Kyoo Hyun Kim, Shinwon Hwang, Min Kyoung Kim, Keon-Uk Park, Tak Yun, Keun-Wook Lee, Joo Hang Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Byoung Chul Cho, So Yeon Oh, Sang Hee Cho, Sangwoo Kim, Sung-Bae Kim, Min Hee Hong, Hye Ryun Kim
Received December 11, 2024 Accepted January 27, 2025 Published online January 31, 2025
Purpose
The TRIUMPH trial was a biomarker-driven umbrella trial for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). This analysis focuses on the PIK3CAɑ inhibitor alpelisib (arm 1) in patients with phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations.
Materials and Methods
Patients with PI3K pathway altered tumors were enrolled in the alpelisib arm of the TRIUMPH study. We conducted a detailed analysis of the correlation between PI3K pathway mutations and treatment outcomes including disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
From Oct 2017 and Aug 2020, 203 were enrolled, with 42 treated with alpelisib. Response evaluation was possible for 33 patients. Genomic profiles revealed PIK3CA amplifications in 26.2%, and point mutations in E542K (26.2%), E545K (23.8%), and H1047R (9.5%). Neither PIK3CA amplification nor co-occurring TP53 mutations had a notable influence on alpelisib response or survival outcomes. Although the overall response rates were similar between helical domain mutations (E542, E545) and kinase domain mutations (H1047), patients with H1047 mutations exhibited significantly poorer PFS compared to those with non-H1047 PIK3CA alterations (1.6 vs. 7.3 months, p=0.017). OS in patients with H1047 kinase domain mutations showed a trend toward being shorter compared to others, though this difference did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion
Alpelisib showed differential efficacy based on PI3K pathway alterations in patients with R/M HNSCC and was well-tolerated. These findings suggest the usefulness of NGS testing-based decision-making when using the targeted agents in R/M HNSCC. We need to confirm results in larger cohorts.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
PIK3CA Mutations: Are They a Relevant Target in Adult Diffuse Gliomas? Ana Tomás, Marta Pojo International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(11): 5276. CrossRef
Kyoo Hyun Kim, Sun Min Lim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Keun-Wook Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn, Bhumsuk Keam, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Ho Jung An, Jin-Soo Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):37-47. Published online July 20, 2023
Purpose Precision oncology approach for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is necessary due to its dismal prognosis. We performed a genomic profile-based umbrella trial of patients with platinum-refractory HNSCC (KCSG-TRIUMPH). Here, we present an in-depth report of the the nintedanib arm (arm 3) of the current trial.
Materials and Methods The TRIUMPH study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, in which patients were assigned to treatment arms based on next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based, matching genomic profiles. Patients whose tumors harbor fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration were enrolled in the nintedanib arm (arm 3) as part of the TRIUMPH study. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and biomarker analysis.
Results Between October 2017 and August 2020, 207 were enrolled in the TRIUMPH study, and eight were enrolled in the nintedanib arm. ORR and disease control rate were 42.9% and 57.1%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.6 months and the median duration of response was 9.1 months. Median OS was 11.1 months. One patient maintained the partial response for 36 months. Overall, the toxicity profiles were manageable.
Conclusion Single-agent nintedanib has demonstrated significant efficacy in FGFR-mutated, recurrent or metastatic HNSCC patients, with tolerable toxicity profiles. The results from the study have provided the basis for routine NGS screening and FGFR-targeted therapy. Because of the small number of patients due to slow accrual in this study, further studies with a larger cohort are warranted for statistical power.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) with inhibitors in head and neck cancers: Their roles, mechanisms and challenges Daowen Luo, Sirinart Kumfu, Nipon Chattipakorn, Siriporn C. Chattipakorn Biochemical Pharmacology.2025; 235: 116845. CrossRef
Functional Characterization of Variants of Unknown Significance of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors 1-4 and Comparison With AI Model–Based Prediction Martin Ziegler, Nadira Khoury, Louisa Maxine Hommerich, Heike Adler, Sonja Loges JCO Precision Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
One-pot synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of new quinoline/pyrimido-diazepines as pulmonary antifibrotic agents Michael Atef Fawzy, Karim Hagag Ibrahim, Ashraf A Aly, Asmaa H Mohamed, Sara Mohamed Naguib Abdel Hafez, Walaa Yehia Abdelzaher, Eslam B Elkaeed, Aisha A Alsfouk, El-Shimaa MN Abdelhafez Future Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 16(21): 2211. CrossRef
Critical review of the current and future prospects of VEGF-TKIs in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck Prashant Puttagunta, Saagar V. Pamulapati, James E. Bates, Jennifer H. Gross, William A. Stokes, Nicole C. Schmitt, Conor Steuer, Yong Teng, Nabil F. Saba Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Yae Jee Baek, Youn-Jung Lee, So Ra Park, Kyoo Hyun Kim, Seung-Hoon Beom, Choong-kun Lee, Sang Joon Shin, Sun Young Rha, Sinyoung Kim, Kyoung Hwa Lee, Jung Ho Kim, Su Jin Jeong, Nam Su Ku, Jun Yong Choi, Joon-Sup Yeom, Minkyu Jung, Jin Young Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(3):746-757. Published online February 9, 2023
Purpose We aimed to assess the humoral response to and reactogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination according to the vaccine type and to analyze factors associated with immunogenicity in actively treated solid cancer patients (CPs).
Materials and Methods Prospective cohorts of CPs, undergoing anticancer treatment, and healthcare workers (HCWs) were established. The participants had no history of previous COVID-19 and received either mRNA-based or adenovirus vector–based (AdV) vaccines as the primary series. Blood samples were collected before the first vaccination and after 2 weeks for each dose vaccination. Spike-specific binding antibodies (bAbs) in all participants and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) wild-type, Delta, and Omicron variants in CPs were analyzed and presented as the geometric mean titer.
Results Age-matched 20 HCWs and 118 CPs were included in the analysis. The bAb seroconversion rate and antibody concentrations after the first vaccination were significantly lower in CPs than in HCWs. After the third vaccination, antibody levels in CPs with a primary series of AdV were comparable to those in HCWs, but nAb titers against the Omicron variant did not quantitatively increase in CPs with AdV vaccine as the primary series. The incidence and severity of adverse reactions post-vaccination were similar between CPs and HCWs.
Conclusion CPs displayed delayed humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The booster dose elicited comparable bAb concentrations between CPs and HCWs, regardless of the primary vaccine type. Neutralization against the Omicron variant was not robustly elicited following the booster dose in some CPs, implying the need for additional interventions to protect them from COVID-19.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Shielding the immunocompromised: COVID-19 prevention strategies for patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies Giulio Olivieri, Donato Amodio, Emma Concetta Manno, Veronica Santilli, Nicola Cotugno, Paolo Palma Vaccine.2025; 51: 126853. CrossRef
Safety, immunogenicity and protective effect of sequential vaccination with inactivated and recombinant protein COVID-19 vaccine in the elderly: a prospective longitudinal study Hong-Hong Liu, Yunbo Xie, Bao-Peng Yang, Huan-Yue Wen, Peng-Hui Yang, Jin-E Lu, Yan Liu, Xi Chen, Meng-Meng Qu, Yang Zhang, Wei-Guo Hong, Yong-Gang Li, Junliang Fu, Fu-Sheng Wang Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A meta-analysis Tiantian Hua, Ru Fan, Yang Fan, Feng Chen Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A Three-Dose mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Regime Produces Both Suitable Immunogenicity and Satisfactory Efficacy in Patients with Solid Cancers Urska Janzic, Urska Bidovec-Stojkovic, Peter Korosec, Katja Mohorcic, Loredana Mrak, Marina Caks, Maja Ravnik, Erik Skof, Matija Rijavec Vaccines.2023; 11(6): 1017. CrossRef
Neutralizing Antibody Response following a Third Dose of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine among Cancer Patients Christopher W. Dukes, Marine Potez, Jeffrey Lancet, Barbara J. Kuter, Junmin Whiting, Qianxing Mo, Brett Leav, Haixing Wang, Julie S. Vanas, Christopher L. Cubitt, Kimberly Isaacs-Soriano, Kayoko Kennedy, Julie Rathwell, Julian Diaz Cobo, Wesley O’Nan, Br Vaccines.2023; 12(1): 13. CrossRef