, Zhimin Shao
    The Breast.2020; 51: 40.     CrossRef
  • The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive triple-negative breast cancer
    Lei Zhang, Ru Tang, Jia-Peng Deng, Wen-Wen Zhang, Huan-Xin Lin, San-Gang Wu, Zhen-Yu He
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Breast Conserving Surgery Followed by Radiation Therapy with Mastectomy Alone for Pathologic N1 Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 1418)
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1041.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on triple-negative breast cancer with T1-2 and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes: a population-based study using the SEER 18 database
    Jie Zhang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Jun-Yu Lian, Chuan-Gui Song
    Oncotarget.2019; 10(50): 5245.     CrossRef
  • Local and regional recurrence following mastectomy in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive nodes: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy volume
    Shin-Hyung Park, Jeeyeon Lee, Jeong Eun Lee, Min Kyu Kang, Mi Young Kim, Ho Yong Park, Jin Hyang Jung, Yee Soo Chae, Soo Jung Lee, Jae-Chul Kim
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2018; 36(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • 11,393 View
  • 346 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Effects of Postoperative Radiotherapy on Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis or Dural Metastasis after Resection of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients
Boram Ha, Seung Yeun Chung, Yeon-Joo Kim, Ho-Shin Gwak, Jong Hee Chang, Sang Hyun Lee, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Seeyoun Lee, Tae Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Seok-Gu Kang, Chang-Ok Suh
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):748-758.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.303
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
In this retrospective study, we compared the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or dural metastasis (LMCDM) in patients who received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), partial radiotherapy (PRT), or no radiotherapy (RT) following resection of brain metastases from breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-one patients with breast cancer underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed brain metastases in two institutions between March 2001 and March 2015. Among these, 34 received postoperative WBRT (n=24) or PRT (n=10) and 17 did not.
Results
With a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range, 2.3 to 83.6 months), 22/51 patients developed LMCDM at a median of 8.6 months (range, 4.8 to 51.2 months) after surgery. The 18-months LMCDM-free survival (LMCDM-FS) rates were 77.5%, 30.0%, and 13.6%, in the WBRT, PRT, and no RT groups, respectively (p=0.013). The presence of a tumor adjacent to cerebrospinal fluid flow and no systemic treatment after treatment for brain metastases were also associated with poor LMCDM-FS rate. Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT compared to PRT (p=0.009) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced incidence of LMCDM.
Conclusion
WBRT improved LMCDM-FS rate after resection of brain metastases compared to PRT in breast cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Stroke associated with microvascular tumoral infiltration in a patient with metastatic breast cancer
    Joshua Mangerel, Andres Rodriguez-Sein, Daniel Masri
    Radiology Case Reports.2025; 20(3): 1620.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis
    Joonho Byun, Jong Hyun Kim
    Brain Tumor Research and Treatment.2023; 11(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Literature Review: Role of Neurosurgery in Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
    Thaís Mitie Ogasawara, Thaís Yumi Kobayashi Batista, Rafael Rodrigues Pinheiro dos Santos, Ana Carla Mondek Rampazzo, Caroline Amane Pessoa Badaoui, Igor Ruan de Araújo Caetano, Jonathan Vinícius Martins, Maria Letícia Nogueira, José Ângelo Guarnieri, Car
    Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery.2023; 42(04): e337.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Craniotomy for Resection of Metastatic Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Report
    Brittany M. Stopa, Joshua A. Cuoco, Srijan Adhikari, Douglas J. Grider, Cara M. Rogers, Eric A. Marvin
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Autocrine GMCSF Signaling Contributes to Growth of HER2+ Breast Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
    Khairul I. Ansari, Arunoday Bhan, Mika Saotome, Antariksh Tyagi, Bony De Kumar, Clara Chen, Motoki Takaku, Rahul Jandial
    Cancer Research.2021; 81(18): 4723.     CrossRef
  • Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer
    Maria Alice Franzoi, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2019; 135: 85.     CrossRef
  • Leptomeningeal Metastases
    Jerome J. Graber, Santosh Kesari
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal dose and volume for postoperative radiotherapy in brain oligometastases from lung cancer: a retrospective study
    Seung Yeun Chung, Jong Hee Chang, Hye Ryun Kim, Byoung Chul Cho, Chang Geol Lee, Chang-Ok Suh
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2017; 35(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • 13,679 View
  • 287 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Incorporating Risk Factors to Identify the Indication of Post-mastectomy Radiotherapy in N1 Breast Cancer Treated with Optimal Systemic Therapy: A Multicenter Analysis in Korea (KROG 14-23)
Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Ja Young Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Yeon-joo Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Hyun Soo Shin, Bae Kwon Jeong, Sun Young Lee, Suzy Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):739-747.   Published online October 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.405
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
In a recent meta-analysis, post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) reduced any first recurrence (AFR) and improved survival in N1 and N2 patients. We investigated risk factors for AFR in N1 after optimal systemic therapy without PMRT, to define a subgroup of patients who may benefit from PMRT.
Materials and Methods
One thousand three hundred eighty-two pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy without PMRT between 2005 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Only 0.6% had no systemic therapy.
Results
After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, there were 173 AFR (53 loco-regional recurrence [LRR] without distant metastases [DM], 38 LRR with DM, and 82 DM without LRR). The 5-year LRR and AFR rates were 6.1% and 12.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that close resection margin (p=0.001) was the only independent risk factor for LRR. Multivariate analysis for AFR revealed that age < 35 years (p=0.025), T2 stage (p=0.004), high tumor grade (p=0.032), close resection margin (p=0.035), and triple-negative biological subtype (p=0.031) were independent risk factors. Two or three positive lymph nodes (p=0.078) were considered a marginally significant factor. When stratified by these six factors, the 5-year LRR rates were 3.6% with 0-1 (n=606), 7.5% with 2-3 (n=655), and 12.7% with 4-6 (n=93) risk factors. The 5-year AFR rates were 7.1% with 0-1, 15.0% with 2-3, and 24.5% with 4-6 risk factors.
Conclusion
Patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and optimal systemic therapy showed excellent loco-regional control and disease control. The patients with four or more risk factors may benefit from PMRT, and those with two or three risk factors merit consideration of PMRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical treatment score Post-5 Years (CTS5) predicts the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-2N1 luminal breast cancer
    Ke Liu, Guan-Qiao Li, Si-Qi Li, Xue-Qin Chen, San-Gang Wu
    The Breast.2025; 79: 103873.     CrossRef
  • Who can benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy among HR+/HER2- T1-2 N1M0 breast cancer patients? An explainable machine learning mortality prediction based approach
    Long Jin, Qifan Zhao, Shenbo Fu, Yuan Zhang, Shuhan Wu, Xiao Li, Fei Cao
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Receipt by Age and Association With Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer
    Carolina E. Fasola, Elaina Graham, Wei Sha, Courtney R. Schepel, Sally J. Trufan, Anna Hecksher, Richard L. White, Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2024; 24(5): e396.     CrossRef
  • The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer
    Chao Wei, Jie Kong, Huina Han, Xue Wang, Zimeng Gao, Danyang Wang, Andu Zhang, Jun Zhang, Zhikun Liu
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer to identify those who could not benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy
    Hongyu Pu, Yunbo Luo, Linxing Zhang, Xin Li, Fangwei Li, Jingtai Chen, Shuangqiang Qian, Yunhui Tang, Xiaobo Zhao, Lingmi Hou, Yanchun Gao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: a single center experience and a meta-analysis
    Meng Luo, Yao Jin, Chunjing Xu, Huihui Chen, Kun Zhang, Qiang Chen, Chencan Jin, Jinglu Lu, Jing Wang, Jia Huang, Hao Deng, Weili Jin, Shu Zheng, Yiding Chen, Jiaojiao Zhou
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(12): 9979.     CrossRef
  • Developing prompts from large language model for extracting clinical information from pathology and ultrasound reports in breast cancer
    Hyeon Seok Choi, Jun Yeong Song, Kyung Hwan Shin, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2023; 41(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy in T1-2N1 Breast Cancer Patients: Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Kangpyo Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Nalee Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu
    Cancers.2023; 15(22): 5473.     CrossRef
  • Immediate breast reconstruction has no impact on the oncologic outcomes of patients treated with post-mastectomy radiation therapy: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching
    Nalee Kim, Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Doo Ho Choi, Won Kyung Cho, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Sei Kyung Lee, Byung-Joon Jeon, Jai Kyong Pyon, Goo-Hyun Mun, Tae Gyu Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 192(1): 101.     CrossRef
  • Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Patients With Minimally Involved Lymph Nodes: A Review of the Current Data and Future Directions
    Bum-Sup Jang, Kyung Hwan Shin
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2022; 25(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Practical Model to Optimize the Strategy of Adjuvant Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in T1-2N1 Breast Cancer With Modern Systemic Therapy
    Fei-Fei Xu, Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Shu-Bei Wang, Wei-Xiang Qi, Jia-Yi Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of age as a continuous variable on the prognosis of patients with pT1-2N1 breast cancer
    Xu-Ran Zhao, Yu Tang, Hong-Fen Wu, Qi-Shuai Guo, Yu-Jing Zhang, Mei Shi, Jing Cheng, Hong-Mei Wang, Min Liu, Chang-Ying Ma, Ge Wen, Xiao-hu Wang, Hui Fang, Hao Jing, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning
    The Breast.2022; 66: 136.     CrossRef
  • Suggestion for the omission of post-mastectomy chest wall radiation therapy in patients who underwent skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Nalee Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Hae Young Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Goo-Hyun Mun, Jai-Kyong Pyon, Byung-Joon Jeon
    The Breast.2022; 66: 54.     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy
    Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors to identify the indication for regional nodal irradiation in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer: A joint analysis of 4,243 real-world cases from two institutions
    Guang-Yi Sun, Ge Wen, Yu-Jing Zhang, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Hui Fang, Jian-Yang Wang, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Xu-Ran Zhao, Si-Ye Chen, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Yuan Tang, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Bo Chen, Ning-Ning Lu, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors for breast cancer patients with T1–2 tumors and 1–3 positive lymph nodes and the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy in these patients
    Jia-ming Zhao, Qi An, Chao-nan Sun, Yu-bing Li, Zi-lan Qin, Hong Guo, Xue Zeng, Yao-tian Zhang, Lin-lin Wei, Ning Han, Shi-chen Sun, Na Zhang
    Breast Cancer.2021; 28(2): 298.     CrossRef
  • A Prognostic Risk Stratification Model to Identify Potential Population Benefiting From Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in T1–2 Breast Cancer With 1–3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes
    Niuniu Hou, Juliang Zhang, Lu Yang, Ying Wu, Zhe Wang, Mingkun Zhang, Li Yang, Guangdong Hou, Jianfeng Wu, Yidi Wang, Bingyao Dong, Lili Guo, Mei Shi, Rui Ling
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mastectomy alone for pT1-2 pN0-1 breast cancer patients: when postmastectomy radiotherapy is indicated
    Maria Cristina Leonardi, Ida Rosalia Scognamiglio, Patrick Maisonneuve, Samantha Dicuonzo, Damaris Patricia Rojas, Maria Alessia Zerella, Anna Morra, Marianna Alessandra Gerardi, Mattia Zaffaroni, Alessandra De Scalzi, Antonia Girardi, Francesca Magnoni,
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 188(2): 511.     CrossRef
  • Impact of clinical-pathological factors on locoregional recurrence in mastectomy patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: who can omit adjuvant radiotherapy?
    Xiaofang Wang, Li Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Jurui Luo, Xuanyi Wang, Xingxing Chen, Zhaozhi Yang, Xin Mei, Xiaoli Yu, Zhen Zhang, Xiaomao Guo, Zhimin Shao, Jinli Ma
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 190(2): 277.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
    San-Gang Wu, Jun Wang, Chen-Lu Lian, Jian Lei, Li Hua, Qin Lin, Yong-Xiong Chen, Zhen-Yu He
    The Breast.2020; 51: 2.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes
    Yu Tang, Yu-Jing Zhang, Na Zhang, Mei Shi, Ge Wen, Jing Cheng, Hong-Mei Wang, Min Liu, Xiao-Hu Wang, Qi-Shuai Guo, Hong-Fen Wu, Chang-Ying Ma, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Yong-Wen Song, Hui Fang, Hua Ren, Shu-Lian Wang, Ye-Xiong Li
    Cancer.2020; 126(S16): 3857.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for selecting patients with T1–2N1 breast cancer for post-mastectomy radiotherapy: a joint analysis of 1986 patients from two institutions
    Shulian Wang, Ge Wen, Yu Tang, Yong Yang, Hao Jing, Jianyang Wang, Jianghu Zhang, Xuran Zhao, Guangyi Sun, Jing Jin, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Hui Fang, Yujing Zhang, Yexiong Li
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postmastectomy radiotherapy in T1-2 patients with one to three positive lymph nodes – Past, present and future
    Filip Kaššák, Christine Rossier, Cristina Picardi, Jacques Bernier
    The Breast.2019; 48: 73.     CrossRef
  • Chest wall recurrence in pT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy without radiotherapy
    Ji Hyun Chang, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seung Do Ahn, Hae Jin Park, Eui Kyu Chie, Jin Ho Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Won Park, Yeon-Joo Kim, Hyun Soo Shin, Jin Hee Kim, Sun Young Lee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Bae Kwon Jeong, Ja Young Kim, Suzy Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 169(3): 507.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Benefit of Radiotherapy in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis of the SEER Database
    Byoung Hyuck Kim, Jeanny Kwon, Kyubo Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(2): 551.     CrossRef
  • Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23
    Kyubo Kim, Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Won Park, Seung Do Ahn, Su Ssan Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Jiyoung Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1316.     CrossRef
  • Meeting Highlights: The Second Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer Treatment in Korea
    Seeyoun Lee, In Hae Park, Seho Park, Joohyuk Sohn, Joon Jeong, Sung Gwe Ahn, Ik Jae Lee, Hae Kyung Lee, Seung Ah Lee, Won Park, Kyung-Hun Lee, Sung-Won Kim, Sang-Ah Han, Kyung Hae Jung, Byung Ho Son
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2017; 20(3): 228.     CrossRef
  • Predicting loco-regional recurrence risk in T1, T2 breast cancer with 1–3 positive axillary nodes postmastectomy: Development of a predictive nomogram
    T Wadasadawala, S Kannan, S Gudi, A Rishi, A Budrukkar, V Parmar, T Shet, S Desai, S Gupta, R Badwe, R Sarin
    Indian Journal of Cancer.2017; 54(1): 352.     CrossRef
  • 11,652 View
  • 354 Download
  • 28 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
Close layer
Locoregional Recurrence by Tumor Biology in Breast Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemotherapy and Breast Conservation Treatment
Eunjin Jwa, Kyung Hwan Shin, Ja Young Kim, Young Hee Park, So-Youn Jung, Eun Sook Lee, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Jungsil Ro, Yeon-Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1363-1372.   Published online February 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.456
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine whether breast cancer subtype can affect locoregional recurrence (LRR) and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Materials and Methods We evaluated 335 consecutive patients with clinical stage II-III breast cancer who received NAC plus BCT from 2002 to 2009. Patients were classified according to six molecular subtypes: luminal A (hormone receptor [HR]+/HER2–/Ki-67 < 15%, n=113), luminal B1 (HR+/HER2–/Ki-67 ≥ 15%, n=33), luminal B2 (HR+/HER2+, n=83), HER2 with trastuzumab (HER2[T+]) (HR–/HER2+/use of trastuzumab, n=14), HER2 without trastuzumab (HER2[T–]) (HR–/HER2+, n=31), and triple negative (TN) (HR–/HER2–, n=61).
Results
After a median follow-up period of 7.2 years, 26 IBTRs and 37 LRRs occurred. The 5-year LRR-free survival rates were luminal A, 96.4%; B1, 93.9%; B2, 90.3%; HER2(T+), 92.9%; HER2(T–), 78.3%; and TN, 79.6%. The 5-year IBTR-free survival rates were luminal A, 97.2%; B1, 93.9%; B2, 92.8%; HER2(T+), 92.9%; HER2(T–), 89.1%; and TN, 84.6%. In multivariate analysis, HER2(T–) (IBTR: hazard ratio, 4.2; p=0.04 and LRR: hazard ratio, 7.6; p < 0.01) and TN subtypes (IBTR: hazard ratio, 6.9; p=0.01 and LRR: hazard ratio, 8.1; p < 0.01) were associated with higher IBTR and LRR rates. A pathologic complete response (pCR) was found to show correlation with better LRR and a tendency toward improved IBTR controls in TN patients (IBTR, p=0.07; LRR, p=0.03). Conclusion The TN and HER2(T–) subtypes predict higher rates of IBTR and LRR after NAC and BCT. A pCR is predictive of improved IBTR or LRR in TN subtype.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prioritizing cases from a multi-institutional cohort for a dataset of pathologist annotations
    Victor Garcia, Emma Gardecki, Stephanie Jou, Xiaoxian Li, Kenneth R. Shroyer, Joel Saltz, Balazs Acs, Katherine Elfer, Jochen Lennerz, Roberto Salgado, Brandon D. Gallas
    Journal of Pathology Informatics.2025; 16: 100411.     CrossRef
  • Mitomycin C in the treatment of early triple-negative locally advanced BRCA-associated breast cancer
    D. A. Enaldieva, P. V. Krivorotko, E. N. Imyanitov, R. V. Donskih, A. P. Sokolenko, V. O. Azaova, N. N. Amirov, Ya. Ig. Bondarchuk, V. E. Levcheko, D. G. Ulrikh, V. F. Semiglazov
    Medical alphabet.2024; (7): 13.     CrossRef
  • Tissue- and Temporal-Dependent Dynamics of Myeloablation in Response to Gemcitabine Chemotherapy
    Lydia E. Kitelinger, Eric A. Thim, Sarah Y. Zipkowitz, Richard J. Price, Timothy N. J. Bullock
    Cells.2024; 13(16): 1317.     CrossRef
  • Risk of locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery by molecular subtype—a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lily Nolan, Matthew G. Davey, Gavin G. Calpin, Éanna J. Ryan, Michael R. Boland
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2024; 193(6): 2965.     CrossRef
  • Local-Regional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy: Data from ACOSOG Z1031 (Alliance), a Randomized Phase 2 Neoadjuvant Comparison Between Letrozole, Anastrozole, and Exemestane for Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Clinical
    Kelly K. Hunt, Vera J. Suman, Hannah F. Wingate, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary Unzeitig, Judy C. Boughey, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Matthew J. Ellis, John Olson
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(4): 2111.     CrossRef
  • Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Mary Mrdutt, Alexandra Heerdt, Varadan Sevilimedu, Anita Mamtani, Andrea Barrio, Monica Morrow
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(1): 484.     CrossRef
  • Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol
    Ariane A. van Loevezijn, Marieke E. M. van der Noordaa, Marcel P. M. Stokkel, Erik D. van Werkhoven, Emma J. Groen, Claudette E. Loo, Paula H. M. Elkhuizen, Gabe S. Sonke, Nicola S. Russell, Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Pee
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 193(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • De-escalation of radiotherapy after primary chemotherapy in cT1–2N1 breast cancer (RAPCHEM; BOOG 2010–03): 5-year follow-up results of a Dutch, prospective, registry study
    Sabine R de Wild, Linda de Munck, Janine M Simons, Janneke Verloop, Thijs van Dalen, Paula H M Elkhuizen, Ruud M A Houben, A Elise van Leeuwen, Sabine C Linn, Ruud M Pijnappel, Philip M P Poortmans, Luc J A Strobbe, Jelle Wesseling, Adri C Voogd, Liesbeth
    The Lancet Oncology.2022; 23(9): 1201.     CrossRef
  • Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis
    Anna Baranova, Mykola Krasnoselskyi, Volodymyr Starikov, Sergii Kartashov, Igor Zhulkevych, Vadym Vlasenko, Kateryna Oleshko, Olga Bilodid, Marina Sadchikova, Yurii Vinnyk
    Journal of Medicine and Life.2022; 15(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Triple-Negative or HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Who Achieve a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Makoto Ishitobi, Naoko Matsuda, Mizuho Tazo, Sayuka Nakayama, Ryu Tokui, Tomoko Ogawa, Atsushi Yoshida, Yasuyuki Kojima, Takashi Kuwayama, Takahiro Nakayama, Hideko Yamauchi, Seigo Nakamura, Koichiro Tsugawa, Naoki Hayashi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(5): 2545.     CrossRef
  • Disease-free and overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery compared to mastectomy in a large single-centre cohort study
    Janine M. Simons, Julien G. Jacobs, Joost P. Roijers, Maarten A. Beek, Leandra J. M. Boonman-de Winter, Arjen M. Rijken, Paul D. Gobardhan, Jan H. Wijsman, Eric Tetteroo, Joan B. Heijns, C. Y. Yick, Ernest J. T. Luiten
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 185(2): 441.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes after breast conserving surgery
    Matthew R. Woeste, Neal Bhutiani, Marilyn Donaldson, Kelly M. McMasters, Nicolás Ajkay
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 123(2): 439.     CrossRef
  • Does Surgical Margin Width Remain a Challenge for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer? A Retrospective Analysis
    Eduard-Alexandru Bonci, Ștefan Țîțu, Alexandru Marius Petrușan, Claudiu Hossu, Vlad Alexandru Gâta, Morvarid Talaeian Ghomi, Paul Milan Kubelac, Teodora Irina Bonci, Andra Piciu, Maria Cosnarovici, Liviu Hîțu, Alexandra Timea Kirsch-Mangu, Diana Cristina
    Medicina.2021; 57(3): 203.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery following neoadjuvant treatment
    Hsu-Huan Chou, Wei-Shan Chung, Rong-Yao Ding, Wen-Ling Kuo, Chi-Chang Yu, Hsiu-Pei Tsai, Shih-Che Shen, Chia-Hui Chu, Yung-Feng Lo, Shin-Cheh Chen
    BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation between outcome and extent of residual disease in the sentinel node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically fine-needle proven node-positive breast cancer patients
    Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri, Franca Carli, Elsa Garrone, Stefano Spinaci, Angelica Della Valle, Erika Barbieri, Emilia Marrazzo, Paolo Bruzzi, Beatrice Dozin
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 1920.     CrossRef
  • Diverse Distribution and Gene Expression on the 21-Gene Recurrence Assay in Breast Cancer Patients with Locoregional Recurrence Versus Distant Metastasis
    Yujie Lu, Yiwei Tong, Jiahui Huang, Lin Lin, Jiayi Wu, Xiaochun Fei, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 6279.     CrossRef
  • De-escalation of axillary irradiation for early breast cancer – Has the time come?
    Elżbieta Senkus, Maria Joao Cardoso, Orit Kaidar-Person, Aleksandra Łacko, Icro Meattini, Philip Poortmans
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 101: 102297.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Surgical Margins in Breast Cancer After Preoperative Systemic Chemotherapy on Local Recurrence and Survival
    K. Wimmer, M. Bolliger, Z. Bago-Horvath, G. Steger, D. Kauer-Dorner, R. Helfgott, C. Gruber, F. Moinfar, M. Mittlböck, F. Fitzal
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2020; 27(5): 1700.     CrossRef
  • Association of surgical margins with local recurrence in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Joseph Lin, Kuo-Juei Lin, Yu-Fen Wang, Ling-Hui Huang, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Dar-Ren Chen
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identifying Risk Factors for Regional Recurrence in Early-Stage Breast Cancer with pT1-2 and Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy


    Kai-yun You, Zhuo-fei Bi, Lin Ding, Yu-jia Ma, Yi-min Liu, He-rui Yao
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 9211.     CrossRef
  • Discordance between Primary Breast Cancer and Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Tumor Recurrence as a Function of Distance
    Sebastian M. Jud, Reinhard Hatko, Julius Emons, Bianca Lauterbach, Carolin C. Hack, Caroline Preuß, Werner Adler, Matthias W. Beckmann, Felix Heindl
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(12): 4033.     CrossRef
  • A common Chk1-dependent phenotype of DNA double-strand break suppression in two distinct radioresistant cancer types
    Patrick H. Dinkelborg, Meng Wang, Liliana Gheorghiu, Joseph M. Gurski, Theodore S. Hong, Cyril H. Benes, Dejan Juric, Rachel B. Jimenez, Kerstin Borgmann, Henning Willers
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 174(3): 605.     CrossRef
  • The reciprocal influences of prognosis between two types of surgical interventions and early breast cancer patients with diverse luminal subtypes
    Lin He, Shengnan Zhao, Min Liu, Zhumin Su, Yuanzhong Ren, Yuhua Song
    Medicine.2019; 98(11): e14912.     CrossRef
  • Integrative In Vivo Drug Testing Using Gene Expression Signature and Patient-Derived Xenografts from Treatment-Refractory HER2 Positive and Triple-Negative Subtypes of Breast Cancer
    Jin-Sun Ryu, Sung Hoon Sim, In Hae Park, Eun Gyeong Lee, Eun Sook Lee, Yun-Hee Kim, Youngmee Kwon, Sun-Young Kong, Keun Seok Lee
    Cancers.2019; 11(4): 574.     CrossRef
  • Partial-Breast Irradiation: Review of Modern Trials
    Bindu Manyam, Chirag Shah, Thomas Julian, Frank Vicini
    Current Breast Cancer Reports.2019; 11(4): 277.     CrossRef
  • AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2019
    Marc Thill, Christian Jackisch, Wolfgang Janni, Volkmar Müller, Ute-Susann Albert, Ingo Bauerfeind, Jens Blohmer, Wilfried Budach, Peter Dall, Ingo Diel, Peter A. Fasching, Tanja Fehm, Michael Friedrich, Bernd Gerber, Volker Hanf, Nadia Harbeck, Jens Huob
    Breast Care.2019; 14(4): 247.     CrossRef
  • The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for accelerated partial-breast irradiation
    Chirag Shah, Frank Vicini, Simona F. Shaitelman, Jaroslaw Hepel, Martin Keisch, Douglas Arthur, Atif J. Khan, Robert Kuske, Rakesh Patel, David E. Wazer
    Brachytherapy.2018; 17(1): 154.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Biology: Clinical Implications for Breast Radiation Therapy
    Janet K. Horton, Reshma Jagsi, Wendy A. Woodward, Alice Ho
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2018; 100(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for locoregional disease recurrence after breast‐conserving therapy in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An international collaboration and individual patient meta‐analysis
    Antonios Valachis, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Naoki Hayashi, Makoto Ishitobi, Clara Natoli, Florian Fitzal, Isabel T. Rubio, Daniel G. Tiezzi, Hee‐Chul Shin, Stewart J. Anderson, Kelly K. Hunt, Naoko Matsuda, Shozo Ohsumi, Athina To
    Cancer.2018; 124(14): 2923.     CrossRef
  • Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Therapy
    Jungeun Choi, Alison Laws, Jiani Hu, William Barry, Mehra Golshan, Tari King
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2018; 25(12): 3541.     CrossRef
  • Critical review of axillary recurrence in early breast cancer
    Carlos A. Castaneda, Pamela Rebaza, Miluska Castillo, Henry L. Gomez, Miguel De La Cruz, Gabriela Calderon, Jorge Dunstan, Jose Manuel Cotrina, Julio Abugattas, Tatiana Vidaurre
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2018; 129: 146.     CrossRef
  • Effects of trastuzumab on locoregional recurrence in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy
    Seung Hyuck Jeon, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Kim, In Ah Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Seock-Ah Im
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 172(3): 619.     CrossRef
  • Pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts locoregional control in patients with triple negative breast cancer
    Victor E. Chen, Erin F. Gillespie, Kaveh Zakeri, James D. Murphy, Catheryn M. Yashar, Sharon Lu, John P. Einck
    Advances in Radiation Oncology.2017; 2(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • Factors predictive of locoregional recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancer: An analysis of the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 study
    Pauline Gillon, Nathan Touati, Christel Breton-Callu, Leen Slaets, David Cameron, Hervé Bonnefoi
    European Journal of Cancer.2017; 79: 226.     CrossRef
  • Age, molecular subtypes and local therapy decision-making
    Anne Kuijer, Tari A. King
    The Breast.2017; 34: S70.     CrossRef
  • Identification of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 as a tumour suppressor in human breast cancer
    Cefan Zhou, Jing Yu, Ming Wang, Jing Yang, Hui Xiong, Huang Huang, Dongli Wu, Shimeng Hu, Yefu Wang, Xing-Zhen Chen, Jingfeng Tang
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(60): 101309.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of PLIN1 expression in human breast cancer
    Cefan Zhou, Ming Wang, Li Zhou, Yi Zhang, Weiyong Liu, Wenying Qin, Rong He, Yang Lu, Yefu Wang, Xing-Zhen Chen, Jingfeng Tang
    Oncotarget.2016; 7(34): 54488.     CrossRef
  • 15,751 View
  • 359 Download
  • 38 Web of Science
  • 37 Crossref
Close layer
Identification of Prognostic Risk Factors for Transient and Persistent Lymphedema after Multimodal Treatment for Breast Cancer
Myungsoo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Eun Sook Lee, Seung Hyun Chung, Yeon-Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kwan Ho Cho
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1330-1337.   Published online February 3, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.463
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for transient lymphedema (TLE) and persistent lymphedema (PLE) following treatment for breast cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 1,073 patients who underwent curative breast surgery were analyzed. TLE was defined as one episode of arm swelling that had resolved spontaneously by the next followup; arm swelling that persisted over two consecutive examinations was considered PLE.
Results
At a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, 370 cases of lymphedema were reported, including 120 TLE (11.2%) and 250 PLE (23.3%). Initial grade 1 swelling was observed in 351 patients, of which 120 were limited to TLE (34%), while the other 231 progressed to PLE (66%). All initial swelling observed in TLE patients was classified as grade 1. In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy with taxane and supraclavicular radiation therapy (SCRT) were associated with development of TLE, whereas SCRT, stage III cancer and chemotherapy with taxane were identified as risk factors for PLE (p < 0.05). The estimated incidence of TLE among initial grade 1 patients was calculated using up to three treatment-related risk factors (number of dissected axillary lymph nodes, SCRT, and taxane chemotherapy). The approximate ratios of TLE and PLE based on the number of risk factors were 7:1 (no factor), 1:1 (one factor), 1:2 (two factors), and 1:3 (three factors). Conclusion One-third of initial swelling events were transient, whereas the other two-thirds of patients experienced PLE. Estimation of TLE and PLE based on known treatment factors could facilitate prediction of this life-long complication.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multimodal treatments and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: insights from a nationally representative cohort in South Korea
    Sung Hoon Jeong, Seong Min Chun, Miji Kim, Ye Seol Lee, Jisun Kim, Ja-Ho Leigh, Yoon-Hee Choi
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in predicting surgical outcomes of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in lower extremity lymphedema: Clinical correlations in gynecological cancer-related lymphedema
    Min Young Yoo, Kyong-Je Woo, Seo Young Kang, Byung Seok Moon, Bom Sahn Kim, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Andrea Giannini
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(1): e0296466.     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic remapping by long-term lymphoscintigraphy follow-up in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery
    Garam Hong, Koeun Lee, Sangwon Han, Jae Yong Jeon
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of exercise and educational programs for breast cancer patients on the development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary endpoint from a randomized controlled trial in the Setouchi Breast Project-10
    Shogo Nakamoto, Takayuki Iwamoto, Naruto Taira, Yukiko Kajiwara, Kengo Kawada, Daisuke Takabatake, Yuichiro Miyoshi, Shinichiro Kubo, Yoko Suzuki, Mari Yamamoto, Yutaka Ogasawara, Minami Hatono, Seiji Yoshitomi, Kyoko Hara, Asako Sasahara, Shozo Ohsumi, M
    Breast Cancer.2024; 31(5): 969.     CrossRef
  • Taxanes and Breast Cancer‐Related Lymphedema
    Daniel Najafali, Charalampos Siotos, George Kokosis
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Single Institution Experience With Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Impact of Insurance Coverage on Risk Reduction
    Anne Huang, Emma Koesters, Rebecca M. Garza, Summer E. Hanson, David W. Chang
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prevalence of arm lymphedema after radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer
    Kamonrat Sueangamiam, Kanisa Rongsriyam
    Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Elena Canales-Lachén, Ángel Asunsolo, Oscar J. Manrique, Javier Blázquez, Purificación Holguín, Andrés A. Maldonado
    Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.2023; 39(02): 102.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies
    Aomei Shen, Qian Lu, Xin Fu, Xiaoxia Wei, Liyuan Zhang, Jingru Bian, Wanmin Qiang, Dong Pang
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for the development of severe breast cancer-related lymphedema: a retrospective cohort study
    Xiaozhen Liu, Kewang Sun, Hongjian Yang, Lingli Xia, Kefeng Lu, Xuli Meng, Yongfeng Li
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Practical Approach to Establishing a Lymphedema Screening Program: Tips and Tricks
    Derly C. Munoz, Sarah S. Virk, Oluwadamilola T. Oladeru, Pamela Clevenger, Tracy L. Hollen, Mariam W. Hanna, Lisa R. P. Spiguel
    Current Breast Cancer Reports.2023; 15(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • The impact of rehabilitation sport on breast cancer-related lymphoedema and quality of life
    Bettina Boeer, Anna Seller, Birgitt Schoenfisch, Ute krainick-Strobel, Andreas Dietrich, Sara Y. Brucker, Diethelm Wallwiener, Andreas Niess, Markus Hahn
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 307(5): 1529.     CrossRef
  • The potential of gas plasma technology for targeting breast cancer
    Sander Bekeschus, Fariba Saadati, Steffen Emmert
    Clinical and Translational Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of breast cancer-related lymphedema risk after postoperative radiotherapy via multivariable logistic regression analysis
    Jae Sik Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Ji Hyun Chang, Do Wook Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Invited Commentary from the Authors of: Kuruvilla AS, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Lymphedema: Amulticenter Retrospective Analysis
    Annet S. Kuruvilla
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2022; 89(6): 716.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema among Chinese breast cancer survivors
    Yan-fei Liu, Jun-E Liu, Yi Zhu, Yim Wah Mak, Hui Qiu, Li-hui Liu, Shen-shen Yang, Shao-hua Chen
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(9): 5435.     CrossRef
  • Eliminating the Burden of Lymphedema in Cancer Patients Requiring Nodal Dissections Using Prophylactic Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction – A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Abiye Mussie, Maria C. Medor, Sylia Mohand-Said, Andrea M. Ibrahim, Carolyn Nessim, Moein Momtazi
    Plastic Surgery Case Studies.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors predicting one or two sentinel lymph nodes to be accepted for sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer patients
    Li-Wei Tsai, Yi-Hsuan Lee, Chiao Lo, Huang-Chun Lien, Ming-Yang Wang, I-Shiow Jan, Ruoh-Fang Yen, Fu-Chang Hu, Chiun-Sheng Huang
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 39: 101667.     CrossRef
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in T3 and T4b Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis in a Tertiary Cancer Hospital and Systematic Literature Review
    Idam de Oliveira-Junior, Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahas, Ana Cristina Cherem, Jorge Nahas-Neto, René Aloisio da Costa Vieira
    Breast Care.2021; 16(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Histological features of skin and subcutaneous tissue in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relationship to post-treatment edema
    Ayako Nakagawa, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Takeshi Nagashima, Takafumi Sangai, Mamoru Takada, Takahito Masuda, Ryotaro Teranaka, Satoshi Ota, Jun Matsushima, Shinsuke Akita, Masayuki Ohtsuka
    Breast Cancer.2020; 27(1): 77.     CrossRef
  • Lymphedema Signs, Symptoms, and Diagnosis in Women Who Are in Minority and Low-Income Groups and Have Survived Breast Cancer
    Ann Marie Flores, Jason Nelson, Lee Sowles, Rebecca G Stephenson, Kathryn Robinson, Andrea Cheville, Antoinette P Sander, William J Blot
    Physical Therapy.2020; 100(3): 487.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in patients with lymphedema referred for complete decongestive therapy
    Côme Roux, Béatrice Villemur, Brigitte Giovannoni, Lucie Koeyemelk, Monique Mendelson, Meriem Benmerad, Marie Joyeux-Faure, Renaud Tamisier, Jean-Louis Pepin
    Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders.2020; 8(1): 137.     CrossRef
  • The results of the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy and the determination of predictive factors for response to treatment in patients with breast cancer related‐lymphedema
    Dilek Keskin, Meltem Dalyan, Sibel Ünsal‐Delialioğlu, Ülkü Düzlü‐Öztürk
    Cancer Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A scoring system for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema
    Fenglian Li, Qian Lu, Sanli Jin, Quanping Zhao, Xueying Qin, Shuai Jin, Lichuan Zhang
    International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2020; 7(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Lymphedema and Lymphovenous Bypass: Perioperative Nursing Implications
    Lori A. Whitnell
    AORN Journal.2020; 111(2): 187.     CrossRef
  • Who Will Continuously Depend on Compression to Control Persistent or Progressive Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Despite 2 Years of Conservative Care?
    Chul Jung, JaYoung Kim, Yu Jin Seo, Kyeong Joo Song, Ma. Nessa Gelvosa, Jin Geun Kwon, Changsik John Pak, Hyunsuk Peter Suh, Joon Pio Hong, Hwa Jung Kim, Jae Yong Jeon
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(11): 3640.     CrossRef
  • Role of p53 as a prognostic marker in breast carcinoma and its correlation with tumor size, tumor grade and lymph node metastasis
    Alok Mohan, Bharat Jindal, Rajender Kumar Thakral, Vaseem Ansari, Veena K Sharma
    Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology.2020; 7(3): 378.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and prediction model for persistent breast-cancer-related lymphedema: a 5-year cohort study
    I-Wen Penn, Yue-Cune Chang, Eric Chuang, Chi-Ming Chen, Chi-Feng Chung, Chia-Yu Kuo, Tien-Yow Chuang
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2019; 27(3): 991.     CrossRef
  • Progressive resistance training to prevent arm lymphedema in the first year after breast cancer surgery: Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Gunn Ammitzbøll, Christoffer Johansen, Charlotte Lanng, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Niels Kroman, Bo Zerahn, Ole Hyldegaard, Merete Celano Wittenkamp, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
    Cancer.2019; 125(10): 1683.     CrossRef
  • Frequency and risk factors for arm lymphedema after multimodal breast-conserving treatment of nodal positive breast Cancer – a long-term observation
    Julia Rupp, Catarina Hadamitzky, Christoph Henkenberens, Hans Christiansen, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns
    Radiation Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Elevated levels of eEF1A2 protein expression in triple negative breast cancer relate with poor prognosis
    Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Petracci, Oriana Nanni, Cristina Bottin, Maurizio Pinamonti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante, Aamir Ahmad
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0218030.     CrossRef
  • Introduction of the Lymphedema Action Plan (LeAP): Clinical Advancement in Proactive Lymphedema Care
    Renata Beaman
    Rehabilitation Oncology.2019; 37(3): 122.     CrossRef
  • Profile of women with lymphedema after breast cancer treatment
    Thais de Oliveira Gozzo, Gabriela Aguado, Aniele Tomadon, Marislei Sanches Panobianco, Maria Antonieta Spinoso Prado
    Escola Anna Nery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema—a Preliminary Report
    Juhi Agrawal, Sandeep Mehta, Ashish Goel, Pankaj Kumar Pande, Kapil Kumar
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 9(3): 369.     CrossRef
  • Progressive strength training to prevent LYmphoedema in the first year after breast CAncer – the LYCA feasibility study
    Gunn Ammitzbøll, Charlotte Lanng, Niels Kroman, Bo Zerahn, Ole Hyldegaard, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Christoffer Johansen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
    Acta Oncologica.2017; 56(2): 360.     CrossRef
  • Association between adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and breast cancer-related lymphedema
    Wen Zhu, Dan Li, Xiaoqin Li, Jin Ren, Wenqi Chen, Hangang Gu, Yongqian Shu, Deqiang Wang
    Anti-Cancer Drugs.2017; 28(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients
    Yunbao Pan, Yufen Yuan, Guoshi Liu, Yongchang Wei, William B. Coleman
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(2): e0172324.     CrossRef
  • Considerations for Clinicians in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert ASBrS Panel
    Sarah A. McLaughlin, Alicia C. Staley, Frank Vicini, Paul Thiruchelvam, Nancy A. Hutchison, Jane Mendez, Fiona MacNeill, Stanley G. Rockson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Suzanne Klimberg, Michael Alatriste, Francesco Boccardo, Mark L. Smith, Sheldon M. Feldman
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2017; 24(10): 2818.     CrossRef
  • Current and future perspectives on the evaluation, prevention and conservative management of breast cancer related lymphoedema: A best practice guideline
    Nick Gebruers, Hanne Verbelen, Tessa De Vrieze, Lore Vos, Nele Devoogdt, Lore Fias, Wiebren Tjalma
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2017; 216: 245.     CrossRef
  • Changes in volume and incidence of lymphedema during and after treatment with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) in patients with breast cancer
    Janine T. Hidding, Carien H. G. Beurskens, Philip J. van der Wees, Wilmy C. A. M. Bos, Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Palliative surgery for giant mucinous carcinoma of the breast in an elderly patient: A rare case report
    Haruko Takuwa, Wakako Tsuji, Fumiaki Yotsumoto
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2017; 7(4): 609.     CrossRef
  • Update December 2016
    Francine Blei
    Lymphatic Research and Biology.2016; 14(4): 240.     CrossRef
  • 13,069 View
  • 248 Download
  • 46 Web of Science
  • 42 Crossref
Close layer
Second Primary Cancer after Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Cancer
Myong Cheol Lim, Young-Joo Won, Jiwon Lim, Yeon-Joo Kim, Sang Soo Seo, Sokbom Kang, Eun Sook Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Joo-Young Kim, Sang-Yoon Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):641-649.   Published online July 17, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.326
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study was conducted to investigate the incidence and survival outcomes of second primary cancers after the diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Materials and Methods
Data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry between 1993 and 2010 were reviewed and analyzed. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of second primary cancers among women with cervical cancer were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for cervical cancer patients with or without a second primary cancer.
Results
Among 72,805 women with cervical cancer, 2,678 (3.68%) developed a second primary cancer within a mean follow-up period of 7.34 years. The overall SIR for a second cancer was 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.12). The most frequent sites of second primary cancers were the vagina, bone and joints, vulva, anus, bladder, lung and bronchus, corpus uteri, and esophagus. However, the incidence rates of four second primary cancers (breast, rectum, liver, and brain) were decreased. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 78.3% and 72.7% in all women with cervical cancer, and for women with a second primary cancer, these rates were 83.2% and 65.5% from the onset of cervical cancer and 54.9% and 46.7% from the onset of the second primary cancer, respectively.
Conclusion
The incidence rates of second primary cancers were increased in women with cervical cancer compared to the general population, with the exception of four decreasing cancers. The 10-year overall survival rates were decreased in cervical cancer patients with a second primary cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Temporal trends in the incidence of second primary cancers in Northern Portugal: a population-based study
    Elisabete Gonçalves, Filipa Fontes, Jéssica Rocha Rodrigues, Luis Antunes, Maria José Bento, Nuno Lunet, Samantha Morais
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The risk for subsequent primary lung cancer after cervical carcinoma: A quantitative analysis based on 864,627 cases
    Sheng Gong, Gang Li, Dan Li, Yu Liu, Banggui Wu, Yan Wang
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(6): e0305670.     CrossRef
  • Increased risk of subsequent primary lung cancer among female hormone-related cancer patients: A meta-analysis based on over four million cases
    Yan Wang, Wenpeng Song, Haoyu Wang, Guonian Zhu, Yangqian Li, Zhoufeng Wang, Weimin Li, Guowei Che
    Chinese Medical Journal.2024; 137(15): 1790.     CrossRef
  • Association between radiation therapy for primary endometrial cancer and risk of second primary malignancies: a retrospective cohort study
    Yuebo Wang, Yanan Cai
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nomograms constructed for predicting diagnosis and prognosis in cervical cancer patients with second primary malignancies: a SEER database analysis
    Ning Xie, Jie Lin, Linying Liu, Sufang Deng, Haijuan Yu, Yang Sun
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(14): 13201.     CrossRef
  • Differences of characteristics, influencing factors, and treatment effects on the survival in patients with first and second primary cervical cancer
    Fan Zhang, Ping Yu, Lixia Xu, Xuwei Chen, Junqiang Du
    Preventive Medicine Reports.2023; 36: 102504.     CrossRef
  • Second primary malignancies in cervical cancer and endometrial cancer survivors: a population-based analysis
    Kejie Huang, Lijuan Xu, Mingfang Jia, Wenmin Liu, Shijie Wang, Jianglong Han, Yanbo Li, Qibin Song, Zhenming Fu
    Aging.2022; 14(9): 3836.     CrossRef
  • Second Malignancies Following Primary Cervical Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of the SEER Database
    Oluwasegun A Akinyemi, Faith O Abodunrin, Tsion F Andine, Kindha Elleissy Nasef, Bolarinwa Akinwumi, Ayobami Oduwole, Christina Lipscombe, Ademola S Ojo, Mary Fakorede
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Conditional relative survival of cervical cancer: a Korean National Cancer Registry Study
    Dong Wook Shin, Jaeman Bae, Johyun Ha, Kyu-Won Jung
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MicroRNAs expression analysis shows key affirmation of Synaptopodin-2 as a novel prognostic and therapeutic biomarker for colorectal and cervical cancers
    Md. Shahadat Hossain, Mahafujul Islam Quadery Tonmoy, Md. Nur Islam, Md. Sajedul Islam, Ibrahim Khalil Afif, Arpita Singha Roy, Atqiya Fariha, Hasan Al Reza, Newaz Mohammed Bahadur, Md. Mizanur Rahaman
    Heliyon.2021; 7(6): e07347.     CrossRef
  • Increased risk of second cancers at sites associated with HPV after a prior HPV-associated malignancy, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duncan C. Gilbert, Katie Wakeham, Ruth E. Langley, Claire L. Vale
    British Journal of Cancer.2019; 120(2): 256.     CrossRef
  • Leiomyosarcoma of the Rectum as a Radiation-Induced Second Malignancy after Cervical Cancer Treatment: Case Report with Review of the Literature
    Dmytro E. Makhmudov, Olena O. Kolesnik, Natalia N. Lagoda, Maryna O. Volk
    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Incidences and risk factors of metachronous vulvar, vaginal, and anal cancers after cervical cancer diagnosis
    Koji Matsuo, Erin A. Blake, Hiroko Machida, Rachel S. Mandelbaum, Lynda D. Roman, Jason D. Wright
    Gynecologic Oncology.2018; 150(3): 501.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of tumor-tumor interactions in a double human cervical carcinoma xenograft model in nude mice
    Barbara Mertens, Tatiane Cristina de Araujo Nogueira, Dimitrios Topalis, Ruzena Stranska, Robert Snoeck, Graciela Andrei
    Oncotarget.2018; 9(31): 21978.     CrossRef
  • Elevated risk of human papillomavirus‐related second cancers in survivors of anal canal cancer
    Rebecca A. Nelson, Lily L. Lai
    Cancer.2017; 123(20): 4013.     CrossRef
  • 14,383 View
  • 135 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
Close layer
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Proton Beam Therapy for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Tae Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Yeon-Joo Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Jae Park, Joo-Young Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(1):34-45.   Published online September 11, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.218
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal dose of proton beam therapy (PBT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
Materials and Methods
Inoperable HCC patients who had naïve, recurrent, or residual tumor to treatment were considered eligible for PBT. Patients received PBT with 60 GyE in 20 fractions (dose level 1; equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2], 65 GyE10); 66 GyE in 22 fractions (dose level 2; EQD2, 71.5 GyE10); or 72 GyE in 24 fractions (dose level 3; EQD2, 78 GyE10). Dose-limiting toxicity was determined by grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity.
Results
Twenty-seven patients were enrolled; eight, seven, and 12 patients were treated with dose levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. The complete response (CR) rates of primary tumors after PBT for dose levels 1, 2, and 3 were 62.5% (5/8), 57.1% (4/7), and 100% (12/12), respectively (p=0.039). The 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates among 26 patients, excluding one patient who underwent liver transplantation after PBT due to its probable significant effect on disease control, were 79.9% and 63.9%, respectively, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 56.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The 3-year LPFS rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR than in those who did not (90% vs. 40%, p=0.003).
Conclusion
PBT is safe and effective and an EQD2 ≥ 78 GyE10 should be delivered for achievement of local tumor control.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion
    Sabrina Groß, Michael Bitzer, Jörg Albert, Susanne Blödt, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Katrin Borucki, Thomas Brunner, Reiner Caspari, Frank Dombrowski, Matthias Evert, Markus Follmann, Paul Freudenberger, Cihan Gani, Jamila Gebert, Andreas Geier, Eleni Gkika, M
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2025; 63(02): e82.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms – Langversion
    Michael Bitzer, Sabrina Groß, Jörg Albert, Susanne Blödt, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Katrin Borucki, Thomas Brunner, Reiner Caspari, Frank Dombrowski, Matthias Evert, Markus Follmann, Paul Freudenberger, Cihan Gani, Jamila Gebert, Andreas Geier, Eleni Gkika, M
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2025; 63(03): e159.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms“ – Langversion 4.0
    Michael Bitzer, Sabrina Groß, Jörg Albert, Susanne Blödt, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Thomas Brunner, Reiner Caspari, Enrico De Toni, Frank Dombrowski, Matthias Evert, Markus Follmann, Paul Freudenberger, Cihan Gani, Andreas Geier, Eleni Gkika, Martin Götz, Tho
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(01): e67.     CrossRef
  • Tumor Response on Diagnostic Imaging after Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hikaru Niitsu, Masashi Mizumoto, Yinuo Li, Masatoshi Nakamura, Toshiki Ishida, Takashi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Haruko Numajiri, Hirokazu Makishima, Kei Nakai, Yoshiko Oshiro, Kazushi Maruo, Hideyuki Sakurai
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 357.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome“ – Langversion 4.0
    Sabrina Groß, Michael Bitzer, Jörg Albert, Susanne Blödt, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Thomas Brunner, Reiner Caspari, Enrico De Toni, Frank Dombrowski, Matthias Evert, Markus Follmann, Paul Freudenberger, Cihan Gani, Andreas Geier, Eleni Gkika, Martin Götz, Tho
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(02): e213.     CrossRef
  • Recent update of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun Hyun Bae, Won Il Jang, Hanna Rahbek Mortensen, Britta Weber, Mi Sook Kim, Morten Høyer
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2024; 24(2): 286.     CrossRef
  • Analytical calculation of proton beam Bragg curve inside heterogeneous media
    Behzad Aminafshar, Hamid Reza Baghani, Ali Asghar Mowlavi
    The European Physical Journal Plus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Longer Survival and Preserved Liver Function after Proton Beam Therapy for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Takuto Nosaka, Hidetaka Matsuda, Ryotaro Sugata, Yu Akazawa, Kazuto Takahashi, Tatsushi Naito, Masahiro Ohtani, Kazuyuki Kinoshita, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Yoshitaka Sato, Yoshikazu Maeda, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Yasunari Nakamoto
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(4): 3915.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie biliärer Karzinome – Langversion
    Michael Bitzer, Sabrina Groß, Jörg Albert, Judit Boda-Heggemann, Thomas Brunner, Reiner Caspari, Enrico De Toni, Frank Dombrowski, Matthias Evert, Andreas Geier, Eleni Gkika, Martin Götz, Thomas Helmberger, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Peter Huppert, Achim Kau
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2023; 61(04): e92.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab
    Tae Hyun Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Yu Ri Cho, Young-Hwan Koh, Joong-Won Park
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(2): 330.     CrossRef
  • Current evidence and the potential role of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sung Uk Lee, Tae Hyun Kim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2023; 29(4): 958.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms
    Voesch Sabrina, Bitzer Michael, Albert Jörg, Bartenstein Peter, Bechstein Wolf, Blödt Susanne, Brunner Thomas, Dombrowski Frank, Evert Matthias, Follmann Markus, La Fougère Christian, Freudenberger Paul, Geier Andreas, Gkika Eleni, Götz Martin, Hammes Elk
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2022; 60(01): e56.     CrossRef
  • Proton Therapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Jana M. Kobeissi, Lara Hilal, Charles B. Simone, Haibo Lin, Christopher H. Crane, Carla Hajj
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2900.     CrossRef
  • Proton Beam Therapy for Treatment-Naïve Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Prognostic Significance of Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade
    Tae Hyun Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Yu Ri Cho, Young-Hwan Koh, Jung Won Chun, Eun Sang Oh, Do Yeul Lee, Sung Uk Lee, Yang-Gun Suh, Sang Myung Woo, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Woo Jin Lee
    Cancers.2022; 14(18): 4445.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Efficacy of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Tae Hyun Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Woo Jin Lee, Jung Won Chun, Yu Ri Cho, Bo Hyun Kim, Young-Hwan Koh, Sang Soo Kim, Eun Sang Oh, Do Yeul Lee, Sung Uk Lee, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Joong-Won Park
    Cancers.2022; 14(22): 5561.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Korean Journal of Radiology.2022; 23(12): 1126.     CrossRef
  • lncRNA MIR22HG-Derived miR-22-5p Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Increasing Histone Acetylation Through the Inhibition of HDAC2 Activity
    Qiao Jin, Hao Hu, Siqi Yan, Long Jin, Yuliang Pan, Xiangjun Li, Yayi Peng, Peiguo Cao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • External Beam Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Review of the Current Guidelines in the East and the West
    Sang Min Yoon
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2021; 21(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Role of modern radiotherapy in managing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang-Cheng Chen, Hon-Yi Lin, Shih-Kai Hung, Wen-Yen Chiou, Moon-Sing Lee
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(20): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of Proton Beam Therapy Use in Clinical Practice between 2007 and 2019 in Korea
    Sung Uk Lee, Kyungmi Yang, Sung Ho Moon, Yang-Gun Suh, Gyu Sang Yoo
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 935.     CrossRef
  • Current role of proton beam therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2021; 10(4): 175.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Liver Metastasis From Breast Cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Yeon-Joo Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Heejung Chae, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jai Hong Han, So Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han Sung Kang, Eun Sook Lee
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A phase 2 multicenter study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Safety and efficacy
    Won Il Jang, Sun Hyun Bae, Mi‐Sook Kim, Chul Ju Han, Su Cheol Park, Sang Bum Kim, Eung‐Ho Cho, Chul Won Choi, Kyung Su Kim, Sangyoun Hwang, Jin Ho Kim, A Ram Chang, Younghee Park, Eun Seog Kim, Woo Chul Kim, Sunmi Jo, Hae Jin Park
    Cancer.2020; 126(2): 363.     CrossRef
  • Phase II Study of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Tae Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Bo Hyun Kim, Eun Sang Oh, Sang Hee Youn, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee, Dae Yong Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase trial
    Tae Hyun Kim, Young Hwan Koh, Bo Hyun Kim, Min Ju Kim, Ju Hee Lee, Boram Park, Joong-Won Park
    Journal of Hepatology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Eun Sang Oh, Sang Hee Youn, Hye Young Jang, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A feasibility study of high-dose hypofractionated carbon ion radiation therapy using four fractions for localized hepatocellular carcinoma measuring 3 cm or larger
    Kei Shibuya, Tatsuya Ohno, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masahiko Okamoto, Shintaro Shiba, Yoshinori Koyama, Satoru Kakizaki, Ken Shirabe, Takashi Nakano
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2019; 132: 230.     CrossRef
  • Does Risk-Adapted Proton Beam Therapy Have a Role as a Complementary or Alternative Therapeutic Option for Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
    Tae Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Bo Hyun Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Kim
    Cancers.2019; 11(2): 230.     CrossRef
  • 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association–National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    KLCA Korean Liver Cancer Association, NCC National Cancer Center
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(3): 227.     CrossRef
  • Rethinking the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Data Driven Treatment Algorithm for Optimizing Outcomes
    Mutlay Sayan, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Stephanie H. Greco, Bin Gui, Andrew Zhang, Anupama Chundury, Miral S. Grandhi, Howard S. Hochster, Timothy J. Kennedy, Russell C. Langan, Usha Malhotra, Vinod K. Rustgi, Mihir M. Shah, Kristen R. Spencer, Darren R. Carpiz
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association–National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Korean Journal of Radiology.2019; 20(7): 1042.     CrossRef
  • Hypofractionated particle beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma–a brief review of clinical effectiveness
    Che-Yu Hsu, Chun-Wei Wang, Ann-Lii Cheng, Sung-Hsin Kuo
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2019; 11(8): 579.     CrossRef
  • Proton therapy: the current status of the clinical evidences
    Dongryul Oh
    Precision and Future Medicine.2019; 3(3): 91.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of publications on charged particle therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hiroshi Igaki, Masashi Mizumoto, Toshiyuki Okumura, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Norihiro Kokudo, Hideyuki Sakurai
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 23(3): 423.     CrossRef
  • Strategic application of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Seo Hee Choi, Jinsil Seong
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2018; 24(2): 114.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Hyunjung Kim, Eun Sang Oh, Ju Hee Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(28): 3090.     CrossRef
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Trends and Controversies
    Stephanie K. Schaub, Pehr E. Hartvigson, Michael I. Lock, Morten Høyer, Thomas B. Brunner, Higinia R. Cardenes, Laura A. Dawson, Edward Y. Kim, Nina A. Mayr, Simon S. Lo, Smith Apisarnthanarax
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Strahlentherapie bei hepatozellulärem Karzinom
    Thomas B. Brunner, Eleni Gkika, Christoph Willich, Maciej Pech, Peter Hass
    Der Onkologe.2018; 24(9): 698.     CrossRef
  • Proton Beam Therapy and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Smith Apisarnthanarax, Stephen R. Bowen, Stephanie E. Combs
    Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2018; 28(4): 309.     CrossRef
  • Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine
    Man Hu, Liyang Jiang, Xiangli Cui, Jianguang Zhang, Jinming Yu
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal time of tumour response evaluation and effectiveness of hypofractionated proton beam therapy for inoperable or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
    Tae Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park, Bo Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Ju Hee Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee, Chang-Min Kim
    Oncotarget.2018; 9(3): 4034.     CrossRef
  • Risk-adapted simultaneous integrated boost-proton beam therapy (SIB-PBT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumour vascular thrombosis
    Dae Yong Kim, Joong-Won Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Young-Hwan Koh, Woo Jin Lee, Chang-Min Kim
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2017; 122(1): 122.     CrossRef
  • Long‐term outcomes of proton beam therapy in patients with previously untreated hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kuniaki Fukuda, Toshiyuki Okumura, Masato Abei, Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu, Kazunori Ishige, Masashi Mizumoto, Naoyuki Hasegawa, Haruko Numajiri, Kayoko Ohnishi, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Koji Tsuboi, Hideyuki Sakurai, Ichinosuke Hyodo
    Cancer Science.2017; 108(3): 497.     CrossRef
  • Silencing the Girdin gene enhances radio-sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma via suppression of glycolytic metabolism
    Li Yu, Yifan Sun, Jingjing Li, Yan Wang, Yuxing Zhu, Yong Shi, Xiaojun Fan, Jianda Zhou, Ying Bao, Jie Xiao, Ke Cao, Peiguo Cao
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Rosanna H Yeung, Tobias R Chapman, Stephen R Bowen, Smith Apisarnthanarax
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2017; 17(10): 911.     CrossRef
  • Strategies to tackle the challenges of external beam radiotherapy for liver tumors
    Michael I Lock, Jonathan Klein, Hans T Chung, Joseph M Herman, Edward Y Kim, William Small, Nina A Mayr, Simon S Lo
    World Journal of Hepatology.2017; 9(14): 645.     CrossRef
  • External beam radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Omar Abdel-Rahman, Zeinab Elsayed
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic group stratification and nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients who received radiotherapy for abdominal lymph node metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 15-02)
    Youngkyong Kim, Hee Chul Park, Sang Min Yoon, Tae Hyun Kim, Jieun Lee, Jinhyun Choi, Jeong Il Yu, Jin-Hong Park, Jong Hoon Kim, Joong-Won Park, Jinsil Seong
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(55): 94450.     CrossRef
  • Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the University of Tsukuba Experience
    Masashi Mizumoto, Yoshiko Oshiro, Toshiyuki Okumura, Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu, Haruko Numajiri, Kayoko Ohnishi, Teruhito Aihara, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Koji Tsuboi, Hideyuki Sakurai
    International Journal of Particle Therapy.2016; 2(4): 570.     CrossRef
  • Proton Therapy Results in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma According to the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Staging System
    Francesco Dionisi, Maurizio Amichetti
    International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology.2015; 04(02): 96.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic indicators for radiotherapy of abdominal lymph node metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma
    Doo Yeul Lee, Joong-Won Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Ju Hee Lee, Bo Hyun Kim, Sang Myung Woo, Sang Soo Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Dae Yong Kim, Chang-Min Kim
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.2015; 191(11): 835.     CrossRef
  • 14,309 View
  • 130 Download
  • 53 Web of Science
  • 54 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP