Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Sang-Hoon Ahn"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Survival Rates of Patients with Gastric Cancer According to Age and Sex: A Large-Scale Study Using Data from 14,739 Patients
Yonghoon Choi, Nayoung Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Hyeong Ho Jo, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Hye Seung Lee, Yu Kyung Jun, Hyuk Yoon, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee, So Hyun Kang, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Do Joong Park, Hyung Ho Kim, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Won Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Won Chang, Yoon Jin Lee, Kyoung Ho Lee, Young Hoon Kim
Received February 9, 2025  Accepted April 15, 2025  Published online April 16, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.149    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The male predominance in the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is established; however, sex differences in the prognosis of GC remain controversial. As such, this study analyzed the prognosis of patients with GC based on age and sex.
Materials and Methods
Data from 14,739 patients diagnosed with GC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2023 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, histological types of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates (age and stage stratification), and associated risk factors were analyzed.
Results
Females were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and exhibited more gastric body cancers (p < 0.001) and tumors with diffuse-type or poorly differentiated histology (p < 0.001) than males. Females exhibited an advantage over males in terms of overall survival (p=0.004), but not in GC-specific survival. However, age stratification revealed significant sex differences, that females < 50 years of age exhibited survival disadvantages (p < 0.001); however, this trend was reversed with age, and females > 60 years exhibited survival advantages (p < 0.001) for both overall and GC-specific survival. This may be explained by the lower ratio of diffuse-type GC as females age. Furthermore, in the analysis according to stage, females with stage IV disease exhibited significant survival disadvantages, with significantly younger age and a higher proportion of diffuse-type GC which exhibits aggressive features, resulting in poorer survival than in males.
Conclusion
Age and stage stratification revealed significant differences in survival between the sexes, which can be helpful for public health strategies.
  • 187 View
  • 16 Download
Close layer
Detection Ability of Quality of Life Changes and Responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 and the EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparative Study
Bang Wool Eom, Keun Won Ryu, Ji Yeong An, Yun-Suhk Suh, In Cho, Sung Geun Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Hoon Hur, Hyung-Ho Kim, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Hong Man Yoon, Ki Bum Park, Hyoung-Il Kim, In-Gyu Kwon, Han-Kwang Yang, Byoung-Jo Suh, Sang-Ho Jeong, Tae-Han Kim, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hye-Seong Ahn, Ji Yeon Park, Ki Young Yoon, Myoung Won Son, Seong-Ho Kong, Young-Gil Son, Geum Jong Song, Jong Hyuk Yun, Jung-Min Bae, Do Joong Park, Sol Lee, Jun-Young Yang, Kyung Won Seo, You-Jin Jang, So Hyun Kang, Joongyub Lee, Hyuk-Joon Lee, on behalf of KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)
Received November 20, 2024  Accepted February 28, 2025  Published online March 5, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.1104    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ).
Materials and Methods
A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire.
Results
Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and 0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ.
Conclusion
KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
  • 518 View
  • 25 Download
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Gastric Cancer with Bone Metastasis
Sujin Oh, Soo Kyung Nam, Keun-Wook Lee, Hye Seung Lee, Yujun Park, Yoonjin Kwak, Kyu Sang Lee, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Won Kim, Minsu Kang, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Do Joong Park, Hyung Ho Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):219-237.   Published online August 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.340
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Bone metastasis (BM) adversely affects the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). We investigated molecular features and immune microenvironment that characterize GC with BM compared to GC without BM.
Materials and Methods
Targeted DNA and whole transcriptome sequencing were performed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissues (gastrectomy specimens) of 50 GC cases with distant metastases (14 with BM and 36 without BM). In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mucin-12 and multiplex IHC for immune cell markers were performed.
Results
Most GC cases with BM had a histologic type of poorly cohesive carcinoma and showed worse overall survival (OS) than GC without BM (p < 0.05). GC with BM tended to have higher mutation rates in TP53, KDR, APC, KDM5A, and RHOA than GC without BM. Chief cell-enriched genes (PGA3, PGC, and LIPF), MUC12, MFSD4A, TSPAN7, and TRIM50 were upregulated in GC with BM compared to GC without BM, which was correlated with poor OS (p < 0.05). However, the expression of SERPINA6, SLC30A2, PMAIP1, and ITIH2 were downregulated in GC with BM. GC with BM was associated with PIK3/AKT/mTOR pathway activation, whereas GC without BM showed the opposite effect. The densities of helper, cytotoxic, and regulatory T cells did not differ between the two groups, whereas the densities of macrophages were lower in GC with BM (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
GC with BM had different gene mutation and expression profiles than GC without BM, and had more genetic alterations associated with a poor prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Targeted Sequencing in Gastric Cancer: Association with Tumor Molecular Characteristics and FLOT Therapy Effectiveness
    Liudmila V. Spirina, Alexandra V. Avgustinovich, Olga V. Bakina, Sergey G. Afanas’ev, Maxim Yu. Volkov, Sergey V. Vtorushin, Irina V. Kovaleva, Tatyana S. Klyushina, Igor O. Munkuev
    Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2024; 46(2): 1281.     CrossRef
  • SLC30A2-Mediated Zinc Metabolism Modulates Gastric Cancer Progression via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway
    Fan Li, Xiaohong Zhang, Li Feng, Xingxing Zhang
    Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast: A case report and literature review
    Xi Cao, Yongchao Luo, Songjie Shen, Xinyu Ren
    Oncology Letters.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,538 View
  • 232 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Development and Validation of Models to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer Using Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting Machine Methods
Hae Dong Lee, Kyung Han Nam, Cheol Min Shin, Hye Seung Lee, Young Hoon Chang, Hyuk Yoon, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Hyung-Ho Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1240-1249.   Published online March 21, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1330
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
To identify important features of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and develop a prediction model for early gastric cancer (EGC) using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) method.
Materials and Methods
The clinicopathologic data of 2556 patients with EGC who underwent gastrectomy were used as training set and the internal validation set (set 1) at a ratio of 8:2. Additionally, 548 patients with EGC who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the initial treatment were included in the external validation set (set 2). The GBM model was constructed, and its performance was compared with that of the Japanese guidelines.
Results
LNM was identified in 12.6% (321/2556) of the gastrectomy group (training set & set 1) and 4.3% (24/548) of the ESD group (set 2). In the GBM analysis, the top five features that most affected LNM were lymphovascular invasion, depth, differentiation, size, and location. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics of set 1 were 0.566, 0.922, 0.516, and 0.867, while those of set 2 were 0.810, 0.958, 0.803, and 0.944, respectively. When the sensitivity of GBM was adjusted to that of Japanese guidelines (beyond the expanded criteria in set 1 [0.922] and eCuraC-2 in set 2 [0.958]), the specificities of GBM in sets 1 and 2 were 0.516 (95% confidence interval, 0.502-0.523) and 0.803 (0.795-0.805), while those of the Japanese guidelines were 0.502 (0.488-0.509) and 0.788 (0.780-0.790), respectively.
Conclusion
The GBM model showed good performance comparable with the eCura system in predicting LNM risk in EGCs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Establishment of a machine learning model for predicting splenic hilar lymph node metastasis
    Kenichi Ishizu, Satoshi Takahashi, Nobuji Kouno, Ken Takasawa, Katsuji Takeda, Kota Matsui, Masashi Nishino, Tsutomu Hayashi, Yukinori Yamagata, Shigeyuki Matsui, Takaki Yoshikawa, Ryuji Hamamoto
    npj Digital Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications
    Runze Li, Jingfan Li, Yuman Wang, Xiaoyu Liu, Weichao Xu, Runxue Sun, Binqing Xue, Xinqian Zhang, Yikun Ai, Yanru Du, Jianming Jiang
    Cancer Cell International.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a Chinese single-centre study with external validation in an Asian American population
    Qian Li, Shangcheng Yan, Weiran Yang, Zhuan Du, Ming Cheng, Renwei Chen, Qiankun Shao, Yuan Tian, Mengchao Sheng, Wei Peng, Yongyou Wu
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(3): e098476.     CrossRef
  • Intratumoural and peritumoural CT-based radiomics for diagnosing lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma in patients with pure ground-glass nodules: a machine learning approach
    Y. Zou, Q. Mao, Z. Zhao, X. Zhou, Y. Pan, Z. Zuo, W. Zhang
    Clinical Radiology.2024; 79(2): e211.     CrossRef
  • eCura and W-eCura: different scores, different populations, same goal
    Rui Morais, Diogo Libanio, João Santos-Antunes
    Gut.2024; 73(11): e29.     CrossRef
  • A machine learning model for predicting the lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer not meeting the endoscopic curability criteria
    Minoru Kato, Yoshito Hayashi, Ryotaro Uema, Takashi Kanesaka, Shinjiro Yamaguchi, Akira Maekawa, Takuya Yamada, Masashi Yamamoto, Shinji Kitamura, Takuya Inoue, Shunsuke Yamamoto, Takashi Kizu, Risato Takeda, Hideharu Ogiyama, Katsumi Yamamoto, Kenji Aoi,
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1069.     CrossRef
  • The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Guide
    Amin Zadeh Shirazi, Morteza Tofighi, Alireza Gharavi, Guillermo A. Gomez
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Analysis of Different Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma and Pulmonary Inflammatory Pseudotumor
    An-Lin Zhang, Yan-Mei Fu, Zhi-Yang He
    Iranian Journal of Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening of gastric cancer diagnostic biomarkers in the homologous recombination signaling pathway and assessment of their clinical and radiomic correlations
    Ahao Wu, Tengcheng Hu, Chao Lai, Qingwen Zeng, Lianghua Luo, Xufeng Shu, Pan Huang, Zhonghao Wang, Zongfeng Feng, Yanyan Zhu, Yi Cao, Zhengrong Li
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5,489 View
  • 224 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Development and Validation of a Symptom-Focused Quality of Life Questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy
Bang Wool Eom, Joongyub Lee, In Seob Lee, Young-Gil Son, Keun Won Ryu, Sung Geun Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Young-Woo Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Ji-Ho Park, Ji Yeong An, Chang Hyun Kim, Byoung-Jo Suh, Hong Man Yoon, Myoung Won Son, Ji Yeon Park, Jong-Min Park, Sang-Ho Jeong, Moon-Won Yoo, Geum Jong Song, Han-Kwang Yang, Yun-Suhk Suh, Ki Bum Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Dong Woo Shin, Ye Seob Jee, Hye-Seong Ahn, Sol Lee, Jae Seok Min, Haejin In, Ahyoung Kim, Hoon Hur, Hyuk-Joon Lee, on behalf of KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(3):763-772.   Published online December 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1270
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Patients who have undergone gastrectomy have unique symptoms that are not appropriately assessed using currently available tools. This study developed and validated a symptom-focused quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for patients who have received gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods Based on a literature review, patient interviews, and expert consultation by the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS), the initial item pool was developed. Two large-scale developmental studies were then sequentially conducted for exploratory factor analyses for content validity and item reduction. The final item pool was validated in a separate cohort of patients and assessed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and clinical validity.
Results
The initial questionnaire consisted of 46-items in 12 domains. Data from 465 patients at 11 institutions, followed by 499 patients at 13 institutions, were used to conduct item reduction and exploratory factor analyses. The final questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) comprised 40 items within 11 domains. Validation of KOQUSS-40 was conducted on 413 patients from 12 hospitals. KOQUSS-40 was found to have good model fit. The mean summary score of the KOQUSS-40 was correlated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22 (correlation coefficients, 0.821 and 0.778, respectively). The KOQUSS-40 score was also correlated with clinical factors, and had acceptable internal consistency (> 0.7). Test-retest reliability was greater than 0.8. Conclusion The KOQUSS-40 can be used to assess QoL of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy and allows for a robust comparison of surgical techniques in clinical trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Function Preserving Gastrectomy and Quality of Life
    Jeesun Kim, Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025; 25(1): 247.     CrossRef
  • Is Braun Jejunojejunostomy Necessary? Comparison Between Billroth-II Alone and Billroth-II With Braun Anastomosis After Distal Gastrectomy
    Jane Chungyoon Kim, Min Jung Lee, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Kyoyoung Park, Min Kyu Kang, Sa-Hong Kim, Chun Zhuang, Abdullah Almayouf, Ma. Jeanesse C. Bernardo, Jeesun Kim, Yo-Seok Cho, Seong-Ho Kong, Soo-Jeong Cho, Do Joong Park, Han-Kwang Yang
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025; 25(2): 318.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Pylorus-preserving Gastrectomy Versus Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer
    Hyuk-Joon Lee, Young-Woo Kim, Do Joong Park, Sang Uk Han, Keun Won Ryu, Hyung-Ho Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Ji-Ho Park, Yun-Suhk Suh, Oh-Kyung Kwon, Wook Kim, Young-Kyu Park, Hong Man Yoon, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Seong-Ho Kong, Han-Kwang Yang
    Annals of Surgery.2025; 281(4): 573.     CrossRef
  • Prospective Multicenter Observational Study on Postoperative Quality of Life According to Type of Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Sung Eun Oh, Yun-Suhk Suh, Ji Yeong An, Keun Won Ryu, In Cho, Sung Geun Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Hoon Hur, Hyung-Ho Kim, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Hong Man Yoon, Ki Bum Park, Hyoung-Il Kim, In Gyu Kwon, Han-Kwang Yang, Byoung-Jo Suh, Sang-Ho Jeong, Tae-Han Ki
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025; 25(2): 382.     CrossRef
  • Global status of research on gastrointestinal cancer patients’ quality of life: A bibliometric and visual analysis from 2003 to 2023
    Xiaoqin Wang, Caihua Wang, Wenjin Han, Jiaru Sun, Zhaozhao Hui, Shuangyan Lei, Huili Wu, Xiaohong Liu
    Heliyon.2024; 10(1): e23377.     CrossRef
  • Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy
    Ji-Hyeon Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, JeeSun Kim, Yo-Seok Cho, Sunjoo Lee, Seongmin Park, Hwinyeong Choe, Eunhwa Song, Youngran Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Do Joong Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Han-Kwang Yang
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2024; 24(4): 420.     CrossRef
  • REsolution of Symptoms afTer Oesophago-gastric cancer REsection delphi (RESTOREd)—standardizing the definition, investigation and management of gastrointestinal symptoms and conditions after surgery
    Ben E Byrne, Kwabena Siaw-Acheampong, Orla Evans, Joanna Taylor, Fiona Huddy, Magnus Nilsson, Ewen A Griffiths, Donald Low, James Gossage, Jason Dunn, Sebastian Zeki, Sheraz Markar, Kerry Avery, Jane M Blazeby, Andrew Cockbain, Charlotte Moss, Mieke van H
    British Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Four Main Gastrectomy Procedures for Proximal Gastric Cancer on Patient Quality of Life: A Nationwide Multi-Institutional Study
    Koji Nakada, Akitoshi Kimura, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Nobue Futawatari, Kazunari Misawa, Kuniaki Aridome, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Kazuaki Tanabe, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Atsushi Oshio, Yasuhiro Kodera
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life after gastric cancer surgery
    Jae Kyun Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Foregut Surgery.2023; 3(2): 27.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Functional and Patient-reported Outcomes Between Intra-corporeal Delta-shaped Gastroduodenostomy and Gastrojejunostomy After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy
    Sin Hye Park, Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Young-Woo Kim, Mira Han, Bang Wool Eom
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(4): 561.     CrossRef
  • Potential Applicability of Local Resection With Prophylactic Left Gastric Artery Basin Dissection for Early-Stage Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach
    Yoshimasa Akashi, Koichi Ogawa, Katsuji Hisakura, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Yusuke Ohara, Yohei Owada, Shinji Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Osamu Shimomura, Manami Doi, Yoshihiro Miyazaki, Kinji Furuya, Shoko Moue, Tatsuya Oda
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(3): 184.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences
    Alison Rowsell, Samantha C. Sodergren, Vassilios Vassiliou, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Marianne G. Guren, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Chantelle Moorbey, Kristopher Dennis, Mitsumi Terada
    Gastric Cancer.2022; 25(4): 665.     CrossRef
  • Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms following surgery for gastric cancer and the relative risk factors
    Rui Xu, Qiong Gu, Shuomeng Xiao, Ping Zhao, Zhi Ding
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing survival rates, quality of life and nutritional status between advanced gastric cancer patients with different follow-up intensities: study protocol for the STOFOLUP trial
    Bang Wool Eom, Dong-Hoe Koo, Ji Yeong An, Han Hong Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hoon Hur, Moon-Won Yoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Su Mi Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Jae Seok Min, Kyung Won Seo, Sang-Ho Jeong, Oh Jeong, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Seung Wan Ryu, Chang Hak Yoo, Jae Moon
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(12): e056187.     CrossRef
  • 9,544 View
  • 338 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
PD-L1 Testing in Gastric Cancer by the Combined Positive Score of the 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assay with Clinically Relevant Cut-offs
Yujun Park, Jiwon Koh, Hee Young Na, Yoonjin Kwak, Keun-Wook Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(3):661-670.   Published online January 10, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.718
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
We provide a comparison between 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assay, for evaluating programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Materials and Methods
The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry by 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed in the center of the tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) in 379 GC tissues using tissue microarrays and interpreted as combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS). Of the total samples, 55 samples were independently reviewed by five pathologists.
Results
The two assays showed a high correlation in both the CPS and TPS. At a CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, 219 (57.8%) and 231 (60.9%) GCs were positive for PD-L1 with the 22C3 and SP263 assays, and at ≥ 10 cut-off, 37 (9.8%) and 36 (9.5%) GCs were positive, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) was greater than 90% with CPS ≥ 1 and ≥ 10 cut-offs, and TPS ≥ 1% and ≥ 10% cut-offs. There was higher OPA between the two assays with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (99.2%) than ≥ 1 (94.7%). The percent agreement between the CT and IM was higher with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (92.9%) than ≥ 1 (77.6%). Patient with positive expression at CPS ≥ 5 cut-off had a significantly better outcomes in both assays. Interobserver variability among five pathologists was higher than the assay variability.
Conclusion
Two assays for PD-L1 expression in GC showed high agreement. These results provide guidance for selecting eligible patients with GC for pembrolizumab treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • PD-L1 as a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy
    Yunjoo Cho, Soomin Ahn, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025; 25(1): 177.     CrossRef
  • CT radiomics-based intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity indicators for prognosis prediction in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Jiazheng Li, Zhenhui Li, Yinkui Wang, Yuzhuo Li, Jing Zhang, Ziyu Li, Lei Tang
    European Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP)
    Maria Alsina Maqueda, Ana Teijo Quintáns, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Maria Jesús Fernández Aceñero, Ana Fernández Montes, Carlos Gómez Martín, Paula Jiménez Fonseca, Carolina Martínez Ciarpaglini, Fernando Rivera Herrero, Mar Iglesias Coma
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment Selection for Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer Expressing Claudin 18.2 and PD-L1
    Yusuke Miyajima, Takeshi Kawakami
    Cancers.2025; 17(7): 1120.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of phase III trials including unreported PD-L1 subgroups
    Choong-kun Lee, Sejung Park, Yaeji Lee, Choa Yun, Moonki Hong, Chung Mo Nam, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha
    Cancer Letters.2025; 623: 217718.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Promising Early Signal?
    Mojun Zhu, Harry H. Yoon
    Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 42(4): 373.     CrossRef
  • Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) clone 22C3 expression in resected colorectal cancer as companion diagnostics for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A comparison study and inter-rater agreement evaluation across proposed cut-offs and predictive (TPS, C
    Dordi Lea, Claudia Zaharia, Kjetil Søreide
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2024; 38: 100788.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between high ratios of CD4/FOXP3 and CD8/CD163 and the improved survivability of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study
    Jeffry Beta Tenggara, Andhika Rachman, Joedo Prihartono, Lisnawati Rachmadi, Sonar Soni Panigoro, Didik Setyo Heriyanto, Noorwati Sutandyo, Intan Russianna Nasution, Familia Bella Rahadiati, Ricci Steven, Rachelle Betsy, Samuel Juanputra, Aru Wisaksono Su
    BMC Research Notes.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Who Should Receive Immunotherapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer?
    Suhaib Khateeb, Ludimila Cavalcante, Noor Alnairat, Meghana Singh, Ibrahim Halil Sahin, Azhar Saeed, Anwaar Saeed
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2024; 25(4): 496.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression in Colorectal Carcinomas by Comparing Scoring Methods and Their Significance in Relation to Clinicopathologic Parameters
    Mirela Frančina, Mislav Mikuš, Marin Mamić, Tihomir Jovanović, Mario Ćorić, Božica Lovrić, Ivan Vukoja, Goran Zukanović, Kristijan Matković, Jasmina Rajc, Ferdinand Slišurić, Mateja Jurić-Marelja, Goran Augustin, Ilijan Tomaš
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 1007.     CrossRef
  • The tumor immune composition of mismatch repair deficient and Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric cancer: A systematic review
    J. Bos, T.S. Groen-van Schooten, C.P. Brugman, F.S. Jamaludin, H.W.M. van Laarhoven, S. Derks
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2024; 127: 102737.     CrossRef
  • Discordant PD-L1 results between 28–8 and 22C3 assays are associated with outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy
    Hyung-Don Kim, Jinho Shin, In Hye Song, Jaewon Hyung, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Soo Park
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(4): 819.     CrossRef
  • Claudin-18 status and its correlation with HER2 and PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination
    Haruki Ogawa, Hiroyuki Abe, Koichi Yagi, Yasuyuki Seto, Tetsuo Ushiku
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(4): 802.     CrossRef
  • Interpretation of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: summary of a consensus meeting of Korean gastrointestinal pathologists
    Soomin Ahn, Yoonjin Kwak, Gui Young Kwon, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Moonsik Kim, Hyunki Kim, Young Soo Park, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Kyoungyul Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Hye Seung Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2024; 58(3): 103.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry in Gastric Cancer: Comparison of Combined Positive Score and Tumor Area Positivity Across 28-8, 22C3, and SP263 Assays
    Samuel J. Klempner, Eric S. Cowden, Samuel L. Cytryn, Matteo Fassan, Hisato Kawakami, Hideaki Shimada, Laura H. Tang, Daniel-Christoph Wagner, Yasushi Yatabe, Alexander Savchenko, Jennifer Salcius, Dorhyun Johng, Jing Chen, Giuliana Montenegro, Markus Moe
    JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 expression in squamous cervical carcinomas of Mozambican women living with or without HIV
    Lucília Lovane, Satish Tulsidás, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing population
    Feiyang Zhang, Guoming Chen, Yixin Yin, Xiaojiang Chen, Runcong Nie, Yingbo Chen
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Concordance of PD-L1 status in primary gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and matched peritoneal metastases: a single institution study
    V. Massa, F. Signorini, F. Salani, M.E. Filice, G. Grelli, P. Lippolis, P. Faviana, V. Genovesi, S. Santi, C. Vivaldi, S. Cesario, A. Bertolucci, C. Cremolini, V. Nardini, G. Masi, C. Ugolini, L. Fornaro
    ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 5: 100089.     CrossRef
  • A Phase 1a/1b Dose Escalation/Expansion Study of the Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Nofazinlimab in Chinese Patients with Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
    Jifang Gong, Ye Guo, Yanqiao Zhang, Yi Ba, Tong Chen, Wei Li, Caicun Zhou, Mengzhao Wang, Haiyan Yang, Yuhong Zhou, Qiqing Cai, Ziping Wang, Gang Huang, Wei Zhang, Rila Su, Zhongheng Cai, Zenglian Yue, Jinzhou Dou, Peiqi Li, Rachel Wu, Archie N. Tse, Lin
    Targeted Oncology.2024; 19(5): 723.     CrossRef
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a series of patient-level meta-analyses in different programmed death-ligand 1 subgroups
    A.G. Leone, A.S. Mai, K.Y. Fong, D.W.T. Yap, K. Kato, E. Smyth, M. Moehler, J.T.C. Seong, R. Sundar, J.J. Zhao, F. Pietrantonio
    ESMO Open.2024; 9(11): 103962.     CrossRef
  • HIPEC for Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Moving the Needle Towards 3-Year Survival
    Neal Bhutiani, Y. David Seo, Kristen A. Robinson, Michael G. White, Naruhiko Ikoma, Paul F. Mansfield, Jenny J. Li, Mariela Blum Murphy, Jaffer A. Ajani, Brian D. Badgwell
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; : 108790.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Personalized Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer
    Moonsik Kim, Ji Yun Jeong, An Na Seo
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2782.     CrossRef
  • Development of an automated combined positive score prediction pipeline using artificial intelligence on multiplexed immunofluorescence images
    Abhishek Vahadane, Shreya Sharma, Devraj Mandal, Madan Dabbeeru, Josephine Jakthong, Miguel Garcia-Guzman, Shantanu Majumdar, Chung-Wein Lee
    Computers in Biology and Medicine.2023; 152: 106337.     CrossRef
  • CT-based delta radiomics in predicting the prognosis of stage IV gastric cancer to immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Jiazheng Li, Zifan Chen, Yang Chen, Jie Zhao, Meng He, Xiaoting Li, Li Zhang, Bin Dong, Xiaotian Zhang, Lei Tang, Lin Shen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer based on clinical characteristics: a meta-analysis
    Gengwei Huo, Wenjie Liu, Peng Chen
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical relevance of PD-1 positive CD8 T-cells in gastric cancer
    Joan Choo, Ley Fang Kua, Mu Yar Soe, Bernadette Reyna Asuncion, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Chong Boon Teo, Ryan Yong Kiat Tay, Jimmy So, Asim Shabbir, Kim Guowei, Hon Lyn Tan, Gloria Chan, Haoran Ma, Gokula Krishnan Ramachandran, Jeffrey H. Y. Lum, Cheng Ean C
    Gastric Cancer.2023; 26(3): 393.     CrossRef
  • Genetic and immune microenvironment characterization of HER2‐positive gastric cancer: Their association with response to trastuzumab‐based treatment
    Hyun Jung Kwon, Yujun Park, Soo Kyung Nam, Enoch Kang, Ka‐Kyung Kim, Inhae Jeong, Yoonjin Kwak, Jeesun Yoon, Tae‐Yong Kim, Keun‐Wook Lee, Do‐Youn Oh, Seock‐Ah Im, Seong‐Ho Kong, Do Joong Park, Hyuk‐Joon Lee, Hyung‐Ho Kim, Han‐Kwang Yang, Hye Seung Lee
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(9): 10371.     CrossRef
  • High Interobserver Variability Among Pathologists Using Combined Positive Score to Evaluate PD-L1 Expression in Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Marie E. Robert, Josef Rüschoff, Bharat Jasani, Rondell P. Graham, Sunil S. Badve, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Liudmila L. Kodach, Amitabh Srivastava, Hanlin L. Wang, Laura H. Tang, Giancarlo Troncone, Federico Rojo, Benjamin J. Van Treeck, James Pratt, Iryna
    Modern Pathology.2023; 36(5): 100154.     CrossRef
  • Heterogeneous distribution pattern of CD3+ tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes (TILs) and high combined positive score (CPS) favored the prognosis of resected early stage small-cell lung cancer
    Liang Zhu, Guoping Cheng, Meijuan Wu, Ming Chen, Ying Jin
    Translational Oncology.2023; 34: 101697.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Immunotherapy in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer
    Hans Dedecker, Laure-Anne Teuwen, Timon Vandamme, Andreas Domen, Hans Prenen
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2023; 22(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • Tissue- and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for immunotherapy in breast cancer
    Luca Licata, Marco Mariani, Federico Rossari, Giulia Viale, Giulia Notini, Matteo Maria Naldini, Carlo Bosi, Marta Piras, Matteo Dugo, Giampaolo Bianchini
    The Breast.2023; 69: 330.     CrossRef
  • PD‐L1andHLA‐class I expression status and their therapeutic implication in oesophageal small‐cell carcinoma
    Satoshi Yamashita, Hiroyuki Abe, Hiroharu Yamashita, Koichi Yagi, Yasuyuki Seto, Tetsuo Ushiku
    Histopathology.2023; 83(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and overall survival in Thai patients with gastric cancer
    Taned Chitapanarux, Pawut Gumrai, Sarawut Kongkarnka, Komson Wannasai, Nirush Lertprasertsuke
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Pd-1/Pd-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer Based on Characteristics: A Meta-Analysis
    Wenjie Liu, Gengwei Huo, Peng Chen
    Immunotherapy.2023; 15(10): 751.     CrossRef
  • Immunology and immunotherapy in gastric cancer
    Xiaqing Xu, Jiaxing Chen, Wenxing Li, Chenlu Feng, Qian Liu, Wenfang Gao, Meng He
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2023; 23(7): 3189.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Therapies and Developing Precision Medicine in Gastric Cancer
    Rille Pihlak, Caroline Fong, Naureen Starling
    Cancers.2023; 15(12): 3248.     CrossRef
  • Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in gastric cancer: literature review
    T. N. Sotnikova, N. V. Danilova, P. G. Malkov, T. V. Polushkina
    Advances in Molecular Oncology.2023; 10(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Novel Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer: Current Research and Future Perspectives
    Yasushi Sato, Koichi Okamoto, Yutaka Kawano, Akinari Kasai, Tomoyuki Kawaguchi, Tamotsu Sagawa, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Tetsuji Takayama
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(14): 4646.     CrossRef
  • Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in primary gastric adenocarcinoma and matched metastases
    Drolaiz H. W. Liu, Heike I. Grabsch, Beat Gloor, Rupert Langer, Bastian Dislich
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(14): 13345.     CrossRef
  • Chemoimmunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma—Summary and discussion of recent clinical trials
    Zhen Zhang, Jiaqian Huang, Yuhong Xu, Huiyan Luo
    MedComm – Future Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Next generation immuno-oncology biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer: what does the future hold?
    Hassan Abushukair, Obada Ababneh, Ayah Al-Bzour, Ibrahim Halil Sahin, Anwaar Saeed
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.2023; 23(10): 863.     CrossRef
  • Impact of programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) positivity on clinical and molecular features of patients with metastatic gastric cancer
    Minkyue Shin, Soomin Ahn, Jaeyun Jung, Sujin Hyung, Kyoung‐Mee Kim, Seung Tae Kim, Won Ki Kang, Jeeyun Lee
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(18): 18633.     CrossRef
  • Regulatory T cells in gastric cancer: Key controllers from pathogenesis to therapy
    Ion Negura, Mariana Pavel-Tanasa, Mihai Danciu
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2023; 120: 102629.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic value of a combined immune score in tumor and immune cells assessed by immunohistochemistry in triple-negative breast cancer
    Ji Eun Choi, Jae Seok Lee, Min-Sun Jin, Ilias P. Nikas, Kwangsoo Kim, Sunah Yang, Soo Young Park, Jiwon Koh, Sohyeon Yang, Seock-Ah Im, Han Suk Ryu
    Breast Cancer Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of SP142 and 22C3 Immunohistochemistry PD-L1 Assays for Clinical Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the Randomized OAK Trial
    Shirish Gadgeel, Fred R. Hirsch, Keith Kerr, Fabrice Barlesi, Keunchil Park, Achim Rittmeyer, Wei Zou, Namrata Bhatia, Hartmut Koeppen, Sarah M. Paul, David Shames, Jing Yi, Christina Matheny, Marcus Ballinger, Mark McCleland, David R. Gandara
    Clinical Lung Cancer.2022; 23(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Adrenal Nodules Detected at Staging CT in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancers Have a Low Incidence of Malignancy
    Hae Young Kim, Won Chang, Yoon Jin Lee, Ji Hoon Park, Jungheum Cho, Hee Young Na, Hyungwoo Ahn, Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee, Young Hoon Kim, Kyoung Ho Lee
    Radiology.2022; 302(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemistry as predictive and prognostic markers for gastrointestinal malignancies
    Matthew W. Rosenbaum, Raul S. Gonzalez
    Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology.2022; 39(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Histopathology of Gastrointestinal Immune-related Adverse Events
    M. Lisa Zhang, Vikram Deshpande
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2022; 46(1): e15.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of HER2 blockade by trastuzumab-based chemotherapy-containing combination strategies in HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
    D.V.T. Catenacci, H.C. Chung, L. Shen, M. Moehler, H.H. Yoon, M.K. Rosales, Y.-K. Kang
    ESMO Open.2022; 7(1): 100360.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 and HER2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma and their prognostic significance
    Jie Lian, Guanjun Zhang, Yun Zhang, Heng Liu, Jiaojiao Zhang, Pengfei Nan, Wei Tian
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(10): 1419.     CrossRef
  • Tissue miR-200c-3p and circulating miR-1290 as potential prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer
    Enoch Kang, Sung Cheol Jung, Soo Kyung Nam, Yujun Park, Soo Hyun Seo, Kyoung Un Park, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hye Seung Lee
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastric Cancer: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches
    Sangjoon Choi, Sujin Park, Hyunjin Kim, So Young Kang, Soomin Ahn, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Biomedicines.2022; 10(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy use in oesophagogastric cancers—a review of the literature
    Annabel Smith, Amitesh Roy, Christos S. Karapetis, Vy Broadbridge, Timothy Price
    British Journal of Cancer.2022; 127(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Interspatial Distribution of Tumor and Immune Cells in Correlation with PD-L1 in Molecular Subtypes of Gastric Cancers
    Bastian Dislich, Kirsten D. Mertz, Beat Gloor, Rupert Langer
    Cancers.2022; 14(7): 1736.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy in Gastro-Oesophageal Cancer: Current Practice and the Future of Personalised Therapy
    Mary E. Booth, Elizabeth C. Smyth
    BioDrugs.2022; 36(4): 473.     CrossRef
  • Anlotinib Combined with Toripalimab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced, Relapsed Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma
    Man Jiang, Chuantao Zhang, Yabin Hu, Tianjun Li, Guangjie Yang, Guanqun Wang, Jingjuan Zhu, Changfeng Shao, Helei Hou, Na Zhou, Kewei Liu, Xiaochun Zhang
    The Oncologist.2022; 27(11): e856.     CrossRef
  • Abdominal Computed Tomography Enhanced Image Features under an Automatic Segmentation Algorithm in Identification of Gastric Cancer and Gastric Lymphoma
    Lihua Zhou, Hao Hu, Lei Zhou, Yi Zhou, Ahmed Faeq Hussein
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Margetuximab with retifanlimab as first-line therapy in HER2+/PD-L1+ unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: MAHOGANY cohort A
    D.V.T. Catenacci, Y.-K. Kang, H.H. Yoon, B.Y. Shim, S.T. Kim, D.-Y. Oh, A.I. Spira, S.V. Ulahannan, E.J. Avery, P.M. Boland, J. Chao, H.C. Chung, F. Gardner, S.J. Klempner, K.-W. Lee, S.C. Oh, J. Peguero, M.B. Sonbol, L. Shen, M. Moehler, J. Sun, D. Li, M
    ESMO Open.2022; 7(5): 100563.     CrossRef
  • Advances in molecular biomarkers research and clinical application progress for gastric cancer immunotherapy
    Hongzhen Cai, Man Li, Ruiyi Deng, Mopei Wang, Yanyan Shi
    Biomarker Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: An Update
    Kathryn DeCarli, Jonathan Strosberg, Khaldoun Almhanna
    Cancers.2022; 14(17): 4201.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy for Gastroesophageal Tumors: Is there still Hope for Efficacy?
    Hannah Christina Puhr, Aysegul Ilhan-Mutlu
    Current Cancer Drug Targets.2022; 22(8): 651.     CrossRef
  • The seen and the unseen: Molecular classification and image based-analysis of gastrointestinal cancers
    Corina-Elena Minciuna, Mihai Tanase, Teodora Ecaterina Manuc, Stefan Tudor, Vlad Herlea, Mihnea P. Dragomir, George A. Calin, Catalin Vasilescu
    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.2022; 20: 5065.     CrossRef
  • Ornithine aminotransferase and carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 involved in ammonia metabolism serve as novel targets for early stages of gastric cancer
    Zhen Jiang, Chen Wei, Yaomin Luo, Yang Xiao, Li Wang, Wubin Guo, Xiaoxia Yuan
    Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Indirect Clinical Validation of a Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Laboratory-Developed Test for Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma with 22C3 Antibody Concentrate
    Ji Min Kim, Binnari Kim, Eunji Kim, Minsun Jang, Jun Hun Cho, Hye Seung Lee, Yoonjin Kwak, Lingkang Huang, Radha Krishnan, Sally Y. Bai, Mounia Mounawar, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2022; 26(6): 679.     CrossRef
  • High interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility among pathologists assessing PD‐L1 CPS across multiple indications
    Shanthy Nuti, Yiwei Zhang, Nabila Zerrouki, Charlotte Roach, Gudrun Bänfer, George L Kumar, Edward Manna, Rolf Diezko, Kristopher Kersch, Josef Rüschoff, Bharat Jasani
    Histopathology.2022; 81(6): 732.     CrossRef
  • Validation of E1L3N antibody for PD-L1 detection and prediction of pembrolizumab response in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lianxi Song, Liang Zeng, Huan Yan, Qinqin Xu, Qing Xia, Jian Lei, Xiaoyan Chen, Xiaoping Hu, Zhan Wang, Hong Liu, Nong Yang, Yongchang Zhang
    Communications Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Loss of SATB2 expression correlates with cytokeratin 7 and PD-L1 tumor cell positivity and aggressiveness in colorectal cancer
    Jan Hrudka, Radoslav Matěj, Andrej Nikov, Igor Tomyak, Hana Fišerová, Karolína Jelínková, Petr Waldauf
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 but not HER2 is a potential therapeutic target in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
    Satoshi Yamashita, Hiroyuki Abe, Akiko Kunita, Hiroharu Yamashita, Yasuyuki Seto, Tetsuo Ushiku
    Histopathology.2021; 78(3): 381.     CrossRef
  • MAHOGANY: Margetuximab Combination in HER2+ Unresectable/metastatic Gastric/gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
    Daniel V T Catenacci, Minori Rosales, Hyun Cheol Chung, Harry H Yoon, Lin Shen, Markus Moehler, Yoon-Koo Kang
    Future Oncology.2021; 17(10): 1155.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 expression in paired biopsies and surgical specimens in gastric adenocarcinoma: A digital image analysis study
    You Jeong Heo, Binnari Kim, Hyunjin Kim, Soi Kim, Min Sun Jang, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2021; 218: 153338.     CrossRef
  • Targeting Oncoimmune Drivers of Cancer Metastasis
    Chie Kudo-Saito, Yukinori Ozaki, Hiroshi Imazeki, Hideyuki Hayashi, Jun Masuda, Hiroki Ozawa, Yamato Ogiwara
    Cancers.2021; 13(3): 554.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors
    Deborah Blythe Doroshow, Sheena Bhalla, Mary Beth Beasley, Lynette M. Sholl, Keith M. Kerr, Sacha Gnjatic, Ignacio I. Wistuba, David L. Rimm, Ming Sound Tsao, Fred R. Hirsch
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.2021; 18(6): 345.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Immunotherapy Update: FDA-Approved Checkpoint Inhibitors and Companion Diagnostics
    Julianne D. Twomey, Baolin Zhang
    The AAPS Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High Expression of PD-L1 Is Associated with Better Survival in Pancreatic/Periampullary Cancers and Correlates with Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition
    Nishant Thakur, Kwang Yeol Paik, Gyoyeon Hwang, Yosep Chong
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(4): 597.     CrossRef
  • Prädiktive Diagnostik für Checkpoint-Inhibitoren
    Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Wilko Weichert
    Der Pathologe.2021; 42(4): 380.     CrossRef
  • PD-1/PD-L1 in Cancer: Pathophysiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects
    Enrico Munari, Francesca R. Mariotti, Linda Quatrini, Pietro Bertoglio, Nicola Tumino, Paola Vacca, Albino Eccher, Francesco Ciompi, Matteo Brunelli, Guido Martignoni, Giuseppe Bogina, Lorenzo Moretta
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(10): 5123.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: interchangeability of 22C3 and 28-8 pharmDx assays for responses to immunotherapy
    Soomin Ahn, Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Modern Pathology.2021; 34(9): 1719.     CrossRef
  • PD-L1 Expression Harmonization in Gastric Cancer Using 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assays
    Tamara Z. Dabbagh, Maher A. Sughayer
    Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology.2021; 29(6): 462.     CrossRef
  • Expression of the immune checkpoint receptors PD-1, LAG3, and TIM3 in the immune context of stage II and III gastric cancer by using single and chromogenic multiplex immunohistochemistry
    Yujun Park, An Na Seo, Jiwon Koh, Soo Kyoung Nam, Yoonjin Kwak, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
    OncoImmunology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tong Xie, Zhening Zhang, Xiaotian Zhang, Changsong Qi, Lin Shen, Zhi Peng
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of TP53 mutations by p53 immunohistochemistry and their prognostic significance in gastric cancer
    Hye Jung Hwang, Soo Kyung Nam, Hyunjin Park, Yujun Park, Jiwon Koh, Hee Young Na, Yoonjin Kwak, Woo Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2020; 54(5): 378.     CrossRef
  • 18,323 View
  • 728 Download
  • 79 Web of Science
  • 81 Crossref
Close layer
S-1–Induced Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction and Its Association with Ingredients/Metabolites of S-1 in Tears and Plasma: A Prospective Multi-institutional Study
Namju Kim, Jin Won Kim, Je-Hyun Baek, Jin-Soo Kim, Ho-Kyung Choung, Tae-Yong Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Yung-Jue Bang, Sang In Khwarg, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Jae-Yong Chung, Soyeon Ahn, Keun-Wook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(1):30-39.   Published online February 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.569
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This prospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of lacrimal drainage obstruction (LDO) during S-1 chemotherapy and evaluate the association between the development of LDO and the concentrations of ingredients/metabolites of S-1 in tears and plasma.
Materials and Methods
A total of 145 patients with gastric cancer who received adjuvant S-1 therapy were enrolled. Ophthalmologic examinations were performed regularly during S-1 chemotherapy. Concentrations of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and 5-fluorouracil at steady-state trough level were measured in both tears and plasma.
Results
Fifty-three patients (37%) developed LDO. The median time to the onset of LDO was 10.9 weeks, and LDO developed most frequently in the nasolacrimal duct. Univariable analyses revealed that an older age (≥ 70 years), creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) < 80 mL/min, 5-fluorouracil concentration in plasma ≥ 22.3 ng/mL (median), CDHP concentration in plasma ≥ 42.0 ng/mL (median), and tegafur concentration in tears ≥ 479.2 ng/mL (median) were related to increased development of LDO. Multivariable analysis indicated that a high plasma 5-fluorouracil concentration was predictive of increased development of LDO (hazard ratio, 2.02; p=0.040), along with older age and decreased Ccr. Patients with LDO also developed S-1–related non-hematologic toxicity more frequently than those without LDO (p=0.016).
Conclusion
LDO is a frequent adverse event during S-1 chemotherapy. An older age, decreased Ccr, and high plasma 5-fluorouracil concentration were found to be independent risk factors for LDO. The high incidence of LDO warrants regular ophthalmologic examination and early intervention in patients receiving S-1 therapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ocular complication induced by anticancer drug S-1: association with drug concentrations in tears
    Masakazu Yamada, Tomoyuki Kamao, Atsushi Shiraishi, Jo Sakai, Yuichi Ohashi, Masashi Mimura, Yoshitsugu Inoue, Kazuyoshi Ohtomo, Tai-ichiro Chikama, Chika Miyazaki, Yuka Hosotani
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influenza A Virus Utilizes the Nasolacrimal System to Establish Respiratory Infection after Ocular Exposure in the Swine Model
    Shubin Li, Xuebin Peng, MinJie Wang, Wenqian Wang, Yuye Liu, Qian Yang, Makoto Ozawa
    Transboundary and Emerging Diseases.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in the Patients Receiving Treatment for Cancer
    Vasily D. Yartsev, Eugenia L. Atkova
    International Ophthalmology Clinics.2023; 63(3): 137.     CrossRef
  • Obstrução lacrimal pós-tratamento oncológico: revisão de literatura
    Camilla Duarte Silva, Fabricio Lopes da Fonseca, Juliana Mika Kato, Suzana Matayoshi
    Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Case of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction During S-1 Treatment For Breast Cancer
    Hisataka Ominato, Michihisa Kono, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Takumi Kumai, Miki Takahara, Akihiro Katada, Tatsuya Hayashi
    Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica.2022; 115(6): 503.     CrossRef
  • Corneal nerve changes following treatment with neurotoxic anticancer drugs
    Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, David Goldstein, Susanna B. Park, Arun V. Krishnan, Maria Markoulli
    The Ocular Surface.2021; 21: 221.     CrossRef
  • The impact of anticancer drugs on the ocular surface
    Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, Ilyanoon Zahari, Maria Markoulli, Arun V. Krishnan, Susanna B. Park, Annalese Semmler, David Goldstein, Katie Edwards
    The Ocular Surface.2020; 18(3): 403.     CrossRef
  • Pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in plasma and in tears for gastric cancer patients
    Hirofumi Yasui, Takeshi Kawakami, Hiroya Kashiwagi, Keita Mori, Katsuhiro Omae, Jun Kasai, Kunihiro Yoshisue, Masahiro Kawahira, Takahiro Tsushima, Nozomu Machida, Akira Fukutomi, Ken Yamaguchi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 24(6): 660.     CrossRef
  • 10,976 View
  • 413 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP