KCA
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Original Article
- Gastrointestinal cancer
- Development and Validation of Models to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer Using Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting Machine Methods
- Hae Dong Lee, Kyung Han Nam, Cheol Min Shin, Hye Seung Lee, Young Hoon Chang, Hyuk Yoon, Young Soo Park, Nayoung Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Hyung-Ho Kim
- Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1240-1249. Published online March 21, 2023
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1330
-
Abstract
PDF
Supplementary Material
PubReader
ePub - Purpose
To identify important features of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and develop a prediction model for early gastric cancer (EGC) using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) method.
Materials and Methods
The clinicopathologic data of 2556 patients with EGC who underwent gastrectomy were used as training set and the internal validation set (set 1) at a ratio of 8:2. Additionally, 548 patients with EGC who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the initial treatment were included in the external validation set (set 2). The GBM model was constructed, and its performance was compared with that of the Japanese guidelines.
Results
LNM was identified in 12.6% (321/2556) of the gastrectomy group (training set & set 1) and 4.3% (24/548) of the ESD group (set 2). In the GBM analysis, the top five features that most affected LNM were lymphovascular invasion, depth, differentiation, size, and location. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics of set 1 were 0.566, 0.922, 0.516, and 0.867, while those of set 2 were 0.810, 0.958, 0.803, and 0.944, respectively. When the sensitivity of GBM was adjusted to that of Japanese guidelines (beyond the expanded criteria in set 1 [0.922] and eCuraC-2 in set 2 [0.958]), the specificities of GBM in sets 1 and 2 were 0.516 (95% confidence interval, 0.502-0.523) and 0.803 (0.795-0.805), while those of the Japanese guidelines were 0.502 (0.488-0.509) and 0.788 (0.780-0.790), respectively.
Conclusion
The GBM model showed good performance comparable with the eCura system in predicting LNM risk in EGCs. -
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Establishment of a machine learning model for predicting splenic hilar lymph node metastasis
Kenichi Ishizu, Satoshi Takahashi, Nobuji Kouno, Ken Takasawa, Katsuji Takeda, Kota Matsui, Masashi Nishino, Tsutomu Hayashi, Yukinori Yamagata, Shigeyuki Matsui, Takaki Yoshikawa, Ryuji Hamamoto
npj Digital Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications
Runze Li, Jingfan Li, Yuman Wang, Xiaoyu Liu, Weichao Xu, Runxue Sun, Binqing Xue, Xinqian Zhang, Yikun Ai, Yanru Du, Jianming Jiang
Cancer Cell International.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Machine learning models for prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a Chinese single-centre study with external validation in an Asian American population
Qian Li, Shangcheng Yan, Weiran Yang, Zhuan Du, Ming Cheng, Renwei Chen, Qiankun Shao, Yuan Tian, Mengchao Sheng, Wei Peng, Yongyou Wu
BMJ Open.2025; 15(3): e098476. CrossRef - Combining biomarkers to construct a novel predictive model for predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer
Yujian He, Xiaoli Xie, Bingxue Yang, Xiaoxu Jin, Zhijie Feng
Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Intratumoural and peritumoural CT-based radiomics for diagnosing lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma in patients with pure ground-glass nodules: a machine learning approach
Y. Zou, Q. Mao, Z. Zhao, X. Zhou, Y. Pan, Z. Zuo, W. Zhang
Clinical Radiology.2024; 79(2): e211. CrossRef - eCura and W-eCura: different scores, different populations, same goal
Rui Morais, Diogo Libanio, João Santos-Antunes
Gut.2024; 73(11): e29. CrossRef - A machine learning model for predicting the lymph node metastasis of early gastric cancer not meeting the endoscopic curability criteria
Minoru Kato, Yoshito Hayashi, Ryotaro Uema, Takashi Kanesaka, Shinjiro Yamaguchi, Akira Maekawa, Takuya Yamada, Masashi Yamamoto, Shinji Kitamura, Takuya Inoue, Shunsuke Yamamoto, Takashi Kizu, Risato Takeda, Hideharu Ogiyama, Katsumi Yamamoto, Kenji Aoi,
Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1069. CrossRef - The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Guide
Amin Zadeh Shirazi, Morteza Tofighi, Alireza Gharavi, Guillermo A. Gomez
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Analysis of Different Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma and Pulmonary Inflammatory Pseudotumor
An-Lin Zhang, Yan-Mei Fu, Zhi-Yang He
Iranian Journal of Radiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Screening of gastric cancer diagnostic biomarkers in the homologous recombination signaling pathway and assessment of their clinical and radiomic correlations
Ahao Wu, Tengcheng Hu, Chao Lai, Qingwen Zeng, Lianghua Luo, Xufeng Shu, Pan Huang, Zhonghao Wang, Zongfeng Feng, Yanyan Zhu, Yi Cao, Zhengrong Li
Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
- Establishment of a machine learning model for predicting splenic hilar lymph node metastasis
- 5,569 View
- 225 Download
- 9 Web of Science
- 10 Crossref
First
Prev
