Purpose Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary disorder caused by germline mutation in TP53. Owing to the rarity of LFS, data on its clinical features are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of Korean patients with LFS.
Materials and Methods Patients who underwent genetic counseling and confirmed with germline TP53 mutation in the National Cancer Center in Korea between 2011 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on family history with pedigree, types of mutation, clinical features, and prognosis were collected.
Results Fourteen patients with LFS were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis of the first tumor was 32 years. Missense and nonsense mutations were observed in 13 and one patients, respectively. The repeated mutations were p.Arg273His, p.Ala138Val, and pPro190Leu. The sister with breast cancer harbored the same mutation of p.Ala138Val. Seven patients had multiple primary cancers. Breast cancer was most frequently observed, and other types of tumor included sarcoma, thyroid cancer, pancreatic cancer, brain tumor, adrenocortical carcinoma, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, colon cancer, vaginal cancer, skin cancer, and leukemia. The median follow-up period was 51.5 months. Two and four patients showed local recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. Two patients died of leukemia and pancreatic cancer 3 and 23 months after diagnosis, respectively.
Conclusion This study provides information on different characteristics of patients with LFS, including types of mutation, types of cancer, and prognostic outcomes. For more appropriate management of these patients, proper genetic screening and multidisciplinary discussion are required.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Consensus Statement: Recommendations on Actionable Biomarker Testing for Thyroid Cancer Management Ozgur Mete, Andrée Boucher, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Omar Abdel-Rahman, Houda Bahig, Cheryl Ho, Olfat Kamel Hasan, Bernard Lemieux, Eric Winquist, Ralph Wong, Jonn Wu, Nicole Chau, Shereen Ezzat Endocrine Pathology.2024; 35(4): 293. CrossRef
Purpose This study investigated pathological complete response (pCR) according to androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and estimated the relationship between AR expression and clinicopathological factors.
Materials and Methods We identified 624 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center in Goyang, Korea from April 2016 to October 2019. We retrospectively collected the clinicopathologic information and AR expression results and analyzed the data according to cancer stage, hormonal receptor (HR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, tumor subtype, and pCR.
Results Among the 624 breast cancer patients, 529 (84.8%) were AR-positive (AR+) patients and 95 (15.2%) were AR-negative (AR–) patients. AR+ patients showed more estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, progesterone receptor (PR) positivity, HER2-positivity, and HR-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) subtype. The rate of pCR was 31.4% (196/624). AR– patients had a significantly higher rate of pCR than AR+ patients (AR– 43.2% vs. AR+ 29.3%, p=0.007). The tumor factors associated with pCR were early stage, histologic grade 3, ER-negative, PR-negative, AR-negative, HER2-positive, and high Ki-67 values. In univariable analysis, AR+ significantly decreased the state of pCR (odds ratio, 0.546; 95% confidence interval, 0.349 to 0.853; p=0.008). According to tumor subtype, AR– tumor showed higher pCR rate in HR+/HER2– subtype (AR– 28.6% vs. AR+ 7.3%, p=0.022).
Conclusion AR expression is predominant in the HR+/HER2– subtype. AR– is significantly associated with the pCR rate in breast cancer patients, especially within HR+/HER2– subtype. When determining neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the HR+/HER2– subtype, AR expression can be considered as a pCR predictive marker.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers: from chemotherapy to hormonal therapy, CDK inhibitors, and beyond Athina Stravodimou, Ioannis A. Voutsadakis Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2024; 24(3-4): 117. CrossRef
Luminal androgen receptor subtype and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes groups based on triple-negative breast cancer molecular subclassification Miseon Lee, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Byung Joo Chae, Ahwon Lee, Yoon Jin Cha, Jieun Lee, Sung Gwe Ahn, Jun Kang Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the Clinico-Pathological Relationship Between Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Androgen Receptor Expression Across Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Carcinoma Adil Aziz Khan, Sana Ahuja, Kiruthikasri G., Sufian Zaheer Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(4): 802. CrossRef
Biomarkers and translational research approaches in breast cancer—an update Angelika M. Starzer, Anna S. Berghoff, Rupert Bartsch memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology.2023; 16(1): 42. CrossRef
Evaluation of predictive and prognostic value of androgen receptor expression in breast cancer subtypes treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy Zhendong Shi, Yingxue Liu, Shichao Zhang, Shuanglong Cai, Xu Liu, Jie Meng, Jin Zhang Discover Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose
This study aimed to determine the incidence of male breast cancer (MBC) and its survival outcomes in Korea, and to compare these results to those for female breast cancer (FBC).
Materials and Methods
We searched the Korea Central Cancer Registry and identified 227,122 breast cancer cases that were diagnosed between 1999 and 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated according to sex, age, histological type, and cancer stage.
Results
The 227,122 patients included 1,094 MBC cases and 226,028 FBC cases. Based on the age-standardized rate, the male: female ratio was 0.0055:1. The most common ages at diagnosis were 60-69 years for MBC and 40-49 years for FBC (p < 0.001). Male patients were less likely than female patients to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (7.5% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001) or adjuvant chemotherapy (40.1% vs. 55.4%, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates after diagnosis were 88.8% for all patients, although it was significantly lower for MBC than for FBC (76.2% vs. 88.9%, p < 0.001). In both groups, older age (≥ 60 years) was associated with shorter survival. The 5-year OS rates for the invasive histological types were 75.8% for men and 89.0% for women. The 5-year OS rates in both groups decreased with increasing cancer stage.
Conclusion
MBC was diagnosed at older ages than FBC, and male patients were less likely to receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The survival outcomes were worse for MBC than for FBC, with even poorer outcomes related to older age, the inflammatory histological types, and advanced stage. It is important that clinicians recognize the differences between FBC and MBC when treating these patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Trends and Age-Period-Cohort Effect on Incidence of Male Breast Cancer from 1980 to 2019 in Taiwan and the USA Jhao-Yang Peng, Yu-Kwang Lee, Rong-Qi Pham, Xiao-Han Shen, I-Hui Chen, Yong-Chen Chen, Hung-Shu Fan Cancers.2024; 16(2): 444. CrossRef
The features of male breast cancer in China: A real-world study Yuxuan Gao, Mengmeng Zhang, Gang Sun, Li Ma, Jianyun Nie, Zhongyu Yuan, Zhenzhen Liu, Yali Cao, Jianbin Li, Qiang Liu, Songqing Ye, Bo Chen, Yuhua Song, Kun Wang, Yu Ren, Guolin Ye, Ling Xu, Shu Liu, Qianjun Chen, Weiwen Li, Xinxin Chen, Peifen Fu, Wei We The Breast.2024; 76: 103762. CrossRef
Clinicopathologic Features and Prognoses of Male Patients With Breast Cancer Meiling Huang, Jingjing Xiao, Changjiao Yan, Rui Ling, Ting Wang American Journal of Men's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Stage and Type of Male Breast Cancer Presented at Mankweng Academic Hospital from 2015-2023 Fumani Charles Makhandule, Mirza Mohamod Zahir Uddin Bhuiyan European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences.2024; 6(6): 1. CrossRef
Impacts of Subtype on Clinical Feature and Outcome of Male Breast Cancer: Multicenter Study in Korea (KCSG BR16-09) Jieun Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Heejung Chae, Joohyuk Sohn, Gun Min Kim, Kyung-Hee Lee, Su Hwan Kang, Kyung Hae Jung, Jae-ho Jeong, Jae Ho Byun, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Seungtaek Lim, Hee Jun Kim, Hye Sung Won, Hyung Soon Park, Guk Jin Lee, S Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 123. CrossRef
Risk of Lymphedema and Death after Lymph Node Dissection with Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments in Patients with Breast Cancer: An Eight-Year Nationwide Cohort Study Ye-Seul Lee, Yu-Cheol Lim, Jiyoon Yeo, Song-Yi Kim, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha Healthcare.2023; 11(13): 1833. CrossRef
Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women Mi-ri Kwon, Yoosoo Chang, Inyoung Youn, Shin Ho Kook, Yoosun Cho, Boyoung Park, Seungho Ryu Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 202(2): 357. CrossRef
Clinicopathological features and correlation analysis of male breast cancer Lei Xi, Jinxing Zhou, Yan Wu, Rong Rong Medicine.2023; 102(30): e34408. CrossRef
Germline variants profiling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Chinese Hakka breast and ovarian cancer patients Yunuo Zhang, Heming Wu, Zhikang Yu, Liang Li, Jinhong Zhang, Xinhong Liang, Qingyan Huang BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Poor prognosis of male triple-positive breast Cancer patients: a propensity score matched SEER analysis and molecular portraits Biyuan Wang, Hui Wang, Andi Zhao, Mi Zhang, Jin Yang BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic difficulties of men with breast cancer Ian S. Fentiman The Breast Journal.2021; 27(12): 877. CrossRef
Clinicopathological features and prognosis of male breast cancer Xinli Wang, Shusong Liu, Yan Xue Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors in Male Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Study in South Korea by the Study of SMARTSHIP Group Sungmin Park, Ho Hur, Ji Sung Lee, JaeSun Yoon, Sung Mo Hur, Il Yong Chung, Jong Won Lee, Hyun Jo Youn, Se Jeong Oh, Cheol Wan Lim, Jihyoun Lee Journal of Breast Cancer.2021; 24(6): 561. CrossRef
Male breast cancer: A closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors associated with survival Jing Zhao, Bin Wang, Jing Zhao, Yiran Mao, Jun Liu, Yanfang Yang Thoracic Cancer.2020; 11(11): 3107. CrossRef
Eun-Gyeong Lee, Hyok Jo Kang, Myong Cheol Lim, Boyoung Park, Soo Jin Park, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Sang-Yoon Park, Boram Park, Jungnam Joo, Jai Hong Han, Sun-Young Kong, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):280-288. Published online May 4, 2018
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate decision patterns to reduce the risks of BRCArelated breast and gynecologic cancers in carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. We found a change in risk-reducing (RR) management patterns after December 2012, when the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) of Korea began to pay for BRCA testing and riskreducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in pathogenic-variant carriers.
Materials and Methods
The study group consisted of 992 patients, including 705 with breast cancer (BC), 23 with ovarian cancer (OC), 10 with both, and 254 relatives of high-risk patients who underwent BRCA testing at the National Cancer Center of Korea from January 2008 to December 2016.We analyzed patterns of and factors in RR management.
Results
Of the 992 patients, 220 (22.2%) were carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. About 92.3% (203/220) had a family history of BC and/or OC,which significantly differed between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (p < 0.001). All 41 male carriers chose surveillance. Of the 179 female carriers, 59 of the 83 carriers (71.1%) with BC and the 39 of 79 unaffected carriers (49.4%) underwent RR management. None of the carriers affected with OC underwent RR management. Of the management types, RRSO had the highest rate (42.5%) of patient choice. The rate of RR surgery was significantly higher after 2013 than before 2013 (46.3% [74/160] vs. 31.6% [6/19], p < 0.001).
Conclusion
RRSO was the preferred management for carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants. The most important factors in treatment choice were NHIS reimbursement and/or the severity of illness.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A Scoping Review of Primary Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies in East and Southeast Asia Filipa Alpeza, Christine Kim Yan Loo, Qingyuan Zhuang, Mikael Hartman, Serene Si Ning Goh, Jingmei Li Cancers.2025; 17(2): 168. CrossRef
Risk-reducing decisions regarding germlineBRCApathogenic variant: focusing on the timing of genetic testing and RRSO Akiko Abe, Hidetaka Nomura, Atsushi Fusegi, Mayu Yunokawa, Arisa Ueki, Eri Habano, Hiromi Arakawa, Keika Kaneko, Yuko Minoura, Hitoshi Inari, Takayuki Ueno, Hiroyuki Kanao Journal of Medical Genetics.2024; 61(4): 392. CrossRef
BRCA Mutation Patients: Are There Other Predisposing Factors for Ovarian Cancer Occurrence? A Multicenter Retrospective Study Vera Loizzi, Michele Mongelli, Francesca Arezzo, Isabella Romagno, Gerardo Cazzato, Ondina Popescu, Francesco Legge, Paolo Trerotoli, Erica Silvestris, Anila Kardhashi, Gennaro Cormio Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.2024; 89(2): 87. CrossRef
Implementation of BRCA Test among Young Breast Cancer Patients in South Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study Yung-Huyn Hwang, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Il Yong Chung Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 802. CrossRef
Pattern Anlysis of Risk-Reducing Strategies in Unaffected Korean BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers Dabin Kim, Jai Min Ryu, Sang-Ah Han, Zisun Kim, Sung-Won Kim Current Oncology.2024; 31(11): 6767. CrossRef
Impact of graphical display on the intention to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and mastectomy in individuals positive for BRCA pathogenic variant Yoon-Jung Choi, Younju Park, Boyoung Park, Heejung Chae, So-Youn Jung, Kum Hei Ryu, Myong Cheol Lim, Soo Jin Park, Yoon Jung Chang, Sun-Young Kong Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of the coverage of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy by the national insurance system for women with BRCA pathogenic variants in Japan Hidetaka Nomura, Akiko Abe, Atsushi Fusegi, Teruyuki Yoshimitsu, Satoki Misaka, Atsushi Murakami, Tsuyoshi Matsumoto, Shiho Tsumura, Motoko Kanno, Yoichi Aoki, Sachiho Netsu, Makiko Omi, Terumi Tanigawa, Sanshiro Okamoto, Kohei Omatsu, Mayu Yunokawa, Hiro Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics of second primary breast cancer after ovarian cancer: a Korea central cancer registry retrospective study Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jiwon Lim, Hyeong In Ha, Myong Cheol Lim, Yoon Jung Chang, Young-Joo Won, So-Youn Jung Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Differences in Willingness to Undergo BRCA1/2 Testing and Risk Reducing Surgery among the General Public, Cancer Patients, and Healthcare Professionals: A Large Population-Based Survey Yoon Jung Chang, Seungyeon Cho, Jungnam Joo, Kum Hei Ryu, Sangwon Lee, Juhee Cho, Myong Cheol Lim, So-Youn Jung, Jai Hong Han, Eun Sook Lee, Sun-Young Kong Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(5): 818. CrossRef
Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon M.L. Riis Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 65: 102311. CrossRef
Disparities between Uptake of Germline BRCA1/2 Gene Tests and Implementation of Post-test Management Strategies in Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Patients Young Min Hur, Jaehee Mun, Mi-Kyung Kim, Maria Lee, Yun Hwan Kim, Seung-Cheol Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical significance of gene polymorphisms for hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer (review of literature) D. I. Vodolazhsky, A. V. Mayakovskaya, A. V. Kubyshkin, K. A. Aliev, I. I. Fomochkina Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics.2021; 66(12): 760. CrossRef
Trends in Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Korean Carriers of the BRCA1/2 Mutation Sung Mi Jung, Jai Min Ryu, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Soo Park, Eunyoung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyun Jo Youn, Tae-Kyung Yoo, Jisun Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Sang Ah Han, Dongwon Kim, Sung-Won Kim Journal of Breast Cancer.2020; 23(6): 647. CrossRef
Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Seung Jae Huh, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Han-Sung Kang, In Hae Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):970-980. Published online January 4, 2017
Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of supraclavicular lymph node radiotherapy (SCNRT) on N1 breast cancer patients receiving post-lumpectomy whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We performed a case-control analysis to compare the outcomes of WBI and WBI plus SCNRT (WBI+SCNRT). Among 1,147 patients with N1 breast cancer who received post-lumpectomy radiotherapy and AT-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals, 542 were selected after propensity score matching. Patterns of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and treatment-related toxicity were compared between groups.
Results
A total of 41 patients (7.6%) were found to have recurrence. Supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) failure was detected in three patients, two in WBI and one in WBI+SCNRT. All SCN failures were found simultaneously with distant metastasis. There was no significant difference in patterns of failure or survival between groups. The 5-year DFS and DMFS for patients with WBI and WBI+SCNRT were 94.4% versus 92.6% (p=0.50) and 95.1% versus 94.5% (p=0.99), respectively. The rates of lymphedema and radiation pneumonitis were significantly higher in the WBI+SCNRT than in the WBI.
Conclusion
We did not find a benefit of SCNRT for N1 breast cancer patients receiving AT-based chemotherapy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Whole-Breast Plus Regional Irradiation and Whole-Breast Irradiation Only in pN1 Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial (KROG 17-01) Nalee Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Yong Bae Kim International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The optimal regional irradiation volume for breast cancer patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of published studies Wei-Xiang Qi, Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Jiayi Chen Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
What Is High-risk Breast Cancer With Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes for Regional Recurrence? Sang-Won Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Haeyoung Kim, Oyeon Cho, Won Park, Mison Chun International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 111(4): 992. CrossRef
Regional nodal irradiation in pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation Shin-Hyung Park, Jae-Chul Kim Radiation Oncology Journal.2020; 38(1): 44. CrossRef
Prediction of nodal staging in breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel nodes in the Z0011 era Fabio Corsi, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Albasini, Daniela Bossi, Carlo Morasso, Laura Villani, Marta Truffi Medicine.2020; 99(35): e21721. CrossRef
Locoregional recurrence patterns in women with breast cancer who have not undergone post-mastectomy radiotherapy Xuran Zhao, Yu Tang, Shulian Wang, Yong Yang, Hui Fang, Jianyang Wang, Hao Jing, Jianghu Zhang, Guangyi Sun, Siye Chen, Jing Jin, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ningning Lu, Hua Ren, Yexiong Li Radiation Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Dose Distribution in Regional Lymph Nodes in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy vs. Whole-Breast Plus Regional Lymph Node Irradiation: An In Silico Planning Study in Participating Institutions of the Phase III Randomized Trial (KROG 1701) Haeyoung Kim, Heejung Kim, Won Park, Jong Yun Baek, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Jee Suk Chang, Cancers.2020; 12(11): 3261. CrossRef
Clinical Significance of Lymph-Node Ratio in Determining Supraclavicular Lymph-Node Radiation Therapy in pN1 Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Breast-Conserving Treatment (KROG 14-18): A Multicenter Study Jaeho Kim, Won Park, Jin Kim, Doo Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Lee, Kyung Shin, Jin Kim, Kyubo Kim, Yong Kim, Sung-Ja Ahn, Jong Lee, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Kim, Jihye Cha Cancers.2019; 11(5): 680. CrossRef
Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23 Kyubo Kim, Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Won Park, Seung Do Ahn, Su Ssan Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Jiyoung Kim Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1316. CrossRef
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for transient lymphedema (TLE) and persistent lymphedema (PLE) following treatment for breast cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 1,073 patients who underwent curative breast surgery were analyzed. TLE was defined as one episode of arm swelling that had resolved spontaneously by the next followup; arm swelling that persisted over two consecutive examinations was considered PLE.
Results At a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, 370 cases of lymphedema were reported, including 120 TLE (11.2%) and 250 PLE (23.3%). Initial grade 1 swelling was observed in 351 patients, of which 120 were limited to TLE (34%), while the other 231 progressed to PLE (66%). All initial swelling observed in TLE patients was classified as grade 1. In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy with taxane and supraclavicular radiation therapy (SCRT) were associated with development of TLE, whereas SCRT, stage III cancer and chemotherapy with taxane were identified as risk factors for PLE (p < 0.05). The estimated incidence of TLE among initial grade 1 patients was calculated using up to three treatment-related risk factors (number of dissected axillary lymph nodes, SCRT, and taxane chemotherapy). The approximate ratios of TLE and PLE based on the number of risk factors were 7:1 (no factor), 1:1 (one factor), 1:2 (two factors), and 1:3 (three factors). Conclusion One-third of initial swelling events were transient, whereas the other two-thirds of patients experienced PLE. Estimation of TLE and PLE based on known treatment factors could facilitate prediction of this life-long complication.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacy of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in predicting surgical outcomes of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in lower extremity lymphedema: Clinical correlations in gynecological cancer-related lymphedema Min Young Yoo, Kyong-Je Woo, Seo Young Kang, Byung Seok Moon, Bom Sahn Kim, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Andrea Giannini PLOS ONE.2024; 19(1): e0296466. CrossRef
Lymphatic remapping by long-term lymphoscintigraphy follow-up in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery Garam Hong, Koeun Lee, Sangwon Han, Jae Yong Jeon Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The effect of exercise and educational programs for breast cancer patients on the development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary endpoint from a randomized controlled trial in the Setouchi Breast Project-10 Shogo Nakamoto, Takayuki Iwamoto, Naruto Taira, Yukiko Kajiwara, Kengo Kawada, Daisuke Takabatake, Yuichiro Miyoshi, Shinichiro Kubo, Yoko Suzuki, Mari Yamamoto, Yutaka Ogasawara, Minami Hatono, Seiji Yoshitomi, Kyoko Hara, Asako Sasahara, Shozo Ohsumi, M Breast Cancer.2024; 31(5): 969. CrossRef
Taxanes and Breast Cancer‐Related Lymphedema Daniel Najafali, Charalampos Siotos, George Kokosis Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A Single Institution Experience With Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Impact of Insurance Coverage on Risk Reduction Anne Huang, Emma Koesters, Rebecca M. Garza, Summer E. Hanson, David W. Chang Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The prevalence of arm lymphedema after radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer Kamonrat Sueangamiam, Kanisa Rongsriyam Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review Elena Canales-Lachén, Ángel Asunsolo, Oscar J. Manrique, Javier Blázquez, Purificación Holguín, Andrés A. Maldonado Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.2023; 39(02): 102. CrossRef
Risk factors of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies Aomei Shen, Qian Lu, Xin Fu, Xiaoxia Wei, Liyuan Zhang, Jingru Bian, Wanmin Qiang, Dong Pang Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors for the development of severe breast cancer-related lymphedema: a retrospective cohort study Xiaozhen Liu, Kewang Sun, Hongjian Yang, Lingli Xia, Kefeng Lu, Xuli Meng, Yongfeng Li BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Practical Approach to Establishing a Lymphedema Screening Program: Tips and Tricks Derly C. Munoz, Sarah S. Virk, Oluwadamilola T. Oladeru, Pamela Clevenger, Tracy L. Hollen, Mariam W. Hanna, Lisa R. P. Spiguel Current Breast Cancer Reports.2023; 15(3): 242. CrossRef
The impact of rehabilitation sport on breast cancer-related lymphoedema and quality of life Bettina Boeer, Anna Seller, Birgitt Schoenfisch, Ute krainick-Strobel, Andreas Dietrich, Sara Y. Brucker, Diethelm Wallwiener, Andreas Niess, Markus Hahn Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 307(5): 1529. CrossRef
The potential of gas plasma technology for targeting breast cancer Sander Bekeschus, Fariba Saadati, Steffen Emmert Clinical and Translational Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction of breast cancer-related lymphedema risk after postoperative radiotherapy via multivariable logistic regression analysis Jae Sik Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Ji Hyun Chang, Do Wook Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Invited Commentary from the Authors of: Kuruvilla AS, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Lymphedema: Amulticenter Retrospective Analysis Annet S. Kuruvilla Annals of Plastic Surgery.2022; 89(6): 716. CrossRef
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema among Chinese breast cancer survivors Yan-fei Liu, Jun-E Liu, Yi Zhu, Yim Wah Mak, Hui Qiu, Li-hui Liu, Shen-shen Yang, Shao-hua Chen Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(9): 5435. CrossRef
Eliminating the Burden of Lymphedema in Cancer Patients Requiring Nodal Dissections Using Prophylactic Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction – A Case Report and Review of the Literature Abiye Mussie, Maria C. Medor, Sylia Mohand-Said, Andrea M. Ibrahim, Carolyn Nessim, Moein Momtazi Plastic Surgery Case Studies.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors predicting one or two sentinel lymph nodes to be accepted for sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer patients Li-Wei Tsai, Yi-Hsuan Lee, Chiao Lo, Huang-Chun Lien, Ming-Yang Wang, I-Shiow Jan, Ruoh-Fang Yen, Fu-Chang Hu, Chiun-Sheng Huang Surgical Oncology.2021; 39: 101667. CrossRef
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in T3 and T4b Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis in a Tertiary Cancer Hospital and Systematic Literature Review Idam de Oliveira-Junior, Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahas, Ana Cristina Cherem, Jorge Nahas-Neto, René Aloisio da Costa Vieira Breast Care.2021; 16(1): 27. CrossRef
Histological features of skin and subcutaneous tissue in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relationship to post-treatment edema Ayako Nakagawa, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Takeshi Nagashima, Takafumi Sangai, Mamoru Takada, Takahito Masuda, Ryotaro Teranaka, Satoshi Ota, Jun Matsushima, Shinsuke Akita, Masayuki Ohtsuka Breast Cancer.2020; 27(1): 77. CrossRef
Lymphedema Signs, Symptoms, and Diagnosis in Women Who Are in Minority and Low-Income Groups and Have Survived Breast Cancer Ann Marie Flores, Jason Nelson, Lee Sowles, Rebecca G Stephenson, Kathryn Robinson, Andrea Cheville, Antoinette P Sander, William J Blot Physical Therapy.2020; 100(3): 487. CrossRef
Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in patients with lymphedema referred for complete decongestive therapy Côme Roux, Béatrice Villemur, Brigitte Giovannoni, Lucie Koeyemelk, Monique Mendelson, Meriem Benmerad, Marie Joyeux-Faure, Renaud Tamisier, Jean-Louis Pepin Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders.2020; 8(1): 137. CrossRef
The results of the intensive phase of complete decongestive therapy and the determination of predictive factors for response to treatment in patients with breast cancer related‐lymphedema Dilek Keskin, Meltem Dalyan, Sibel Ünsal‐Delialioğlu, Ülkü Düzlü‐Öztürk Cancer Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
A scoring system for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema Fenglian Li, Qian Lu, Sanli Jin, Quanping Zhao, Xueying Qin, Shuai Jin, Lichuan Zhang International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2020; 7(1): 21. CrossRef
Lymphedema and Lymphovenous Bypass: Perioperative Nursing Implications Lori A. Whitnell AORN Journal.2020; 111(2): 187. CrossRef
Who Will Continuously Depend on Compression to Control Persistent or Progressive Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Despite 2 Years of Conservative Care? Chul Jung, JaYoung Kim, Yu Jin Seo, Kyeong Joo Song, Ma. Nessa Gelvosa, Jin Geun Kwon, Changsik John Pak, Hyunsuk Peter Suh, Joon Pio Hong, Hwa Jung Kim, Jae Yong Jeon Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(11): 3640. CrossRef
Role of p53 as a prognostic marker in breast carcinoma and its correlation with tumor size, tumor grade and lymph node metastasis Alok Mohan, Bharat Jindal, Rajender Kumar Thakral, Vaseem Ansari, Veena K Sharma Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology.2020; 7(3): 378. CrossRef
Risk factors and prediction model for persistent breast-cancer-related lymphedema: a 5-year cohort study I-Wen Penn, Yue-Cune Chang, Eric Chuang, Chi-Ming Chen, Chi-Feng Chung, Chia-Yu Kuo, Tien-Yow Chuang Supportive Care in Cancer.2019; 27(3): 991. CrossRef
Progressive resistance training to prevent arm lymphedema in the first year after breast cancer surgery: Results of a randomized controlled trial Gunn Ammitzbøll, Christoffer Johansen, Charlotte Lanng, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Niels Kroman, Bo Zerahn, Ole Hyldegaard, Merete Celano Wittenkamp, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton Cancer.2019; 125(10): 1683. CrossRef
Frequency and risk factors for arm lymphedema after multimodal breast-conserving treatment of nodal positive breast Cancer – a long-term observation Julia Rupp, Catarina Hadamitzky, Christoph Henkenberens, Hans Christiansen, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns Radiation Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Elevated levels of eEF1A2 protein expression in triple negative breast cancer relate with poor prognosis Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Petracci, Oriana Nanni, Cristina Bottin, Maurizio Pinamonti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante, Aamir Ahmad PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0218030. CrossRef
Introduction of the Lymphedema Action Plan (LeAP): Clinical Advancement in Proactive Lymphedema Care Renata Beaman Rehabilitation Oncology.2019; 37(3): 122. CrossRef
Profile of women with lymphedema after breast cancer treatment Thais de Oliveira Gozzo, Gabriela Aguado, Aniele Tomadon, Marislei Sanches Panobianco, Maria Antonieta Spinoso Prado Escola Anna Nery.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema—a Preliminary Report Juhi Agrawal, Sandeep Mehta, Ashish Goel, Pankaj Kumar Pande, Kapil Kumar Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 9(3): 369. CrossRef
Progressive strength training to prevent LYmphoedema in the first year after breast CAncer – the LYCA feasibility study Gunn Ammitzbøll, Charlotte Lanng, Niels Kroman, Bo Zerahn, Ole Hyldegaard, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Christoffer Johansen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton Acta Oncologica.2017; 56(2): 360. CrossRef
Association between adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and breast cancer-related lymphedema Wen Zhu, Dan Li, Xiaoqin Li, Jin Ren, Wenqi Chen, Hangang Gu, Yongqian Shu, Deqiang Wang Anti-Cancer Drugs.2017; 28(3): 350. CrossRef
P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients Yunbao Pan, Yufen Yuan, Guoshi Liu, Yongchang Wei, William B. Coleman PLOS ONE.2017; 12(2): e0172324. CrossRef
Considerations for Clinicians in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert ASBrS Panel Sarah A. McLaughlin, Alicia C. Staley, Frank Vicini, Paul Thiruchelvam, Nancy A. Hutchison, Jane Mendez, Fiona MacNeill, Stanley G. Rockson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Suzanne Klimberg, Michael Alatriste, Francesco Boccardo, Mark L. Smith, Sheldon M. Feldman Annals of Surgical Oncology.2017; 24(10): 2818. CrossRef
Current and future perspectives on the evaluation, prevention and conservative management of breast cancer related lymphoedema: A best practice guideline Nick Gebruers, Hanne Verbelen, Tessa De Vrieze, Lore Vos, Nele Devoogdt, Lore Fias, Wiebren Tjalma European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2017; 216: 245. CrossRef
Changes in volume and incidence of lymphedema during and after treatment with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) in patients with breast cancer Janine T. Hidding, Carien H. G. Beurskens, Philip J. van der Wees, Wilmy C. A. M. Bos, Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven Supportive Care in Cancer.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Palliative surgery for giant mucinous carcinoma of the breast in an elderly patient: A rare case report Haruko Takuwa, Wakako Tsuji, Fumiaki Yotsumoto Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2017; 7(4): 609. CrossRef
Update December 2016 Francine Blei Lymphatic Research and Biology.2016; 14(4): 240. CrossRef
Purpose This study evaluated the effect of surgery-radiotherapy interval (SRI) on outcomes in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by four cycles of taxane. Materials and Methods From 1999 to 2007, 397 eligible patients were diagnosed. The effect of SRI on outcomes was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and a maximal chi-square method was used to identify optimal cut-off value of SRI for each outcome.
Results The median SRI was 6.7 months (range, 5.6 to 10.3 months). A SRI of 7 months was the significant cut-off value for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using a maximal chi-square method. For overall survival, a significant cut-off value was not found. The patients with SRI > 7 months had worse 6-year DMFS and DFS than those with SRI ≤ 7 months on univariate analysis (DMFS, 81% vs. 91%, p=0.003; DFS, 78% vs. 89%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, SRI > 7 months did not affect DMFS and DFS. Conclusion RT delayed for more than 7 months after BCS and adjuvant four cycles of AC followed by four cycles of taxane did not compromise clinical outcomes.
Timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy following adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: A post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled clinical trial Si-Ye Chen, Guang-Yi Sun, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Xu-Ran Zhao, Yu-Chun Song, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Ning Li, Hui Fang, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang European Journal of Cancer.2022; 174: 153. CrossRef
Timing of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Following Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Breast Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Si-Ye Chen, Guang-Yi Sun, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Xu-Ran Zhao, Yu-Chun Song, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Ning Li, Hui Fang, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality Among Black and White Women Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde, Jan M. Eberth, Tisha Felder, Robert Moran, Samantha Truman, James R. Hebert, Jiajia Zhang, Swann Arp Adams Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.2021; 8(1): 147. CrossRef
How Does the Interval Between Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Initiation of Radiotherapy Impact Clinical Outcomes in Operable Breast Cancer Patients? Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Wei-Xiang Qi, Rong Cai, Shu-Bei Wang, Dan Ou, Min Li, Kun-Wei Shen, Jia-Yi Chen Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(4): 2155. CrossRef
Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Maryam Khayamzadeh, Hamid Reza Mirzaei, Afshin Moradi, Atieh Akbari, Farid Moradian, Neda Khalili International Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Timing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Si-Ye Chen, Yu Tang, Shu-Lian Wang, Yong-Wen Song, Hui Fang, Jian-Yang Wang, Hao Jing, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Guang-Yi Sun, Xu-Ran Zhao, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Hua Ren, Zi-Hao Yu, Ye-Xiong Li Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of tissue computed tomography number changes and dosimetric shifts after conventional whole-breast irradiation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery Joo Hwan Lee, Dong Soo Lee, So Hyun Park, Young Kyu Lee, Jeong Soo Kim, Yong Seok Kim Tumor Biology.2018; 40(8): 101042831879188. CrossRef
The influence of timing of radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery on 10-year disease-free survival Marissa C van Maaren, Reini W Bretveld, Jan J Jobsen, Renske K Veenstra, Catharina GM Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Hendrik Struikmans, John H Maduro, Luc JA Strobbe, Philip MP Poortmans, Sabine Siesling British Journal of Cancer.2017; 117(2): 179. CrossRef
Myungsoo Kim, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Jungsil Ro, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Eun Sook Lee, Tae Hyun Kim, Kwan Ho Cho, Kyung Hwan Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(3):416-423. Published online November 17, 2014
Purpose The risk for lymphedema (LE) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in breast cancer patients has not been fully understood thus far. This study is conducted to investigate the incidence and time course of LE after NCT. Materials and Methods A total of 313 patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who underwent NCT followed by surgery with axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection from 2004 to 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received breast and supraclavicular radiation therapy (SCRT). The determination of LE was based on both objective and subjective methods, as part of a prospective database. Results At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 132 patients had developed LE: 88 (28%) were grade 1; 42 (13%) were grade 2; and two (1%) were grade 3. The overall 5-year cumulative incidence of LE was 42%. LE first occurred within 6 months after surgery in 62%; 1 year in 77%; 2 years in 91%; and 3 years in 96%. In a multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; p < 0.01) and the number of dissected ALNs (HR, 1.68; p < 0.01) were independent risk factors for LE. Patients with both of these risk factors showed a significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of LE compared with patients with no or one risk factor (61% and 37%, respectively; p < 0.001). The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly correlate with LE. Conclusion LE after NCT, surgery, and SCRT developed early after treatment, and with a high incidence rate. More frequent surveillance of arm swelling may be necessary in patients after NCT, especially during the first few years of follow-up.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection: a retrospective cohort study Miaomiao Jia, Lihui Pan, Haibo Yang, Jinnan Gao, Fan Guo Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 204(2): 223. CrossRef
Incidence and risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema in Korea: A nationwide retrospective cohort study Ha Rim Ahn, Hyeong Eun Jeong, Choyun Jeong, Sang Yull Kang, Sung Hoo Jung, Hyun Jo Youn, Jong Seung Kim International Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers Marie-Eve Letellier, Marize Ibrahim, Anna Towers, Geneviève Chaput Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Age as a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review Gunel Guliyeva, Maria T. Huayllani, Daniel Boczar, Francisco R. Avila, Xiaona Lu, Antonio Jorge Forte Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2023; 17(1): 246. CrossRef
Risk factors of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies Aomei Shen, Qian Lu, Xin Fu, Xiaoxia Wei, Liyuan Zhang, Jingru Bian, Wanmin Qiang, Dong Pang Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond cardiomyocytes: Cellular diversity in the heart's response to exercise Lena E. Trager, Margaret Lyons, Alexandra Kuznetsov, Cedric Sheffield, Kangsan Roh, Rebecca Freeman, James Rhee, J. Sawalla Guseh, Haobo Li, Anthony Rosenzweig Journal of Sport and Health Science.2023; 12(4): 423. CrossRef
Managing the Morbidity Giacomo Montagna, Andrea V. Barrio Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2023; 32(4): 705. CrossRef
Risk of Lymphedema and Death after Lymph Node Dissection with Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments in Patients with Breast Cancer: An Eight-Year Nationwide Cohort Study Ye-Seul Lee, Yu-Cheol Lim, Jiyoon Yeo, Song-Yi Kim, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha Healthcare.2023; 11(13): 1833. CrossRef
Discussion: Variable Anatomy of the Lateral Upper Arm Lymphatic Channel: An Anatomical Risk Factor for Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema Mengfan Wu, Shailesh Agarwal Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2023; 152(2): 430. CrossRef
Breast cancer treatment‐related arm lymphoedema and morbidity: A 6‐year experience in an Australian tertiary breast centre Yang Yang Huang, Pei Yinn Toh, Catherine Hunt, Joshua Tzi Wei Lin, Roshi Kamyab, Ananda Kallyani Ponniah Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 18(1): 109. CrossRef
Cancer Rehabilitation Fact Sheet in Korea Jin A Yoon, Bo Young Hong Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 46(4): 155. CrossRef
Burden of lymphedema in long‐term breast cancer survivors by race and age Yumeng Ren, Michael A. Kebede, Adeyemi A. Ogunleye, Marc A. Emerson, Kelly R. Evenson, Lisa A. Carey, Sandra C. Hayes, Melissa A. Troester Cancer.2022; 128(23): 4119. CrossRef
Acquired lymphedema: Molecular contributors and future directions for developing intervention strategies Ika Nurlaila, Kangsan Roh, Chang-Hwan Yeom, Hee Kang, Sukchan Lee Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction of breast cancer-related lymphedema risk after postoperative radiotherapy via multivariable logistic regression analysis Jae Sik Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Ji Hyun Chang, Do Wook Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Histological features of skin and subcutaneous tissue in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relationship to post-treatment edema Ayako Nakagawa, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Takeshi Nagashima, Takafumi Sangai, Mamoru Takada, Takahito Masuda, Ryotaro Teranaka, Satoshi Ota, Jun Matsushima, Shinsuke Akita, Masayuki Ohtsuka Breast Cancer.2020; 27(1): 77. CrossRef
A scoring system for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema Fenglian Li, Qian Lu, Sanli Jin, Quanping Zhao, Xueying Qin, Shuai Jin, Lichuan Zhang International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2020; 7(1): 21. CrossRef
Body Mass Index as a Major Risk Factor for Severe Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Hélène Leray, Julie Malloizel-Delaunay, Amélie Lusque, Elodie Chantalat, Léonard Bouglon, Charlotte Chollet, Benoit Chaput, Barbara Garmy-Susini, Alexandra Yannoutsos, Charlotte Vaysse Lymphatic Research and Biology.2020; 18(6): 510. CrossRef
Factors Associated With Lymphedema in Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Axillary Dissection Jane M. Armer, Karla V. Ballman, Linda McCall, Pamela L. Ostby, Eris Zagar, Henry M. Kuerer, Kelly K. Hunt, Judy C. Boughey JAMA Surgery.2019; 154(9): 800. CrossRef
Breast deformation during the course of radiotherapy: The need for an additional outer margin J. Seppälä, K. Vuolukka, T. Virén, J. Heikkilä, J.T.J. Honkanen, A. Pandey, A. Al-Gburi, M. Shah, S. Sefa, T. Koivumäki Physica Medica.2019; 65: 1. CrossRef
Current and future perspectives on the evaluation, prevention and conservative management of breast cancer related lymphoedema: A best practice guideline Nick Gebruers, Hanne Verbelen, Tessa De Vrieze, Lore Vos, Nele Devoogdt, Lore Fias, Wiebren Tjalma European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2017; 216: 245. CrossRef
Incidence and risk factors of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: 10 years of follow-up Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira, Rosalina Jorge Koifman, Anke Bergmann The Breast.2017; 36: 67. CrossRef
Risk factors for lymphoedema in women with breast cancer: A large prospective cohort S.L. Kilbreath, K.M. Refshauge, J.M. Beith, L.C. Ward, O.A. Ung, E.S. Dylke, J.R. French, J. Yee, L. Koelmeyer, K. Gaitatzis The Breast.2016; 28: 29. CrossRef
Identification of Prognostic Risk Factors for Transient and Persistent Lymphedema after Multimodal Treatment for Breast Cancer Myungsoo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Eun Sook Lee, Seung Hyun Chung, Yeon-Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kwan Ho Cho Cancer Research and Treatment.2016; 48(4): 1330. CrossRef
Local Treatment of Breast Cancer Joanne Lester Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2015;[Epub] CrossRef
Discrepant Trajectories of Impairment, Activity, and Participation Related to Upper-Limb Function in Patients With Breast Cancer Eun Joo Yang, Eunyoung Kang, Sung-Won Kim, Jae-Young Lim Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2015; 96(12): 2161. CrossRef
Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy (PTTM) is a rare, malignancy-related complication that causes marked pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure, and death. We report on a patient with locally advanced breast cancer whose course was complicated by fatal PTTM based on clinical and laboratory findings.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic review Rohit H. Godbole, Rajan Saggar, Nader Kamangar Pulmonary Circulation.2019; 9(2): 1. CrossRef
Microangiopathie thrombotique tumorale pulmonaire M. Merad, A. Alibay, S. Ammari, S. Antoun, A. Bouguerba, S. Ayed, F. Vincent Revue des Maladies Respiratoires.2017; 34(10): 1045. CrossRef
Ante-mortem diagnosis of pulmonary tumour thrombotic microangiopathy in a patient with unrecognised extramammary Paget's disease Aya Banno, Keijiro Chiba, Hiroko Kasai, Keiichi Nagami BMJ Case Reports.2016; : bcr2016216666. CrossRef
Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy Associated with Advanced Gastric Cancer Successfully Treated with Chemotherapy Seung-Hyun Yoo, Kwonoh Park, Ji Yeon Hong, Ji Yeon Kim, Jang Won Park, Yong Won Park, Kyung-Hun Lee, Kyung-So Jeon The Ewha Medical Journal.2014; 37(2): 146. CrossRef
A Case of Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy Diagnosed by Transbronchial Lung Biopsy and Treated with Chemotherapy and Long-Term Oxygen and Anticoagulation Therapies Atsushi Kitamura, Naoki Nishimura, Torahiko Jinta, Rika Suda, Yasuhiko Yamano, Genta Ishikawa, Yutaka Tomishima, Tsuyoshi Hamaoka, Koyu Suzuki, Naohiko Chohnabayashi Case Reports in Pulmonology.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef