Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Byung Soh Min"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Which Patients with Isolated Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis Will Truly Benefit from Extended Lymph Node Dissection for Colon Cancer?
Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):712-719.   Published online July 14, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.100
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The prognosis of patientswith colon cancer and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) is poor. We analyzed the prognostic factors of extramesenteric lymphadenectomy for colon cancer patients with isolated PALNM.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients with PALNM who underwent curative resection between October 1988 and December 2009.
Results
In univariate analyses, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were higher in patients with ≤ 7 positive para-aortic lymph node (PALN) (36.5% and 27.5%) than in those with > 7 PALN (14.3% and 14.3%; p=0.010 and p=0.027, respectively), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 was also correlated with a lower 5-year OS and DFS rate of 21.5% and 11.7% compared with those with CEA ≤ 5 (46.3% and 41.4%; p=0.122 and 0.039, respectively). Multivariate analysis found that the number of positive PALN (hazard ratio [HR], 3.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.309 to 8.275; p=0.011) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and the number of positive PALN (HR, 2.484; 95% CI, 0.993 to 6.211; p=0.052) and preoperative CEA level (HR, 1.953; 95% CI, 0.940 to 4.057; p=0.073) were marginally independent prognostic factors for DFS. According to our prognostic model, the 5-year OS and DFS rate increased to 59.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 7 positive PALN and CEA level ≤ 5.
Conclusion
PALN dissection might be beneficial in carefully selected patients with a low CEA level and less extensive PALNM.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection
    Shin Emoto, Yosuke Fukunaga, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroshi Kawachi, Shuhei Sano, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Masashi Ueno
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(4): 356.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence
    Rémi Grange, Pascal Rousset, Nicolas Williet, Mathias Guesnon, Laurent Milot, Guillaume Passot, Jean-Marc Phelip, Bertrand Le Roy, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2378.     CrossRef
  • Para-aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer: Predicting Pathologic Lymph Node Positivity and Optimizing Outcomes
    Neal Bhutiani, Kentaro Ochiai, Muhammad O. Awiwi, Miguel A. Rodriguez-Bigas, Abhineet Uppal, Oliver Peacock, Craig Messick, Michael G. White, John M. Skibber, Brian K. Bednarski, Y. Nancy You, George J. Chang, Harmeet Kaur, Tsuyoshi Konishi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(9): 5962.     CrossRef
  • Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer
    Anne-Sophie Dulac, Pietro Genova, Olivier Benoit, Cindy Neuzillet, Mostapha El Hajjam, Jean-François Emile, Frédérique Peschaud, Renato Micelli Lupinacci
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1306.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Sono Ito, Yusuke Kinugasa, Shinichi Yamauchi, Hiroyuki Sato, Akihiro Hirakawa, Soichiro Ishihara, Akio Shiomi, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Takeshi Suto, Hiroki Takahashi, Michio Itabashi, Manabu Shiozawa, Masaya Hiyoshi, Takaya Kobatake, Koji Komori, Hiroyuki Egi
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(11): 1423.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcome After Resection of Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases in Multivisceral Colorectal Cancer
    Christopher Berlin, Geoffroy Andrieux, Magdalena Menzel, Gabriel J. Stöger, Andreas Gengenbach, Luisa Schäfer, Hans C. Hillebrecht, Rebecca Kesselring, Uyen-Thao Le, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Philipp A. Holzner
    Cancers.2024; 16(22): 3741.     CrossRef
  • Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Surgical Resection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer—A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Hiroaki Nozawa, Sono Ito, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Shinichi Yamauchi, Yusuke Kinugasa, Yoichi Ajioka, Soichiro Ishihara
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes after synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Conor Aylward, Jawed Noori, Jack Tyrrell, Niall O'sullivan, Dara O. Kavanagh, John O. Larkin, Brian J. Mehigan, Paul H. McCormick, Michael E. Kelly
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(4): 645.     CrossRef
  • Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review
    Michael G. Fadel, Mosab Ahmed, Gianluca Pellino, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris Tekkis, David Nicol, Christos Kontovounisios, Erik Mayer
    Cancers.2023; 15(2): 455.     CrossRef
  • The management of clinically suspicious para‐aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Yeng Kwang Tay, Swetha Prabhakaran, Joseph C Kong
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 19(6): 596.     CrossRef
  • Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Rong-Chang Wang, Jian-Qi Wang, Xiao-Yu Zhou, Chu-lin Zhong, Jin-Xu Chen, Jing-Song Chen
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of Extraperitoneal Metastases on the Curative-Intent Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
    Frédéric Schell, Amaniel Kefleyesus, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Guillaume Passot, Pascal Rousset, Alhadeedi Omar, Laurent Villeneuve, Julien Péron, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 4444.     CrossRef
  • Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qingwei Ren, Yanyan Chen, Xuejun Shao, Lanzhong Guo, Xinxin Xu
    European Journal of Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes after Surgical Resection for Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer
    Takayuki Okuno, Masaya Hiyoshi, Yuusuke Kyoden, Junji Yamamoto
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2023; 76(7): 460.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter study of prognostic factors in paraaortic lymph node dissection for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Jun Woo Bong, Sanghee Kang, Pyoungjae Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 271.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Jennifer Redfern, Agastya Patel, Thomas Satyadas, Minas Baltatzis
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors of survival of colorectal cancer patients after para-aortic lymph node metastasis
    Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazushige Kawai, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Shinya Abe, Hirofumi Sonoda, Koji Murono, Junko Kishikawa, Yuzo Nagai, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Anzai, Soichiro Ishihara
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(3): 520.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Pathologically Confirmed Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Maurizio Zizzo, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Maria Chiara Bassi, Andrea Palicelli, Stefano Ascani, Alessandro Giunta
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 661.     CrossRef
  • Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pengyue Zhao, Xingpeng Yang, Yang Yan, Jiaqi Yang, Songyan Li, Xiaohui Du
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of enlarged paraaortic lymph nodes detected during left-sided colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Jaram Lee, Hyeong-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients
    G.N. Piozzi, H. Park, T.H. Lee, J.S. Kim, H.B. Choi, S.J. Baek, J.M. Kwak, J. Kim, S.H. Kim
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 2069.     CrossRef
  • Effect of lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with isolated synchronous para‐aortic lymph node metastasis
    Sung Chul Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2584.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351.     CrossRef
  • Is 18F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hamid Dahmarde, Fateme Parooie, Morteza Salarzaei
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes after resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in left-sided colon and rectal cancer
    Junichi Sakamoto, Heita Ozawa, Hiroki Nakanishi, Shin Fujita, Norikatsu Miyoshi
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0241815.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcome and prognostic factors for patients with para-aortic lymph node dissection in left-sided colorectal cancer
    Kota Sahara, Jun Watanabe, Atsushi Ishibe, Yusuke Suwa, Hirokazu Suwa, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(6): 1121.     CrossRef
  • 16,202 View
  • 329 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Novel Methods for Clinical Risk Stratification in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases
Ki-Yeol Kim, Nam Kyu Kim, In-Ho Cha, Joong Bae Ahn, Jin Sub Choi, Gi-Hong Choi, Joon Suk Lim, Kang Young Lee, Seung Hyuk Baik, Byung Soh Min, Hyuk Hur, Jae Kyung Roh, Sang Joon Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(2):242-250.   Published online September 11, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.066
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Colorectal cancer patients with liver-confined metastases are classified as stage IV, but their prognoses can differ from metastases at other sites. In this study, we suggest a novel method for risk stratification using clinically effective factors. Materials and Methods Data on 566 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) between 1989 and 2010 were analyzed. This analysis was based on principal component analysis (PCA). Results The survival rate was affected by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p < 0.001; risk ratio, 1.90), distribution of liver metastasis (p=0.014; risk ratio, 1.46), and disease-free interval (DFI; p < 0.001; risk ratio, 1.98). When patients were divided into three groups according to PCA score using significantly affected factors, they showed significantly different survival patterns (p < 0.001). Conclusion The PCA scoring system based on CEA level, distribution of liver metastasis, and DFI may be useful for preoperatively determining prognoses in order to assist in clinical decisionmaking and designing future clinical trials for CLM treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group’s Comparative Survey Study
    Won Kyung Cho, Gyu Sang Yoo, Chai Hong Rim, Jae-Uk Jeong, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun Won Um, Yang-Gun Suh, Ah Ram Chang, Jong Hoon Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Long disease-free interval diminishes the prognostic value of primary tumor stage for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Jia-Ming Liu, Yan-Yan Wang, Wei Liu, Da Xu, Kun Wang, Bao-Cai Xing
    HPB.2022; 24(5): 737.     CrossRef
  • A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
    You Jin Chun, Seong-Geun Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Sang Hee Cho, Tae Won Kim, Ji Yeon Baek, Young Suk Park, Soojung Hong, Chong Woo Chu, Seung-Hoon Beom, Minkyu Jung, Sang Joon Shin, Joong Bae Ahn
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2020; 19(3): e140.     CrossRef
  • Preclinical Efficacy of [V4 Q5 ]dDAVP, a Second Generation Vasopressin Analog, on Metastatic Spread and Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer
    Juan Garona, Natasha T. Sobol, Marina Pifano, Valeria I. Segatori, Daniel E. Gomez, Giselle V. Ripoll, Daniel F. Alonso
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(2): 438.     CrossRef
  • A multi-gene expression profile panel for predicting liver metastasis: An algorithmic approach
    Kanisha Shah, Shanaya Patel, Sheefa Mirza, Rakesh M. Rawal, Kapil Mehta
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(11): e0206400.     CrossRef
  • A combined prognostic factor for improved risk stratification of patients with oral cancer
    K‐Y Kim, X Zhang, S‐M Kim, B‐D Lee, I‐H Cha
    Oral Diseases.2017; 23(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • 11,254 View
  • 87 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Restoration of Wild - type p53 Induces Chemo-sensitization in the Gastric Cancer Cell Line with Mutant p53
Ho Young Maeng, Sun Young Rha, Byung Soh Min, Yong Bae Kim, Hyun Joo Kwak, Tae Soo Kim, Kyu Hyun Park, Nae Choon Yoo, Ho Young Lim, Jin Hyuk Choi, Joo Hang Kim, Jae Kyung Roh, Jin Sik Min, Byung Soo Kim, Hyun Cheol Chung
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(3):497-507.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
It has been theorized that p53 may be involved in the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. We evaluated the chemosensitivity of wild p53 after transduction into gastric cancer cell lines with mutant p53.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
YCC-3(parent cell line with mutant p53), YCC-3v(parent cell line transduced with vector alone) and YCC-3C3(clone with wild p53) cell lines were used in this study. p53 protein expression was measured by ELISA assay. Tumorigenicity and drug sensitivity were evaluated by soft agar and proliferation assay, respectively. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flowcytometry. Telomerase activity was measured by TRAP assay and terminal restriction fragment(TRF) length was measured after Southern blot analysis.
RESULTS
Even though p53 production from the YCC-3C3 cell line was three times higher than those of YCC-3 and YCC-3v cell lines, the cell cycle was the same in these three cell lines. In the YCC-3C3 cell line, drug sensitivity to etoposide and cisplatin was increased when we compared it to those of the YCC-3v cell line(etoposide, 50% versus 83%; cisplatin, 67% versus 83%). However, there was no chemo-sensitization effect with vincristine, vinblastine and carboplatin. After exposure to cisplatin, a G0/G1 check-point effect was found in the YCC-3C3 cell line, but not in the YCC-3v cell line. No differences were found in telomerase activity, TRFs length or DNA fragmentation between the YCC-3v and YCC-3C3 cell lines after cisplatin treatment.
CONCLUSION
Wild-type p53 gene transduction in the gastric cancer cell line induced sensitization to the cytotoxicity of etoposide and cisplatin. This suggests the possible application of combined chemo-gene therapy with an EP regimen and wild-type p53 in gastric cancer patients with p53 mutation.
  • 3,123 View
  • 22 Download
Close layer
Midkine Gene Expression in Gastric Cancer Tissues
Hyun Joo Kwak, Yong Bae Kim, Byung Soh Min, Ho Young Maeng, Sung Hoon Song, Hye Weon Chung, Tae Soo Kim, Hei Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sung Hoon Noh, Joo Hang Kim, Jae Kyung Roh, Jin Sik Min, Byung Soo Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(2):204-211.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We evaluated the clinical significance of the tumor growth factor, midkine (MK), in paired gastric cancer and normal tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty paired normal and cancer tissues were tested for MK mRNA expression by Northern blot analysis. Vessel staining was done by immunohistochemical staining using CD-31 monoclonal antibody (Dako).
RESULTS
MK mRNA was mainly expressed in cancer tissues (11 versus 1). Lymph node metastasis, pathological stage and tumor differentiation did not correlate with MK expression. However, MK expression rate increased with increment in tumor size (p=0.05). Microvascular density did not correlate with tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and pathological stages. However, there was a tendency of vascular density increment with MK expression in T1-T2 stage.
CONCLUSION
MK was mainly expressed in larger gastric cancer tissues suggesting its role in cancer growth in vivo. But no definite correlation between MK expression and tumor microvascular density was found.
  • 3,346 View
  • 22 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP