Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Kyong-Ah Yoon"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Detection of Germline Mutations in Breast Cancer Patients with Clinical Features of Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Using a Multi-Gene Panel Test
Hee-Chul Shin, Han-Byoel Lee, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Eun-Shin Lee, Ryong Nam Kim, Boyoung Park, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Charny Park, Eun Sook Lee, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Dong-Young Noh, Sun-Young Kong, Wonshik Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(3):697-713.   Published online February 4, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.559
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Hereditary cancer syndrome means that inherited genetic mutations can increase a person's risk of developing cancer. We assessed the frequency of germline mutations using an nextgeneration sequencing (NGS)–based multiple-gene panel containing 64 cancer-predisposing genes in Korean breast cancer patients with clinical features of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC).
Materials and Methods
A total of 64 genes associated with hereditary cancer syndrome were selected for development of an NGS-based multi-gene panel. Targeted sequencing using the multi-gene panel was performed to identify germline mutations in 496 breast cancer patients with clinical features of HBOC who underwent breast cancer surgery between January 2002 and December 2017.
Results
Of 496 patients, 95 patients (19.2%) were found to have 48 deleterious germline mutations in 16 cancer susceptibility genes. The deleterious mutations were found in 39 of 250 patients (15.6%) who had breast cancer and another primary cancer, 38 of 169 patients (22.5%) who had a family history of breast cancer (≥ 2 relatives), 16 of 57 patients (28.1%) who had bilateral breast cancer, and 29 of 84 patients (34.5%) who were diagnosed with breast cancer at younger than 40 years of age. Of the 95 patients with deleterious mutations, 60 patients (63.2%) had BRCA1/2 mutations and 38 patients (40.0%) had non-BRCA1/2 mutations. We detected two novel deleterious mutations in BRCA2 and MLH1.
Conclusion
NGS-based multiple-gene panel testing improved the detection rates of deleterious mutations and provided a cost-effective cancer risk assessment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 and Other High-Risk Gene Carriers: Current Evidence and Practical Guidance
    Jun-Hee Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Ji Soo Park, Joo Heung Kim, Chihwan David Cha, Kyung Jin Eoh, Yaewon Yang, Bom-Yi Lee, Sang-Ah Han, Sung-Won Kim
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2026; 29(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Pathogenicity Prediction of Missense Variations in Hereditary Cancer Genes
    Cemaliye B. Akyerli, Gizel Gerdan, Alper Bülbül, Hilal Keskin-Karakoyun, Şirin K. Yüksel, Emel Timucin
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2026; 27(5): 2453.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive germline and somatic profiling of high-risk Thai breast cancer via next-generation sequencing
    Kornyok Kamdee, Ekkapong Roothumnong, Wanna Thongnoppakhun, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Panee Nakthong, Peerawat Dungort, Chutima Meesamarnpong, Supakit Wiboontanasarn, Warisara Tansa-nga, Kittiporn Punuch, Khontawan Pongsuktavorn, Warunya Tititumjariya, Chitta
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Next-generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment: clinical applications and future directions
    Nima Ghoreyshi, Reza Heidari, Arezoo Farhadi, Mohsen Chamanara, Nastaran Farahani, Mahmood Vahidi, Javad Behroozi
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Illuminating Bilateral Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Experience and Clinical Observations
    Berkan Karabuğa, Mustafa Büyükkör, Ekin Konca Karabuğa, Sedat Yıldız, Mirmehdi Mehtiyev, Havva Yeşil Çınkır, Sıla Soylu Koçoğlu, Hacer Demir, Ozan Yazıcı, Doğan Uncu, Ömür Berna Öksüzoğlu, Ülkü Yalçıntaş Arslan
    Medicina.2025; 61(6): 1029.     CrossRef
  • Genetic landscape of Pakistani familial breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing
    Muhammad Usman Rashid, Noor Muhammad, Shumaila Arif, Humaira Naeemi, Ute Hamann
    International Journal of Cancer.2025; 157(10): 2081.     CrossRef
  • NGS-DRIVEN MUTATION PROFILING IN BREAST CANCER: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN REAL-WORLD DATA AND PERSONALIZED THERAPY
    S MALIK, A MALIK, J ISLAM, A ZAHID, J IQBAL, M MARVI, Q ALI, A FATIMA
    Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research.2025; 2025(1): 104.     CrossRef
  • Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research
    Kathleen Noller, Taxiarchis Botsis, Pablo G. Camara, Lauren Ciotti, Lee A.D. Cooper, Jeremy Goecks, Malachi Griffith, Brian J. Haas, Trey Ideker, Rachel Karchin, Despina Kontos, Jiaying Lai, Daniel Marcus, Clifford A. Meyer, Kristen Naegle, Sarthak Pati,
    Cancer Research.2025; 85(16): 2967.     CrossRef
  • Next-Generation Sequencing in Breast Cancer Patients: Real-World Data for Precision Medicine
    Hyunwoo Lee, Yoon Ah Cho, Deok Geun Kim, Eun Yoon Cho
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(1): 149.     CrossRef
  • Identification of pathogenic germline variants in a large Chinese lung cancer cohort by clinical sequencing
    Zhe Yu, Zirui Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiaoying Wu, Xiaojun Fan, Jiaohui Pang, Hua Bao, Jiani Yin, Xue Wu, Yang Shao, Zhengcheng Liu, Fang Liu
    Molecular Oncology.2024; 18(5): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Germline mutations of 4567 patients with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer spectrum in Thailand
    Chalermkiat Kansuttiviwat, Pongtawat Lertwilaiwittaya, Ekkapong Roothumnong, Panee Nakthong, Peerawat Dungort, Chutima Meesamarnpong, Warisara Tansa-Nga, Khontawan Pongsuktavorn, Supakit Wiboonthanasarn, Warunya Tititumjariya, Nannipa Phuphuripan, Chittap
    npj Genomic Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of genome mutation analysis for tumor-informed detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with breast cancer
    Mugip Rahaman Abdul Wahab, Thirunavukkarasu Palaniyandi, Swarnakala Thamada, Sandhiya Viswanathan, Gomathy Baskar, Hemapreethi Surendran, P Baraneedharan, J Kannan, Maddaly Ravi, Suba Rajinikanth, Mohamed A. El-Tayeb, Shaban Syed
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2024; 561: 119818.     CrossRef
  • Towards targeting the breast cancer immune microenvironment
    Michael A. Harris, Peter Savas, Balaji Virassamy, Megan M. R. O’Malley, Jasmine Kay, Scott N. Mueller, Laura K. Mackay, Roberto Salgado, Sherene Loi
    Nature Reviews Cancer.2024; 24(8): 554.     CrossRef
  • Genetic Testing Among Breast Cancer Patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Single-Center Experience
    Ghadeer Al Ghareeb, Zainab Al Nass, Salma Abu-Grain, Alia Alnaji, Hani Almohanna, Hadi Al Shaikh Nasser, Saad Al Shahrani
    Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health.2024; 14(3): 1351.     CrossRef
  • The Genomic and Biologic Landscapes of Breast Cancer and Racial Differences
    Sapthala P Loku Galappaththi, Kelly R. Smith, Enas S. Alsatari, Rachel Hunter, Donna L. Dyess, Elba A. Turbat-Herrera, Santanu Dasgupta
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(23): 13165.     CrossRef
  • Clinical usefulness of NGS multi-gene panel testing in hereditary cancer analysis
    Federico Anaclerio, Lucrezia Pilenzi, Anastasia Dell’Elice, Rossella Ferrante, Simona Grossi, Luca Maria Ferlito, Camilla Marinelli, Simona Gildetti, Giuseppe Calabrese, Liborio Stuppia, Ivana Antonucci
    Frontiers in Genetics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and modern vaccine-based treatment strategies
    Asad Mustafa Karim, Jeong Eun Kwon, Tanveer Ali, Jinsoo Jang, Irfan Ullah, Yeong-Geun Lee, Dae Won Park, Juha Park, Jin Woo Jeang, Se Chan Kang
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2023; 212: 115545.     CrossRef
  • Klinische Anwendungsbeispiele einer Next-Generation-Sequencing-basierten Multi-Genpanel-Analyse
    Dietmar Enko, Erich Schaflinger, Daniel J. Müller
    DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.2023; 148(11): 695.     CrossRef
  • A study of clinical and molecular characteristics in bilateral primary breast cancer
    Bin Li, Weiqi Xu, Jianing Cao, Duancheng Guo, Zhonghua Tao, Juan Jin, Xichun Hu
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(15): 15881.     CrossRef
  • Klinische Anwendungsbeispiele einer Next-Generation-Sequencing-basierten Multi-Genpanel-Analyse
    Dietmar Enko, Erich Schaflinger, Daniel J. Müller
    TumorDiagnostik & Therapie.2023; 44(06): 401.     CrossRef
  • Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes among young Turkish breast cancer patients
    Aysun Dauti Isiklar, Lamiya Aliyeva, Ahmet Yesilyurt, Aykut Soyder, Gul Basaran
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 202(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of germline variants in Bahraini women with breast cancer using next-generation sequencing based-multigene panel
    Ghada Al-Kafaji, Ghufran Jassim, Amani AlHajeri, Amna Mohamed Tayeb Alawadhi, Mariam Fida, Ibrahim Sahin, Faisal Alali, Elias Fadel, Amy McCart Reed
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291015.     CrossRef
  • Low prevalence of germline TP53 and PALB2 mutations in unselected cohort of breast cancer patients from Brunei Darussalam
    Siti Nur Idayu Matusin, Zen Huat Lu, Mas Rina Wati Haji Abdul Hamid
    F1000Research.2023; 12: 1537.     CrossRef
  • Should all patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer syndromes be offered a multigene panel?
    Erica L. Silver, Mariana Niell-Swiller
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.2022; 34(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • The emerging roles of NGS in clinical oncology and personalized medicine
    Bashdar Mahmud Hussen, Sara Tharwat Abdullah, Abbas Salihi, Dana Khdr Sabir, Karzan R. Sidiq, Mohammed Fatih Rasul, Hazha Jamal Hidayat, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Mohammad Taheri, Elena Jamali
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2022; 230: 153760.     CrossRef
  • Increased incidence of pathogenic variants in ATM in the context of testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition
    P. Macquere, S. Orazio, F. Bonnet, N. Jones, V. Bubien, J. Chiron, D. Lafon, E. Barouk-Simonet, J. Tinat, L. Venat-Bouvet, P. Gesta, M. Longy, N. Sevenet
    Journal of Human Genetics.2022; 67(6): 339.     CrossRef
  • Novel Insights From the Germline Landscape of Breast Cancer in Brazil
    Daniel Barbalho, Renata Sandoval, Erika Santos, Janina Pisani, Carla Quirino, Bernardo Garicochea, Benedito Rossi, Maria Isabel Achatz
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of a Four-Gene Panel for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment
    Angela Secondino, Flavio Starnone, Iolanda Veneruso, Maria Di Tella, Serena Conato, Carmine De Angelis, Sabino De Placido, Valeria D’Argenio
    Genes.2022; 13(4): 682.     CrossRef
  • Multi-gene panel testing increases germline predisposing mutations’ detection in a cohort of breast/ovarian cancer patients from Southern Italy
    Marcella Nunziato, Federica Di Maggio, Matilde Pensabene, Maria Valeria Esposito, Flavio Starnone, Carmine De Angelis, Alessandra Calabrese, Massimiliano D’Aiuto, Gerardo Botti, Sabino De Placido, Valeria D’Argenio, Francesco Salvatore
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeted Sequencing of Germline Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes for Discovering Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic Variants in the Jakarta Population
    Sonar Soni Panigoro, Rafika Indah Paramita, Kristina Maria Siswiandari, Fadilah Fadilah
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(9): 2241.     CrossRef
  • Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Mutations in Early and Late Onset Familial Breast Cancer Patients Using Multi-Gene Panel Sequencing: An Egyptian Study
    Auhood Nassar, Abdel-Rahman N. Zekri, Mahmoud M. Kamel, Mostafa H. Elberry, Mai M. Lotfy, Mohamed G. Seadawy, Zeinab K. Hassan, Hany K. Soliman, Ahmed M. Lymona, Amira Salah El-Din Youssef
    Genes.2022; 14(1): 106.     CrossRef
  • Germline molecular data in hereditary breast cancer in Brazil: Lessons from a large single-center analysis
    Renata Lazari Sandoval, Ana Carolina Rathsam Leite, Daniel Meirelles Barbalho, Daniele Xavier Assad, Romualdo Barroso, Natalia Polidorio, Carlos Henrique dos Anjos, Andréa Discaciati de Miranda, Ana Carolina Salles de Mendonça Ferreira, Gustavo dos Santos
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247363.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis by Multigene Panel Testing
    Zeng-Yun-Ou Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Wu, Xin-ying Cai, Wen-Liang Fang, Feng-Li Xiao
    Frontiers in Genetics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Sequence and Copy Number Variants in Canadian Patient Cohort With Familial Cancer Syndromes Using a Unique Next Generation Sequencing Based Approach
    Pratibha Bhai, Michael A. Levy, Kathleen Rooney, Deanna Alexis Carere, Jack Reilly, Jennifer Kerkhof, Michael Volodarsky, Alan Stuart, Mike Kadour, Karen Panabaker, Laila C. Schenkel, Hanxin Lin, Peter Ainsworth, Bekim Sadikovic
    Frontiers in Genetics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge
    M. Bono, D. Fanale, L. Incorvaia, D. Cancelliere, A. Fiorino, V. Calò, A. Dimino, C. Filorizzo, L.R. Corsini, C. Brando, G. Madonia, A. Cucinella, R. Scalia, N. Barraco, F. Guadagni, E. Pedone, G. Badalamenti, A. Russo, V. Bazan
    ESMO Open.2021; 6(4): 100235.     CrossRef
  • Summary of BARD1 Mutations and Precise Estimation of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Associated with the Mutations
    Malwina Suszynska, Piotr Kozlowski
    Genes.2020; 11(7): 798.     CrossRef
  • Detection of Germline Mutations in a Cohort of 139 Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancer by Multi-Gene Panel Testing: Impact of Pathogenic Variants in Other Genes beyond BRCA1/2
    Daniele Fanale, Lorena Incorvaia, Clarissa Filorizzo, Marco Bono, Alessia Fiorino, Valentina Calò, Chiara Brando, Lidia Rita Corsini, Nadia Barraco, Giuseppe Badalamenti, Antonio Russo, Viviana Bazan
    Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2415.     CrossRef
  • 18,205 View
  • 590 Download
  • 37 Web of Science
  • 37 Crossref
Close layer
Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Simultaneous Integrated Boost–Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results from a Feasibility Study
Sang Myung Woo, Min Kyeong Kim, Jungnam Joo, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Boram Park, Sang-Jae Park, Sung-Sik Han, Ju Hee Lee, Eun Kyung Hong, Yun-Hee Kim, Hae Moon, Sun-Young Kong, Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):1022-1032.   Published online January 19, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.495
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study assessed the feasibility and compliance of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by simultaneous integrated boost–intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Materials and Methods
In this trial, patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle. Patients were subsequently treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m2/wk) during SIB-IMRT. The patients received total doses of 55 and 44 Gy in 22 fractions to planning target volume 1 and 2, respectively. As an ancillary study, digital polymerase chain reaction was performed to screen for the seven most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA).
Results
Forty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2015. Of these, 33 (75%) completed the treatment. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (18.2%), grade 3 nausea (6.8%) and vomiting (6.8%). The most common toxicities during SIB-IMRT were grade 3 neutropenia (24.2%) and grade 3 anemia (12.1%). Ten patients (23%) underwent a curative resection after therapy. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative resection (16.8 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.01). The median cfDNA concentration was significantly lower after treatment (108.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent SIB-IMRT was well tolerated and active.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of treatment sequence and dose response on outcomes in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with hypofractionated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost technique
    Tae Hyun Kim, Jung Won Chun, Sang Myung Woo, Joo-Hyun Chung, Min Hee Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Sung Uk Lee, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Woo Jin Lee
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2026; 214: 111295.     CrossRef
  • Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Krishan R. Jethwa, Ed Kim, Jordan Berlin, Christopher J. Anker, Leila Tchelebi, Gerard Abood, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Salma Jabbour, Timothy Kennedy, Rachit Kumar, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vonetta Williams, Suzanne Russo
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 47(4): 185.     CrossRef
  • Kinetics of plasma cell-free DNA as a prospective biomarker to predict the prognosis and radiotherapy effect of esophageal cancer
    Y. Li, J. Wu, Y. Feng, D. Wang, H. Tao, J. Wen, F. Jiang, P. Qian, Y. Liu
    Cancer/Radiothérapie.2024; 28(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • Circulating tumor DNA in unresectable pancreatic cancer is a strong predictor of first-line treatment efficacy: The KRASCIPANC prospective study
    Camille Evrard, Pierre Ingrand, Tristan Rochelle, Marine Martel, Gaëlle Tachon, Nicolas Flores, Violaine Randrian, Aurélie Ferru, Paul-Arthur Haineaux, Jean-Michel Goujon, Lucie Karayan-Tapon, David Tougeron
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2023; 55(11): 1562.     CrossRef
  • Circulating tumor DNA: a help to guide therapeutic strategy in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
    Olivier Caliez, Daniel Pietrasz, Feryel Ksontini, Solène Doat, Jean-Marc Simon, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, Valerie Taly, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Jean-Baptiste Bachet
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(10): 1428.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Tumor DNA Detection by Digital-Droplet PCR in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Marisol Huerta, Susana Roselló, Luis Sabater, Ana Ferrer, Noelia Tarazona, Desamparados Roda, Valentina Gambardella, Clara Alfaro-Cervelló, Marina Garcés-Albir, Andrés Cervantes, Maider Ibarrola-Villava
    Cancers.2021; 13(5): 994.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy-Based Actionable Mutations Detected via ddPCR
    Irina Palacín-Aliana, Noemí García-Romero, Adrià Asensi-Puig, Josefa Carrión-Navarro, Víctor González-Rumayor, Ángel Ayuso-Sacido
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(8): 906.     CrossRef
  • A review on the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed implantation in unresectable pancreatic cancers
    Sheng-Nan Jia, Fu-Xing Wen, Ting-Ting Gong, Xin Li, Hui-Jie Wang, Ya-Min Sun, Ze-Cheng Yang
    International Journal of Radiation Biology.2020; 96(3): 383.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Eun Sang Oh, Sang Hee Youn, Hye Young Jang, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Cancer Panel Sequencing Defines Genetic Diversity and Changes in the Mutational Characteristics of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment
    Kyong-Ah Yoon, Sang Myung Woo, Yun-Hee Kim, Sun-Young Kong, Min Kyoung Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang-Jae Park
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(6): 683.     CrossRef
  • Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Predictive Marker after Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Sangjoon Park, Eun Jung Lee, Chai Hong Rim, Jinsil Seong
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(4): 470.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Hyunjung Kim, Eun Sang Oh, Ju Hee Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12,880 View
  • 260 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Clinically Significant Unclassified Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes among Korean Breast Cancer Patients
Kyong-Ah Yoon, Boyoung Park, Byung Il Lee, Moon Jung Yang, Sun-Young Kong, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):627-634.   Published online September 13, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.292
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Unclassified variants (UVs) of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are not defined as pathogenic for breast cancer, and their clinical significance currently remains undefined. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify potentially pathogenic UVs by comparing their prevalence between breast cancer patients and controls.
Materials and Methods
A total of 328 breast cancer patients underwent BRCA1/2 genetic screening at the National Cancer Center of Korea. Genetic variants of BRCA genes that were categorized as unclassified according to the Breast CancerInformation Core databasewere selected based on allelic frequency, after which candidate variants were genotyped in 421 healthy controls. We also examined family members of the study participants. Finally, the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein structure and function were predicted in silico.
Results
Genetic tests revealed 33 UVs in BRCA1 and 47 in BRCA2. Among 15 candidates genotyped in healthy controls, c.5339T>C in BRCA1 and c.6029T>G, c.7522G>A in BRCA2 were not detected. Moreover, the c.5339T>C variant in the BRCA1 gene was detected in four patients with a family history of breast cancer. This nonsynonymous variant (Leu1780Pro) in the BRCA1 C-terminal domain was predicted to have an effect on BRCA1 protein structure/function.
Conclusion
This study showed that comparison of genotype frequency between cases and controls could help identify UVs of BRCA genes that are potentially pathogenic. Moreover, ourfindings suggest that c.5339T>C in BRCA1 might be a pathogenic variant for patients and their families.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Global prevalence and ethnic variation of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Najeeb Ullah Khan, Huijun Lei, Jinzhen Fu, Ruijiao Lei, Xukai Chen, Sana S. Alqarni, Tianhui Chen
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Characterization of BRCA1 c.5339T>C Missense Mutation in DNA Damage Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Jeong Dong Lee, Won-Ji Ryu, Hyun Ju Han, Tae Yeong Kim, Min Hwan Kim, Joohyuk Sohn
    Cancers.2022; 14(10): 2405.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in the prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study
    Joo Heung Kim, Sunggyun Park, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Soo Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Sung-Won Kim, Jong Won Lee, Min Hyuk Lee, Sue K. Park, Woo-Chul Noh, Doo Ho Choi, Wonshik Han, Sung Hoo Jung
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features of Patients with the BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.Leu1780Pro) Variant
    Hyung Seok Park, Jai Min Ryu, Ji Soo Park, Seock-Ah Im, So-Youn Jung, Eun-Kyu Kim, Woo-Chan Park, Jun Won Min, Jeeyeon Lee, Ji Young You, Jeong Eon Lee, Sung-Won Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 680.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Recurrent Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 across Multiple Cancers in the Chinese Population
    Yue Jiang, Ting Tian, Chengxiao Yu, Wen Zhou, Junzhe Yang, Yifeng Wang, Yang Wen, Jiaping Chen, Juncheng Dai, Guangfu Jin, Hongxia Ma, Hongbing Shen, Zhibin Hu, Yu-Chang Tyan
    BioMed Research International.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines
    Min-Kyung So, Tae-Dong Jeong, Woosung Lim, Byung-In Moon, Nam Sun Paik, Seung Cheol Kim, Jungwon Huh
    Breast Cancer.2019; 26(4): 510.     CrossRef
  • BRCA gene mutations: A population based review
    Ratika Samtani, Deepti Saksena
    Gene Reports.2019; 15: 100380.     CrossRef
  • Unclassified Variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Korean Patients With Ovarian Cancer
    Min Chul Choi, Ja-Hyun Jang, Sang Geun Jung, Hyun Park, Won Duk Joo, Seung Hun Song, Chan Lee, Je Ho Lee
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2018; 28(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Differences in attitudes toward genetic testing among the public, patients, and health-care professionals in Korea
    Heesang Eum, Mangyeong Lee, Junghee Yoon, Juhee Cho, Eun Sook Lee, Kui Son Choi, Sangwon Lee, So-Youn Jung, Myong Cheol Lim, Sun-Young Kong, Yoon Jung Chang
    European Journal of Human Genetics.2018; 26(10): 1432.     CrossRef
  • Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort
    Jee-Soo Lee, Sohee Oh, Sue Kyung Park, Min-Hyuk Lee, Jong Won Lee, Sung-Won Kim, Byung Ho Son, Dong-Young Noh, Jeong Eon Lee, Hai-Lin Park, Man Jin Kim, Sung Im Cho, Young Kyung Lee, Sung Sup Park, Moon-Woo Seong
    Journal of Medical Genetics.2018; 55(12): 794.     CrossRef
  • Suggestion of BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.L1780P) variant confer from ‘unknown significance’ to ‘Likely pathogenic’ based on clinical evidence in Korea
    Jai Min Ryu, Goeun Kang, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Sungmin Park, Hyun-June Paik, Jong-Won Kim, Sung-Shin Park, Jeong Eon Lee, Sung-Won Kim
    The Breast.2017; 33: 109.     CrossRef
  • 15,352 View
  • 515 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene ERCC2 and ERCC5 Variants Increase Risk of Uterine Cervical Cancer
Jungnam Joo, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Tomonori Hayashi, Sun-Young Kong, Hye-Jin Shin, Boram Park, Young Min Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Jeongseon Kim, Aesun Shin, Joo-Young Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):708-714.   Published online June 22, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.098
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Defects in the DNA damage repair process can cause genomic instability and play an important role in cervical carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association of 29 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes in the DNA repair pathway, TP53, and TP53BP1 with the risk of cervical cancer.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-nine SNPs in four genes in the DNA repair pathway (ERCC2, ERCC5, NBS1, and XRCC1), TP53, and TP53BP1 were genotyped for 478 cervical cancer patients and 922 healthy control subjects, and their effects on cervical carcinogenesis were analyzed.
Results
The most significant association was found for rs17655 in ERCC5, with an age-adjusted p-value < 0.0001, for which a strong additive effect of the risk allele C was observed (odds ratio, 2.01 for CC to GG). On the other hand, another significant polymorphism rs454421 in ERCC2 showed a dominant effect (odds ratio, 1.68 for GA+AA to GG) with an age-adjusted p-value of 0.0009. The association of these polymorphisms remained significant regardless of the age of onset. The significant result for rs17655 was also consistent for subgroups of patients defined by histology and human papillomavirus (HPV) types. However, for rs454421, the association was observed only in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and non-HPV 18 type.
Conclusion
The results of this study show a novel association of cervical cancer and the genes involved in the nucleotide excision pathway in the Korean population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • RFC1 regulates the expansion of neural progenitors in the developing zebrafish cerebellum
    Fanny Nobilleau, Sébastien Audet, Alexandra da Silva Babinet, Sanaa Tork, Charlotte Zaouter, Meijiang Liao, Nicolas Pilon, Martine Tétreault, Shunmoogum A. Patten, Éric Samarut
    Nature Communications.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between ERCC2 Lys751Gln, Asp312Asn, and Arg156Arg polymorphisms and gynecological cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis
    Fen Chen, Jiayang Yu, Chun-Guang Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Genetic Polymorphisms in Base Excision Repair (BER) and Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) Pathways as Potential Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Literature Review
    Magdalena Szatkowska, Julita Zdrada-Nowak
    Cancers.2025; 17(13): 2170.     CrossRef
  • Role of NTRK Fusion Genes in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment of HPV (+/−) Cervical Cancer
    Qiongying Wang, Chan Zhang, Shijia Liu, Wangshu Li, Wenjuan Wei, Aziz ur Rehman Aziz, Han Lu, Daqing Wang
    Journal of Medical Virology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring Erythrocyte Glycophorin a Somatic Mutations and ERCC5 Genotypes in Atomic Bomb Survivors: An Association Analysis
    Tomonori Hayashi, Kousuke Tanimoto, Naohiro Kato, Ikue Hayashi, Kengo Yoshida, Misa Imaizumi, Ayumi Hida, Waka Ohishi, Osamu Tanabe, Seishi Kyoizumi
    Radiation Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • KIAA1549 promotes the development and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by upregulating ERCC2
    Feng Ye, Yuwen Xie, Mingdao Lin, Yang Liu, Yuan Fang, Keli Chen, Yaowei Zhang, Yi Ding
    Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.2024; 479(3): 629.     CrossRef
  • Elucidation of Increased Cervical Cancer Risk Due to Polymorphisms in XRCC1 (R399Q and R194W), ERCC5 (D1104H), and NQO1 (P187S)
    Agneesh Pratim Das, Sandeep Saini, Shrishty Tyagi, Nisha Chaudhary, Subhash Mohan Agarwal
    Reproductive Sciences.2023; 30(4): 1118.     CrossRef
  • Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and their association with risk of cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Xueting Shao, Xiaole Yang, Ying Liu, Qingxia Song, Xin Pan, Wansu Chen, Wei Jiang, Dan Xu, Yuanyuan Song, Renshou Chen
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2022; 48(9): 2405.     CrossRef
  • Association of nonsynonymous SNPs of nucleotide excision repair genes ERCC4 rs1800067 (G/A) and ERCC5 rs17655 (G/C) as predisposing risk factors for gallbladder cancer
    Kumari Anjali, Tarun Kumar, Puneet Kumar, Gopeshwar Narayan, Sunita Singh
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(11): 1533.     CrossRef
  • Rare germline variants in DNA repair-related genes are accountable for papillary thyroid cancer susceptibility
    Catia Mio, Antonella Verrienti, Valeria Pecce, Marialuisa Sponziello, Giuseppe Damante
    Endocrine.2021; 73(3): 648.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis of XRCC1 single nucleotide polymorphism and susceptibility to gynecological malignancies
    Xue Qin Zhang, Li Li
    Medicine.2021; 100(50): e28030.     CrossRef
  • The association of integration patterns of human papilloma virus and single nucleotide polymorphisms on immune- or DNA repair-related genes in cervical cancer patients
    Jungnam Joo, Yosuke Omae, Yuki Hitomi, Boram Park, Hye-Jin Shin, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Hiromi Sawai, Makoto Tsuiji, Tomonori Hayashi, Sun-Young Kong, Katsushi Tokunaga, Joo-Young Kim
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Pivotal Role of DNA Repair in Infection Mediated-Inflammation and Cancer
    Ayse Z. Sahan, Tapas K. Hazra, Soumita Das
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Somatic mutation load and spectra: A record of DNA damage and repair in healthy human cells
    Natalie Saini, Dmitry A. Gordenin
    Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis.2018; 59(8): 672.     CrossRef
  • 14,924 View
  • 93 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP