Eun-Gyeong Lee, Hyok Jo Kang, Myong Cheol Lim, Boyoung Park, Soo Jin Park, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Sang-Yoon Park, Boram Park, Jungnam Joo, Jai Hong Han, Sun-Young Kong, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):280-288. Published online May 4, 2018
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate decision patterns to reduce the risks of BRCArelated breast and gynecologic cancers in carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. We found a change in risk-reducing (RR) management patterns after December 2012, when the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) of Korea began to pay for BRCA testing and riskreducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in pathogenic-variant carriers.
Materials and Methods
The study group consisted of 992 patients, including 705 with breast cancer (BC), 23 with ovarian cancer (OC), 10 with both, and 254 relatives of high-risk patients who underwent BRCA testing at the National Cancer Center of Korea from January 2008 to December 2016.We analyzed patterns of and factors in RR management.
Results
Of the 992 patients, 220 (22.2%) were carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. About 92.3% (203/220) had a family history of BC and/or OC,which significantly differed between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (p < 0.001). All 41 male carriers chose surveillance. Of the 179 female carriers, 59 of the 83 carriers (71.1%) with BC and the 39 of 79 unaffected carriers (49.4%) underwent RR management. None of the carriers affected with OC underwent RR management. Of the management types, RRSO had the highest rate (42.5%) of patient choice. The rate of RR surgery was significantly higher after 2013 than before 2013 (46.3% [74/160] vs. 31.6% [6/19], p < 0.001).
Conclusion
RRSO was the preferred management for carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. The most important factors in treatment choice were NHIS reimbursement and/or the severity of illness.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk-reducing decisions regarding germlineBRCApathogenic variant: focusing on the timing of genetic testing and RRSO Akiko Abe, Hidetaka Nomura, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayu Yunokawa, Arisa Ueki, Eri Habano, Hiromi Arakawa, Keika Kaneko, Yuko Minoura, Hitoshi Inari, Takayuki Ueno, Hiroyuki Kanao Journal of Medical Genetics.2024; 61(4): 392. CrossRef
BRCA Mutation Patients: Are There Other Predisposing Factors for Ovarian Cancer Occurrence? A Multicenter Retrospective Study Vera Loizzi, Michele Mongelli, Francesca Arezzo, Isabella Romagno, Gerardo Cazzato, Ondina Popescu, Francesco Legge, Paolo Trerotoli, Erica Silvestris, Anila Kardhashi, Gennaro Cormio Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.2024; 89(2): 87. CrossRef
Implementation of BRCA Test among Young Breast Cancer Patients in South Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study Yung-Huyn Hwang, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Il Yong Chung Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 802. CrossRef
Impact of the coverage of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by the national insurance system for women with BRCA pathogenic variants in Japan Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Teruyuki Yoshimitsu, Satoki Misaka, Atsushi Murakami, Tsuyoshi Matsumoto, Shiho Tsumura, Motoko Kanno, Yoichi Aoki, Sachiho Netsu, Makiko Omi, Terumi Tanigawa, Sanshiro Okamoto, Kohei Omatsu, Mayu Yunokawa, Hiro Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics of second primary breast cancer after ovarian cancer: a Korea central cancer registry retrospective study Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jiwon Lim, Hyeong In Ha, Myong Cheol Lim, Yoon Jung Chang, Young-Joo Won, So-Youn Jung Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Differences in Willingness to Undergo BRCA1/2 Testing and Risk Reducing Surgery among the General Public, Cancer Patients, and Healthcare Professionals: A Large Population-Based Survey Yoon Jung Chang, Seungyeon Cho, Jungnam Joo, Kum Hei Ryu, Sangwon Lee, Juhee Cho, Myong Cheol Lim, So-Youn Jung, Jai Hong Han, Eun Sook Lee, Sun-Young Kong Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(5): 818. CrossRef
Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon M.L. Riis Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 65: 102311. CrossRef
Disparities between Uptake of Germline BRCA1/2 Gene Tests and Implementation of Post-test Management Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Patients Young Min Hur, Jaehee Mun, Mi-Kyung Kim, Maria Lee, Yun Hwan Kim, Seung-Cheol Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical significance of gene polymorphisms for hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer (review of literature) D. I. Vodolazhsky, A. V. Mayakovskaya, A. V. Kubyshkin, K. A. Aliev, I. I. Fomochkina Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics.2021; 66(12): 760. CrossRef
Trends in Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Korean Carriers of the BRCA1/2 Mutation Sung Mi Jung, Jai Min Ryu, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Soo Park, Eunyoung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyun Jo Youn, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Jisun Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Sang Ah Han, Dongwon Kim, Sung-Won Kim Journal of Breast Cancer.2020; 23(6): 647. CrossRef
PURPOSE The Mesima-Ex is a kind of biologic response modifier, which is extracted from a mushroom called Phellinus linteus. Mesima-Ex consists of various chemical compounds which include protein bound polysaccharide, mucoprotein, triterpenoid, and quinones. Mesima-Ex exerts its antitumor effects by augmenting host immune response without any toxic side effects. In vitro study, Mesima-Ex seems to potentiates antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and cell mediated cytotoxicity (CMI) against tumor cells. We initiated this study to verify antitumor effects of Mesima-Ex as an antineoplastic agent. MATERIALS AND METHOD Gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection with normal hepatic and renal function were eligible. They were divided into two groups by random number table. One group (N=30: Mesima-Ex group) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU (500 mg/m2 weekly), adriamycin (40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and Mesima-Ex (6 cap daily per Os). Another group (N=37: control group) received 5-FU and adriamycin only without Mesima-Ex. NK (natural killer cell) activity, ADCC (antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity), CD4 , and CD8 cells were measured and an analysis of disease free survival rate of the two study groups was performed. RESULTS Sixty seven patients were enrolled in this study.
Their median age was 55 years old. NK activity (basal activity: 25%) was enhanced significantly at the 2nd, and 4th months in the Mesima-Ex group (28.9%, 43.4%, p<0.05).
ADCC was also enhanced from 37% to 42.1% at the 2nd month in the Mesima-Ex group (p<0.05). The control group did not show any significant change in NK activity or ADCC. The CD4 cell ratio was increased from 37% to 42.1% at the 2nd months in the Mesima-Ex group but not in the control group (p<0.05).
There was no significant change in CD8 subsets (p>0.05).
There were no toxic side effects more than grade III from Mesima-Ex administration. The two year disease free survival rate was higher in the Mesima-Ex group than that of the control group (77% vs 58%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION Mesima-Ex can be used safely as an immunomodulator with standard chemotherapeutic agents for purpose of adjuvant chemotherapy. Mesima-Ex was effective in augmenting host immune response in vitro. The Mesima-Ex group showed a higher two year disease free survival rate than that of the control group.