Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Haeyoung Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Breast cancer
Implication of Pre- and Post-radiotherapy ctDNA Dynamics in Patients with Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Findings from a Prospective Observational Study
Tae Hoon Lee, Haeyoung Kim, Yeon Jeong Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Nalee Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(2):531-537.   Published online November 10, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.996
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aims to determine the association between pre- and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and oncological outcomes in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Materials and Methods
Between March 2019 and July 2020, 11 nonmetastatic patients with residual disease who underwent surgery after NAC were prospectively enrolled. In each patient, tumor specimens obtained during surgery and blood samples collected at three time points during PORT (T0: pre-PORT, T1: 3 weeks after PORT, T2: 1 month after PORT) were sequenced, targeting 38 cancer-related genes. Disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated and the association between DFS and ctDNA dynamics was analyzed.
Results
At T0, ctDNA was detected in three (27.2%) patients. The ctDNA dynamics were as follows: two showed a decreasing ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) and reached zero VAF at T2, while one patient exhibited an increasing VAF during PORT and maintained an elevated VAF at T2. After a median follow-up of 48 months, two patients experienced distant metastasis without any locoregional failures. All failures occurred in patients with ctDNA positivity at T0 and a decreased VAF after PORT. The 4-year DFS rates according to the T0 ctDNA status were 67% (positive ctDNA) and 100% (negative ctDNA) (p=0.032).
Conclusion
More than a quarter of the patients with residual disease after post-NAC surgery exhibited pre-PORT ctDNA positivity, and ctDNA positivity was associated with poor DFS. For patients with pre-PORT ctDNA positivity, the administration of a more effective systemic treatment should be considered.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of circulating tumor DNA in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Diana Zhang, Shayesteh Jahanfar, Judy B. Rabinowitz, Joshua Dower, Fei Song, Cherng-Horng Wu, Xiao Hu, Phillip Tracy, Mark Basik, Arielle Medford, Po-Han Lin, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Francois-Clement Bidard, Shufang Renault, Lori Pai, Mary Buss, Heather A. Par
    Breast Cancer Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiple drugs

    Reactions Weekly.2024; 2033(1): 183.     CrossRef
  • 3,861 View
  • 163 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Epidemiology of Second Non-breast Primary Cancers among Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Korean Population–Based Study by the SMARTSHIP Group
Haeyoung Kim, Su SSan Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Jae Sun Yoon, Hyun Jo Youn, Hyukjai Shin, Jeong Eon Lee, Se Kyung Lee, Il Yong Chung, So-Youn Jung, Young Jin Choi, Jihyoung Cho, Sang Uk Woo, Korean Breast Cancer Society
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(2):580-591.   Published online December 27, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.410
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognosis of second non-breast primary cancer (SNBPC) among Korean survivors of breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service were searched to identify women who received curative surgery for initial breast cancer (IBC) between 2003 and 2008 (n=64,340). Among them, patients with the following characteristics were excluded: other cancer diagnosis before IBC (n=10,866), radiotherapy before IBC (n=349), absence of data on sex or age (n=371), or male (n=248). Accordingly, data of 52,506 women until December 2017 were analyzed. SNBPC was defined as a newly diagnosed SNBPC that occurred 5 years or more after IBC diagnosis.
Results
The median follow-up time of all patients was 12.13 years. SNBPC was developed in 3,084 (5.87%) women after a median of 7.61 years following IBC diagnosis. The 10-year incidence of SNBPC was 5.78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.56 to 6.00). Higher SNBPC incidence was found in survivors with the following factors: old age at IBC diagnosis, low household income, and receiving combined chemotherapy with endocrine therapy, whereas receiving radiotherapy was related to a lower incidence of SNBPC (hazard ratio, 0.89; p < 0.01). Among the patients with SNBPC, the 5-year survival rate was 62.28% (95% CI, 65.53 to 69.02).
Conclusion
Approximately 5% of breast cancer survivors developed SNBPC within 10 years after IBC diagnosis. The risk of SNBPC was associated with patient’s age at IBC diagnosis, income level, and a receipt of systemic treatments.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk of second primary cancer in young breast cancer survivors: an important yet overlooked issue
    Xinyi Liang, Yiwei Qin, Pengwei Li, You Mo, Dawei Chen
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of radiotherapy for stage I–III breast cancer survivors and second primary malignant cancers: a population-based study
    Jin Shi, Jian Liu, Guo Tian, Daojuan Li, Di Liang, Jun Wang, Yutong He
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2024; 33(2): 115.     CrossRef
  • 4,798 View
  • 94 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Node-Negative Breast Cancer of 5 cm or Larger Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis (KROG 20-03)
Kyubo Kim, Jinhong Jung, Haeyoung Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Ji Hyun Chang, Su Ssan Kim, Won Park, Jee Suk Chang, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Ik Jae Lee, Jong Hoon Lee, Hae Jin Park, Jihye Cha, Juree Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Taeryool Koo, Jeanny Kwon, Jin Hee Kim, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Yeon-Joo Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):497-504.   Published online August 25, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.933
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
To evaluate the role of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors undergoing mastectomy
Materials and Methods
Medical records of 274 patients from 18 institutions treated with mastectomy between January 2000 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 202 patients underwent PMRT, while 72 did not. Two hundred and forty-one patients (88.0%) received systemic chemotherapy, and 172 (62.8%) received hormonal therapy. Patients receiving PMRT were younger, more likely to have progesterone receptor-positive tumors, and received adjuvant chemotherapy more frequently compared with those without PMRT (p <0.001, 0.018, and <0.001, respectively). Other characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups.
Results
With a median follow-up of 95 months (range, 1-249), there were 9 locoregional recurrences, and 20 distant metastases. The 8-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 98.0% with PMRT and 91.3% without PMRT (p=0.133), and the 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 91.8% with PMRT and 73.9% without PMRT (p=0.008). On multivariate analysis incorporating age, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and PMRT, the absence of lymphovascular invasion and the receipt of PMRT were associated with improved DFS (p=0.025 and 0.009, respectively).
Conclusion
Locoregional recurrence rate was very low in node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors treated with mastectomy regardless of the receipt of PMRT. However, PMRT was significantly associated with improved DFS. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Outcomes with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy for pT3N0‐1M0 breast cancer: An institutional experience
    Xinxin Rao, Xuanyi Wang, Kairui Jin, Yilan Yang, Xu Zhao, Zhe Pan, Weiluo Lv, Zhen Zhang, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Yu, Xiaomao Guo
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of radiotherapy on patients with pathological stage IIB breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: A cohort study
    Yi-Ying Pan, Tzu-Yu Lai, Cheng-Ying Shiau, Ling-Ming Tseng, I-Chun Lai, Yu-Ming Liu, Pin-I Huang
    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2024; 87(2): 202.     CrossRef
  • Post-mastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: from historic dogmas to practical expert agreements based on a large literature review of surgical and radiation therapy considerations
    Yazid Belkacemi, Meena S. Moran, Burcu Celet Ozden, Yazan Masannat, Fady Geara, Mohamed Albashir, Nhu Hanh To, Kamel Debbi, Mahmoud El Tamer
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 200: 104421.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer
    Ke Liu, Jia-Yi Li, Guan-Qiao Li, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2024; 24(12): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy: Applications and Advancements
    Jessica L. Thompson, Steven G. Allen, Cecilia Pesavento, Corey W. Speers, Jacqueline S. Jeruss
    Current Breast Cancer Reports.2022; 14(3): 75.     CrossRef
  • 7,228 View
  • 204 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Impact of Elective Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients with N1 Breast Cancer after Lumpectomy and Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy (KROG 1418): A Multicenter Case-Controlled Study
Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Seung Jae Huh, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Han-Sung Kang, In Hae Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):970-980.   Published online January 4, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.382
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of supraclavicular lymph node radiotherapy (SCNRT) on N1 breast cancer patients receiving post-lumpectomy whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We performed a case-control analysis to compare the outcomes of WBI and WBI plus SCNRT (WBI+SCNRT). Among 1,147 patients with N1 breast cancer who received post-lumpectomy radiotherapy and AT-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals, 542 were selected after propensity score matching. Patterns of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and treatment-related toxicity were compared between groups.
Results
A total of 41 patients (7.6%) were found to have recurrence. Supraclavicular lymph node (SCN) failure was detected in three patients, two in WBI and one in WBI+SCNRT. All SCN failures were found simultaneously with distant metastasis. There was no significant difference in patterns of failure or survival between groups. The 5-year DFS and DMFS for patients with WBI and WBI+SCNRT were 94.4% versus 92.6% (p=0.50) and 95.1% versus 94.5% (p=0.99), respectively. The rates of lymphedema and radiation pneumonitis were significantly higher in the WBI+SCNRT than in the WBI.
Conclusion
We did not find a benefit of SCNRT for N1 breast cancer patients receiving AT-based chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Whole-Breast Plus Regional Irradiation and Whole-Breast Irradiation Only in pN1 Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial (KROG 17-01)
    Nalee Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Yong Bae Kim
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2025; 121(2): 341.     CrossRef
  • De-escalation of regional nodal irradiation fields in pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery: retrospective real-world clinical experience
    Ji Hyun Hong, Jin-Ho Song, Kyu-Hye Choi, Shin Woo Kim, Woo-Chan Park, Jieun Lee, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Byung-Ock Choi
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The optimal regional irradiation volume for breast cancer patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of published studies
    Wei-Xiang Qi, Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Jiayi Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy
    Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What Is High-risk Breast Cancer With Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes for Regional Recurrence?
    Sang-Won Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Haeyoung Kim, Oyeon Cho, Won Park, Mison Chun
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 111(4): 992.     CrossRef
  • Regional nodal irradiation in pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation
    Shin-Hyung Park, Jae-Chul Kim
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2020; 38(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of nodal staging in breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel nodes in the Z0011 era
    Fabio Corsi, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Albasini, Daniela Bossi, Carlo Morasso, Laura Villani, Marta Truffi
    Medicine.2020; 99(35): e21721.     CrossRef
  • Locoregional recurrence patterns in women with breast cancer who have not undergone post-mastectomy radiotherapy
    Xuran Zhao, Yu Tang, Shulian Wang, Yong Yang, Hui Fang, Jianyang Wang, Hao Jing, Jianghu Zhang, Guangyi Sun, Siye Chen, Jing Jin, Yongwen Song, Yueping Liu, Bo Chen, Shunan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ningning Lu, Hua Ren, Yexiong Li
    Radiation Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Dose Distribution in Regional Lymph Nodes in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy vs. Whole-Breast Plus Regional Lymph Node Irradiation: An In Silico Planning Study in Participating Institutions of the Phase III Randomized Trial (KROG 1701)
    Haeyoung Kim, Heejung Kim, Won Park, Jong Yun Baek, Sung Ja Ahn, Mi Young Kim, Shin-Hyung Park, Ik Jae Lee, Inbong Ha, Jin Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Hyung-Sik Lee, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Jinhong Jung, Oyeon Cho, Jee Suk Chang,
    Cancers.2020; 12(11): 3261.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Lymph-Node Ratio in Determining Supraclavicular Lymph-Node Radiation Therapy in pN1 Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Breast-Conserving Treatment (KROG 14-18): A Multicenter Study
    Jaeho Kim, Won Park, Jin Kim, Doo Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Eun Lee, Kyung Shin, Jin Kim, Kyubo Kim, Yong Kim, Sung-Ja Ahn, Jong Lee, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Kim, Jihye Cha
    Cancers.2019; 11(5): 680.     CrossRef
  • Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23
    Kyubo Kim, Hae Jin Park, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Won Park, Seung Do Ahn, Su Ssan Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Jiyoung Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1316.     CrossRef
  • 10,682 View
  • 319 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Patients with pT1-2N1 Breast Cancer Treated with Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis (KROG 1418)
Yeon-Joo Kim, Won Park, Boram Ha, Boram Park, Jungnam Joo, Tae Hyun Kim, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Eun Sook Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin, Haeyoung Kim, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Seung Jae Huh, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):927-936.   Published online December 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.508
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in pT1-2N1 patients treated with taxane-based chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of pathological N1 patients who were treated with modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in 12 hospitals between January 2006 and December 2010.
Results
We identified 714 consecutive patients. The median follow-up duration was 69 months (range, 1 to 114 months) and the 5-year LRRFS, DFS, and OS rates were 97%, 94%, and 98%, respectively, in patients who received PMRT (PMRT [+]). The corresponding figures were 96%, 90%, and 96%, respectively, in patients who did not receive PMRT (PMRT [–]). PMRT had no significant impact on survival. Upon multivariable analysis, only the histological grade (HG) was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for LRRFS and DFS. In a subgroup analysis of HG 3 patients, PMRT (+) showed better DFS (p=0.081).
Conclusion
PMRT had no significant impact on LRRFS, DFS, or OS in pT1-2N1 patients treated with taxane-based chemotherapy. PMRT showed a marginal benefit for DFS in HG 3 patients. Randomized studies are needed to confirm the benefit of PMRT in high risk patients, such as those with HG 3.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Does Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy Confer Survival Benefits on Patients With 1-3 Clinically Positive Lymph Nodes Rendered Pathologically Negative After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy: Consensus from A Pooled Analysis?
    Munaser Alamoodi
    European Journal of Breast Health.2024; 20(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer
    Lin-Yu Xia, Wei-Yun Xu, Yan Zhao, Sudeep Gupta
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(6): e0270528.     CrossRef
  • Suggestion for the omission of post-mastectomy chest wall radiation therapy in patients who underwent skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Nalee Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Hae Young Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Goo-Hyun Mun, Jai-Kyong Pyon, Byung-Joon Jeon
    The Breast.2022; 66: 54.     CrossRef
  • Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive lymph nodes: No one size fits all
    Majd Kayali, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Arafat Tfayli, Nagi El Saghir, Philip Poortmans, Youssef H. Zeidan
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2020; 147: 102880.     CrossRef
  • The survival benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients with T1-2N1 disease according to molecular subtype
    Jinli Wei, Yizhou Jiang, Zhimin Shao
    The Breast.2020; 51: 40.     CrossRef
  • The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive triple-negative breast cancer
    Lei Zhang, Ru Tang, Jia-Peng Deng, Wen-Wen Zhang, Huan-Xin Lin, San-Gang Wu, Zhen-Yu He
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Breast Conserving Surgery Followed by Radiation Therapy with Mastectomy Alone for Pathologic N1 Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 1418)
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1041.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on triple-negative breast cancer with T1-2 and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes: a population-based study using the SEER 18 database
    Jie Zhang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Jun-Yu Lian, Chuan-Gui Song
    Oncotarget.2019; 10(50): 5245.     CrossRef
  • Local and regional recurrence following mastectomy in breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive nodes: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy volume
    Shin-Hyung Park, Jeeyeon Lee, Jeong Eun Lee, Min Kyu Kang, Mi Young Kim, Ho Yong Park, Jin Hyang Jung, Yee Soo Chae, Soo Jung Lee, Jae-Chul Kim
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2018; 36(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • 11,336 View
  • 346 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Analysis of BRIP1 Variants among Korean Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Negative High-Risk Breast Cancer
Haeyoung Kim, Dae-Yeon Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Gee Hue Jung, Inkyung Shin, Won Park, Seung Jae Huh, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Won Ho Gil, Seok Won Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):955-961.   Published online January 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.191
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of the current study is to assess the spectrum of genetic variation in the BRIP1 gene among Korean high-risk breast cancer patients who tested negative for the BRCA1/2 mutation.
Materials and Methods
Overall, 235 Korean patientswith BRCA1/2 mutation–negative high-risk breast cancerwere screened for BRIP1 mutations. The entire BRIP1 gene was analyzed using fluorescent-conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis. In silico analysis of BRIP1 variants was performed using PolyPhen-2 and SIFT.
Results
A total of 20 sequence alterations including 12 exonic and eight intronic variantswere found. Among the 12 exonic variants, 10 were missense and two were silent mutations. No protein-truncating mutation was found among the tested patients. Among the 10 missense variants, four (p.L263F, p.L340F, p.L474P, and p.R848H) were predicted to be pathogenic by both PolyPhen-2 and SIFT, and these variants were found in five patients. Of the four missense variants, p.L263F, p.L474P, and p.R848H localize to regions between the helicase motifs, while p.L340F resides in an iron-sulfur domain of BRIP1.
Conclusion
No protein-truncating mutation in BRIP1 was found among the tested patients. The contribution of BRIP1 variants is thought to be minor in Korean non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of pathogenic germline variants in a large Chinese lung cancer cohort by clinical sequencing
    Zhe Yu, Zirui Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiaoying Wu, Xiaojun Fan, Jiaohui Pang, Hua Bao, Jiani Yin, Xue Wu, Yang Shao, Zhengcheng Liu, Fang Liu
    Molecular Oncology.2024; 18(5): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Iron–Sulfur Clusters: Assembly and Biological Roles
    Nunziata Maio
    Inorganics.2024; 12(8): 216.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of 17 genetic variants in association with leukemia in the north Indian population using MassARRAY Sequenom
    Amrita Bhat, Gh. Rasool Bhat, Sonali Verma, Bhanu Sharma, Divya Bakshi, Deepak Abrol, Supinder Singh, Raies Ahmed Qadri, Ruchi Shah, Rakesh Kumar
    Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer-associated mutations in the iron-sulfur domain of FANCJ affect G-quadruplex metabolism
    Diana C. Odermatt, Wei Ting C. Lee, Sebastian Wild, Stanislaw K. Jozwiakowski, Eli Rothenberg, Kerstin Gari, Andrew Deans
    PLOS Genetics.2020; 16(6): e1008740.     CrossRef
  • Helicase-inactivating BRIP1 mutation yields Fanconi anemia with microcephaly and other congenital abnormalities
    Lara Kamal, Sarah B. Pierce, Christina Canavati, Amal Abu Rayyan, Tamara Jaraysa, Orit Lobel, Suhair Lolas, Barbara M. Norquist, Grace Rabie, Fouad Zahdeh, Ephrat Levy-Lahad, Mary-Claire King, Moien N. Kanaan
    Molecular Case Studies.2020; 6(5): a005652.     CrossRef
  • Variants of cancer susceptibility genes in Korean BRCA1/2 mutation-negative patients with high risk for hereditary breast cancer
    Ji Soo Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Jung Woo Han, Jung-Yun Lee, Jieun Kim, Tae Il Kim, Hyung Seok Park
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mutation status of RAD51C,PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese familial breast cancer cases without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
    Katsutoshi Sato, Mio Koyasu, Sachio Nomura, Yuri Sato, Mizuho Kita, Yuumi Ashihara, Yasue Adachi, Shinji Ohno, Takuji Iwase, Dai Kitagawa, Eri Nakashima, Reiko Yoshida, Yoshio Miki, Masami Arai
    Cancer Science.2017; 108(11): 2287.     CrossRef
  • Mutational analysis of FANCJ helicase
    Manhong Guo, Venkatasubramanian Vidhyasagar, Tanu Talwar, Ahmad Kariem, Yuliang Wu
    Methods.2016; 108: 118.     CrossRef
  • 14,417 View
  • 242 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Impact on Loco-regional Control of Radiochemotherapeutic Sequence and Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Treatment in Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Postoperative Concurrent Radiochemotherapy
Haeyoung Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn, Kyubo Kim, Won Park, Won Sup Yoon, Seung Jae Huh, Sung W. Ha
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(2):148-157.   Published online April 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.2.148
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of radiochemotherapeutic sequence and time to initiation of adjuvant treatment on loco-regional control for resected stage II and III rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Treatment outcomes for rectal cancer patients from two hospitals with different sequencing strategies regarding adjuvant concurrent radiochemotherapy (CRCT) were compared retrospectively. Pelvic radiotherapy was administered concurrently on the first (early CRCT, n=180) or the third cycle of chemotherapy (late CRCT, n=180). During radiotherapy, two cycles of fluorouracil were provided to patients in both groups. In the early CRCT group, median six cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin were prescribed during the post-CRCT period. In the late CRCT group, two cycles of fluorouracil were administered in the pre- and post-CRCT periods.

Results

No significant differences in the 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (92.5% vs. 95.6%, p=0.43) or overall survival and disease-free survival were observed between groups. Patients who began receiving adjuvant treatment later than five weeks after surgery had lower LRRFS than patients who received adjuvant treatment within five weeks following surgery (79% vs. 91%, p<0.01). The risk of loco-regional recurrence increased as the time to initiation of adjuvant treatment was delayed.

Conclusion

In the current study, treatment outcomes were not significantly influenced by the sequence of adjuvant treatment but by the delay of adjuvant treatment for more than five weeks. Timely administration of adjuvant treatment is deemed important in achieving loco-regional tumor control for stage II/III rectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patients with pathological stage N2 rectal cancer treated with early adjuvant chemotherapy have a lower treatment failure rate
    Yan-Ru Feng, Jing Jin, Hua Ren, Xin Wang, Shu-Lian Wang, Wei-Hu Wang, Yong-Wen Song, Yue-Ping Liu, Yuan Tang, Ning Li, Xin-Fan Liu, Hui Fang, Zi-Hao Yu, Ye-Xiong Li
    BMC Cancer.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of histologic tumor grade in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery: A multi-institutional retrospective study
    Jin Ho Song, Sung Hwan Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Hyeon Min Cho, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Sun Young Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Jae Hwan Oh, Taek Keun Nam, Mee Sun Yoon, Jae Uk Jeong, Kyubo Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Hong Seok Jang, Jae Sung Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Ki Mun Kang
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2016; 118(2): 387.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Oncologic Outcomes in ypStage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy followed by Total Mesorectal Excision, and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy
    Taeryool Koo, Changhoon Song, Jae-Sung Kim, Kyubo Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Sung-Bum Kang, Keun-Wook Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Tae-You Kim, Ramon Andrade de Mello
    PLOS ONE.2015; 10(9): e0138728.     CrossRef
  • 11,625 View
  • 72 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP